Topic: Even more Confusion now, Bitcoin Core has been created (Read 273 times)

I can not find this on the market anywhere which raises the question whether this was real or just trolling? if anyone has the link to the exchange that has this I would appreciate it.

in any case there is no confusion if some day someone created bitcoin core, in fact I believe it can remove a lot of confusion from people's mind as it once and for all proves that when you add a trailing word to bitcoin you create a useless altcoin so if someone by any chance didn't know this they will figure it out!

The original algorith will still be for the original bitcoin. There might be some confusions because some are using the name bitcoin in their projects so it can look like the real thing, but the value is not the same and the algorithm is different as well, though they are copying the traits of bitcoin

I say it's an obvious scam because it is clearly an attempt to confuse people. Calling it bitcoin Core when we all know that bitcoin Core is the main reference wallet is disingenuous. I don't do business with people who lie to me or try bullshitting me with their language.
And why on Earth do we need another alt-coin? Why, to address the problem of not having enough alts? Please. 

Though these names are quite confusing like bitcoin core, bitcoin cash but one need not to confuse with this all, though this is difficult but still because these all names holds good for bitcoin only. Whatever the name is I just wants to advice more and more people to invest into bitcoin because this is the best time when they can invest into bitcoin because the valuation is not that much hikes and moreover this is the best time to hold the bitcoins for future use.

This is the last chance to make money by forking bitcoin blockchain.
The most big failure i am expect

No, just some people trolling Roger Ver for fun.


Bitcoin Core was never claiming to be the "true Bitcoin", and their website says that "Bitcoin is still king". Haha.

It's also a fork of the original chain of Bitcoin Cash called Bitcoin Clashic, so what it really is is the real Bitcoin Cash.

I don't know why Ver came up with that idea as Bitcoin core is Bitcoins first party wallet, not a standalone cryptocurrency

Roger Ver who runs this weird company, almost feels like a scamcoin, gets angry easily over normal questions, like people calling BCH, just Bitcoin Cash. I think no one should rely on a sociopath like that.

It is to much to ask to follow an angry guy who wants people to listen to his idea, but even forcefully comply with his interpretation, without any criticism back. Almost communism and dictatorships like.

Think the million dollars and years of Elitism, and greed has made him pathological and greedy.

They should fight it by releasing a real Bcash coin thats forked from BTC lol. When some person says BCH is Bcash, they can point them to the real Bcash website.

As an opportunist, I think we are continuing to observe and wait for the real results to emerge. But in my opinion, Bitcoin still occupies a comparatively large advantage. The Bitcoin core is launched and it is considered by people to be borrowing bits. The name of the currency is advertised.

Bitcoin already forked several times too much. But it is no wonder because bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency created.
It will need to be developed. Forking is one of the way to bring new features and capacity of bitcoin.
But sometimes forking too often make peoples confused and start to doubt if the coin scam or not.

There will be more of such coins in the near future, lots of people and developers hoping to emulate the Bitcoin sucess, but that might never come to be, all there is to do is to properly understand where you put your money, thts all,if you know what's good and what's not, then you are safe,

this is a bitcoin centristic worldview, why isnt bitcoin an altcoin?

its just a matter of time till bitcoin will become insignificant factor in cryptoindustry
https://www.cryptocurrencyguide.org/ripple-ceo-bitcoins-influence-over-cryptocurrency-prices-could-end-soon/

Only bitcoin is the real bitcoin, the rest are considered altcoins, even though some came from the forks, the original algorith will still be for the original bitcoin. There might be some confusions because some are using the name bitcoin in their projects so it can look like the real thing, but the value is not the same and the algorithm is different as well, though they are copying the traits of bitcoin, the transactions might be faster, but the acceptance of people will not be the same, since bitcoin is decentralized on not being managed by anyone, only the real bitcoin will be acknowledge, research and understanding of what bitcoin is, will help us how to determine whether someone is just using the good name of bitcoin for their own personal gains.

bitcoin created by satoshi is a legitimate bitcoin. the original bitcoin. and not the other bitcoin.

I think, bitcoin cash, bitcoin core, and others will compete to become crypto king after bitcoin made by satoshi die.

when the bitcoin created by satoshi is alive, no one can overtake it.

It makes sense, the coin that gives the casual customer the best solution will be the coin to look after in the future and it does not matter whether it is some coin or the other but the coin with the best scaling solution will win in the end irrespective of the name, i am not sure about the purpose of this fork nor i am interested to know about it as the market is filled with all the fork coins.

more social kardashian drama to distract the sheep

meanwhile the core devs want to implement more features that can risk peoples funds, especially if people dont read the sighash/op codes of transactions to see if funds can be manipulated by others.

but it seems no one will talk about the risks of the new features but instead divert attention away from core implementing new features without a level playing field of consensus. by talking about these social drama crap that has nothing to do with code/risk

this new drama. is to try to this time give another fork the name bitcoin core.. so that people cannot call the network that the REAL core team control and own that same title.

thus pushing for people to call the network which the REAL CORE TEAM control just bitcoin. because bitcoin core is taken by a crapfork. even though core still should not own bitcoin brand..

because
CORE do control the (btc) network, and thats why the network should be called bitcoin core.(i mean btc should be bitcoin core.. not this new distraction $BTCC)
after all.. think of it this way, imagine if armoury/ btcd (other clients on the btc network) tried to suggest that they were the reference/centre of the network like core does. core would not be happy and REKT them, fork them.

other implementations are not on the same level as core so its not a level network to give it the network a broad open name like the old 2009-2017 network had

the bilateral split of august 2017 seen to it that core gained control of one copy of 2009-2017 network and another team gain (BLOQ) gained control of another copy of the 2009-2017 network. and BOTH went different directions.

it was not a unilateral split. it was a bilateral split. thus both have no claim over the brand . an no one should lay claim to the brand. so to easily identify which network is which. make it clear
bitcoin core
bitcoin cash

just like the fiat world. no country can lay claim to the "dollar" . so make it clear
U.S dollar
canadian dollar.

in common communication people can abbreviate it to just 'dollar','bitcoin' if the content of the conversations is obvious which currency/community/network they are inside. but nethier should say that they are THE dollar / THE bitcoin. because no one should own "bitcoin" brand.

if you wish to deny that core are making the claiims that core own the network. take a hard look at bitcoin.org and cores github.
https://bitcoin.org/en/development
everything points to saying that bitcoin is a core project.. and that anyone can take part by joining cores project
 
and then saying that other clients are other projects

bitcoin.org and the github are centred around core as THE project

thus the network should be defined as bitcoin core until these things happen:
core declare they will never again bilateral split or unilateral split off any opponents to cores bips.. meaning if the community do not majority agree with core.. then tough luck core, compromise and unite the communty next time.
core declare they use proper community consensus as it was intented
core declare to allow other clients to release new features and require consensus without REKT, fork campaigns.
and
when needed core and other clients work together to take a bit of feature X feature Y from the community where by the whole community CAN come to a consensus upgrade agrement where all clients, including core would include code for. to upgrade the network without rekt,fork,bypassing consensus.

but until core declare this, and denounce their monarchy. then the (BTC) network by cores own admission should be known as bitcoin core. but not let core own the brand bitcoin. no one should own the brand

anyway.. whil we all see the sheep play out thir social drama  finer pointy crap. whats happening at code/protocol level of the network the real core devs control will not get discussed and core will slide in new features which could put peoples funds at risk if they dont check out raw tx data before broadcasting.

Not really because the real story is already written, it's not like if we were in the first weeks of the Bitcoin existence. If for example in the future the majority prefers Bitcoin 123, then this same majority will switch to Bitcoin 123, an altcoin forked from Bitcoin.

If I create a better Iphone than Apple and the majority prefer my phone, it doesn't mean I am the real Apple company

All of these dumb variants is simply confusing the situation, it will not help the recovery of the price which has taken a beating these past few weeks. Hopefully everyone will see sense and simply ignore it

it doesnt matter weather something is unknown to you or not "correct" people will define the "truth" according to their interest, and if countless poor people that hold bitcoin xyz will have an interest they will define you as the altcoin it doesnt matter what you say.