Sigh... Have you read the text I linked to above? Here, I link it again: http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/peter-schiff-on-cyprus.html
Also, read this: http://detlevschlichter.com/2013/03/cyprus-and-the-reality-of-banking-deposit-haircuts-are-both-inevitable-and-the-right-thing-to-do/
And then, read my previous posts on this thread.
And stop saying BS, please. These banks are going down, some people are going to lose money. Better it be those who invested in said banks than tax-victims who had nothing to do with the problem. Even worse would be forcing all EUR holders to pay.
Of course, for the 100th time, the bank shareholders should lose all, they should not be saved at the expense of their clients. And ideally those who made riskier investments should be cut before those who simply held checking accounts. And every creditor or client of the bank that loses something should receive a proportional share of the bank's assets in return.
I really shouldn't feed the trolls, but I just can't resist. You are so stupid I simply can't ignore you.
Check out the following definitions:
Share Holder
Depositor
You seem to be confusing these two terms.
If the EU didn't want to bail out banks then they should allow them to fail, but they still need to pay what they owe to the people whose deposits they insured (there is some kind of deposit insurance in Europe, isn't there?). If you want to bail out banks then you need to bail them out and forget your idiotic, suicidal nationalism. In the US wealthy states like New Hampshire have been picking up the tab for poor states like Mississippi since forever. Yeah, they have cultural differences. Yeah, the people in New Hampshire and Mississippi might not like each other. That doesn't matter because we have one financial system. We aren't going to allow one state to fall because another state doesn't want to pay because they aren't from New Hampshire. Nobody would ever hold it against Mississippi that they are poor so they need more handouts from the Federal government. We understand contagion and externalities. Europe doesn't.
The argument I see Germans making is that Germans shouldn't have to bail out other people who work with the same monetary system as them because Germans aren't responsible for anybody but Germany. That is socialist nationalism. If the Cypriots were German then yeah, they would bail them out, but they are from Cyprus so the Germans won't bail them out. It is socialist, but only applying to people within Germany, which makes it nationalist as well.
If Europe can't act like a single financial system and if they want to keep holding these bailouts against countries who do not flourish under the management (or mismanagement) of the EU, and retaliating against each other by destroying each other's economies with austerity then fuck it, you all deserve the recession that is coming. I'm all for the EU working out and Europe prospering, but if it's not going to work then dissolve the EU and be done with it. Stretching it out by stealing people's pensions isn't going to help anybody.