Pages:
Author

Topic: European Union is robbing its citizens' bank accounts. 9.9% to be confiscated. - page 5. (Read 33189 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Lex Ad Impios
You people think the depositors deserve it?  ROFLMAO, that's insane!

Sigh... Have you read the text I linked to above? Here, I link it again: http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/peter-schiff-on-cyprus.html
Also, read this: http://detlevschlichter.com/2013/03/cyprus-and-the-reality-of-banking-deposit-haircuts-are-both-inevitable-and-the-right-thing-to-do/
And then, read my previous posts on this thread.

And stop saying BS, please. These banks are going down, some people are going to lose money. Better it be those who invested in said banks than tax-victims who had nothing to do with the problem. Even worse would be forcing all EUR holders to pay.
Of course, for the 100th time, the bank shareholders should lose all, they should not be saved at the expense of their clients. And ideally those who made riskier investments should be cut before those who simply held checking accounts. And every creditor or client of the bank that loses something should receive a proportional share of the bank's assets in return.

I really shouldn't feed the trolls, but I just can't resist.  You are so stupid I simply can't ignore you.

Check out the following definitions:

Share Holder

Depositor

You seem to be confusing these two terms.

If the EU didn't want to bail out banks then they should allow them to fail, but they still need to pay what they owe to the people whose deposits they insured (there is some kind of deposit insurance in Europe, isn't there?).  If you want to bail out banks then you need to bail them out and forget your idiotic, suicidal nationalism.  In the US wealthy states like New Hampshire have been picking up the tab for poor states like Mississippi since forever.  Yeah, they have cultural differences.  Yeah, the people in New Hampshire and Mississippi might not like each other.  That doesn't matter because we have one financial system.  We aren't going to allow one state to fall because another state doesn't want to pay because they aren't from New Hampshire.  Nobody would ever hold it against Mississippi that they are poor so they need more handouts from the Federal government.  We understand contagion and externalities.  Europe doesn't.

The argument I see Germans making is that Germans shouldn't have to bail out other people who work with the same monetary system as them because Germans aren't responsible for anybody but Germany.  That is socialist nationalism.  If the Cypriots were German then yeah, they would bail them out, but they are from Cyprus so the Germans won't bail them out.  It is socialist, but only applying to people within Germany, which makes it nationalist as well.

If Europe can't act like a single financial system and if they want to keep holding these bailouts against countries who do not flourish under the management (or mismanagement) of the EU, and retaliating against each other by destroying each other's economies with austerity then fuck it, you all deserve the recession that is coming.  I'm all for the EU working out and Europe prospering, but if it's not going to work then dissolve the EU and be done with it.  Stretching it out by stealing people's pensions isn't going to help anybody.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
LOL, nicely done. Russians reportedly managed to move out billions of Euro while Cypriotic bank accounts were frozen. ECB is going to have to pony up extra 3 billion Euro to Cypriots now to cover the "shortfall".

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-26/russian-withdrawals-quantified-cyprus-central-bank-set-expand-emergency-credit-%E2%82%AC3-bi
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
And stop saying BS, please. These banks are going down, some people are going to lose money. Better it be those who invested in said banks than tax-victims who had nothing to do with the problem. Even worse would be forcing all EUR holders to pay.
Of course, for the 100th time, the bank shareholders should lose all, they should not be saved at the expense of their clients. And ideally those who made riskier investments should be cut before those who simply held checking accounts. And every creditor or client of the bank that loses something should receive a proportional share of the bank's assets in return.
There used to be this story called a "capital structure". According to this story every stakeholder in a company was assigned a certain preference so that if a bankruptcy was to occur the losses would be felt by the different classes of stakeholders in a pre-defined order. People who believed this story used it to calculate risk. Some people decided to accept a lower return in exchange for a safer position in the capital structure, other people decided to take a less senior position in exchange for a higher return. Everybody made their decisions based on the idea these rules would remain objective and unchanged.

Then 2008 happened and reality decided to tear down this pretty little fantasy. Much to the dismay of the investors stupid enough to believe in the "rule of law", the way it actually works is when a bank becomes insolvent the losses are eaten by the group of stakeholders who have the least ability to bribe the regulatory and lawmaking apparatus. Your actual position in the capital structure depends on your political clout at the time of bankruptcy. Congratulations, you just learned an expensive lesson in what it means to live in a centrally-planned command economy. Welcome to fascism.

+1

Please see USSA bailout of General Motors for reference.
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
And stop saying BS, please. These banks are going down, some people are going to lose money. Better it be those who invested in said banks than tax-victims who had nothing to do with the problem. Even worse would be forcing all EUR holders to pay.
Of course, for the 100th time, the bank shareholders should lose all, they should not be saved at the expense of their clients. And ideally those who made riskier investments should be cut before those who simply held checking accounts. And every creditor or client of the bank that loses something should receive a proportional share of the bank's assets in return.
There used to be this story called a "capital structure". According to this story every stakeholder in a company was assigned a certain preference so that if a bankruptcy was to occur the losses would be felt by the different classes of stakeholders in a pre-defined order. People who believed this story used it to calculate risk. Some people decided to accept a lower return in exchange for a safer position in the capital structure, other people decided to take a less senior position in exchange for a higher return. Everybody made their decisions based on the idea these rules would remain objective and unchanged.

Then 2008 happened and reality decided to tear down this pretty little fantasy. Much to the dismay of the investors stupid enough to believe in the "rule of law", the way it actually works is when a bank becomes insolvent the losses are eaten by the group of stakeholders who have the least ability to bribe the regulatory and lawmaking apparatus. Your actual position in the capital structure depends on your political clout at the time of bankruptcy. Congratulations, you just learned an expensive lesson in what it means to live in a centrally-planned command economy. Welcome to fascism.

PM me your tip jar, I will show my appreciation.
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
Meanwhile in Finland:

My local bank refuses to give out more than EUR 10,000 in cash to me. The stated reason is Easter. Then I ask, "okay, 10,000 more next week?". Answer: "Nope."

They advice me to go to other branches in the same city, so that I could take out the 20k I wanted. <- Note, it was not even big sum I was asking for.

I regularly visit them and take out several 100,000s a year in cash, so it is not that there is any "suspicious activity" rule that they are enforcing.

I had a meeting and then walked to another bank. Because my risk assessment had changed because of the above incident, I wanted to have an additional EUR 20k. After about 15 minutes of paperwork, none of which was anything special or suspicious to me, I was given the cash I wanted.

Conclusion: What I did is just a precaution. The bank does not pay me anything for keeping my money. I lose nothing if I take it out. I will spend it in my business in approx. 3-4 weeks even if nothing happens. If everyone did the same, there would be same hell here as in Cyprus.



Ahh... feels safer this way.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009
And stop saying BS, please. These banks are going down, some people are going to lose money. Better it be those who invested in said banks than tax-victims who had nothing to do with the problem. Even worse would be forcing all EUR holders to pay.
Of course, for the 100th time, the bank shareholders should lose all, they should not be saved at the expense of their clients. And ideally those who made riskier investments should be cut before those who simply held checking accounts. And every creditor or client of the bank that loses something should receive a proportional share of the bank's assets in return.
There used to be this story called a "capital structure". According to this story every stakeholder in a company was assigned a certain preference so that if a bankruptcy was to occur the losses would be felt by the different classes of stakeholders in a pre-defined order. People who believed this story used it to calculate risk. Some people decided to accept a lower return in exchange for a safer position in the capital structure, other people decided to take a less senior position in exchange for a higher return. Everybody made their decisions based on the idea these rules would remain objective and unchanged.

Then 2008 happened and reality decided to tear down this pretty little fantasy. Much to the dismay of the investors stupid enough to believe in the "rule of law", the way it actually works is when a bank becomes insolvent the losses are eaten by the group of stakeholders who have the least ability to bribe the regulatory and lawmaking apparatus. Your actual position in the capital structure depends on your political clout at the time of bankruptcy. Congratulations, you just learned an expensive lesson in what it means to live in a centrally-planned command economy. Welcome to fascism.
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
You people think the depositors deserve it?  ROFLMAO, that's insane!

Sigh... Have you read the text I linked to above? Here, I link it again: http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/peter-schiff-on-cyprus.html
Also, read this: http://detlevschlichter.com/2013/03/cyprus-and-the-reality-of-banking-deposit-haircuts-are-both-inevitable-and-the-right-thing-to-do/
And then, read my previous posts on this thread.

And stop saying BS, please. These banks are going down, some people are going to lose money. Better it be those who invested in said banks than tax-victims who had nothing to do with the problem. Even worse would be forcing all EUR holders to pay.
Of course, for the 100th time, the bank shareholders should lose all, they should not be saved at the expense of their clients. And ideally those who made riskier investments should be cut before those who simply held checking accounts. And every creditor or client of the bank that loses something should receive a proportional share of the bank's assets in return.

+1. Tipped.

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
You people think the depositors deserve it?  ROFLMAO, that's insane!

Sigh... Have you read the text I linked to above? Here, I link it again: http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/peter-schiff-on-cyprus.html
Also, read this: http://detlevschlichter.com/2013/03/cyprus-and-the-reality-of-banking-deposit-haircuts-are-both-inevitable-and-the-right-thing-to-do/
And then, read my previous posts on this thread.

And stop saying BS, please. These banks are going down, some people are going to lose money. Better it be those who invested in said banks than tax-victims who had nothing to do with the problem. Even worse would be forcing all EUR holders to pay.
Of course, for the 100th time, the bank shareholders should lose all, they should not be saved at the expense of their clients. And ideally those who made riskier investments should be cut before those who simply held checking accounts. And every creditor or client of the bank that loses something should receive a proportional share of the bank's assets in return.
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
Conclusion: What I did is just a precaution. The bank does not pay me anything for keeping my money. I lose nothing if I take it out. I will spend it in my business in approx. 3-4 weeks even if nothing happens. If everyone did the same, there would be same hell here as in Cyprus.

Are you saying that banks don't pay interest in Finland or that the interest is at or below the rate of inflation so the interest doesn't stop the real value of your savings from decreasing?

I think for regular people it's around 0.250% for spending accounts. That is under 2k I think. Not sure how much under euribor it is probably around 0.750% for larger savings on regular accounts.

Of course you have saving accounts with better interest, but then also can't use at any time.

The euribor is ranging from .12% to .55% depending on the maturity. I could theoretically borrow money at about 1% interest for house, but the banks are not so keen on having me as a customer (how come?)

Ppl get 0.25% for spending/saving acct. Businesses get 0% + fees. The way to increase the marketed yield is to demand a multi-year contract with 50% of the money invested in the bank's mutual fund. They can siphon off enough to be able to offer about 1.55% for the account part this way. The reason why I believe the risk for crash has increased, is that insurance against it costs nothing, AND if people go for it, it is causing the very crash they are trying to insure themselves from.

Price inflation is approx. 3.5%-5.5% measured over 10 years (food and energy, that is, the things they usually exclude  Cheesy )
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Conclusion: What I did is just a precaution. The bank does not pay me anything for keeping my money. I lose nothing if I take it out. I will spend it in my business in approx. 3-4 weeks even if nothing happens. If everyone did the same, there would be same hell here as in Cyprus.

Are you saying that banks don't pay interest in Finland or that the interest is at or below the rate of inflation so the interest doesn't stop the real value of your savings from decreasing?

I think for regular people it's around 0.250% for spending accounts.

Of course you have saving accounts with better interest, but then also can't use at any time.

EDIT:
For my bank if minimum balance is over 5k, the interest is bank's prime - 3%... So 0.250% really...
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
You people think the depositors deserve it?  ROFLMAO, that's insane!

"Blame the victim" is a very popular strategy in farming as explained here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Lex Ad Impios
Conclusion: What I did is just a precaution. The bank does not pay me anything for keeping my money. I lose nothing if I take it out. I will spend it in my business in approx. 3-4 weeks even if nothing happens. If everyone did the same, there would be same hell here as in Cyprus.

Are you saying that banks don't pay interest in Finland or that the interest is at or below the rate of inflation so the interest doesn't stop the real value of your savings from decreasing?
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1721
Conclusion: What I did is just a precaution. The bank does not pay me anything for keeping my money. I lose nothing if I take it out. I will spend it in my business in approx. 3-4 weeks even if nothing happens. If everyone did the same, there would be same hell here as in Cyprus.

A lot less than everyone Smiley
In most countries the minimum reserve requirements are in the range of 1-10%, the rest the banks can lend more than they have (''create'' money).
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
Meanwhile in Finland:

My local bank refuses to give out more than EUR 10,000 in cash to me. The stated reason is Easter. Then I ask, "okay, 10,000 more next week?". Answer: "Nope."

They advice me to go to other branches in the same city, so that I could take out the 20k I wanted. <- Note, it was not even big sum I was asking for.

I regularly visit them and take out several 100,000s a year in cash, so it is not that there is any "suspicious activity" rule that they are enforcing.

I had a meeting and then walked to another bank. Because my risk assessment had changed because of the above incident, I wanted to have an additional EUR 20k. After about 15 minutes of paperwork, none of which was anything special or suspicious to me, I was given the cash I wanted.

Conclusion: What I did is just a precaution. The bank does not pay me anything for keeping my money. I lose nothing if I take it out. I will spend it in my business in approx. 3-4 weeks even if nothing happens. If everyone did the same, there would be same hell here as in Cyprus.

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Lex Ad Impios
You people think the depositors deserve it?  ROFLMAO, that's insane!

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
Peter Schiff on Cyprus

Quote from: Peter Schiff
And it's not as if depositors at Cypriot banks, many of whom are reported to be Russian citizens seeking tax havens, were not complicit in the risk taking. Bloomberg reports that over the past five years euro deposits at Cyprus banks returned more than 24 percent cumulatively, almost double the returns on comparable German accounts. The banks were able to offer such returns because they were exposed to riskier assets (i.e. Greek government bonds). What's so wrong with asking those who took greater risks to earn higher returns to give something back when their decisions go bad?

Cypriot citizens, as members of the EU, had the choice to put their deposits in any EU bank. Even after paying the taxes that had been proposed in the bailout, long-term depositors would have made more money by keeping their savings in the high yielding Cypriot banks than low yielding German banks. So what kind of sadistic Rubicon are we crossing?
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
Also, I find you avatar greatly offensive.

I find merkel's proposal, to grab money from my current bank account and use it to pay country's debt, much more offensive.
I don't blame German people, but I'll always blame villainous politicians.

Still the point is that Cyprus bank accounts received up to 15% interest p.a..

On my Bank account I get 2% p.a. on the same currency.

It can't be that we know pay for this outrageous interest rates that obviously just where made up.

Such Interest rate are not risk free. Normally you only get them in High Yield Investment Scams and Ponzis. Oh wait, so that was what happened there.

I don't approve of taking money from bank deposits, but Merkel does right in not just bailing them out. I would be outraged I my Taxmoney would just be used to bail out this Scams without asking for anything in return.

Basically you where in a car accident where the driver of the other car fucked up and now you are blaming the Mechanic for charging you to fix your car.
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
Meanwhile in Finland:

My local bank refuses to give out more than EUR 10,000 in cash to me. The stated reason is Easter. Then I ask, "okay, 10,000 more next week?". Answer: "Nope."

They advice me to go to other branches in the same city, so that I could take out the 20k I wanted. <- Note, it was not even big sum I was asking for.

I regularly visit them and take out several 100,000s a year in cash, so it is not that there is any "suspicious activity" rule that they are enforcing.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Lex Ad Impios
It looks like the Russians got their money out the back door while everybody was fighting.  The Cypriot banks with branches in London and Russia never closed or imposed withdrawal limits, so the Russian mob probably took it all out by now.  That's why Russia didn't bail out Cyprus.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-25/have-russians-already-quietly-withdrawn-all-their-cash-cyprus
Pages:
Jump to: