Task 2 Correction:
The text as copied and pasted from the first link provided is actually:
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization Text Above: SHA-512 Base64: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature and Transaction Identifier: Ed25519 TweetNaCl:
0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
I copied and pasted from the wrong source! So, in any case, the signature would match in your evaluations. This is part of the reason why I'm doing this... to see just how hard it is to do the claims and evaluate manually. Not that easy to do correctly at least when your new at evaluating apparently. But we'll design tools to make it easier for a manual verification before we design the automated tool.
Topic: Evaluators Wanted - page 2. (Read 730 times)
Task 2 of 4 Detailed Instructions:
~
Nothing works with the public key you have transmitted! But this signature you have posted belongs to MY public key from my contribution in the last night!~
I did exactly what you described, I think!
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: 8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Signature: o8aYBduwhDPPss3IdVLeGqPreJQq7Vyoxwx+8zgMxi9WtgBMEkjp8oZmTAWYcBhjWc7tLYNu9djZlQSfHvEbBw==
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=
Anyways, please let me know I'm doing it correctly -
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: 8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Signature: KDSO1U8PsyxNvAV94iWqOPpbvVsGpxTFF6kiRC3u4Y7Zbb8507DMKDX3UOKH/jUjM4OI2iVDbYVefmOWQ3oWBw==
Public Key: 372Nwk1C2Dl10LV9cMS91D4deoksw0xKLDCXjU6heNs=
P.S. I forgot to save my private key so I generated a new one.
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: 8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Signature: KDSO1U8PsyxNvAV94iWqOPpbvVsGpxTFF6kiRC3u4Y7Zbb8507DMKDX3UOKH/jUjM4OI2iVDbYVefmOWQ3oWBw==
Public Key: 372Nwk1C2Dl10LV9cMS91D4deoksw0xKLDCXjU6heNs=
P.S. I forgot to save my private key so I generated a new one.
Delete
Delete
Task 2 of 4 Detailed Instructions:
1. Examine the page at
https://boards.4channel.org/vip/thread/99136#p99161 which has been cc'd to the zenoribbon.freeforums.net claimchain ledger.
It will have this text:
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization SHA-512: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature: JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
This is a claim that Zenoribbon is being placed in a container which can be transacted over the Public Settlement Network (PSN), which can only be honored if done by the rightful owner. So, Check to see if there are any other earlier tranfers of Zenoribbon using a basic internet search. If not, the transaction is potentially valid.
2. Verify that the "Hash of Containerization" matches the text beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Unlike the previous hashes in task 1, this hash is in Base64 encoding and so the TweetNaCl hash won't match. However, the more common version will work.
A good SHA-512 Base64 hash tool can be found here:
https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha512.html
In the input box, the hash from above beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Remove any spaces in the hash because copying and pasting from a browser sometimes adds spaces that ruin the hash.
The output should match the hash as claimed beginning "a204..." for the containerization to be valid. If valid, then you can go to the next step.
3. Verify that the hash signature matches the owner of "Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road" which is indicated by this public key according to your previous evaluation:
Claimant Sharing Key: hqXdZnrTvicitWv4V/LH/9qA3nUMcl5PIbbdgclZ9cY=
A good signature kit can be found at: https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
Click on the verify tab.
Enter the sharing Key as the signature public key.
Enter the Hash signature from above "JO+... Ag==" in the signature line.
Once again, delete any spaces added by your browser.
Enter the "Hash of Containerization" hash as the message. In this case that is the above hash beginning "a204" ending "...a7c"
Click Verify. Hopefully the statement verifies correctly!
4. If everything is valid and there are no conflicting claims found by an internet search, then you can honor the statement using the same signature signing process used in step 1:
Create the evaluation statement as:
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: (hash of honor statement above goes here)
Signature: (signature of the hash in the previous line above)
Public Key: (insert your public key here)
a. Hash the text starting with "Evaluation" and ending "...CQ==" using a hash tool such as the linked page above.
b. Sign the hash such as by using https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
You should still have your public and private key from the previous task. If you don't have that key, generate a new one with the "random" button and save both the private and public keys it for future use.
Paste your private key to the private key field.
In the message field, put the line generated from hashing your evaluation statement, which may be this:
8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Then click sign.
Paste the resulting signature in place of "(signature of the hash in the previous line above)" in your evaluation statement.
c. Paste your public key in place of "(insert your public key here)" in your evaluation statement.
5. Post your evaluation statement to this thread. Done! As always, don't be afraid to loosely interpret these instructions and do things according to your personal preferences.
1. Examine the page at
https://boards.4channel.org/vip/thread/99136#p99161 which has been cc'd to the zenoribbon.freeforums.net claimchain ledger.
It will have this text:
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization SHA-512: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature: JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
This is a claim that Zenoribbon is being placed in a container which can be transacted over the Public Settlement Network (PSN), which can only be honored if done by the rightful owner. So, Check to see if there are any other earlier tranfers of Zenoribbon using a basic internet search. If not, the transaction is potentially valid.
2. Verify that the "Hash of Containerization" matches the text beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Unlike the previous hashes in task 1, this hash is in Base64 encoding and so the TweetNaCl hash won't match. However, the more common version will work.
A good SHA-512 Base64 hash tool can be found here:
https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha512.html
In the input box, the hash from above beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Remove any spaces in the hash because copying and pasting from a browser sometimes adds spaces that ruin the hash.
The output should match the hash as claimed beginning "a204..." for the containerization to be valid. If valid, then you can go to the next step.
3. Verify that the hash signature matches the owner of "Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road" which is indicated by this public key according to your previous evaluation:
Claimant Sharing Key: hqXdZnrTvicitWv4V/LH/9qA3nUMcl5PIbbdgclZ9cY=
A good signature kit can be found at: https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
Click on the verify tab.
Enter the sharing Key as the signature public key.
Enter the Hash signature from above "JO+... Ag==" in the signature line.
Once again, delete any spaces added by your browser.
Enter the "Hash of Containerization" hash as the message. In this case that is the above hash beginning "a204" ending "...a7c"
Click Verify. Hopefully the statement verifies correctly!
4. If everything is valid and there are no conflicting claims found by an internet search, then you can honor the statement using the same signature signing process used in step 1:
Create the evaluation statement as:
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: (hash of honor statement above goes here)
Signature: (signature of the hash in the previous line above)
Public Key: (insert your public key here)
a. Hash the text starting with "Evaluation" and ending "...CQ==" using a hash tool such as the linked page above.
b. Sign the hash such as by using https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
You should still have your public and private key from the previous task. If you don't have that key, generate a new one with the "random" button and save both the private and public keys it for future use.
Paste your private key to the private key field.
In the message field, put the line generated from hashing your evaluation statement, which may be this:
8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Then click sign.
Paste the resulting signature in place of "(signature of the hash in the previous line above)" in your evaluation statement.
c. Paste your public key in place of "(insert your public key here)" in your evaluation statement.
5. Post your evaluation statement to this thread. Done! As always, don't be afraid to loosely interpret these instructions and do things according to your personal preferences.
Hi, could you please check if you put a wrong signature, or I misunderstood something here?
I tried to put the signature you're providing (JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
), but it failed the verification.
So I went to the original post to check again, and I cannot the signature in the post.
I put the signature in the post(0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==) instead, and it works.
Please see below -
Please let me know if I'm doing anything wrong, thanks!
Delete
Task 2 of 4 Detailed Instructions:
1. Examine the page at
https://boards.4channel.org/vip/thread/99136#p99161 which has been cc'd to the zenoribbon.freeforums.net claimchain ledger.
It will have this text:
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization SHA-512: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature: JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
This is a claim that Zenoribbon is being placed in a container which can be transacted over the Public Settlement Network (PSN), which can only be honored if done by the rightful owner. So, Check to see if there are any other earlier tranfers of Zenoribbon using a basic internet search. If not, the transaction is potentially valid.
2. Verify that the "Hash of Containerization" matches the text beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Unlike the previous hashes in task 1, this hash is in Base64 encoding and so the TweetNaCl hash won't match. However, the more common version will work.
A good SHA-512 Base64 hash tool can be found here:
https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha512.html
In the input box, the hash from above beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Remove any spaces in the hash because copying and pasting from a browser sometimes adds spaces that ruin the hash.
The output should match the hash as claimed beginning "a204..." for the containerization to be valid. If valid, then you can go to the next step.
3. Verify that the hash signature matches the owner of "Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road" which is indicated by this public key according to your previous evaluation:
Claimant Sharing Key: hqXdZnrTvicitWv4V/LH/9qA3nUMcl5PIbbdgclZ9cY=
A good signature kit can be found at: https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
Click on the verify tab.
Enter the sharing Key as the signature public key.
Enter the Hash signature from above "JO+... Ag==" in the signature line.
Once again, delete any spaces added by your browser.
Enter the "Hash of Containerization" hash as the message. In this case that is the above hash beginning "a204" ending "...a7c"
Click Verify. Hopefully the statement verifies correctly!
4. If everything is valid and there are no conflicting claims found by an internet search, then you can honor the statement using the same signature signing process used in step 1:
Create the evaluation statement as:
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: (hash of honor statement above goes here)
Signature: (signature of the hash in the previous line above)
Public Key: (insert your public key here)
a. Hash the text starting with "Evaluation" and ending "...CQ==" using a hash tool such as the linked page above.
b. Sign the hash such as by using https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
You should still have your public and private key from the previous task. If you don't have that key, generate a new one with the "random" button and save both the private and public keys it for future use.
Paste your private key to the private key field.
In the message field, put the line generated from hashing your evaluation statement, which may be this:
8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Then click sign.
Paste the resulting signature in place of "(signature of the hash in the previous line above)" in your evaluation statement.
c. Paste your public key in place of "(insert your public key here)" in your evaluation statement.
5. Post your evaluation statement to this thread. Done! As always, don't be afraid to loosely interpret these instructions and do things according to your personal preferences.
1. Examine the page at
https://boards.4channel.org/vip/thread/99136#p99161 which has been cc'd to the zenoribbon.freeforums.net claimchain ledger.
It will have this text:
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization SHA-512: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature: JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
This is a claim that Zenoribbon is being placed in a container which can be transacted over the Public Settlement Network (PSN), which can only be honored if done by the rightful owner. So, Check to see if there are any other earlier tranfers of Zenoribbon using a basic internet search. If not, the transaction is potentially valid.
2. Verify that the "Hash of Containerization" matches the text beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Unlike the previous hashes in task 1, this hash is in Base64 encoding and so the TweetNaCl hash won't match. However, the more common version will work.
A good SHA-512 Base64 hash tool can be found here:
https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha512.html
In the input box, the hash from above beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...b60"
Remove any spaces in the hash because copying and pasting from a browser sometimes adds spaces that ruin the hash.
The output should match the hash as claimed beginning "a204..." for the containerization to be valid. If valid, then you can go to the next step.
3. Verify that the hash signature matches the owner of "Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road" which is indicated by this public key according to your previous evaluation:
Claimant Sharing Key: hqXdZnrTvicitWv4V/LH/9qA3nUMcl5PIbbdgclZ9cY=
A good signature kit can be found at: https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
Click on the verify tab.
Enter the sharing Key as the signature public key.
Enter the Hash signature from above "JO+... Ag==" in the signature line.
Once again, delete any spaces added by your browser.
Enter the "Hash of Containerization" hash as the message. In this case that is the above hash beginning "a204" ending "...a7c"
Click Verify. Hopefully the statement verifies correctly!
4. If everything is valid and there are no conflicting claims found by an internet search, then you can honor the statement using the same signature signing process used in step 1:
Create the evaluation statement as:
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: (hash of honor statement above goes here)
Signature: (signature of the hash in the previous line above)
Public Key: (insert your public key here)
a. Hash the text starting with "Evaluation" and ending "...CQ==" using a hash tool such as the linked page above.
b. Sign the hash such as by using https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign
You should still have your public and private key from the previous task. If you don't have that key, generate a new one with the "random" button and save both the private and public keys it for future use.
Paste your private key to the private key field.
In the message field, put the line generated from hashing your evaluation statement, which may be this:
8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Then click sign.
Paste the resulting signature in place of "(signature of the hash in the previous line above)" in your evaluation statement.
c. Paste your public key in place of "(insert your public key here)" in your evaluation statement.
5. Post your evaluation statement to this thread. Done! As always, don't be afraid to loosely interpret these instructions and do things according to your personal preferences.
I have a good knowledge in this. Like to join
join
1DKFV5MLQfXxAe3A7dFF3bTDmuorwk2UXh
Hi, you are in as the last evaluator needed for the time being. I'll PM you if there are any tasks for you. $5 USD as BTC is relayed to your Bitcoin address. join
1DKFV5MLQfXxAe3A7dFF3bTDmuorwk2UXh
There is need of more peoples ?
We have enough evaluators for the time being. Thanks! Good, that verified nicely, though you swapped signature lines such that the last signature actually corresponds with the second to last hash. The reason why that doesn't need to be corrected is that a digital signature itself is considered bound to whatever statement is verified by it. It is the duty of the signor on the Public Settlement Network (PSN) to check all hash codes to make sure they match the text lest they accidentally sign away their soul. So the moral of the story is to sign a hash carefully on the Public Settlement Network!
Oh man, it was in the middle of the night in Germany, I'm sorry. I hope it did you some help anyway.
What was my mistake again?
Let me know what else I can do for you, please, i look forward to further cooperation!
There is need of more peoples ?
OP, You have a thing going on here. From what i understand, this is an idea of using a web of trust to verify transactions. Consensus to be arrived at by building and utilizing a web of trust. Its like an online version of a bunch of clerks maintaining the ledger in banks in old times.
I doubt its usage for settling transactions but the idea itself is worth exploring as it has potentially several applications in the times of Social media. I would follow this. I have a small but important request for you to kindly consider.
If its a "web of trust" we are looking at, please keep a condition that people who have used alt-accounts for spamming and have negative trust feedback should not be accepted. The condition for "minimum 8 posts" is pretty weak, especially considering that you have an ages old account at the forum. If this isn't a bought account, you must be aware of the mass manipulation and scamming this forum has gone through. If you are looking to start a web of trust, wouldn't it be prudent to have some sort of best practices??
Good Luck!
The Web of Trust is expected to be established on Zeronet (ZNET), which is basically a layer over Tor where everyone is encouraged to run anonymous services which could include a Zenoribbon claimchain ledger. Unlike .onion service, a Zeronet Service Cog is intended to be extremely easy to set up for any participant. Each participant is expected to build their own web of trust by ranking who they trust most to least. The overlap of agreement between that person and each other person they interact with on the network is where consensus begins to build. From that point, users are expected to assign a level of honor to the various groups within their network of most trusted people. The group with the highest honor is then delegated as the consensus leader for that participant. The protocols of that group will be accepted as the protocols used. So for Zenoribbon, the minimum time delay between transactions would be an example of the requirements by that group to get a transaction validated.I doubt its usage for settling transactions but the idea itself is worth exploring as it has potentially several applications in the times of Social media. I would follow this. I have a small but important request for you to kindly consider.
If its a "web of trust" we are looking at, please keep a condition that people who have used alt-accounts for spamming and have negative trust feedback should not be accepted. The condition for "minimum 8 posts" is pretty weak, especially considering that you have an ages old account at the forum. If this isn't a bought account, you must be aware of the mass manipulation and scamming this forum has gone through. If you are looking to start a web of trust, wouldn't it be prudent to have some sort of best practices??
Good Luck!
The Web of Trust is merely a formality. Crypto enthusiasts know that Bitcoin Core is the group setting the Bitcoin protocol. However, who knows their public key? Everyone should have a copy of their public key. We don't have that because we generally don't have a formalized and automated Web of Trust application. Such an application would enable much better security for everyone.
I greet you most sincerely.
Task 2 of 4:
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=
~
Task 2 of 4:
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=
~
Good, that verified nicely, though you swapped signature lines such that the last signature actually corresponds with the second to last hash. The reason why that doesn't need to be corrected is that a digital signature itself is considered bound to whatever statement is verified by it. It is the duty of the signor on the Public Settlement Network (PSN) to check all hash codes to make sure they match the text lest they accidentally sign away their soul. So the moral of the story is to sign a hash carefully on the Public Settlement Network!
OP, You have a thing going on here. From what i understand, this is an idea of using a web of trust to verify transactions. Consensus to be arrived at by building and utilizing a web of trust. Its like an online version of a bunch of clerks maintaining the ledger in banks in old times.
I doubt its usage for settling transactions but the idea itself is worth exploring as it has potentially several applications in the times of Social media. I would follow this. I have a small but important request for you to kindly consider.
If its a "web of trust" we are looking at, please keep a condition that people who have used alt-accounts for spamming and have negative trust feedback should not be accepted. The condition for "minimum 8 posts" is pretty weak, especially considering that you have an ages old account at the forum. If this isn't a bought account, you must be aware of the mass manipulation and scamming this forum has gone through. If you are looking to start a web of trust, wouldn't it be prudent to have some sort of best practices??
Good Luck!
I doubt its usage for settling transactions but the idea itself is worth exploring as it has potentially several applications in the times of Social media. I would follow this. I have a small but important request for you to kindly consider.
If its a "web of trust" we are looking at, please keep a condition that people who have used alt-accounts for spamming and have negative trust feedback should not be accepted. The condition for "minimum 8 posts" is pretty weak, especially considering that you have an ages old account at the forum. If this isn't a bought account, you must be aware of the mass manipulation and scamming this forum has gone through. If you are looking to start a web of trust, wouldn't it be prudent to have some sort of best practices??
Good Luck!
I am a Junior dev. Count me in if you still need people
3FBZQp5vVQtTtTdpVGCPBUKN2EtqyYkwi9
In case I have not told you already, you're in as backup #1. There was another backup number one, but they were needed already. The BTC signup pay has been sent.3FBZQp5vVQtTtTdpVGCPBUKN2EtqyYkwi9
If you need me just send me a pm and for some reason you aren't able to send me one, just quote me here I'll receive a notification via Telegram.
I greet you most sincerely.
Task 2 of 4:
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization SHA-512: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature: JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
Evaluation Statement:
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: jlSdGzZ2AJeTFMg6eIvxIVIjv2rIsdgf4Zhi4UEVGSjF4KIOGgHfzcV+dyNnKCVkjNIqjJrd23KD2A/5Ues+Rg==
Signature: ReECezZZVGIxvIZeCMNFWY42czX/RLeOANNrGNKENcPKEWsTtuljYmbVryh38AaW5/QWzFK72LU9YHuXyDMfAw==
And with SHA512 Hash of Evaluation Statement:
Hash of Evaluation Statement: 8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Signature: o8aYBduwhDPPss3IdVLeGqPreJQq7Vyoxwx+8zgMxi9WtgBMEkjp8oZmTAWYcBhjWc7tLYNu9djZlQSfHvEbBw==
Task 2 of 4:
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization SHA-512: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature: JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
Evaluation Statement:
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement: jlSdGzZ2AJeTFMg6eIvxIVIjv2rIsdgf4Zhi4UEVGSjF4KIOGgHfzcV+dyNnKCVkjNIqjJrd23KD2A/5Ues+Rg==
Signature: ReECezZZVGIxvIZeCMNFWY42czX/RLeOANNrGNKENcPKEWsTtuljYmbVryh38AaW5/QWzFK72LU9YHuXyDMfAw==
And with SHA512 Hash of Evaluation Statement:
Hash of Evaluation Statement: 8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46
Signature: o8aYBduwhDPPss3IdVLeGqPreJQq7Vyoxwx+8zgMxi9WtgBMEkjp8oZmTAWYcBhjWc7tLYNu9djZlQSfHvEbBw==
Task 2 Note:
A good SHA-512 Base64 hash tool that is savable as offline as an extra security step is here:
https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha512.html
The first step would be to copy & paste the text beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...35c02b60". The TweetNaCl uses a rare encoding base for their hashes, so this is using Base64 as an easier way to achieve consensus.
Edit: I don't have time to add details at the moment so feel free to take two days for this task as I'll post details in about 14 hours and will will send PMs to the evaluators with a link to the details.
The evaluation statement will be something like:
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement:
(Hash of above starting with "evaluation:" and ending with "CQ==")
Signed:
(digital signature of the hash using your evaluator keys)
A good SHA-512 Base64 hash tool that is savable as offline as an extra security step is here:
https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha512.html
The first step would be to copy & paste the text beginning "CONTAINERIZATION" and ending "...35c02b60". The TweetNaCl uses a rare encoding base for their hashes, so this is using Base64 as an easier way to achieve consensus.
Edit: I don't have time to add details at the moment so feel free to take two days for this task as I'll post details in about 14 hours and will will send PMs to the evaluators with a link to the details.
The evaluation statement will be something like:
Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
Hash of Evaluation Statement:
(Hash of above starting with "evaluation:" and ending with "CQ==")
Signed:
(digital signature of the hash using your evaluator keys)
Task 2 of 4
Zenoribbon has now been "containerized" so it can be traded on the Public Settlement Network (PSN):
https://boards.4channel.org/vip/thread/99136#p99161
and CC'd to zenoribbon.freeforums.net Claimchain ledger.
The verification task is to ensure that the container identifier matches to the first person to claim it, that the hash accurately matches with the containerization text, and that the same public key that signed the homestead claim is the same public key to sign the containerization transaction. A simple internet search and check of the zenoribbon.freeforums.net transaction ledger will help in deciding if that is the next valid transaction after the homestead claim.
So, a statement of your choosing is then signed to verify that all the above is accurate and honored, or of not honored if the transaction is done with problems. I'll provide detailed instructions in a next post, but it will take a bit of time so this is hopefully enough to get started.
Zenoribbon has now been "containerized" so it can be traded on the Public Settlement Network (PSN):
https://boards.4channel.org/vip/thread/99136#p99161
and CC'd to zenoribbon.freeforums.net Claimchain ledger.
The verification task is to ensure that the container identifier matches to the first person to claim it, that the hash accurately matches with the containerization text, and that the same public key that signed the homestead claim is the same public key to sign the containerization transaction. A simple internet search and check of the zenoribbon.freeforums.net transaction ledger will help in deciding if that is the next valid transaction after the homestead claim.
So, a statement of your choosing is then signed to verify that all the above is accurate and honored, or of not honored if the transaction is done with problems. I'll provide detailed instructions in a next post, but it will take a bit of time so this is hopefully enough to get started.
~
I hope it works this time.
Link to paste bin: https://pastebin.com/MaUicFhs
PS: I used pastebin due to some inconsistency with the hash of the message.
Screenshot:
"KlRVcq ia1vSUQ=="
I didn't notice the space and wouldn't expect such an odd bug in the forum or browser I'm using. But I do now feel good about the TweetNaCl encryption page. They use a rare encoding method for their hashes, which I might not be widely accepted. But of course their public keys are also encoded by the same method. Its something we'll have to consider, but its a good app and good code.
Payment will be sent to you within a day of this message. Task two will be posted shortly.
Glad to hear. I noticed it. I don't know why - I pasted it multiple times and it still had the same issue so I opted for pastebin. waiting for the next task!
Jump to: