Pages:
Author

Topic: ETH vs EOS vs NEO vs MOAC vs ICON vs ADA - page 2. (Read 778 times)

member
Activity: 644
Merit: 10
COVIR.IO
January 04, 2019, 08:29:53 PM
#53
From that table, its look MOAC look better than others but from popularity, ethereum more popular in cryptomarket. We know that most token in market using ethereum network. But right now, EOS interesting me because the price very low compare and having solid developers team
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
January 04, 2019, 07:33:28 PM
#52
interesting chart....gotta really look into each project
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
December 28, 2018, 03:14:46 PM
#51
does anyone have a strong, unbiased comparison??

Been wondering the same thing. It'd be nice to have a cheat sheet
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
December 27, 2018, 03:52:57 PM
#50
does anyone have a strong, unbiased comparison??
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
December 26, 2018, 05:30:19 PM
#49
in my opinion we should not believe in just one reference, try to examine more about Ethereum which has developed far to date with more updated and reliable references.

That's my point exactly. I think the chart is a little biased. When you actually deep dive into these projects, you'll see they have a lot in common and some differences as well. One thing I like categorizing blockchain platforms are the adoption rate and number of users. Which in this case would be EOS and ETH. from what I know, MOAC was launched in 2017 and the mainnet going live earlier this year

Biased or not, I think it does bring to light the competition. I know MOAC launched mainnet and launched their first dapp. I also know that they have a very strong presence in china
full member
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
December 20, 2018, 03:03:22 PM
#48
Actually there are a lot of coins that are better from coins which are famous but these all things is just a idea or plan so we can't know or believe that what will happen in the future of market. Probably many persons prefer basic coins becasue of them seem like more turstable.
hero member
Activity: 2212
Merit: 805
Top Crypto Casino
December 20, 2018, 03:01:16 PM
#47
in my opinion we should not believe in just one reference, try to examine more about Ethereum which has developed far to date with more updated and reliable references.

That's my point exactly. I think the chart is a little biased. When you actually deep dive into these projects, you'll see they have a lot in common and some differences as well. One thing I like categorizing blockchain platforms are the adoption rate and number of users. Which in this case would be EOS and ETH. from what I know, MOAC was launched in 2017 and the mainnet going live earlier this year
member
Activity: 150
Merit: 10
December 20, 2018, 02:51:33 PM
#46
The fate of eth depends directly on the update. But still, at the moment, this platform is a market leader. Everyone else has even more problems within the project, as well as security problems.

I think everyone has security problems. What we need to do is utilize sharding for security AND speed, which I believe MOAC has
member
Activity: 446
Merit: 10
December 20, 2018, 05:29:53 AM
#45
The fate of eth depends directly on the update. But still, at the moment, this platform is a market leader. Everyone else has even more problems within the project, as well as security problems.
jr. member
Activity: 300
Merit: 5
December 19, 2018, 06:24:28 PM
#44
Well, honestly that chart isn't that useful because it's obviously an advertisement for MOAC.
There are a lot of things to consider, honestly I think the technical aspects are secondary.
What markets have shown time and again is that the superior technology doesn't always become the most valuable.

With smart contract platforms, it is all about market penetration and adoption.
After all, the platforms are absolutely useless unless people build on it.
In that respect, of course, eth wins hands down.
Next would be NEO, the 2nd highest network.
A lot of the others are still in speculative stage, so you can speculate, or bet on the sure winners.

Yea I think it's pulled from their site from what I know. I would like to see a comparison. It also looks like they have adoption in china since they just announced a book they wrote about their tech/use cases: https://medium.com/@moac_io/blockchain-and-industrial-innovations-book-launch-captures-holiday-spirit-40f5287adc92
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 41
December 19, 2018, 11:37:45 AM
#43
Well, honestly that chart isn't that useful because it's obviously an advertisement for MOAC.
There are a lot of things to consider, honestly I think the technical aspects are secondary.
What markets have shown time and again is that the superior technology doesn't always become the most valuable.

With smart contract platforms, it is all about market penetration and adoption.
After all, the platforms are absolutely useless unless people build on it.
In that respect, of course, eth wins hands down.
Next would be NEO, the 2nd highest network.
A lot of the others are still in speculative stage, so you can speculate, or bet on the sure winners.
jr. member
Activity: 207
Merit: 1
December 19, 2018, 11:34:31 AM
#42
It seems to me that Ethereum will not win anyway, and even if there will be any problem, the team will come together and work together to solve it!
copper member
Activity: 196
Merit: 1
December 19, 2018, 11:14:06 AM
#41
Great comparison, but I still believe that these all technical parameters does not matter a lot in our industry. I mean look at BTC, this coin and so old and for sure not the best coin on the market, but still the coin with the highest price.
member
Activity: 387
Merit: 13
1ndiaSPqmqRUBXK79chY9Merz5AZrSu6y
December 19, 2018, 10:10:48 AM
#40
Please add another Feeless Blockchain Platform, the x42 Protocol for comparison.
It has interesting features and is a worthy addition here.
Highlighting features : Feeless PoS Smart Contract dApps customisable sidechains C#
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 100
December 18, 2018, 06:51:40 PM
#39
Found this interesting chart posted in another thread. Lately there's been lots of awesome blockchain projects coming out looking to solve scalability and cross chain compatibilities. Thoughts on this chart??

Edit: I can't upload the freaking chart, so go to the link below

Nevermind I figured it out lol:



Link to image: https://www.moac.io/resource_MoacComparison.html
This is not a comparison on features, this is a random list of things that chains might have, put into a table. I don't see any value in it. Otherwise:
ETH - biggest community, mature dedicated programming language, best decentralization and the biggest amount of devs working on it. Top 2 in terms of funding.
EOS - other coin that's top 2 in terms of funding. Significant throughput advantage. Worse decentralization, questionable consensus. Otherwise solid dev community and more common language use.
NEO - centralized shitcoin, got destroyed by a simple sybil attack. It does have some community and probably supports the most popular programming language out of all of them - c#
ADA - no-one is ever going to use it. Not just because of the functional programming language, it's the worst possible pick - at least go for OCaml like Tezos.

Thoughts on MOAC then??
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
December 18, 2018, 10:08:28 AM
#38
Ada EOS and Eth are definitively your choice haven't heard of that MOAC
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
December 18, 2018, 09:03:25 AM
#37
Found this interesting chart posted in another thread. Lately there's been lots of awesome blockchain projects coming out looking to solve scalability and cross chain compatibilities. Thoughts on this chart??

Edit: I can't upload the freaking chart, so go to the link below

Nevermind I figured it out lol:



Link to image: https://www.moac.io/resource_MoacComparison.html
This is not a comparison on features, this is a random list of things that chains might have, put into a table. I don't see any value in it. Otherwise:
ETH - biggest community, mature dedicated programming language, best decentralization and the biggest amount of devs working on it. Top 2 in terms of funding.
EOS - other coin that's top 2 in terms of funding. Significant throughput advantage. Worse decentralization, questionable consensus. Otherwise solid dev community and more common language use.
NEO - centralized shitcoin, got destroyed by a simple sybil attack. It does have some community and probably supports the most popular programming language out of all of them - c#
ADA - no-one is ever going to use it. Not just because of the functional programming language, it's the worst possible pick - at least go for OCaml like Tezos.
jr. member
Activity: 255
Merit: 3
December 17, 2018, 08:07:07 PM
#36
I still believe in eth, besides that we need a lot of references about moac, sometimes good projects don't get good support, so investors don't interest to invest on it

I don't think it's about choosing one over the other. While I still hold ETH, it is important to keep an eye on upcoming blockchains that can disrupt ethereum. Or even if they're solving the problems that ethereum faces, that's already groundbreaking for the ecosystem
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
December 14, 2018, 05:53:47 PM
#35
if we only see images, maybe the MOAC project is good. but the reality is not that easy. ethereum is still the best platform at the moment.

They announced something pretty big today....they partnered with a securities platform. Looks like the future is in securities. IMO this is a huge deal for MOAC and crypto in general. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20181214005053/en/RAC-Announces-Collaboration-Investment-MOAC-Foundation
full member
Activity: 222
Merit: 104
December 12, 2018, 05:42:20 PM
#34
if we only see images, maybe the MOAC project is good. but the reality is not that easy. ethereum is still the best platform at the moment.

True, but I saw that MOAC posted this article explaining their tech: https://medium.com/moac/explaining-moacs-ground-breaking-technology-95362b8aa99a
Pages:
Jump to: