Pages:
Author

Topic: [ENDED] [SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN] CODEX EXCHANGE ____________________________________ - page 8. (Read 8003 times)

full member
Activity: 672
Merit: 105
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username:Choyor
Rank:Fullmember
Bitcoin Wallet Address:1MBgPJwqL555Vxmdq2Gn64tYbAiaHyFhqX
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1020
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: Zadicar
Rank: Legendary
Bitcoin Wallet Address:  39kvdRZ82BPpgXPKZ9Z9JU7W3MwoBAWqyS
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 764
www.V.systems
Well, its settled. Campaign mod has made his final calculations and has assumed that only 19 posts out of the last 36 posts that I made were of "high quality / followed rules" .. out of 36 .. this is sad and disheartening. What a shame!

Seems like Codex received A week's worth of promotion and no money in return. Henceforth, I'm leaving this campaign.

Good luck to the rest of the participants.

Yes, you are right, you did made 36 posts. But, you should also understand that I am strictly implementing the rules that were laid out by the CODEX team.
  • Posts must be spread-out within the week, maximum of 4 posts per day. Excess daily posts will not count towards the next day/week.
You made a lot of excess posts per day which does not count. Hence, only counted 19 qualified posts.


You are WRONG


Each of my posts have time stamp on them. I spread out my posts between 4 pm to 5 am UTC - which would get displayed as under the same "forum day". By my calculations I have made a MINIMUM of 4 posts in each UTC 24 hour period/day and it is unjustified that I shouldn't be paid for my effort.

Since you are the manager I will let you post and compare the timestamps of each day of my post to UTC time.


Quote
I would request the admin to show me definitive proof that there were not enough posts (20) among the last 36 posts I made for me to get paid today. I am sure I followed all the rules by UTC standards and quality standards. I refuse to believe otherwise.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1150
Telegram: @julerz12
Well, its settled. Campaign mod has made his final calculations and has assumed that only 19 posts out of the last 36 posts that I made were of "high quality / followed rules" .. out of 36 .. this is sad and disheartening. What a shame!

Seems like Codex received A week's worth of promotion and no money in return. Henceforth, I'm leaving this campaign.

Good luck to the rest of the participants.

Yes, you are right, you did made 36 posts. But, you should also understand that I am strictly implementing the rules that were laid out by the CODEX team.
  • Posts must be spread-out within the week, maximum of 4 posts per day. Excess daily posts will not count towards the next day/week.
You made a lot of excess posts per day which does not count. Hence, only counted 19 qualified posts.



Week 1 payment will be distributed later today by the official escrow
(He's still at work as this very moment, He'll distribute it when he gets home.)

Slots available:
2 Hero/Legendary Rank
1 Sr. Member Rank
4 Full Member Rank
6 Member/Copper Rank

For anyone who's interested to participate on this campaign,
Kindly read and understand the rules we laid out on this signature campaign first,
Then, fill up the form (see here) and post your authentication post on this bounty thread.

Thanks.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
DIVERGENT OTC MARKET FOR DISTINCTIVE ASSETS!
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: zinjo
Rank: Full Member
Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1qr97usea7jlhm3pzt3n87s57ry8498ul26d483x
Once accept will change signature.
sr. member
Activity: 1582
Merit: 352
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: 0t3p0t
Rank: Senior Member
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 34XcgKnhEYMXkwMAyLQji1319BQ2MNLFMT
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 629
hero member
Activity: 2772
Merit: 645
No dream is too big and no dreamer is too small
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: Distinctin
Rank: hero
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 15QhcPqZBT7AMmUHQhRqT45qjJ9AaLrS4e

full member
Activity: 358
Merit: 118
Reserved for application
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 764
www.V.systems
Well, its settled. Campaign mod has made his final calculations and has assumed that only 19 posts out of the last 36 posts that I made were of "high quality / followed rules" .. out of 36 .. this is sad and disheartening. What a shame!

Seems like Codex received A week's worth of promotion and no money in return. Henceforth, I'm leaving this campaign.

Good luck to the rest of the participants.

I would request the admin to show me definitive proof that there were not enough posts (20) among the last 36 posts I made for me to get paid today. I am sure I followed all the rules by UTC standards and quality standards. I refuse to believe otherwise.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username:  sclmte
Rank:   member
Bitcoin Wallet Address:  3837ozj2NwoJSLXG3sf49B8oAGGMvaowfi
[/quote

Hello sir.I'm here to submit my form just in case you have a vacant member, pls allow me to work you campaign... Thanks
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username:  sclmte
Rank:   member
Bitcoin Wallet Address:  3837ozj2NwoJSLXG3sf49B8oAGGMvaowfi
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 49
Like to join if a Member spot gets available.

#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: Cashi
Rank: Member
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 3Es32PkwW9EHaUupwGhNRR7krH8wM4ZkJE
copper member
Activity: 434
Merit: 19
BTC
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: 101nowby
Rank:Copper Member
Member
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 3G1kBvSA1SSHLLJqyNfNNgwmn3MW4f8EPp

Hey, manager, I can wear a signature in this company.


Need to re-fill the form?
full member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 126
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username:jhonjhon
Rank: Full member
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 3NAS9LqNUFCZ3nBYTXkZ6ZH4WDXZerFvMs

I'll just dropping by my application just in case if there is vacant slot available later
correspond to my rank.
member
Activity: 368
Merit: 25
The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: Bharathi13
Rank: Member
Bitcoin Wallet Address:1CQq3DddhKtYzcB1kFyq5FF7mznMtPRQpW
copper member
Activity: 149
Merit: 1
A licensed cryptocurrencies exchange.
We've contacted user which gave us a negative trust and explained the situation.
Hopefully, we can negotiate and collaborate on the matter.

You should open a thread in Reputation board regarding this.

This kind of disputes are handled more efficiently with the inclusion of the community.

Just my advice anyway.

Thank you, will do that if nothing helps Smiley Currently, finally, negotiating with the user and waiting for a reply from moderators.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
We've contacted user which gave us a negative trust and explained the situation.
Hopefully, we can negotiate and collaborate on the matter.

You should open a thread in Reputation board regarding this.

This kind of disputes are handled more efficiently with the inclusion of the community.

Just my advice anyway.
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 14
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username:sandra_x
Rank: member
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 18b2CuukhpRMVDwtmgA59PYvFse1zHVyBq
copper member
Activity: 149
Merit: 1
A licensed cryptocurrencies exchange.
Does this have anything to do with the almighty game cracker codex? I don't understand then why the using of his name, also, exchanges been ending up in scam since beginning of bitcoin, the great gox, cryptsy now cryptopia the list is pretty big, while I see that a new exchange needs promotion i still dont see how it can prove its legit. And why it feels it is a coin, lol. However all I can do is promise that each single user participating in this campaing will be negative trusted if it ends up being a scam.
You were able to scare many who wanted to join the company.
Why did you write it here and not in the official announcement? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/official-thread-codexone-officially-licensed-cryptocurrency-exchange-5072632

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2471787
it worries me too
But so far there is no mistrust to the project.

Regarding Trust issue, please, refer to our answer in the same thread (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48166035):

Hello everyone,

First of all, we have to admit that indeed back in time we used a service to increase visibility. It was during a period of technical launch and our team tested such a service from a pure curiosity about what it can deliver. We came to the conclusion this was not the best way to achieve some awareness and even harmful, as we saw it later, and stopped it.

Second, as was mentioned above we don't use these kinds of techniques anymore as they are unprofessional and not transparent in a relation to the community. We have changed the marketing team involved and redefined our marketing strategy. Bumping services are not a part of it. We planned quite a lot of activities, partnerships and integrations for this year to increase awareness and provide the best trading experience we can for our customers.

Just a quick note, we have already reviewed our CryptoCompare page. We got to know that comment activity was also artificially increased, but in addition, we faced the competition sent us negative reviews in advance. We contacted CryptoCompare support this month and asked to remove fake comments (both positive and negative). As you can see, even here in our official thread we had no new comments in between our updates.

We welcome opinions and in case you have anything else in mind, please, tell us.

Thank you!

We've contacted user which gave us a negative trust and explained the situation.
Hopefully, we can negotiate and collaborate on the matter.
Pages:
Jump to: