Pages:
Author

Topic: Ethereum Creator: Interest in ETC ‘Coming from the Bitcoin Side’ (Read 2566 times)

newbie
Activity: 68
Merit: 0

Nobody can 51% attack ethereum at the moment. If you fud this to the ETC, then it is quite possible to do that now.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Sorry but your fud is pathetic. You're getting desperate because you dont own any ETH, haah.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 250
Somewhat true, as ETC is more decentralized just like bitcoin now as no any entity or person is behind total control of ETC. So it is obvious to see bitcoin community supporting ETC rather than ETH.

ETC is more centralised than the ETH. 3.6% is owned by the DAO hacker. Most are also owned by the Ethereum Foudation and developers.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1008
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
Somewhat true, as ETC is more decentralized just like bitcoin now as no any entity or person is behind total control of ETC. So it is obvious to see bitcoin community supporting ETC rather than ETH.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
The cryptocurrency community has been reeling from the Ethereum hard fork as the Ethereum Classic (ETC) token has gained momentum with mining, users and major exchanges enabling its trading. Meanwhile, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin believes that interest in this minority chain token is “actually coming from the Bitcoin side.”

https://news.bitcoin.com/ethereum-creator-interest-etc-bitcoin/
It is good news for ETC and i think it will make ETC's price going up, although there are many attacking from developer of ETH and his friends. But concept of ethereum its self  will make comunity of ETC be survive and trust in it. But it is just my analysis fundamental, who can be wrong.
newbie
Activity: 68
Merit: 0
Maybe some bitcoiners who want to see ETH in chaos

A simple answer is "yes". Some known bitcoiners have expressed their dislike for Vitalik and Ethereum and they claim that he is advertising something that will not scale and will not work as promised once the transactions reach the millions. There was a chat log I saw somewhere that a known bitcoiner named GMaxwell think that Vitalik is selling "snake oil".

The Ethereum block chain size has been growing very fast. It is 32 GB now one year after the implementation of ETH.

It is 37 GB now. It is growing very fast. I may have to move it to another disk from the SSD main C driver later.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 250
Maybe some bitcoiners who want to see ETH in chaos

A simple answer is "yes". Some known bitcoiners have expressed their dislike for Vitalik and Ethereum and they claim that he is advertising something that will not scale and will not work as promised once the transactions reach the millions. There was a chat log I saw somewhere that a known bitcoiner named GMaxwell think that Vitalik is selling "snake oil".

The Ethereum block chain size has been growing very fast. It is 32 GB now one year after the implementation of ETH.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1492
Maybe some bitcoiners who want to see ETH in chaos

A simple answer is "yes". Some known bitcoiners have expressed their dislike for Vitalik and Ethereum and they claim that he is advertising something that will not scale and will not work as promised once the transactions reach the millions. There was a chat log I saw somewhere that a known bitcoiner named GMaxwell think that Vitalik is selling "snake oil".
full member
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Maybe some bitcoiners who want to see ETH in chaos
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010
BTC to the moon is inevitable...
the interest towards ETC comes from users, those users who believe that altcoins should be decentralized and they must be without any manipulation from the developers and whales.

I think the interest of the ETC is from the big whales or the pumper and dumpers. They will dump after they have made enough profits.

any interest in any altcoin at any time have always been 90% pump and dump and the profit you can gain from it and only a 10% from those who like the projects so they invest in them but their motif is still profit too.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 250
the interest towards ETC comes from users, those users who believe that altcoins should be decentralized and they must be without any manipulation from the developers and whales.

I think the interest of the ETC is from the big whales or the pumper and dumpers. They will dump after they have made enough profits.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 520
the interest towards ETC comes from users, those users who believe that altcoins should be decentralized and they must be without any manipulation from the developers and whales.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 250
Anybody could have been the DAO hacker but the inside job theory is not to be taken lightly. Who else would know the code better than the authors themselves? I don't discard the theory that Stephan's crew is involved. In any case ETH is damaged and ETC is the answer even if ETH whales are trying everything possible to stop it, it refuses to go down.

It could be an inside job. Has anybody reported to the police about the DAO theft. Who will be responsible for catching the thief?
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1183
Anybody could have been the DAO hacker but the inside job theory is not to be taken lightly. Who else would know the code better than the authors themselves? I don't discard the theory that Stephan's crew is involved. In any case ETH is damaged and ETC is the answer even if ETH whales are trying everything possible to stop it, it refuses to go down.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 250
I'm starting to think Vitalik is the Dao hacker.

Excuse me? Why do you think that? Is it because they cannot deliver a scalable "world computer" is promised? Because what I think is they have no idea how to cash out their ETH because they know this has to end somewhere. All they sold the people is empty dreams and fantasies. But in reality Ethereum will not scale and work as promised. It will fail. So they will need a way to cash out.

There is no need to respond to that comment. That is baseless. I wonder who is responsible to report to the authority about the hack.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1492
I'm starting to think Vitalik is the Dao hacker.

Excuse me? Why do you think that? Is it because they cannot deliver a scalable "world computer" is promised? Because what I think is they have no idea how to cash out their ETH because they know this has to end somewhere. All they sold the people is empty dreams and fantasies. But in reality Ethereum will not scale and work as promised. It will fail. So they will need a way to cash out.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1048
I think we are missing the big picture.

 Why can't some meta ETH organization acquire/manage both chains? This is exactly the way a corporation would handle it. Some customers want an immutable chain, fine, you sell that solution. Some customers want the turing complete more hassle functionality. Fine you offer that. One organization dev'ing both chains would make sense. In some ways the ETH chain would be then the developmental chain for the immutable ETC chain.

This is the reality of the situation. They are both here at this point, better to accomdate both than to.try to poloraze folks. Plenty of miners for both chains, and the price will be more volatile if there are two of these coins to play off of. They serve entirely different markets, these coins are there own individual beasts at this point.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 250
I think we are missing the big picture.

 Why can't some meta ETH organization acquire/manage both chains? This is exactly the way a corporation would handle it. Some customers want an immutable chain, fine, you sell that solution. Some customers want the turing complete more hassle functionality. Fine you offer that. One organization dev'ing both chains would make sense. In some ways the ETH chain would be then the developmental chain for the immutable ETC chain.

The Ethereum will be more valuable if it has only one chain as it is more secure and people can concentrate their efforts.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 501
I think we are missing the big picture.

 Why can't some meta ETH organization acquire/manage both chains? This is exactly the way a corporation would handle it. Some customers want an immutable chain, fine, you sell that solution. Some customers want the turing complete more hassle functionality. Fine you offer that. One organization dev'ing both chains would make sense. In some ways the ETH chain would be then the developmental chain for the immutable ETC chain.

The point is, ETH advertises itself as a decentralized smart contract machine without third party intervention, and that is what they did, intervene in the smart contract. So they should start a new project not called Ethereum. ETC is Ethereum.. ETH is an abortion.
Pages:
Jump to: