Topic: EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.6 - page 17. (Read 85805 times)

Yes, it's because of the OC, but the idea in message, the miner himself could restart, and not do it manually.
If the restart can be done by closing / execute the program, then this can be implemented inside the program itself.

this old readmy (previous version for zec) is fully work with this new ewbf miner? https://github.com/nemosminer/EWBF-Zec-Miner/blob/master/Help.txt

funakoshi vs ewbf:

tried on a 1080 ti, same OC settings, same pool, same coin (btcz)

funakoshi 59-61 sol/s
ewbf 69-71 sol/s

How many sol/s per one 1066 on zhash algo gives 0.5 version?

hello, guys. yeah, i have 2 1060 gpus on windows 10. in verison 0.3 it works fine, but 0.4, 0.5 im take crushing error who caused reboot my farm with cool message - thread exited with message the launch timed out and was terminated.
WAIDW?

I had this same problem and I decreased my OC until this stoppped happening. noticed my SOL/s stayed about the same also as i decreased.

this is my run.bat, it will restart on errors and such:

:restart
@echo  off
TIMEOUT 3
miner.exe --algo 144_5 --pers BgoldPoW --server us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --port 20595 --user xxxx --pass x --pec --fee x --log 2 --eexit 1
ping 127.0.0.1 > nul
goto :restart

Did you mean Funakoshi miner
 

can that be found on fukagithub?

fukanoshi call his miner as a fastest one, anyone checked already ewbf VS fukanoshi?

Thanks man!
My gtx1080 and 1070 rigs hashing 15% more with v0.5
your EWBF v5.0 miner is the best z_hush miner!
 

Great work EWBF, i have two 1050ti card running and they are on average 7% faster than version 0.4.

Sometimes miner crashes and tries to restart:

"
14:06:42 CUDA: Device: 6 Thread exited with message: "all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable"
14:06:43 WARNING: Looks like GPU7 are stopped. Restarting...
14:06:43 INFO: GPU7 are restarted.
14:06:43 CUDA: Device: 7 Thread exited with message: "all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable"
14:06:44 WARNING: Looks like GPU0 are stopped. Restarting...
14:06:44 INFO: GPU0 are restarted.
14:06:44 CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with message: "all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable"
14:06:44 WARNING: Looks like GPU1 are stopped. Restarting...
14:06:44 INFO: GPU1 are restarted.
14:06:44 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with message: "all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable"
14:06:44 WARNING: Looks like GPU2 are stopped. Restarting...
14:06:44 INFO: GPU2 are restarted.
14:06:44 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with message: "all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable"
14:06:44 WARNING: Looks like GPU3 are stopped. Restarting...
14:06:44 INFO: GPU3 are restarted.
14:06:44 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with message: "all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable"
14:06:45 WARNING: Looks like GPU4 are stopped. Restarting...
14:06:45 INFO: GPU4 are restarted.
14:06:45 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with message: "all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable"
"


I kill task  manually and start the task again, then everything works fine

It would be very good if he himself began anew independently

windows 10, 8 cards : 6/1070 +2/1080ti
drivers nvidia 01.06.2018  ver. 24.21.13.9811

Loving the higher hashrate

BUT STILL HAVING PROBLEMS WITH 12 CARD RIGS, it runs fine for about 5 minutes then crashes, GPU dump errors, help please, using SMOS

UPDATE: 1080ti - just received this card, getting 70-71 sol/s of 144,5 with slight overclock 97/282 and 95% PL.  FUN FUN FUN!

Is anyone else experiencing an increase in hashrate and a drop in shares while using v0.5 on BTG?

Which 1070 can handle mc +1000?

Comparison of my 5 x 1070 Ti rig with new published miniZ miner:



Cards are too hot (68 °C) and hash rate result only 190 sol/s,
with EWBF v0.5 hash rate = 233 sol/s at max. 64 °C (room temp. 28 °C).

Tested results after 24 hours:

ZHash 144_5 uses ~2.0GB VRAM

1070        ~41 to 46 Sol/s     //tuned PL=140W, OC=50/1000

1080 Ti    ~64 to 71 Sol/s     //tuned PL=220W, OC=100/1000      test rig with 4 x 1080 Ti + 6 x 1070 = min. 517 to max. 535 Sol/s; Avg. = 526 Sol/s
                                                                                                                                                              Efficiency Avg. = 0.31 Sol/Ws = 0.31 Sol/J

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1070 Ti    ~43 to 50 Sol/s     //tuned PL=120W, OC=200/1200      test rig with 5 x 1070 Ti                  = min. 227 to max. 238 Sol/s; Avg. = 233 Sol/s
                                                                                                                                                              Efficiency Avg. = 0.40 Sol/Ws = 0.40 Sol/J

Has anyone tried alternative miners? What kind of hash rates do they offer compared with EWBF.
I mean considering that most people use EWBF for modern equihash algos (and those who don't use will switch soon if they find out that it offers better hashrate), then there is not much benefit for miners from increased hashrate in new v0.5. The net hash will increase, the income won't change.
Is that how it works?

checked on two identical rigs, did not see any difference either in hashrate or in shares