EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 193. | Bitcointalksearch.org

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote from: Bulletdodger on March 06, 2017, 11:28:56 AM

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on March 06, 2017, 05:21:10 AM

TDP 60% (110w per card)

At that clock - this is impossible, are you measuring that at the wall?

Yes as i listed in my post, i have 60x EVGA FTW 1070 card, those have higher max wattage and come with 2x 8pin power input, so the tdp reading aren't the same as other 1070, i use nvidia-smi to give the watt used, so it doesn't count the psu efficiency or the system. For reference my whole system @ wall is 830w, counting psu efficiency the gpu's must be around 700w, the rest is the system (that correspond to what i read when i don't mine @ boot)

current nvidia-smi reading

Code:

Power Readings

   Power Draw : 113.22 W (current)
   Power Limit : 111.00 W (limit 60%)
   Default Power Limit : 185.00 W (100%)
   Enforced Power Limit : 111.00 W (current limit)
   Min Power Limit : 92.50 W (50%)
   Max Power Limit : 208.00 W (112%)

Code:

Zimmsquad

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 10

Quote from: Bulletdodger on March 06, 2017, 11:28:56 AM

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on March 06, 2017, 05:21:10 AM

TDP 60% (110w per card)

At that clock - this is impossible, are you measuring that at the wall?

His cards have a higher max tdp than 150W so yes it is possible

I am pretty sure his cards are EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, which have two 8 pin power cables

Bulletdodger

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 250

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on March 06, 2017, 05:21:10 AM

TDP 60% (110w per card)

At that clock - this is impossible, are you measuring that at the wall?

induktor

hero member

Activity: 710

Merit: 502

Quote from: painmaker on March 06, 2017, 07:07:30 AM

Quote from: induktor on March 05, 2017, 08:36:53 AM

Hello
I tested version 031b on Linux (Kopiemtu 2.0) drivers 367.44 and 378, with 1070 G1 and 1060 G1 cards at minimum TDP and there is no difference in hashrate, ~~except for 2 or 3 sols less than version 030b on the 1070 G1~~ actually after a while it goes up a bit, but not much, on the 1070.

I will stay with the 030b for now.
indkt

hi there,

i also tested v031b on linux (debian8 64b) with driver 375.20 on my gtx970 (TDP @115W) + gtx980 (TDP @150W) both running stock clocks and found both cards to perform about 2-3% worse than v030b which i also will stay with for now. both have been running stable so far.

cheers,
pain

EDIT:
@bughatti: i haven't seen any crashes and am running the same nv-driver as it seems (375.20). which cuda-version are you on? i'm running 8.0 and also installed/used 7.5 somewhen before without any bigger issues AFAIR.

Yep same here, specially on the 1060s 031b is slower

no crashes at all, stable for weeks with no reboot, cuda version is 8.0.26 (the pre release version), drivers seems to be the same 367.44 or 378 for the 1070 , however 1060 works better on the 378 driver, haven't tested the 375.20.

bughatti

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 06:43:45 PM

Quote from: EWBF_ on March 05, 2017, 05:35:01 PM

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 05:28:12 PM

Quote from: EWBF_ on March 05, 2017, 05:26:17 PM

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 04:36:33 PM

Im back to getting error code 46 and I am on linux now using drivers 375.20. Can anyone confirm running ewbf on linux with no crashes and what driver version they are on?

Also, how can I use --eexit to restart the miner on linux? Cant really find examples in google!

Are you using version 0.3.1b?

Yes, I was also using 3.0b.

With version 3.0b errors happen?
On my test system driver 375.26 and i'm not see problems.

I ran great for a while on 3.0b, when I changed to flypool is when I started to see crashes, then I switched back to suprnova, then I updated and now im on linux. I brought the clocks down to see if that is the issue and will watch it for a while. If it is the clocks I will slowly have to increase but I fear I will never get back to my 1760 SOL/s on all 6 cards.

So it seems it's a oc issue. I am holding steady at about 275 each card. I'll watch it for another 12 hours and crank it up. I might try to go back to 2b since I was steady on that one for weeks.

painmaker

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: induktor on March 05, 2017, 08:36:53 AM

Hello
I tested version 031b on Linux (Kopiemtu 2.0) drivers 367.44 and 378, with 1070 G1 and 1060 G1 cards at minimum TDP and there is no difference in hashrate, except for 2 or 3 sols less than version 030b on the 1070 G1.

I will stay with the 030b for now.
indkt

hi there,

i also tested v031b on linux (debian8 64b) with driver 375.20 on my gtx970 (TDP @115W) + gtx980 (TDP @150W) both running stock clocks and found both cards to perform about 2-3% worse than v030b which i also will stay with for now. both have been running stable so far.

cheers,
pain

EDIT:
@bughatti: i haven't seen any crashes and am running the same nv-driver as it seems (375.20). which cuda-version are you on? i'm running 8.0 and also installed/used 7.5 somewhen before without any bigger issues AFAIR.

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 04:36:33 PM

Im back to getting error code 46 and I am on linux now using drivers 375.20. Can anyone confirm running ewbf on linux with no crashes and what driver version they are on?

Also, how can I use --eexit to restart the miner on linux? Cant really find examples in google!

EWBF v0.3.1b
60x EVGA 1070 FTW
TDP 60% (110w per card)
OC +150/+595
Drivers 378.49
w10 enterprise
2654 Sols/s on average (~442Sols/s per card)
Average Reject ~0.32% (~6M shares, 19.2k rejects)
Pool Flypool
Running 24/7 since release non stop (5 days ago)

for your question bughatti, you can use the command "until" to monitor your miner and restart it if it exited other than gracefully

Code:

#!/bin/bash

until miner --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --user xxx --pass x --port 3333 --eexit 3 --log 2 --solver 0 --logfile ZCASH.ewbf.log --api 0.0.0.0:4444; do

echo "Miner crashed with exit code $?.  Restarting" >&2
sleep 10

done

Put this in a bash file (of course edit the miner startup line with your settings), it will start your miner, and monitor the process, if it exit with 0 mean it ended gracefully and it will exit the bash script, if the errorlevel is anything else than 0, it will restart the miner and continue to monitor it. The "sleep 10" is here to let time for the miner to restart properly.

Cheers

Kompik

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 250

Quote from: newmz on March 06, 2017, 12:19:25 AM

Using version 0.3.1b,

Gigabyte gtx1070 G1 Gaming,

MSI Afterburner core clock +85, mem clock +650,

power limit @ 100% (or higher - makes no difference) 460 sol/s

power limit @ 75% 425 sol/s

power limit @ 60% 390 sol/s

so I'm sticking with power limit 75% for now.

Anyone have a better suggestion for maximizing sol/s vs. power consumption?

There is no universal solution, it depends essentially on those three things: price, type of card and price of electricity. For each one the balance is completely different and you need to find it for yourself. But without watt metter at the wall you will never find balance.

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Quote from: sublimus on March 05, 2017, 04:47:27 PM

Quote from: xrays111 on March 05, 2017, 04:20:21 PM

Quote from: ioglnx on March 03, 2017, 07:13:02 AM

Why you need to insult? Because you said shit and someone made it right?
You should GTFO - we don't need more no brainers and trolls in here.

go away moron. Everyone understood what I said, but you're a moron, and you need to correct.
you in ignore stupid

You are an insulting troll and this because you are out of proper arguments to discuss.
I just pointed your mistake once and you go crazy and insult and defame. You are a shame for this forum and for your parents and just be happy dude that you are not within my sight.

newmz

sr. member

Activity: 372

Merit: 250

The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom

Using version 0.3.1b,

Gigabyte gtx1070 G1 Gaming,

MSI Afterburner core clock +85, mem clock +650,

power limit @ 100% (or higher - makes no difference) 460 sol/s

power limit @ 75% 425 sol/s

power limit @ 60% 390 sol/s

so I'm sticking with power limit 75% for now.

Anyone have a better suggestion for maximizing sol/s vs. power consumption?

bughatti

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: EWBF_ on March 05, 2017, 05:35:01 PM

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 05:28:12 PM

Quote from: EWBF_ on March 05, 2017, 05:26:17 PM

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 04:36:33 PM

Im back to getting error code 46 and I am on linux now using drivers 375.20. Can anyone confirm running ewbf on linux with no crashes and what driver version they are on?

Also, how can I use --eexit to restart the miner on linux? Cant really find examples in google!

Are you using version 0.3.1b?

Yes, I was also using 3.0b.

With version 3.0b errors happen?
On my test system driver 375.26 and i'm not see problems.

I ran great for a while on 3.0b, when I changed to flypool is when I started to see crashes, then I switched back to suprnova, then I updated and now im on linux. I brought the clocks down to see if that is the issue and will watch it for a while. If it is the clocks I will slowly have to increase but I fear I will never get back to my 1760 SOL/s on all 6 cards.

Kejvu

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Is this good with Asus GTX 1060? I don't know how to moddify bios. Can anyone help me?

djeZo

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 520

Quote from: ?? on ??

I got over 542 Sol/s with a TITAN X.

Quote from: vaulter on January 03, 2017, 12:31:57 PM

Quote from: NiceHashSupport on January 03, 2017, 11:29:44 AM

Quote from: vaulter on January 03, 2017, 11:22:32 AM

Quote from: NiceHashSupport on January 03, 2017, 10:21:08 AM

We are releasing EQM v1.0.4b.

666 Sol/s on Titan Pascal..

Stock or OC? Try with mem overclock (as high as possible to be stable) and then lower the TDP. See how far that brings you with minimal power usage.

OCd
with +110 Core and +700 Mem (Resulting 5200 - max stable)
tdp 60(150W) - 560 s/s
tdp 70 (175W) - 620 s/s
tdp 80(200w) - 650s/s
tdp 90 (225w) - 666s/s
tdp 100(250w) - 690 s/s

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 05:28:12 PM

Quote from: EWBF_ on March 05, 2017, 05:26:17 PM

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 04:36:33 PM

Im back to getting error code 46 and I am on linux now using drivers 375.20. Can anyone confirm running ewbf on linux with no crashes and what driver version they are on?

Also, how can I use --eexit to restart the miner on linux? Cant really find examples in google!

Are you using version 0.3.1b?

Yes, I was also using 3.0b.

With version 3.0b errors happen?
On my test system driver 375.26 and i'm not see problems.

bughatti

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: EWBF_ on March 05, 2017, 05:26:17 PM

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 04:36:33 PM

Im back to getting error code 46 and I am on linux now using drivers 375.20. Can anyone confirm running ewbf on linux with no crashes and what driver version they are on?

Also, how can I use --eexit to restart the miner on linux? Cant really find examples in google!

Are you using version 0.3.1b?

Yes, I was also using 3.0b.

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: bughatti on March 05, 2017, 04:36:33 PM

Im back to getting error code 46 and I am on linux now using drivers 375.20. Can anyone confirm running ewbf on linux with no crashes and what driver version they are on?

Also, how can I use --eexit to restart the miner on linux? Cant really find examples in google!

Are you using version 0.3.1b?

sublimus

full member

Activity: 240

Merit: 100

Quote from: xrays111 on March 05, 2017, 04:20:21 PM

Quote from: ioglnx on March 03, 2017, 07:13:02 AM

Why you need to insult? Because you said shit and someone made it right?
You should GTFO - we don't need more no brainers and trolls in here.

go away moron. Everyone understood what I said, but you're a moron, and you need to correct.
you in ignore stupid

This guy (ioglnx) gets in fight with every body and his cousin. Incredible.

bughatti

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Im back to getting error code 46 and I am on linux now using drivers 375.20. Can anyone confirm running ewbf on linux with no crashes and what driver version they are on?

Also, how can I use --eexit to restart the miner on linux? Cant really find examples in google!

Kompik

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 250

Getting code 30 errors. Anyone knows what it means?

xrays111

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: ioglnx on March 03, 2017, 07:13:02 AM

Why you need to insult? Because you said shit and someone made it right?
You should GTFO - we don't need more no brainers and trolls in here.

go away moron. Everyone understood what I said, but you're a moron, and you need to correct.
you in ignore stupid

Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 193. (Read 2164327 times)