you either lie on purpose or you give misinformation both in here and at your webpage.
You guys changed 3 contracts. none of them were verified. only verified contract is Jackpot Contract !!! that github post seems like it got edit 17 hours ago, game has been online 50+ days. I can provide you all contracts you guys used. can you verify them all or not ?
It is not a problem to find all the contract versions we have deployed. Each deprecated contract has the call of «migrate(newContract)» function as the last of its internal transactions. This function runs the migration procedure to move the necessary properties and ETH balance of an old contract to the new one. And each new version of the contract has the same function call as the first of its internal transactions. So one can always follow the contract version chain.
Currently, we have verified only the Jackpot contract, because we have been in the process of security audit for the main game contract. All sensitive Jackpot function calls are limited to the call from the main game contract that is why we have published its code earlier, not disclosing the code of the main game contract. The last version of the game contract has just passed the security audit and we have published its code on
GitHub. We will verify the main game contract as well on the Etherscan too.
also at webpage prize rate chart is all wrong. so please be more informal and lets talk this out as two comsci people. I dont care what you say about the project. you did your promoting and miss-informed your players. statements you make here and at UI are NOT TRUE !
prize rate chart says: The specific symbol prize is 16x which is a lie. you guys pay out 12x also if a player selects two differentspecific symbols and guesses both correct you still pays 12x. this is like stealing eth.
The webpage prize rate chart contains correct values. The 16x rates are applied after the bet amount is deducted in the amount of contributions to the jackpot and house edge. We admit that this details is not described clear enough and we have to rework the rules and the FAQ sections of the website, that is a crucial task for us.
Sorry to tell you this but I am loosing trust here and I am an unemployed solidity lover who has nothing to do other then finding scams in dappworld and notify newbies/normies.
We see your activity and we do appreciate the interest and cooperation. Constructive criticism is an essential tool for product development and we express our thanks to you for the attention, given to Ethex and such a detailed consideration of the system features. We need such experts to make Ethex as transparent and candid as possible. And we would be most grateful, if you join our project on Github as an independent expert and take part in the review of the solidity part of the game.