Pages:
Author

Topic: Elon Musk Becomes Owner Of Twitter, Immediately Fires CEO And CFO - page 2. (Read 672 times)

hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 540
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
And he doesn't need these people as he wanted to make the business runs in his new way with a new set of people that he knows will follow and support his plan. That will also be my decision if I was in his position as this might creates some misunderstanding and miscommunication if the old organization remains. But to start with a new one is just like moving for another game plan. Elon Musk is not new in business, not even new in social media, and we knows he can take risk at all cost.
I mean if you already have some CEO candidate in your mind, that would be good enough reason to fire someone, let alone the fact that the one he fired was openly attacking Elon until he bought it, so it was reasonable to fire him as well. Elon has just one problem, and I know it's not easy but it could be done somehow, which is not combining all of his projects together, if he tied them down it would be a lot smarter.

Imagine one company that owns solar city, tesla, spacex and twitter at the same time (and any other if he owns), they are still different companies, just owned by one big larger company, which would really work out better for him and he would have easier time handling it from one headquarters instead of going into each of them.
There's no such thing about hiring some candidate but rather he do make himself the sole director.  Cheesy
Elon Musk named sole director of Twitter, dissolves board
Source: https://thehill.com/policy/technology/3712742-elon-musk-named-sole-director-of-twitter-dissolves-board/

So whats up into his mind? Or just simply he doesnt really want for any board and would just tend to run the company alone.
This is indeed an inevitable thing to be done by a company owner.Well, its his decision.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1132
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
And he doesn't need these people as he wanted to make the business runs in his new way with a new set of people that he knows will follow and support his plan. That will also be my decision if I was in his position as this might creates some misunderstanding and miscommunication if the old organization remains. But to start with a new one is just like moving for another game plan. Elon Musk is not new in business, not even new in social media, and we knows he can take risk at all cost.
I mean if you already have some CEO candidate in your mind, that would be good enough reason to fire someone, let alone the fact that the one he fired was openly attacking Elon until he bought it, so it was reasonable to fire him as well. Elon has just one problem, and I know it's not easy but it could be done somehow, which is not combining all of his projects together, if he tied them down it would be a lot smarter.

Imagine one company that owns solar city, tesla, spacex and twitter at the same time (and any other if he owns), they are still different companies, just owned by one big larger company, which would really work out better for him and he would have easier time handling it from one headquarters instead of going into each of them.
sr. member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 344
win lambo...
~~~
Do you think firing the CFO and CEO will create a lot of panic among the employees in twitter and it will create a sense of fear in terms of job security?  Let's see how it will affect Twitter in the mid to long term.

By the way, has he announced the new CFO / CEO for Twitter, or the positions are vacant for now?

There should be no surprise. Elon was very clear even before the takeover about his intentions. He one put up a tweet (in reply to someone who asked him what was the biggest issue with Twitter) where he claimed that there are 10 staff who manage for every staff who does the coding. And animosity between guys such as Parag and Vijaya with Elon was also quite public. For now, Elon Musk is the new Twitter CEO. For other posts, it may take some time to find suitable replacements and fill the vacancies.
And he doesn't need these people as he wanted to make the business runs in his new way with a new set of people that he knows will follow and support his plan. That will also be my decision if I was in his position as this might creates some misunderstanding and miscommunication if the old organization remains. But to start with a new one is just like moving for another game plan. Elon Musk is not new in business, not even new in social media, and we knows he can take risk at all cost.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~~~
Do you think firing the CFO and CEO will create a lot of panic among the employees in twitter and it will create a sense of fear in terms of job security?  Let's see how it will affect Twitter in the mid to long term.

By the way, has he announced the new CFO / CEO for Twitter, or the positions are vacant for now?

There should be no surprise. Elon was very clear even before the takeover about his intentions. He one put up a tweet (in reply to someone who asked him what was the biggest issue with Twitter) where he claimed that there are 10 staff who manage for every staff who does the coding. And animosity between guys such as Parag and Vijaya with Elon was also quite public. For now, Elon Musk is the new Twitter CEO. For other posts, it may take some time to find suitable replacements and fill the vacancies.
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1172
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Firing the two Top empolyee is one of the best things Musk can do - many people are very happy with his decision

From what I read from mainstream media, these guys (Parag, Vijaya.etc) left with a fat paycheck. But nonetheless, their firings will be beneficial to Twitter in the long term. The first tweet that Elon put up after taking over Twitter was that "the bird has been set free". And this is exactly what happened. People like Parag and Vijaya were censoring anything that even remotely resembled right-wing viewpoint in Twitter, while protecting all the hate-speech (including calls for genocide) that was coming from the rabid left.

Do you think firing the CFO and CEO will create a lot of panic among the employees in twitter and it will create a sense of fear in terms of job security?  Let's see how it will affect Twitter in the mid to long term.

By the way, has he announced the new CFO / CEO for Twitter, or the positions are vacant for now?

Now Elon Musk officially bought Twitter and the initial impact is that Doge prices have gone up more than 140% in a week, this is because the Twitter plan that will receive doge for transactions and I'm sure will have a positive impact on the market.

Twitter has been the main source of publishing tweets about the hype of dogecoin and now since Elon Musk has bought twitter we can say that "The stage is yours" for Dogecoin tweets to again gain hype. I think the future of dogecoin is good as long as Elon musk keep supporting it.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 722
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Twitter is currently one of the most famous social media and one of the oldest ones so maybe paying 44 billion to buy Twitter is not really a lot especially if you imagine the controlling this social media can give much ore power to Elon Musk by controlling this platform, in the other hand, he fired many important people from this company and this shows us that he is disagree with the correct situation of twitter and that's not surprising to see more important new like the thing about blue mark about twitter.
hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 582
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Do you think the Tesla CEO made the right move by firing these top people in the company?
I don't think we're in any position to decide if it's right or wrong, or criticize his decision. The company is now his and he alone decides what is right and what is wrong for it.  but one thing I know is whenever ownership of a company a business is transferred to another person, the lay off of some staffs in some key positions is usually expected. It is usually a strategic decision to bring people that you're certain will be loyal to you and will also share in your vision for the company.
Just don't take this question seriously because any answers here won't have any effect to elon as he already made the decision and I believe that his mind won't be changed anymore. I know some of us here will think that Elon is too cruel to do this but this move is actually normal.

Even our local government does this too like if when there is a new mayor that is elected, previous staffs are also being replaced by a new one or they are being replaced by the people who are related to that new mayor. I know the old ceo and cfo of twitter already expected this to happen so they are always read to pack up their bags and leave. They can still apply to other companies since they already have a good working experience.
sr. member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 255
Now Elon Musk officially bought Twitter and the initial impact is that Doge prices have gone up more than 140% in a week, this is because the Twitter plan that will receive doge for transactions and I'm sure will have a positive impact on the market.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Firing the two Top empolyee is one of the best things Musk can do - many people are very happy with his decision

From what I read from mainstream media, these guys (Parag, Vijaya.etc) left with a fat paycheck. But nonetheless, their firings will be beneficial to Twitter in the long term. The first tweet that Elon put up after taking over Twitter was that "the bird has been set free". And this is exactly what happened. People like Parag and Vijaya were censoring anything that even remotely resembled right-wing viewpoint in Twitter, while protecting all the hate-speech (including calls for genocide) that was coming from the rabid left.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1012
He can do whatever he wants.Its his company and he had completely bought it.Whatever decisions he would make then there would be no someone could able to oppose with that. If he do find out that there are things turns out to be that offensive or something he doesnt like then he would do make out decisions on whats inside his mind.Fire or hiring someone on said position then it would be his choice.Now that Twitter is owned by Elon now then lets see on what are the huge changes and overhaul that he would be making with this platform or company.
Musk promised before the purchase that he would make Twitter a private company, so his power in the future will be even greater. The main problem of Twitter, which led to the sale of the company, is that it is still unprofitable and so could not find ways to generate solid profits. Therefore, it is quite understandable that Musk, after his acquisition of the company, dismisses the previous management, brings his people there and will directly manage the company himself. Then there will be inevitable staff cuts, which in Ilon's opinion are too many. Another question is that he also has Tesla, which is now experiencing a difficult period of time of transformation from a startup into a normal large car manufacturing enterprise and also requires a lot of attention. Will this attention be enough for both companies and will their activities suffer from this? Does he really need an additional headache and additional responsibility?
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 609
It is so sad that people started to use "freedom of speech" as a way of saying things that would be hurtful to others and consider it a freedom of speech. Just because you are free to say it, doesn't mean you should, there are nasty things that you could say to people that would not be acceptable in society, but allowed on twitter which is a weird dilemma.

If a famous celebrity came out and said "women are only good in kitchen, they shouldn't be acting, cook food and have sex with, that's all women are good for" then all of Hollywood would banish that actor and nobody would hire them ever again right? That's a wrong sentence that shouldn't be said right? Well on twitter you are "free" to say it, that's the problem, just because you are free to say it, doesn't mean it's an okay sentence to be tweeted.
But people are excited about learning that CEO and CFO has been fired from twitter soon after the Musk joined the Twitter headquarter
And he has also resorted the Trump account and seems like it will give Trump great benefit as the midterm elections are round the corner
He can do whatever he wants.Its his company and he had completely bought it.Whatever decisions he would make then there would be no someone could able to oppose with that.

If he do find out that there are things turns out to be that offensive or something he doesnt like then he would do make out decisions on whats inside his mind.

Fire or hiring someone on said position then it would be his choice.Now that Twitter is owned by Elon now then lets see on what are the huge changes and
overhaul that he would be making with this platform or company.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Well according to the blog post "Elon Musk has officially become the owner of Twitter after the acquisition closed on Thursday. As reported by Reuters, Twitter’s CEO and CFO, who allegedly provided very little information and provided misinformation, was terminated from the contract and expelled from the head office.
On October 27, billionaire Elon Musk officially became the new owner of social media platform Twitter with a bid of $ 44 billion. The deal was completed after a long time when Elon Musk repeatedly changed his mind about the acquisition and went through a legal battle between the two sides.
Elon immediately fired the company’s executives and chief financial officers, Parag Agrawal and Ned Segal, and other issues. Legal issues and policy director Vijaya Gadde. These are the people Musk alleges they misled him and Twitter investors about the number of fake accounts on the social media platform".

Do you think the Tesla CEO made the right move by firing these top people in the company? There is no denying that Twitter has a lot of shot comings just like every other big platform out and needs some serious overhauling. There are so many complaints about bots and scams and those are the major area Elon intends to tackle. Hopefully, with this new ownership, we are going to see Twitter in a different state.

What are your thoughts?
 

It looks like today he also removed anyone remaining on the board of directors to consolidate his power, almost dictatorial in feel but it is clear he is an egomaniac. These two people really got the last laugh anyway, because they got to walk away with huge severance packages, could easily slide into a very senior position at an equally big company and likely have no interest in working with Elon at all. There seem to be many people now who are fed up with his endless bullsh*t and he will likely have to implement major changes, including charging for all sorts of stuff, in order to help him pay off the cost of Twitter. Even Elon knows he vastly overpaid for it.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
It is so sad that people started to use "freedom of speech" as a way of saying things that would be hurtful to others and consider it a freedom of speech. Just because you are free to say it, doesn't mean you should, there are nasty things that you could say to people that would not be acceptable in society, but allowed on twitter which is a weird dilemma.

If a famous celebrity came out and said "women are only good in kitchen, they shouldn't be acting, cook food and have sex with, that's all women are good for" then all of Hollywood would banish that actor and nobody would hire them ever again right? That's a wrong sentence that shouldn't be said right? Well on twitter you are "free" to say it, that's the problem, just because you are free to say it, doesn't mean it's an okay sentence to be tweeted.
hero member
Activity: 2282
Merit: 589
Actually the freedom of speech part is the advertising to keep the people focused on something nice.
Meanwhile, in the background, the monetization is the important part. Firing staff, charging 20$ every month for those who want the "verified" mark are the first steps in that direction.
If anybody thought Elon buys Twitter do good for others, it's dreaming. He bought it as a business to earn him money.
I don't believe that he's so rash changing everything for an update on twitter, should elon evaluate the progress for next year's roadmap without changing ground rules for users, I don't agree with the update about the $20 fee for wanting a "verified" sign, even though many people are declaring it's time to crypto twitter period but I'm not sure he will support his platform to be linked to pro-crypto unless he is concerned with his business needs. I hope that it's time for crypto social media to create big things in the future and my main hope is that he prioritizes social media services for all his users.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
He really meant about freedom of speech and he is not joking. His declaration about twitter monetization is also important

Actually the freedom of speech part is the advertising to keep the people focused on something nice.
Meanwhile, in the background, the monetization is the important part. Firing staff, charging 20$ every month for those who want the "verified" mark are the first steps in that direction.
If anybody thought Elon buys Twitter do good for others, it's dreaming. He bought it as a business to earn him money.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The trust relationship between them and Elon Musk was broken, before he bought the platform. (They even went to court to fight against him) So why should he keep them in the same positions, if they are working against him.  Huh Huh Huh

I would have done the same thing, but I would have sat down with them and explained my actions and then I would have fired them. Twitter management made controversial decisions, that went against freedom of speech..and that is the main reason why Elon Musk fired them... they do not have his vision for what he wants to do with the platform.  Wink
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 620
 Well, Elon has been known for his impulsive acts and spontaneous actions and as such his firing Parag and Ned Segal is quite necessary since their functions were to ensure the platform was free of spam and bots but looking at what actually caused his initial disinterest to continue the purchase, it looks like they failed. But where I still don't get is his firing of Vidiya Gadde, although she was responsible for the ban on Donald Trump's account. I guess this move is part of the #cleanupTwitter process.

 
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 135
Elon Marx currently owns the Twitter Company. Elon Musk I think it's too early to change Twitter's logo. Because it has already been discussed that the Twitter logo might change.



It appears that Elon Musk has let the bird out of the current Twitter avatar's cage. In this we can assume that there is definitely a possibility that the logo will change.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1457
We here on the forum making arguments over Elon Musk and his terminations, meanwhile those guys got fired but were compensated with 100 million dollars.  Grin

They be like what the hell, retirements came in real early. Who cares if they were fired or not I was able to tweet anyways. Twitter has no more function than that.

That’s big cream layer up there and big thick base down there, better skip to the good part and keep tweeting.
What is the reason to pay for these former top managers so much money? Did they lead the company to the pinnacle of financial success? The company ended 2021 with a loss of $220 million.

It seemed to me that Twitter and before the Mask was going to fire people because of poor financial performance. Yes, now the price of Twitter's shares looks good against the background of Meta, but it's still not clear why top managers are paid so much money especially against the backdrop of the dismissal of ordinary workers who are unlikely to be paid such generous bonuses.
hero member
Activity: 2478
Merit: 695
SecureShift.io | Crypto-Exchange
That's dope and badass. Well, he's now the new boss and owner and he can do whatever he wants, be it with operations, employees and as in everything from the management. With all of those political issues and there's a very big chance that he's building it up for the next election.
But the biggest one are those contents and tweets that are made about woke's political agenda. I've seen folks that are happy with his taking over and that issue is about to be solved by him and Twitter is going to be back on its form like it's for everyone and freedom.

Am struggling to understand your meaning of "there's a very big chance that he's building it up for the next election" What have political issues got to do with Twitter and the new management? Besides, I doubt Elon will allow Twitter to be politicized in that nature. Elon has his vision of how he wants Twitter to be managed, it has no specific interest in politics.
Pages:
Jump to: