Pages:
Author

Topic: Everything you wanted to know about ES Volcano Bond and were afraid to ask! - page 5. (Read 1567 times)

jr. member
Activity: 50
Merit: 3
My guess is most of the majority of bond buyers will be in bitcoin
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1018
Hello Leo! You can still win.
@fillippone is one of the reasons I fell out of love with travelling.
You can be in your home country and be more informed than the citizens of another country with this kind of detailed research and information.
Quote from: fillippone
3. El Salvador as an Issuer in Traditional Finance

El Salvador Has a poor financial situation. The Country has a CCC+ rating, essentially their financial stability is rated as “junk”.
This condition precluded the country from accessing traditional financial markets, as many money managers cannot buy Junk Bonds, and those who can require high premiums to do so.
El Salvador has a few bonds outstanding:
The Bitcoin legal tender decision and the Bitcoin related bonds project if well managed will surely I no distance time raise the financial situation of El Salvador. They have taken the early spot on the queue, I am so much convinced that many giant countries will join pending the success of what I will  can El Salvador bitcoin experiment. The world is watching.

Quote from: aysg76
Exactly if you want to invest in something you should directly do the same instead of buying something related to it.They makes no sense to me as well because suppose you are having $2000 worth of bitcoin with you safely stored  in your hardware wallet the returns would be immense in short period of time if you have patience to hold over all those years...
Our presence and knowledge in this forum should not make us think that bitcoin is an easy investment. Starting from buying, securing to investment aspects of bitcoin is quite complicated. There are so many laymen in the society who wish to invest in bitcoin, but due to the lack of knowledge of it, they are restrained. It is not advisable to invest in what you do not understand.
This is the reason they can be comfortable to buy something related to it.

Take for instance;
I want to invest in Bitcoin but I am unsure how to go about it. Knowing too well the research prowess of @fillippone, I saw him open a bitcoin related bond or investment. I will simply trust him because of his deep knowledge in the project.
That is how the citizens trusts her government. There's a level of comfort when the government decisions fail than when an individual decision fails.
My major worry is that with the level of interference by the US, if president Nayib Bukele exists, will there be continuity of the bitcoin projects? Time will tell!
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 15144
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
El Salvador is adapting their legal system to ease the issue, circulation, and management of the Volcano Bond, according to Reuters:

El Salvador plans raft of legislation to cover bitcoin bond issue

Quote
SAN SALVADOR, Jan 4 (Reuters) - El Salvador's government will send to Congress about twenty bills covering financial markets and investment in securities to provide a legal foundation for issuing bitcoin bonds, Finance Minister Alejandro Zelaya said on Tuesday.

Zelaya said the government was drawing up the legislation to create a framework to cover corresponding market regulation and issuance of securities in crypto assets after the Central American country said in November it would issue bitcoin bonds.

"(This is) to provide a legal structure and legal certainty to everyone who buys the bitcoin bond," Zelaya said in an interview on local television, without saying exactly when the legislation would be submitted to lawmakers.

Of course, they are dotting the i's and crossing the t's to make sure they don't shoot on their own foot with this issue, which will be closely monitored from abroad, potentially setting up a new paradigm for other sovereigns.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124

I think the answer is quite elusive.
I really cannot see anyone wrapping a digital bond in a traditional fund. Why anyone would do that?

Of course, this doesn't mean it's a bubble. But as you say, Bitcoin doesn't need that to succeed.
Actually the case is bitcoin don't need them they need profits.They have seen so much profits simply by investing the people's funds into bitcoin and the example is they buying each dip and publicly giving statement about the same like they holds around 1120 bitcoins or more at this time so they planning something big to generate more profits for the state or say for themselves at rational viewpoint.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 15144
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

So you are thinking that this will be another bubble like dot com that we have seen earlier in this century. It is true many countries have legal issues with BTC so people want to invest in products related to BTC. But as long as it has a working product behind it and it contains value there should not be a problem. Still, It is not the same as buying BTC and won't serve the purpose of BTC.

What I am saying is that I struggle to see a rationale, besides cheering for El Salvador, for buying this bond.

From an economic standpoint of view, it makes no sense.

I even tried to express my concerns to Samson Mow:



I think the answer is quite elusive.
I really cannot see anyone wrapping a digital bond in a traditional fund. Why anyone would do that?

Of course, this doesn't mean it's a bubble. But as you say, Bitcoin doesn't need that to succeed.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6205
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
So you are thinking that this will be another bubble like dot com that we have seen earlier in this century. It is true many countries have legal issues with BTC so people want to invest in products related to BTC. But as long as it has a working product behind it and it contains value there should not be a problem. Still, It is not the same as buying BTC and won't serve the purpose of BTC.

No. I didn't say anything about any bubble. All I said was that buying the real deal is the way to go, not derivative things that you don't know what they are and may get you fooled because of too many hidden details.
As simple as that.

It's not nice to put as other's saying things they didn't. And this bitcoin vs .com crap is so old one could have been reading more since it was "launched".
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 537
4. How this Bond compares to traditional investment.
[~snip~]
Cutting long story short: this bond is a financial disaster.

This was the part I was looking for.
I understand that certain entities prefer to invest into bitcoin related products instead of bitcoin itself because it may be easier from legal, accountancy and maybe also from tech/safety point of view.

Still, for us, individuals who already got to this forum, and can read the few words about buying bitcoin and keeping it safe, buying bitcoin related products instead of actual bitcoin makes no sense.
And yes, there's always the risk that some of such bitcoin related products, like these volcano bonds, are a "financial disaster". And in most cases those details are pretty well hidden.

So you are thinking that this will be another bubble like dot com that we have seen earlier in this century. It is true many countries have legal issues with BTC so people want to invest in products related to BTC. But as long as it has a working product behind it and it contains value there should not be a problem. Still, It is not the same as buying BTC and won't serve the purpose of BTC.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 15144
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
An article on the Volcano Bond appeared on Yahoo news today:

Yahoo Finance
Why Bitcoin bulls still think $100K is in the cards despite ugly end to 2021

Avoiding commenting the clickbait title, we have a few interesting lines on the bond, something we know, something we didn't.
Something we knew:

Quote
The 10-year bond which reaches maturity in 2032, carries a coupon of 6.5%. While Mow admitted this novel sovereign security is far more popular with Bitcoin investors than the general investing public, he suggested institutions “starving for yield” will snap up the bonds.

Something we didn't know:

Quote
While the bond isn’t available yet, Mow said Blockstream is working with a number of brokers.

I guess this is exactly the true challenge of this bond.
While having the first issuances of this bond being fully covered by the "bitcoin investors" (whatever this means) will be pretty trivial, the true challenge will be about opening the market toward true "institutional investors", the ones that are relly capable of moving new inflows into the market.



legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 15144
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Amazing topic fillippone!
You know what currency will be used as soon as you see that Bitfinex exchange and Liquid network is involved in this, saying that USD, USDT and BTC will be used for funding.
Maybe we can expect to see sudden and huge inflow of USDT coming soon for funding, after being freshly printed by Bitfinex printing machine  Cheesy

My Guess is that the vast majority of bond-buyers will be in BTC.
I think they won't have any problems having a Bid to Cover Ratio (total demand of the bond over the total issued amount) around 2 or 3.

There is just too much support from whales and the overall community.

The true challenge will be the onboarding of the more traditional finance, who will have huge difficulties onboarding Bitfinex, not exactly the most traditional institution friendly exchange.
member
Activity: 368
Merit: 24
Awesome thread !!!

How do we get involved in this and how we can buy ?

Also how citizenship by investment works?

is there roadmap for completion of the actual city?

Thank you!!!
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 7049
SATOCHIP.io
Amazing topic fillippone!
You know what currency will be used as soon as you see that Bitfinex exchange and Liquid network is involved in this, saying that USD, USDT and BTC will be used for funding.
Maybe we can expect to see sudden and huge inflow of USDT coming soon for funding, after being freshly printed by Bitfinex printing machine  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 2125
I have a strong feeling that this project will fail because the costs will prove to be higher than anticipated, there will be lots of small problems that would together slow things down significantly, and there will also be political factors, both from inside and outside of the country. Not the first "dream city", not the last.

Why not take an existing city and make it a special economic zone, why should it be a brand new city? Just because of the volcano mining hype?
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 6108
Jambler.io
Thank you for letting me know about that thread.
I think we can take this one to discuss the more technical aspects of the bond, and leave the other part of the discussion on that thread.

Of course, and I also think those two will diverge a lot although they are supposed to be correlated. My opinion is clear, that city will not be built with that little amount of money and it will not serve as a cash cow on its own, it's going to lose money for decades.

The bonds, well these are way trickier.

Of course, no matter how they sugarcoated the plan behind it's simple and obvious, you use investors money to grab more bitcoins and at the same time, you pump the price for your own assets (both Salvador and Blockstream and other involved) and then simply wait for 10 years if Bitcoin does an x10 everyone is happy if not, that's all folks. I'm not sure about the investors looking for these, yeah, some still can't get access to physical bitcoins, some don't want physical bitcoins, but these bonds are at this point the most roundabout way to get something that is bitcoin related than everything else, and we're looking at 10 years, much of the legal framework can change in a year, why would you run head-on into this, no idea. But that's the part of getting the money, who knows, maybe they will get it all in one hour, and then, we wait!

Everyone that will put his money into these will look more at the bitcoin price than what's really happening in Salvador, you're not betting on the Salvador economy with it you're betting on Bitcoin, even if Salvador defaults if BTC rises to xxxx you're in the green.



legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 6706
Proudly Cycling Merits for Foxpup
The level of corruption and bureaucracy is multiplied by 10,if we are talking about underdeveloped Latin American countries like El Salvador.
Yeah, and no doubt that's why their credit rating is so deep in the crapper that their bonds are considered junk.  Still, if nothing else I applaud El Salvador for doing something so bold with bitcoin.  I'll stop the applause immediately if and when any evidence of corruption or broken promises starts to appear--and something tells me that said evidence will pop up eventually. 

The best solution for this "Bitcoin city" was to allow foreign investors to build the city and give them tax benefits.If there's no interest among foreign investors to build such "Bitcoin city" then such project shouldn't be realized,because it is pointless from an economical point of view.
Maybe, but I'm wondering what those foreign investors would turn the city into.  It might be worse than whatever it turns out to be with El Salvador running it, though that's yet to be seen.  And I am very curious to see what this "bitcoin city" looks like when it's fully up and running.  I guess if nothing else it'll be a neat social experiment, though the cynical side of me is betting that it won't work nearly as well as planned.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 667
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Indeed this thread is quite different from my previous thread, which was aimed at breaking the news of the first bitcoin city, this thread is rich with wider information on the El Salvador Bitcoin city. Am glad to see the details I have been searching for on this thread.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58492824

legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124
Seriously man appreciate your efforts for this detailed thread about this information which can enlighten all of us about this El Salvador new Bitcoin city as many members would not be able to collect so much information about it easily but you have made it simple through this huge informative wall of text which are more of facts by the way.I have bookmarked the same and will share it with other also.Keep up the work man.

This was the part I was looking for.
I understand that certain entities prefer to invest into bitcoin related products instead of bitcoin itself because it may be easier from legal, accountancy and maybe also from tech/safety point of view.

Still, for us, individuals who already got to this forum, and can read the few words about buying bitcoin and keeping it safe, buying bitcoin related products instead of actual bitcoin makes no sense.
And yes, there's always the risk that some of such bitcoin related products, like these volcano bonds, are a "financial disaster". And in most cases those details are pretty well hidden.
Exactly if you want to invest in something you should directly do the same instead of buying something related to it.They makes no sense to me as well because suppose you are having $2000 worth of bitcoin with you safely stored  in your hardware wallet the returns would be immense in short period of time if you have patience to hold over all those years but on the other side you buy these volcano bonds which are something familiar to the Gold bonds and they are centrally backup which can make them do the changes anytime like the Gold confiscation of 1933 so why people go this way instead of doing it directly?The road that leads straight is sometimes better than covering extra miles to reach the same destination.

Hey fillippone, we're on a forum, it's not about writing books here, lol.
He is old renowned author in publishing this books on the forum and the he publish his everything you were afraid to ask editions for members of forum and they are well liked Grin



What has come to my mind is what would happen in 4 years if Bukele loses the elections. We will have to see how this evolves and I guess it will be crucial that the price of Bitcoin is significantly higher then for him to renew in power.
I think the next elections in El Salvador are going to be conducted in 2024 and the only in the last few months the supreme court made an official order which makes him eligible running for re-elections and the decision was opposed by US government, right group and opposite parties.Considering his past elections :

Quote
Salvadoran politics have been dominated by the Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA) on the right and the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) on the left. But after his 2017 expulsion from by the FMLN, Nayib Bukele ran in 2019 as an outsider candidate, railing against both parties with an anti-corruption, populist message. He won with 53 percent of the vote, placing him more than 21 points ahead of his next closest rival.

But after the Bitcoin adoption there were many revolts against him as the small merchants and some groups were not happy with his decision at all so we can foresee he losing some support among them but still there are chances he winning the elections and they are regularly investing in Bitcoin and i think they have accumulated 1220 bitcoins at this time but will see what will happen in next elections as the prices are definitely going to be high in 2024.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 15144
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Cross quoting DdmrDdmr here:

-   It will be initially funded through tokenized bitcoin bonds for a facial value of 1.000M $, out of which 500M $ will be invested in bitcoin, and the other 500M $ will go towards infrastructure, energy and mining. Nevertheless, I've read that they estimate needing 300 000 BTCs (17 774 M$) to fully fund the public infrastructure, without there bein and explanation as to how to fill the gap between the initial funding and the x17 needed figure.

There are still many details to be portrayed, and I’m personally perplexed and wondering if this is an act of madness or bravery …

Thank you for letting me know about that thread.
I think we can take this one to discuss the more technical aspects of the bond, and leave the other part of the discussion on that thread.


First Bitcoin City]
Cross quoting DdmrDdmr here:

-   It will be initially funded through tokenized bitcoin bonds for a facial value of 1.000M $, out of which 500M $ will be invested in bitcoin, and the other 500M $ will go towards infrastructure, energy and mining. Nevertheless, I've read that they estimate needing 300 000 BTCs (17 774 M$) to fully fund the public infrastructure, without there bein and explanation as to how to fill the gap between the initial funding and the x17 needed figure.

There are still many details to be portrayed, and I’m personally perplexed and wondering if this is an act of madness or bravery …

Thank you for letting me know about that thread.
I think we can take this one to discuss the more technical aspects of the bond, and leave the other part of the discussion on that thread.


First Bitcoin City

Adding reference in OP.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6205
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
Since neuroticfish is also here, he might give his opinion if this is not like Ceausescu did, first digging his pit by borrowing more money than he could ever payback and then accusing others they are sabotaging his country.

Notifications rule! Cheesy
Actually, afaik Ceausescu has paid most of the debt by keeping the country hungry.
The socialists (to say it in an overly nice manner) that took the country over were doing what you said: got (and wasted) a lot of money from IMF and when IMF started imposing rules (for cutting costs) started crying about how evil IMF and the westerners are.

(And they still have a mildly anti-west propaganda, and still receive money, and still waste it.)

You guys still don't know that whatever politicians say it's 100% worthless?!
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 6108
Jambler.io
Cutting long story short: this bond is a financial disaster.

Just lol... Cheesy

So if it's a disaster for the average Joe and the only ones who would be interested in these would-be investors who can't touch bitcoin directly, I really wonder what investors would like to go through these so-called bonds issued by a foreign country rather than going to at this point already established alternatives available in the US and other countries.

-   It will be initially funded through tokenized bitcoin bonds for a facial value of 1.000M $, out of which 500M $ will be invested in bitcoin, and the other 500M $ will go towards infrastructure, energy and mining. Nevertheless, I've read that they estimate needing 300 000 BTCs (17 774 M$) to fully fund the public infrastructure, without there bein and explanation as to how to fill the gap between the initial funding and the x17 needed figure.

There are still many details to be portrayed, and I’m personally perplexed and wondering if this is an act of madness or bravery …

https://www-businessinsider-es.translate.goog/bitcoin-city-primera-ciudad-financiada-criptomoneda-968367?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui

I think it's a 25/75 chance of this project to actually take shape, but something like 99% that at least on the "masterminds" behind it will end up in jail after this  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 15144
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Coindesk released a "CoinDesk Inside" about the bond.
A lot of things were already known and written above, but few details emerge:


Behind the Scenes of El Salvador’s Bitcoin Bond With the Man Who Designed It

Amongst the new things we discovered it is Samson Mow though toward IMF hostility:
I am sure it will sell, just like GBTC or MSTR shares are sold which are objectively worse investment options than investing in Bitcoin directly.

In the article we read
Quote

As of our conversation in early December, Mow said there were already $300 million worth of “soft commitments” to the bond, which is still being refined ahead of its expected launch in 2022. “These are just Bitfinex whales, mostly,” said Mow.


So yes, it will sell.
Pages:
Jump to: