Topic: Europe need to change gone are the old days like it was - page 2. (Read 365 times)

Arabia is not rich the Saudi usurpers are rich. If you ever go to Arabia and move away from the tourist center (which is pretty much around Makkah) you'll enter the Arabian slums where many people are living in absolute poverty.

The same with UAE. Even though it is a much tinier place compared to Arabia, it has one of the highest poverty rate. The official stats talk of 20% living under poverty line even though it is a lot higher than that. But when you go to Dubai (the tourist destination) they've built it beautifully that creates the illusion of wealth. They have to build that front as well, after all 90% of the UAE population is foreigner investors and businessmen and workers (10%-11% is Emirati)!!!

BTW this is why they arrest tourists or anybody who says anything negative about UAE. They want to keep that illusion alive.

European countries  are the most powerful countries of the World and they have full strength to attack on any country and they could win the War against any country. But now many states got freedom and now they don't try to do War. Russia is in struggle and it attacked on Ukraine. We know every country want to get resources from the other country but now situation of Europe is good but when they noticed that they are lacking in something then they will attack on any country. War has many side effects but it could give the resources to the winner but in that area peace will be disturb  . UK was dominant on the Asia and they got all from Muglia family.But now that is time to every country to avoid War because it is bad for every country,and it has lots of side effects.

NATO is powerful, with 3.5 million personnel, but invading a country like Qatar isn't as easy as it sounds. International politics have become far more complicated. Invasions today risk global backlash, economic sanctions, and disturbed alliances. NATO countries heavily depend on the Middle East nations for energy, therefore, attacking Qatar could backfire economically. Qatar is small but not defenseless. It has been increasing its military strength, having increased personnel and investment in modern defense systems. The best result such a decision would bring about would be political and logistical problems that make it dangerous for any country to invade. There's no doubt about the strength of NATO, but today's modern warfare and diplomacy have made straight invasion the way it used to be many years ago very rare.

I agree with you. There are many who believe that Qatar and the Emirates are countries like the rest of the world. They are a group of families ruling tribes (called clans), who were granted self-rule in exchange for facilitating the transfer of energy resources to Europe and the "civilized" world. These gas stations cannot even have a homogeneous population because all the indigenous population does not exceed a few thousand and the rest of the millions are foreign business owners or workers. The Western powers succeeded in recruiting these tribes into what resembles small states that guarantee their interests, and then made similar offers to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and even Bahrain and the Sultanate of Oman, and it seems that the matter succeeded as well. This is the modern form of colonialism because military colonialism has become an old fashioned fashion and its losses in the long run are greater than its profits. Colonial countries are no longer only looking for energy resources, but also for securing markets for their products. Countries that refused to submit to these plans found themselves in conflicts and seditions fueled by those colonial powers using the same gas stations they had established. We have the Syrian example that can explain the whole situation when all the evil forces in the Gulf, before Europe and America, allied to overthrow the regime in Syria, as a continuation of colonial plans that had been worked on for years.

What exactly is your point because you talk about resources and then you speak about the military? Maybe you can be clearer on what you're trying to discuss in future. It seems like you are a Russian, upset that your stupid leader has dragged you into a pointless war and made you all poorer. That is the only reason that you try to talk badly about Qatar, who are selling Europe enough gas to exist without Russian supplies. Ironically Russia has lost it's most valuable market and traded it all for a pile of murdered people. Europe does not need to fight anyone, they are happy to trade for the resources that they need and rich enough to survive without begging a dictator like Putin.

One of the key problems of modern Europe is a very painful tolerance towards everything, including the “new citizens” destroying Europe (economically, mentally,...). The incoming emigrants are mostly from poor and undeveloped countries, where the concept of legality and human values is in the last place. They do not care about the “master's house”, about traditions, they want not only to receive material benefits at the expense of EU citizens, but also to form a way of life they are accustomed to, planting their traditions, if I may say “culture”, religion. And the authorities of European countries, instead of putting their own house in order, forcing “guests” to behave decently, respecting local traditions, culture, laws, continue to play a painful game of tolerance....

Countries are getting wiser and aware of European tactics detrimental to their own development that's why you see some countries in Africa, their military have taken over government because their democratic leaders are slaves to these European colonial masters.

The European colonial masters are even getting smarter now and pretending to invest into respective sectors in less developed countries or bringing NGO scheme with exploitation undercover having agreements with the government on perceived benefits while schemes lasts.
They still want to be a key player in their economy so they can continue their exploitation.

1) You are bringing back a war mentality that, since the WWII, has been almost overcome around the globe, with painful and very well known exceptions.

2) In the XXI century land is not the most valuable asset anymore, but data. And if we don't build bridges but bring back to light ancient rivalries instead, chances are that no traditional power will dominate the world, but a very different "artificial entity" controlled by itself, if you know what I mean.

Just my two sats.

I think these are all a do away (gone) due to significance of human developments and the practices of human rights.
Unlike during the times of colonies that the Europe gives development offers with high profits of returns.

But then, I see no necessary of them required to change because every one country is mostly now an independent of it own.
They are only answerable to the US because they holds the world power.
It is also unnecessary for NATO to engage on power reigns with the Europe just because they have gained ground of sophisticated amenities.
So everything is going just well no need the Europe to change.

I'm not the most competent person to talk about Europe but I think that Europe really needs to change but not in a way you talk about it OP. Europe needs less bureaucracy, less migrants, a little bit more nationalism instead of extreme liberalism. I like Europe but to be fair, migrants (including migrants from my country) do very bad things and aren't punished as they deserve. I understand that these migrants also do very hard jobs for a low pay but from my information, lots of migrants do more bad than good.

It's not the 20th century, it's the 21st century.

Do they pillage their resources? If they pillage, then how is Saudi Arabia so rich? As I see, these countries spend billions of dollars on simple things like it's nothing valuable. I've been to Dubai and the wealth that I saw here is out of this world.

You’re right when you say they are no longer the powerful people who go to countries to colonize and take land and resources. Funnily enough, it’s been stated that there are more Indians now that own properties in UK . Some people say that they are only colonizing the british people back lol but I think it shows how times are changing.

The days have changed and white people do not really have the advantage anymore when it comes to economic stability.

That would be very, very stupid.

Do you know where United States CENTCOM is located? You can check on Google if you want.

I'll wait for you.

...yeah, so not a great idea to invade Qatar, a sovereign country minding its own business.

If anyone even thinks about touching Qatar or another gulf country, they lose all the military installations they have there, which means they can't take Middle East troops out of there or bring them in.

For your information these tiny gas stations which they call "country" were artificially created not so long ago so that they don't have to invade anymore. With the corrupt families that they installed in these gas stations they freely pillage their resources without having to send any troops.

Otherwise I don't even think they have enough troops to invade a gas station as tiny and weak as Qatar.

Gone are days when Europe Went in just countries like france uk netherland and took the land and resources now it seems like Europe need to either pay high price or not get resources at all.
Back in the many years europe use to go and invade and just take it.

But If NATO is so strong and eu military are strong maybe they can Do last invasion like italy Job kind of thing quick robbery ....for example going to QATAR and taking lol 😂 middle East cant fight against all france uk netherland finland germany i think it Will be one week job to go there,