Author

Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 197. (Read 2164327 times)

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
March 03, 2017, 11:35:55 AM
I have noticed over the last few days I keep getting this.  I saw it with the newer version and then went back to 3b.  The only other difference is I went from suprnova to flypool.  I will put it back on suprnova to see if it resolves but wandered if you know why this is happening

INFO: GPU1 are restarted.
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 0
ERROR: Looks like GPU2 are stopped. Restart attempt.
INFO: GPU2 are restarted.
ERROR: Looks like GPU3 are stopped. Restart attempt.
INFO: GPU3 are restarted.
ERROR: Looks like GPU4 are stopped. Restart attempt.
INFO: GPU4 are restarted.
ERROR: Looks like GPU5 are stopped. Restart attempt.
INFO: GPU5 are restarted.
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 46
Temp: GPU0: 28C GPU1: 29C GPU2: 30C GPU3: 28C GPU4: 24C GPU5: 30C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s GPU4: 0 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
Temp: GPU0: 28C GPU1: 28C GPU2: 30C GPU3: 28C GPU4: 24C GPU5: 30C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s GPU4: 0 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
sr. member
Activity: 481
Merit: 250
March 03, 2017, 08:59:28 AM
I notice some gtx 1080 required 2-8 pin power connector but they have the same TPD (180w) as those that only have 1-8 pin connector. Can I just plug in 1-8 pin power connector and leave the other one of it empty?
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
March 03, 2017, 07:13:02 AM
Quote
...and there is no 0.3.0c of EWBF_
Smart ass? GTFO

Why you need to insult? Because you said shit and someone made it right?
You should GTFO - we don't need more no brainers and trolls in here.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
March 03, 2017, 04:20:56 AM
Quote
...and there is no 0.3.0c of EWBF_
Smart ass? GTFO
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
March 03, 2017, 03:46:30 AM
0.3.0c - no fee, low temp
0.3.1c - +1% hashrate and +2% fee and +2C temp...
I'd rather stay on 0.3.0c with lower temperatures and without fee


The 0.3.0b has a fee too ...and there is no 0.3.0c of EWBF_
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
March 03, 2017, 03:38:29 AM
0.3.0c - no fee, low temp
0.3.1c - +1% hashrate and +2% fee and +2C temp...
I'd rather stay on 0.3.0c with lower temperatures and without fee
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 253
March 03, 2017, 01:37:53 AM
Had a slight increase, it decayed just like 0.3.0b. It started higher and settled around 1820 sols/sec for my 4x gtx 1070 rig. Better than the 1795 I was getting before. However, my GPU crash and can't restart a lot on the 0.3.1rc. I stopped running it but now both are crashing. Anyone have any ideas? I'd like to prevent the decay from 1850 sols and stop the crashing.

did you check your thermals?

or maybe your PSU isn't supplying enough power to your system.

try to double check first your system if its overheating and the voltages are stable.

Good luck!

Cheers!



Thanks mate, Ido have the max temp set to 70c, I have two fans on the cards. My PSU is 1700w so it should be good.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
March 03, 2017, 01:29:42 AM
Hi
I have a problem whin mining ZCL.
The program said one of my gpu isn't selected.
So ithis rig can only works with 5 GPUS.
This problem only happen when I try to mine ZCL.
When I mine Zec on the same rig the miner runs 6 GPUs properly, this is so weird.
If there're problem with the card, it suppose to have problem with both ZEC and ZCl. I don't really understand that.
Please help.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
March 02, 2017, 09:12:28 PM
Version 0.3.1b released, it is a slightly modified 0.3.1rc.

I just tried the 0.3.1b

it seems that its temp is higher that the previous versions...

GTX 1060:

0.3.1b @ 70c
0.3.0b @ 67c
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 160
March 02, 2017, 03:20:29 PM
Version 0.3.1b released, it is a slightly modified 0.3.1rc.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
March 02, 2017, 12:35:59 PM
Not working for me, keep getting "INFO: Received incorrect work!"

Am I doing something wrong?

+-------------------------------------------------+
|         EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.1rc         |
+-------------------------------------------------+
INFO: Server: us-east.stratum.slushpool.com:3333
INFO: Solver Auto.
INFO: Devices: User defined.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------
INFO: Received incorrect work!
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1050, 2048 MB
INFO: Received incorrect work!
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0
Temp: GPU0: 32C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
INFO: Received incorrect work!
INFO: Received incorrect work!
INFO: Received incorrect work!

BTC

EWBF's CUDA miner is for Z Cash mining program for nVidia Geforce GPUs. It is not for SHA256 Bitcoin mining.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
March 02, 2017, 11:51:49 AM
Not working for me, keep getting "INFO: Received incorrect work!"

Am I doing something wrong?

+-------------------------------------------------+
|         EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.1rc         |
+-------------------------------------------------+
INFO: Server: us-east.stratum.slushpool.com:3333
INFO: Solver Auto.
INFO: Devices: User defined.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------
INFO: Received incorrect work!
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1050, 2048 MB
INFO: Received incorrect work!
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0
Temp: GPU0: 32C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
INFO: Received incorrect work!
INFO: Received incorrect work!
INFO: Received incorrect work!

BTC
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
March 02, 2017, 09:35:47 AM
Had a slight increase, it decayed just like 0.3.0b. It started higher and settled around 1820 sols/sec for my 4x gtx 1070 rig. Better than the 1795 I was getting before. However, my GPU crash and can't restart a lot on the 0.3.1rc. I stopped running it but now both are crashing. Anyone have any ideas? I'd like to prevent the decay from 1850 sols and stop the crashing.

did you check your thermals?

or maybe your PSU isn't supplying enough power to your system.

try to double check first your system if its overheating and the voltages are stable.

Good luck!

Cheers!

sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 253
March 02, 2017, 06:40:42 AM
Had a slight increase, it decayed just like 0.3.0b. It started higher and settled around 1820 sols/sec for my 4x gtx 1070 rig. Better than the 1795 I was getting before. However, my GPU crash and can't restart a lot on the 0.3.1rc. I stopped running it but now both are crashing. Anyone have any ideas? I'd like to prevent the decay from 1850 sols and stop the crashing.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
March 02, 2017, 06:35:27 AM
Hi people.
I want to ask you for help.
I uploaded the release candidate of the new version https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9EPp8NdigFiZWdSdGtlSXZ0bzA
This version must bring to us speed improvements up to 4%.
Unfortunately not for all gpus, so i ask you make speed comparison of this version and version 0.3.0b with maxwell gpus gtx 950 960 970 980 etc, solver 0, power limit 100 and post you result.
Thank you!


Hi EWBF,

 Not Maxwell, and not 100TDP, but tought be good to share the results with Gig. 1070 G1 with slight OC:

0.3.0b:
Min - 433
Max - 450
AVG - 440

0.3.1rc:
Min - 437
Max - 457
AVG - 445

slight increase, keep it up! Smiley
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
March 01, 2017, 04:49:32 PM
Anyone has gtx 770 2gb? How much h/s can you get? I get 250 h/s on radeon hd 7950 3gb and I want to buy another card to play video games but also mine when not playing. I am choosing between these two but can't decide. Gtx 770 is 110€ but hd7950 is 80€. Gtx 770 is better for gaming though.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
March 01, 2017, 11:53:07 AM
Hi people.
I want to ask you for help.
I uploaded the release candidate of the new version https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9EPp8NdigFiZWdSdGtlSXZ0bzA
This version must bring to us speed improvements up to 4%.
Unfortunately not for all gpus, so i ask you make speed comparison of this version and version 0.3.0b with maxwell gpus gtx 950 960 970 980 etc, solver 0, power limit 100 and post you result.
Thank you!

GTX 950
0.3.0.b -- 152..159 sol/s : mem +650, core +150
0.3.1rc -- 148..158 sol/s : mem +650, core +150

after a while i will provide data for 1050 and 1060
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
March 01, 2017, 10:53:31 AM
Hello

Guys
for the past few days I have been having an issue
I get disconnected from the pool every once in a while, however the miner never attempt to reconnect until I hit enter!!

"ERROR: Lost connection with the server. Attempt reconnect..."
Any solution to this issue?
Also is there any plan to add a failover feature? multi-pool mining?

Also, for some reason the only pool that is working for me is the flypool! the others won't even run!


Thanks
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
March 01, 2017, 09:48:11 AM
With power limit about 75-80 there is not speedup for gtx 1070-1060 at all.

If a kernel can be run at full speed with power limit, then the code is not optimized Smiley
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 160
March 01, 2017, 09:47:24 AM
why does my 970 card get 270 sols/s and my gtx titan z only get 180 sols/s?

Version 0.3.0b give the same results?
Jump to: