Regardless of what a multibillionaire egomaniac like Elon Musk says, I do not think it is even possible to stop AI development at this point. Also, I have lost all faith in Musk and his pump and dump manipulation schemes ever since he sold Tesla's Bitcoin with his ridiculous excuses. Why would anyone, especially the people from the cryptocurrency community want to trust in his words anymore?
I think that AI development is scarier in its public image than it actually is in reality.
It probably stems from the fact that many people do not understand it and think that AI is some kind of living being which is slowly becoming more superior to humans. Which is both not even close to true.
Topic: Elon Musk and others urge AI pause, citing 'risks to society' - page 6. (Read 869 times)
Well some people try to use the amazing capabilities of technology for their bad behavior and then blame technology. I find this funny, the issue of ethical use is mentioned a lot in every tool in life, but it seems easy for us to ignore it and just see it as a tool to satisfy our needs. limited thing we know.
I see great potential and applications in work from AI, and why not bring such news and keep it in your mind, but bring negative things that are man-made go out.
I see great potential and applications in work from AI, and why not bring such news and keep it in your mind, but bring negative things that are man-made go out.
We are in a new era where technology might be fully exploited, but caution is advised. Before now, I'd iterated a lot of problems it could cause in the process of trying to solve some. This is not new to me and many more issues will still arise, not only with AI but also with the development of robots. The issues have not started rising, they could be severe and detrimental over time and would affect almost all aspects of life including jobs, way of living and many more.
There is a need for its regulation, but should still be well-researched to see if they are indeed dangerous and could be regulated or not.
There is a need for its regulation, but should still be well-researched to see if they are indeed dangerous and could be regulated or not.
Just to give two examples, one is the fact that if students wants to write their school homework with an AI, then there are websites that uses detection programs to detect if an AI wrote it or not (not really that hard to figure out) and secondly, if a video is made by an AI, then there are detection software that also figures that one out as well. All in all I would guess that there is no need for any of this at all.
Pretty confident message. Show an example of such sites, the results of which could be relied upon, proving that the text was written by AI. Let's not go far; already today on the forum, a lot of people use AI tools to write posts. Have you seen a clear conclusion that moderators can confidently say and accuse a person of using AI?
Therefore, I think it's too early to say that AI behavior is easily detected. If you look at how many of the greatest minds are screaming that the development of AI needs to be suspended, then we can conclude that AI is becoming really dangerous for humanity.
There's also the possibility that any other country who has enough influence could make use of this technology as a weapon. As time goes by, the more AI becoming more and more mature enough.
Just to give two examples, one is the fact that if students wants to write their school homework with an AI, then there are websites that uses detection programs to detect if an AI wrote it or not (not really that hard to figure out) and secondly, if a video is made by an AI, then there are detection software that also figures that one out as well. All in all I would guess that there is no need for any of this at all.
Pretty confident message. Show an example of such sites, the results of which could be relied upon, proving that the text was written by AI. Let's not go far; already today on the forum, a lot of people use AI tools to write posts. Have you seen a clear conclusion that moderators can confidently say and accuse a person of using AI?
Therefore, I think it's too early to say that AI behavior is easily detected. If you look at how many of the greatest minds are screaming that the development of AI needs to be suspended, then we can conclude that AI is becoming really dangerous for humanity.
I still can't believe that AI would be considered such a big deal when in fact the other side is getting more work as well. Meaning, when AI is getting bigger, things that realizes what is AI and what is not is also getting more attention as well.
Just to give two examples, one is the fact that if students wants to write their school homework with an AI, then there are websites that uses detection programs to detect if an AI wrote it or not (not really that hard to figure out) and secondly, if a video is made by an AI, then there are detection software that also figures that one out as well. All in all I would guess that there is no need for any of this at all.
Just to give two examples, one is the fact that if students wants to write their school homework with an AI, then there are websites that uses detection programs to detect if an AI wrote it or not (not really that hard to figure out) and secondly, if a video is made by an AI, then there are detection software that also figures that one out as well. All in all I would guess that there is no need for any of this at all.
Every new technology is risky on its own level. This is the beginning of the development of artificial intelligence technology, which can be used for useful things but it is difficult to prevent abuse.
The most important thing is how to minimize the negative risks that might be caused by this AI, while I'm not too worried because this will continue to be developed in a better direction. I think AI has helped a lot of people do something useful so far, but somehow it's hard to prevent someone from abusing this technology.
The most important thing is how to minimize the negative risks that might be caused by this AI, while I'm not too worried because this will continue to be developed in a better direction. I think AI has helped a lot of people do something useful so far, but somehow it's hard to prevent someone from abusing this technology.
While we should be aware and mindful of the direction where the development of our technologies is going, I don't think that Musk's call will be heard. Once the tech is out there (and we've already crossed that threshold), someone else will do it if you don't, unless it's something that has very strong and obvious problematic ethical implications, in which case an international law might be introduced to ban a certain practice. Generation of texts and images by AI isn't like human cloning, so I don't think it will be stopped from being developed further. Yes, there's a privacy concern and a concern for fake imagery, texts etc., but I don't think this can be stopped at this point. Regulations can be introduced to limit the purposes and make some usage illegal, but other than that, we're going to have to adapt to the world with sophisticated AI and we what's important is to help shape its future development as something beneficial rather than harmful to society. If someone doesn't push the beneficial development further and simply stops for a while, others will probably push for the harmful development in the meantime.
Artificial intelligence was created to have a positive impact on society, but in the end it is society that misuses it so that the impact becomes negative. Risks continue to emerge, while the positive impact can still be expected. The problem is, a group of people tend to misuse this artificial intelligence for things that are detrimental so that it can pose risks that were previously unthinkable.
Quote
One question I have. Does chatgpt own any btc? Can it have some hidden keys?
ChatGPT doesn't have btc, but I think the programmers behind it probably do.If see more ChatGPT is a research organization focused on artificial intelligence and its applications, and its mission is to ensure that the development of AI benefits humanity as a whole. The company was founded by a group of prominent individuals in the field of AI whose primary focus is advancing AI research and development. I don't understand cryptocurrency and other investments myself.
AI bots have the power to change public perception on politically contentious issues because of herd mentality so you can begin to amplify certain viewpoints that initially begin as unpopular. The AI generated pictures are not concerning to me. Photoshop has existed for years and any amateur PS user could create realistic altered images. It's a bit surprising that this picture opened peoples eyes to the danger of AI, as if the threat was not glaring before.
Purging AI R&D isn't the answer. China won't stop their AI development program out of concern for ethics, so neither should any of the western nations. If China beats out everyone else in the AI race, rest assured they'll immediately weaponize it against the west. It won't be to their benefit.
Purging AI R&D isn't the answer. China won't stop their AI development program out of concern for ethics, so neither should any of the western nations. If China beats out everyone else in the AI race, rest assured they'll immediately weaponize it against the west. It won't be to their benefit.
After the recent events of the fake AI generated photo of Pope the risks to the society are clear.
The fact that someone played a little with the image of the Pope is the least problem that one should have when it comes to artificial intelligence. After all, the Pope is only human, subject to sin like any mortal. After I watched the documentary about the missing Vatican girl Emanuela Orlandi I concluded that a black suit would suit some people much better than a white one.
Risks must be correctly managed and there must be some kind of security protocols to avoid damage that chatgpt and others can do.
Mr. Mars and others like him had enough time and resources to do something about AI, and now that the genie has been released from the bottle, they are pretending to be smart and advocating some kind of break to do exactly what? I think that such things cannot be fixed in any sense of the word.
Quote
One question I have. Does chatgpt own any btc? Can it have some hidden keys?
Since artificial intelligence language model powered by massive amount of GPU, it could crack some hashes and contribute to the cryptocurrency Proof of Work network and get reward from solving the block. So... 
There is no way that AI development can be stopped, it's not nuclear thing where you need certain chemicals and substances, it's an online world where anyone can do anything with python and other programming languages, anyone can hire fast-performance servers. AI development is inevitable, especially in the capitalistic world and especially in this case, when business found out that AI can make it more automatic and get rid of a lot of employees.
Artificial intelligence was created to have a positive impact on society, but in the end it is society that misuses it so that the impact becomes negative. Risks continue to emerge, while the positive impact can still be expected. The problem is, a group of people tend to misuse this artificial intelligence for things that are detrimental so that it can pose risks that were previously unthinkable.
Quote
One question I have. Does chatgpt own any btc? Can it have some hidden keys?
ChatGPT doesn't have btc, but I think the programmers behind it probably do.
When we use a new tool to serve our lives, however, our use behavior is only at the level of exploiting evil things and paying little attention to important applications in life. I see many people talking about the fear of abusing it in life, not only now but I also see it being raised a lot about the ethical issue of using tools that support not only AI. And see that it develops if we don't adapt to the new changes, we will forever stand still and lag behind the development, try to re-imagine the previous social changes when children people who discover new technology, we are not slowing down, but the speed of development is faster and more new jobs for people are created.
Fake photos or anything like that is the least of the risks to humanity and is not something to worry about right now. ChatGPT, like other types of artificial intelligence, is really learning and humanity does not have any guarantee that it will never be able to direct its knowledge against a person and try to destroy it. Indeed, even now, even primitive AI expresses its opinion that a person is not perfect and must be destroyed. It is necessary already now to lay some kind of programs or something similar in AI so that it cannot even think in the direction of harming a person.
Elon Musk and a group of AI teams agree to pause the development and only update once a year, but they're can't force any other developer who's want to create or develop the current OpenAI. It's already late for them to control the "risks to society" after they announcing the GPT-3, many people are abusing it.
But we can't control them to create a crazy technology that might ruin or destroy human society, all we can do is to learn about it and make sure you're better than the AI.
But we can't control them to create a crazy technology that might ruin or destroy human society, all we can do is to learn about it and make sure you're better than the AI.
One question I have. Does chatgpt own any btc? Can it have some hidden keys?
I meaaaann, you can probably ask it to create it's own wallet and then ask for the address so you can send him some, might help in pleading for innocence when they take over the world.Honestly speaking though, I never considered deepfakes being one of the most notable problems AI would make, didn't really expect it to go all artsy after all. Unless devs put some noteable sign that something was generated via AI, and can't be edited that easily, then I don't think stuff like this is stopping.
Can't wait for Github Copilot X though, let that release first before stopping AI devs.
owning BTC can be considered proof of being human.
Actually, a micropayment of a few satoshi could be viewed as some sort of proof of work.
So, no, as far as I know, Chat GPT doesn't own any corn.
Actually, a micropayment of a few satoshi could be viewed as some sort of proof of work.
So, no, as far as I know, Chat GPT doesn't own any corn.
Are you kidding, mate? It won't have bitcoin as of today, but what do you think prevents the AI of the future, say ChatGPT10 from making a bitcoin payment?
Also, I think think that the benefit of AI-generated content fairly outweighs the problems.
The problem as I see it is that today it already does many tasks much better than humans and in less time. Add to that the fact that we are in the early stages of AI, something like the internet in 1990, and it is expected to improve exponentially. Although I see this as positive in principle, I would not be blindly confident that there are no risks.
There is no guarantee what danger it may fall to mankind if that's the case, but it is also undeniable that there are so many benefits given by the development of technology.
As always, when bad things happen, things get out of hand and it's too late, THEN people start to worry.
At this point, ChatGPT is train-able. Meaning, it learns as it is given and answers information. It can't hold Bitcoin or possess anything at this point in time.
One question I have. Does chatgpt own any btc? Can it have some hidden keys?
At this point, ChatGPT is train-able. Meaning, it learns as it is given and answers information. It can't hold Bitcoin or possess anything at this point in time.
Jump to: