I have been going over the Emercoin Blockchain Technology and for all the services offered this is very undervalued.
Upon further research I have come to find the current management team has begun to invest in a marketing campaign, a re brand and more importantly
distribution relationships with one of the goals to be listed on Poloniex. This is one of the handful of cryptos I have been following for the last year,
they do not communicate much in my opinion but the technology is top notch. I believe the management team is also investing heavily in expertise to get
listed on more exchanges and create a better industry presence. The price has been falling for awhile now and has a lower market cap. then some proof of
concept coins that are not yet even functional. When Emercoin gets listed on Poloniex I wonder how much higher the price will go considering
it's trading at $0.16 now? But does Emercoin have long term potential? Or will the Poloniex listing only have a short term price spike?
Topic: [EMC] EMERCOIN — Blockchain Service Platform. PoS&PoW | BTC merge-mined - page 69. (Read 393845 times)
May 30, 2016, 09:17:15 AM
May 29, 2016, 04:55:16 AM
hi,
it requires 1 month over the planning, but now emc.multipool.info pool is up again. You still find your users and workers.
What changes is the address to use to mine: 78.26.93.125 port 3333
This is as now we have tree servers that operates in one domain (multi-pool.info).
thanks
it requires 1 month over the planning, but now emc.multipool.info pool is up again. You still find your users and workers.
What changes is the address to use to mine: 78.26.93.125 port 3333
This is as now we have tree servers that operates in one domain (multi-pool.info).
thanks
May 29, 2016, 03:39:21 AM
Здpaвcтвyйтe!Oтпpaвил нa yobit.net Emc , a тaм тex.peмoнт кoщёлькa .Чтo дeлaть и кoгдa вce тaм cдeлaют?
May 24, 2016, 12:37:19 PM
Hy,
i want setup a emercoin pool with unomp, but i become a error message.
How can i add "gettransactions" ?
i want setup a emercoin pool with unomp, but i become a error message.
Code:
daemon rpc error with batch gettransactions {"code":-32700,"message":"Parse error"}How can i add "gettransactions" ?
May 18, 2016, 10:23:12 AM
- https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/projects/WeSupportTor
Emerproxy - http:// eivd4nanrtr2qkk6.onion/ - https://emerproxy.xyz - #WeSupportTor and also runs an exit node.
Thanks!
...
Anyone who has been issued with a ShadowSOCKS server beta key for Emerproxy may (or may not) be experiencing some crash issues which are platform dependent - see: https://github.com/shadowsocks/shadowsocks-qt5/issues/312 (awaiting the new client release / fix).
Note that the above is not an issue with EMC, which is working fine.
...
Also, do we have any known / public Tor addnode=.onion addresses for running Emercoin over Tor ?
Emerproxy - http:// eivd4nanrtr2qkk6.onion/ - https://emerproxy.xyz - #WeSupportTor and also runs an exit node.
Thanks!
...
Anyone who has been issued with a ShadowSOCKS server beta key for Emerproxy may (or may not) be experiencing some crash issues which are platform dependent - see: https://github.com/shadowsocks/shadowsocks-qt5/issues/312 (awaiting the new client release / fix).
Note that the above is not an issue with EMC, which is working fine.
...
Also, do we have any known / public Tor addnode=.onion addresses for running Emercoin over Tor ?
May 17, 2016, 08:52:46 AM
besides that sending back and creating 1 UTXO dosnt not help, as i already did mention.
I thought that consolidating to 1 UTXO should help, but you say it doesn't. Have you tried any other bug-hunting ideas like creating a new wallet, and sending the coins to it, to compare?
I know you're an early adopter of EMC and you run the first emc explorer. So I think your opinion matters. If we can discover the problem then I am sure the devs will take notice and fix it.
May 17, 2016, 08:11:48 AM
Yesterday and today the price raised again. This is a normal behaviour if you follow the crpyto currency markets for a while.
If there are no or less news about the coin then the prices are usually declining. Notwithstanding the above, that there is good developing going on in the background. For that reason, I would not be worry about the current price, it is rather a good opportunity to buy EMC cheap.
If there are no or less news about the coin then the prices are usually declining. Notwithstanding the above, that there is good developing going on in the background. For that reason, I would not be worry about the current price, it is rather a good opportunity to buy EMC cheap.
Good afternoon from Greece. I want to ask if someone knows what is happen with Emercoin. The price is down (over 11% in coinmarketcap.com)... 
May 17, 2016, 07:58:09 AM
network hash and daily volume dropping back to pre btc38 listing. its okay , every alt gets pump and dumped once in a while...
May 14, 2016, 12:21:25 PM
Good afternoon from Greece. I want to ask if someone knows what is happen with Emercoin. The price is down (over 11% in coinmarketcap.com)...
May 08, 2016, 09:18:54 PM
Beside this, a friend asked me what the final amount of Emercoin will be? I read on Coingecko that it will be one billion. Is this right? And how many EMC are created per year?
Maxihatop answered this question here, see also posts above his answer. Due to the 6% annual Proof-of-Stake generation, my understanding is there is no real hard limit. But it would take approx. 50 years to reach 1 billion.
May 08, 2016, 07:05:31 AM
Thank you very much for your donation!
Beside this, a friend asked me what the final amount of Emercoin will be? I read on Coingecko that it will be one billion. Is this right? And how many EMC are created per year?
I sent you an emc tip which should help a bit! Clearly it's much more convenient for everyone to just use bitcointalk, as everyone has an account here. For now, I think it's great if you can keep the emercointalk.org forum going, even though it may be just to find out if it has a future need. I will try to post a topic for discussion there in the coming days.
http://letsencrypt.org/ is free and requires only an email address I believe, so hopefully you won't ever pay for SSL.
To the emc community and developers: It's easy to feel that communication can lapse but there is so much potential in Emercoin, and I know the developers are always working hard behind the scenes. I always admire the lack of chatter to the amount of work being done in EMC, yet I hope that communication with the community will begin to flow more in coming months and years.
Beside this, a friend asked me what the final amount of Emercoin will be? I read on Coingecko that it will be one billion. Is this right? And how many EMC are created per year?
I will keep the forums up.
Thanks for sharing the link. I will looking for good prices in order to get a SSL certification in the next days.
Yes, I have got a donation address for the board. Please send tips to EcwZFZVzZUCLLZ3tFhwRPuQkYzrz6kHFAL
I think it's too early to give up on your forum. It may be valuable to have, especially if bitcointalk ever went down. So I hope you leave your forum up. If you have an EMC donation address for the forum I would send a little EMC to help keep the forum alive.
But also I think you should get an SSL certificate so it's secure for logins as currently it seems the SSL cert is invalid e.g. from http://letsencrypt.org/
Thanks for sharing the link. I will looking for good prices in order to get a SSL certification in the next days.
Yes, I have got a donation address for the board. Please send tips to EcwZFZVzZUCLLZ3tFhwRPuQkYzrz6kHFAL
I am currently running and maintaining the Emercointalk.org community. Since the active has been decreased over the last weeks, I would like to know if the community is still needed. I would like to read your opinion.
I think it's too early to give up on your forum. It may be valuable to have, especially if bitcointalk ever went down. So I hope you leave your forum up. If you have an EMC donation address for the forum I would send a little EMC to help keep the forum alive.
But also I think you should get an SSL certificate so it's secure for logins as currently it seems the SSL cert is invalid e.g. from http://letsencrypt.org/
I sent you an emc tip which should help a bit! Clearly it's much more convenient for everyone to just use bitcointalk, as everyone has an account here. For now, I think it's great if you can keep the emercointalk.org forum going, even though it may be just to find out if it has a future need. I will try to post a topic for discussion there in the coming days.
http://letsencrypt.org/ is free and requires only an email address I believe, so hopefully you won't ever pay for SSL.
To the emc community and developers: It's easy to feel that communication can lapse but there is so much potential in Emercoin, and I know the developers are always working hard behind the scenes. I always admire the lack of chatter to the amount of work being done in EMC, yet I hope that communication with the community will begin to flow more in coming months and years.
May 06, 2016, 11:42:26 PM
I will keep the forums up.
Thanks for sharing the link. I will looking for good prices in order to get a SSL certification in the next days.
Yes, I have got a donation address for the board. Please send tips to EcwZFZVzZUCLLZ3tFhwRPuQkYzrz6kHFAL
I think it's too early to give up on your forum. It may be valuable to have, especially if bitcointalk ever went down. So I hope you leave your forum up. If you have an EMC donation address for the forum I would send a little EMC to help keep the forum alive.
But also I think you should get an SSL certificate so it's secure for logins as currently it seems the SSL cert is invalid e.g. from http://letsencrypt.org/
Thanks for sharing the link. I will looking for good prices in order to get a SSL certification in the next days.
Yes, I have got a donation address for the board. Please send tips to EcwZFZVzZUCLLZ3tFhwRPuQkYzrz6kHFAL
I am currently running and maintaining the Emercointalk.org community. Since the active has been decreased over the last weeks, I would like to know if the community is still needed. I would like to read your opinion.
I think it's too early to give up on your forum. It may be valuable to have, especially if bitcointalk ever went down. So I hope you leave your forum up. If you have an EMC donation address for the forum I would send a little EMC to help keep the forum alive.
But also I think you should get an SSL certificate so it's secure for logins as currently it seems the SSL cert is invalid e.g. from http://letsencrypt.org/
I sent you an emc tip which should help a bit! Clearly it's much more convenient for everyone to just use bitcointalk, as everyone has an account here. For now, I think it's great if you can keep the emercointalk.org forum going, even though it may be just to find out if it has a future need. I will try to post a topic for discussion there in the coming days.
http://letsencrypt.org/ is free and requires only an email address I believe, so hopefully you won't ever pay for SSL.
To the emc community and developers: It's easy to feel that communication can lapse but there is so much potential in Emercoin, and I know the developers are always working hard behind the scenes. I always admire the lack of chatter to the amount of work being done in EMC, yet I hope that communication with the community will begin to flow more in coming months and years.
May 06, 2016, 03:34:32 PM
I will keep the forums up.
Thanks for sharing the link. I will looking for good prices in order to get a SSL certification in the next days.
Yes, I have got a donation address for the board. Please send tips to EcwZFZVzZUCLLZ3tFhwRPuQkYzrz6kHFAL
I think it's too early to give up on your forum. It may be valuable to have, especially if bitcointalk ever went down. So I hope you leave your forum up. If you have an EMC donation address for the forum I would send a little EMC to help keep the forum alive.
But also I think you should get an SSL certificate so it's secure for logins as currently it seems the SSL cert is invalid e.g. from http://letsencrypt.org/
Thanks for sharing the link. I will looking for good prices in order to get a SSL certification in the next days.
Yes, I have got a donation address for the board. Please send tips to EcwZFZVzZUCLLZ3tFhwRPuQkYzrz6kHFAL
I am currently running and maintaining the Emercointalk.org community. Since the active has been decreased over the last weeks, I would like to know if the community is still needed. I would like to read your opinion.
I think it's too early to give up on your forum. It may be valuable to have, especially if bitcointalk ever went down. So I hope you leave your forum up. If you have an EMC donation address for the forum I would send a little EMC to help keep the forum alive.
But also I think you should get an SSL certificate so it's secure for logins as currently it seems the SSL cert is invalid e.g. from http://letsencrypt.org/
May 06, 2016, 11:29:15 AM
besides that sending back and creating 1 UTXO dosnt not help, as i already did mention.
I thought that consolidating to 1 UTXO should help, but you say it doesn't. Have you tried any other bug-hunting ideas like creating a new wallet, and sending the coins to it, to compare?
I know you're an early adopter of EMC and you run the first emc explorer. So I think your opinion matters. If we can discover the problem then I am sure the devs will take notice and fix it.
May 06, 2016, 10:37:28 AM
Minting on this coin is very cpu intensive due to bad implementation. The problem is mostly ignored and probably wont be fixed.
It is not true. Wallet feels fine even on old processors.
I find it works great staking on old processor too, even virtual machine. However I think there may be some problem if the amount of UTXO in the wallet is very large. Because, all those many amounts trying to stake separately...
The code for staking is at https://github.com/EvgenijM86/emercoin/blob/master/src/wallet.cpp in function CreateCoinStake. But I don't know enough about C++ to understand all implications.
Hopefully K1773R can explain more about his problem. And if there is a problem for some situations, then perhaps the team will investigate the cause.
Unfortunately this problem is ignored. may it be due to bad English skills or ignorance, it still an issue and others will hit it too.
In looking at it, I think there is nothing noticeably wrong with EMC's stake implementation. In the CreateCoinStake() of wallet.cpp there are conditions under which the stake will "split" or "combine" UTXO, depending on the amount of coins, etc. So if you have a large balance it may keep splitting until you have so many UTXO that it will begin to create server load (after many months). To remedy this you could send all coins back to yourself every few months of staking, to combine again into a single UTXO. This isn't unusual, I have needed to do this with other POS coins. Another option may be to tweak the split/combine thresholds in wallet.cpp and compile your own daemon that keeps the number of UTXO under control for your situation. Obviously you would need to be very careful about making such a change to the split & combine thresholds.
I am no expert in this just sharing what I see and perhaps there are better answers to your issue. I'm sure the EMC devs will agree that anything to improve EMC's useablility is worth discussion
I don't think it is a widespread problem as smaller balances should combine properly but if it is a wider issue then hopefully someone can contribute an improvement to the staking code. May 06, 2016, 07:09:41 AM
I am currently running and maintaining the Emercointalk.org community. Since the active has been decreased over the last weeks, I would like to know if the community is still needed. I would like to read your opinion.
I think it's too early to give up on your forum. It may be valuable to have, especially if bitcointalk ever went down. So I hope you leave your forum up. If you have an EMC donation address for the forum I would send a little EMC to help keep the forum alive.
But also I think you should get an SSL certificate so it's secure for logins as currently it seems the SSL cert is invalid e.g. from http://letsencrypt.org/
May 04, 2016, 10:04:33 PM
Minting on this coin is very cpu intensive due to bad implementation. The problem is mostly ignored and probably wont be fixed.
It is not true. Wallet feels fine even on old processors.
I find it works great staking on old processor too, even virtual machine. However I think there may be some problem if the amount of UTXO in the wallet is very large. Because, all those many amounts trying to stake separately...
The code for staking is at https://github.com/EvgenijM86/emercoin/blob/master/src/wallet.cpp in function CreateCoinStake. But I don't know enough about C++ to understand all implications.
Hopefully K1773R can explain more about his problem. And if there is a problem for some situations, then perhaps the team will investigate the cause.
Unfortunately this problem is ignored. may it be due to bad English skills or ignorance, it still an issue and others will hit it too.
In looking at it, I think there is nothing noticeably wrong with EMC's stake implementation. In the CreateCoinStake() of wallet.cpp there are conditions under which the stake will "split" or "combine" UTXO, depending on the amount of coins, etc. So if you have a large balance it may keep splitting until you have so many UTXO that it will begin to create server load (after many months). To remedy this you could send all coins back to yourself every few months of staking, to combine again into a single UTXO. This isn't unusual, I have needed to do this with other POS coins. Another option may be to tweak the split/combine thresholds in wallet.cpp and compile your own daemon that keeps the number of UTXO under control for your situation. Obviously you would need to be very careful about making such a change to the split & combine thresholds.
I am no expert in this just sharing what I see and perhaps there are better answers to your issue. I'm sure the EMC devs will agree that anything to improve EMC's useablility is worth discussion
I don't think it is a widespread problem as smaller balances should combine properly but if it is a wider issue then hopefully someone can contribute an improvement to the staking code. May 04, 2016, 04:46:03 PM
I am currently running and maintaining the Emercointalk.org community. Since the active has been decreased over the last weeks, I would like to know if the community is still needed. I would like to read your opinion.
April 29, 2016, 12:13:16 PM
im sry but we are talking about something completely different.
It seems that we are talking about how you do not like our code. At the same time you do not offer anything. You just say that the code is bad. Ok, show as it should.
Jump to: