Yes there "was" a problem to start, this has been resolved during testing and development.
There is no proof of that
Espesially with all new features Dan coded after previous testing
And history says that there will be syncing problems
The use of a block tree means that guaranteeing Consistency (all nodes see the same data at the same time) is not required. So long as a portion of nodes see a portion of the same data at the same time all is good.
Different trader swill see different orderbooks? And no syncing problems?
Secondly, block tree's allow HIGH Partition tolerance because a block tree is allowed to be partitioned, (or forked in lay terms).
HFT trading on partitioned trees? That will be hillarious!
Will trades be canselled after resyncing? Or we would be able to doublespend - on one fork and then on another?
Why does anyone bother responding to this blatant troll?
May be because i am not saying about Dan all that crap you are saying about me?
This observation of my style of posting from so honorable eMu adept is noway offtopic in this thread!