Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB - page 229.

x3maniac

sr. member

Activity: 255

Merit: 250

Quote from: Biomech on March 22, 2014, 08:26:32 PM

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:44:55 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 22, 2014, 06:36:26 PM

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:32:05 PM

You are still not defining what you perceive as a problem. I have users mining with 50TH off one instance of cgminer

Try testing with a generation transaction of 100+ kB size.
Edit: Also, I would expect it to not affect high-end hosts. Probably just embedded and crappy miner-only hosts.

The host WAS mining on this pool with the 50TH without a problem

As for "crappy" miner only hosts, cointerra devices use "crappy" beaglebone boards and mine on this pool with 1.6TH per instance at 3% CPU usage.

So how big is the current generation transaction?

*sigh*

Depending on what I'm mining and the mood I'm in and what machine I'm using, I have used cgminer, sgminer (a derivative work) and bfgminer. All of them, let me repeat that in large letters, ALL OF THEM work well.

cgminer is the best known and most widely used. I don't really see why bfgminer doesn't have wider adoption, as it's damn good too.

You two have a long running problem with each other. I don't know, or care, what it is.

But I have a proposal. I raise the funds to get you both in a boxing ring. No holds barred fight, pay-per-view. Tickets start at .1 BTC. I take 10 percent of the profit for getting it organized. You two split the rest. You'll make money, no matter what, and have the pleasure of beating the shit out of each other.

What do you say?

I will buy a ticket!

x3

Biomech

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1022

Anarchy is not chaos.

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:44:55 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 22, 2014, 06:36:26 PM

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:32:05 PM

You are still not defining what you perceive as a problem. I have users mining with 50TH off one instance of cgminer

Try testing with a generation transaction of 100+ kB size.
Edit: Also, I would expect it to not affect high-end hosts. Probably just embedded and crappy miner-only hosts.

The host WAS mining on this pool with the 50TH without a problem

As for "crappy" miner only hosts, cointerra devices use "crappy" beaglebone boards and mine on this pool with 1.6TH per instance at 3% CPU usage.

So how big is the current generation transaction?

*sigh*

Depending on what I'm mining and the mood I'm in and what machine I'm using, I have used cgminer, sgminer (a derivative work) and bfgminer. All of them, let me repeat that in large letters, ALL OF THEM work well.

cgminer is the best known and most widely used. I don't really see why bfgminer doesn't have wider adoption, as it's damn good too.

You two have a long running problem with each other. I don't know, or care, what it is.

But I have a proposal. I raise the funds to get you both in a boxing ring. No holds barred fight, pay-per-view. Tickets start at .1 BTC. I take 10 percent of the profit for getting it organized. You two split the rest. You'll make money, no matter what, and have the pleasure of beating the shit out of each other.

What do you say?

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 22, 2014, 06:36:26 PM

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:32:05 PM

You are still not defining what you perceive as a problem. I have users mining with 50TH off one instance of cgminer

Try testing with a generation transaction of 100+ kB size.
Edit: Also, I would expect it to not affect high-end hosts. Probably just embedded and crappy miner-only hosts.

The host WAS mining on this pool with the 50TH without a problem

As for "crappy" miner only hosts, cointerra devices use "crappy" beaglebone boards and mine on this pool with 1.6TH per instance at 3% CPU usage.

So how big is the current generation transaction?

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:32:05 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 22, 2014, 06:29:49 PM

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:25:05 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:23:06 PM

Although poorly designed mining software (*cough* cgminer) and hardware have forced us to artificially limit it Sad

Define this alleged limitation you speak of in a way that can be fixed instead of plain trolling.

I don't know exactly why cgminer has this problem; it doesn't affect BFGMiner, so I never bothered investigating it.
My guess would be something that causes cgminer to not keep up with generating "struct work"s as fast as the hashers need them.

You are still not defining what you perceive as a problem. I have users mining with 50TH off one instance of cgminer, so I say you are just plain trolling now.

Try testing with a generation transaction of 100+ kB size.
Edit: Also, I would expect it to not affect high-end hosts. Probably just embedded and crappy miner-only hosts.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 22, 2014, 06:29:49 PM

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:25:05 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:23:06 PM

Although poorly designed mining software (*cough* cgminer) and hardware have forced us to artificially limit it Sad

Define this alleged limitation you speak of in a way that can be fixed instead of plain trolling.

I don't know exactly why cgminer has this problem; it doesn't affect BFGMiner, so I never bothered investigating it.
My guess would be something that causes cgminer to not keep up with generating "struct work"s as fast as the hashers need them.

You are still not defining what you perceive as a problem. I have users mining with 50TH off one instance of cgminer, so I say you are just plain trolling now.

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: -ck on March 22, 2014, 06:25:05 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:23:06 PM

Although poorly designed mining software (*cough* cgminer) and hardware have forced us to artificially limit it Sad

Define this alleged limitation you speak of in a way that can be fixed instead of plain trolling.

I don't know exactly why cgminer has this problem; it doesn't affect BFGMiner, so I never bothered investigating it.
My guess would be something that causes cgminer to not keep up with generating "struct work"s as fast as the hashers need them.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:23:06 PM

Although poorly designed mining software (*cough* cgminer) and hardware have forced us to artificially limit it Sad

Define this alleged limitation you speak of in a way that can be fixed instead of plain trolling.

un_ordinateur

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: lowerjerzey on March 22, 2014, 03:32:15 PM

Quote from: mdude77 on March 22, 2014, 02:07:54 PM

Quote from: jgu1394 on March 22, 2014, 01:26:11 PM

575.82339714 BTC are ahead in queue, putting this user's payout after a 23 block delay...

When do we get a nice clean Manual payout ? , Thanks Wink

I've had 3 payouts since I started mining here, and *all* have been within an hour of hitting my threshold. The queue is misleading.

M

It's not misleading. It's variable. You could have a 3 block delay, then jump to 42 blocks. example:

You have a 3 block delay. A farm has set there min to 1000. A block is solved and they reach 1000 and enter the queue. There oldest share is a week old and yours is a day. You now just fell back to a 42 block delay.

It is variable, but a good rule of thumb is to look the balance age of the last payout of the first block at the top of the payout list. This is the expected minimum delay between two consecutive payments you could have with current queue lenght.

If you cross your treshold slower that that, you'll probably be payed out as soon as the treshold is crossed. If you cross your treshold faster that that, you'll wait.

un_ordinateur

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: vsdagama on March 22, 2014, 05:57:56 PM

Secondly: Are the NMC payouts being delayed or are we just not mining any NMC at the moment?
I would very much like to see the first one appear in my wallet

The NMC payouts are being delayed since there was a bug discovered in the system which made some payout addresses dissapear. Untin this is sorted out, the NMC payouts are suspended.

vsdagama

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Hey guys!

First things first: Thank you very much guys for your work to keep the pool up and running.
It's my very first week of mining and I very much appreciate the work.

Secondly: Are the NMC payouts being delayed or are we just not mining any NMC at the moment?
I would very much like to see the first one appear in my wallet

Greetings and many thanks

V

DaveF

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6320

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 22, 2014, 12:11:43 AM

BTW, everyone please ensure they have failovers set for the next week or so.
I don't expect any trouble, but there's a possibility as some things get moved around.

I know you don't know, but are we talking the possibility of five minutes, an hour, five hours?
It would depend on where I set the fail-over to.

-Dave

lowerjerzey

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

🤖UBEX.COM 🤖

Quote from: mdude77 on March 22, 2014, 02:07:54 PM

Quote from: jgu1394 on March 22, 2014, 01:26:11 PM

575.82339714 BTC are ahead in queue, putting this user's payout after a 23 block delay...

When do we get a nice clean Manual payout ? , Thanks Wink

I've had 3 payouts since I started mining here, and *all* have been within an hour of hitting my threshold. The queue is misleading.

M

It's not misleading. It's variable. You could have a 3 block delay, then jump to 42 blocks. example:

You have a 3 block delay. A farm has set there min to 1000. A block is solved and they reach 1000 and enter the queue. There oldest share is a week old and yours is a day. You now just fell back to a 42 block delay.

mdude77

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1001

Quote from: jgu1394 on March 22, 2014, 01:26:11 PM

575.82339714 BTC are ahead in queue, putting this user's payout after a 23 block delay...

When do we get a nice clean Manual payout ? , Thanks Wink

I've had 3 payouts since I started mining here, and *all* have been within an hour of hitting my threshold. The queue is misleading.

M

jgu1394

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

575.82339714 BTC are ahead in queue, putting this user's payout after a 23 block delay...

When do we get a nice clean Manual payout ? , Thanks Wink

merv77

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

1.21 GIGA WATTS

Quote from: JaroBe on March 22, 2014, 06:10:14 AM

Hi everybody

Does Eligius still mine NMC? I didn't get any NMC since the 8th of March (discovered just yesterday, when I wanted to sell them). I am pretty sure that my settings are correct.

there was a problem with NMC wallet address in options settings where some members discovered that their address had mysteriously changed.
I think that wizkid has temporarily stopped NMC payouts untill further notice
see post. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5682456

JaroBe

member

Activity: 99

Merit: 10

Hi everybody

Does Eligius still mine NMC? I didn't get any NMC since the 8th of March (discovered just yesterday, when I wanted to sell them). I am pretty sure that my settings are correct.

babaji.ca

full member

Activity: 184

Merit: 100

If I am not mistaken, you have recommended bitminter in the past?

should I have a 3rd pool set as a failover # 2 ? If so, what pool would be a good choice for that 3rd spot?

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

BTW, everyone please ensure they have failovers set for the next week or so.
I don't expect any trouble, but there's a possibility as some things get moved around.

Biomech

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1022

Anarchy is not chaos.

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 22, 2014, 12:00:29 AM

Quote from: Biomech on March 21, 2014, 11:55:36 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:46:24 PM

Quote from: anth0ny on March 21, 2014, 11:45:02 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:23:06 PM

Quote from: anth0ny on March 21, 2014, 11:16:53 PM

It wouldn't even really be possible because there's a limit to how many addresses you can put in the coinbase transaction.

Actually, there isn't.
Although poorly designed mining software (*cough* cgminer) and hardware have forced us to artificially limit it Sad

As in it'd cause a hard fork?

No, just the miner ends up with a crappy hashrate :/

will bfgminer work eith Technobit HEX16b boards? I have been considering eliminating the tplink in my AMT unit and plugging the boards directly to my computer.

Not yet. nwoolls is working on this.

Well, at least it's in the pipleline Cheesy

I really wish I could program..

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: Biomech on March 21, 2014, 11:55:36 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:46:24 PM

Quote from: anth0ny on March 21, 2014, 11:45:02 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 11:23:06 PM

Quote from: anth0ny on March 21, 2014, 11:16:53 PM

It wouldn't even really be possible because there's a limit to how many addresses you can put in the coinbase transaction.

Actually, there isn't.
Although poorly designed mining software (*cough* cgminer) and hardware have forced us to artificially limit it Sad

As in it'd cause a hard fork?

No, just the miner ends up with a crappy hashrate :/

will bfgminer work eith Technobit HEX16b boards? I have been considering eliminating the tplink in my AMT unit and plugging the boards directly to my computer.

Not yet. nwoolls is working on this.

Topic: Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB - page 229. (Read 1061843 times)