Author

Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 269. (Read 2164327 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
December 18, 2016, 02:25:37 AM
Why not buy a new card instead of hassle with outdated hardware and make a problem of not supporting a device that even nvidia dropped long long time ago.


 Do keep in mind that a lot of us have EXISTING hardware on hand we'd like to mine more efficiently with, and don't see any reason to toss out working hardware just to spend $$$ on new stuff.
 There are also the SMALL miners that can't afford to casually just "buy a new card".


 Also keep in mind that AMD in particular had *3 generations* of "new" stuff that was no more than a bios refresh + slightly faster RAM with NO CHANGE TO THE ACTUAL GPU for most of the cards in the "new" line.
 (HD 7750/7770/78xx/79xx series, R5/7/9 2xx series, R5/7/9 3xx series - each generation only added 1 or 2 actual NEW gpu chips, usually at the top-end of the new line).

 Some of the R9 3xx series IS STILL IN PRODUCTION as AMD hasn't released their RX 4xx series replacements yet - which makes cards like the HD 7970 and 7950 arguably still current, and DEFINITELY the HD 7990.
 They also haven't released replacements for the bottom-end cards, so my HD 7750 is arguably still a CURRENT GPU (not one a miner should go out to buy, but since I have them on hand already no point in not USING them and achieving even MORE profit past the ROI they managed years ago).


 As far as the GPU goes, my HD 7870 is in actual FACT only one generation behind current, even if it's OFFICIALLY 4 generations old and 3-4 years out of production - and my R9 290s blow away ANY RX SERIES CARD that has been released to date on hashrate on pretty much ANY coin despite having been "dropped years ago".

If you were a real miner you should be doing research before you make a purchase and not just pick something out of the trash regardless of how little money you have and expect it to work like a top tier piece of hardware. The same can be said about people who are buying four year old AMD hardware and expecting it to hash as fast and be as efficient as brand new AMD hardware because someone recommended them buying a $80 7970 off of eBay. Sadly Ethereum has given people a false sense of profitability concerning older hardware due to the unique way it hashes. As we get closer and closer to electricity cost efficiency is going to matter a lot more and there are going to be a lot of disgruntled miners turning off their rigs.

This has already happened before at the end of '14, beginning of '15 and if you've did your research you would have also figured that out.

That aside, this is a Nvidia thread, it doesn't matter what AMD is doing on the other side of the spectrum. Nvidia hardware has had new architecture with every new GPU generation (putting aside super low end cards). The only cross generation weirdness was the 750ti which was Maxwell regardless of branding. Coming in here and talking about AMD cards and what's happening with AMD doesn't apply to Nvidia.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
December 18, 2016, 02:00:33 AM

THANKS so much for this. really quick, it is appreciated!
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
December 18, 2016, 01:48:55 AM
Why not buy a new card instead of hassle with outdated hardware and make a problem of not supporting a device that even nvidia dropped long long time ago.


 Do keep in mind that a lot of us have EXISTING hardware on hand we'd like to mine more efficiently with, and don't see any reason to toss out working hardware just to spend $$$ on new stuff.
 There are also the SMALL miners that can't afford to casually just "buy a new card".


 Also keep in mind that AMD in particular had *3 generations* of "new" stuff that was no more than a bios refresh + slightly faster RAM with NO CHANGE TO THE ACTUAL GPU for most of the cards in the "new" line.
 (HD 7750/7770/78xx/79xx series, R5/7/9 2xx series, R5/7/9 3xx series - each generation only added 1 or 2 actual NEW gpu chips, usually at the top-end of the new line).

 Some of the R9 3xx series IS STILL IN PRODUCTION as AMD hasn't released their RX 4xx series replacements yet - which makes cards like the HD 7970 and 7950 arguably still current, and DEFINITELY the HD 7990.
 They also haven't released replacements for the bottom-end cards, so my HD 7750 is arguably still a CURRENT GPU (not one a miner should go out to buy, but since I have them on hand already no point in not USING them and achieving even MORE profit past the ROI they managed years ago).


 As far as the GPU goes, my HD 7870 is in actual FACT only one generation behind current, even if it's OFFICIALLY 4 generations old and 3-4 years out of production - and my R9 290s blow away ANY RX SERIES CARD that has been released to date on hashrate on pretty much ANY coin despite having been "dropped years ago".



legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
December 18, 2016, 01:20:29 AM
Looks like best results come from running 4 instances. Definitely something needs to be toned up as far as GPU utilization. There is basically 15% overhead the miner isn't taking advantage of for some reason. You can reach EQM speeds by running this many instances. Even just two instances is a huge boost (10%) compared to running one.
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
December 17, 2016, 10:35:42 PM
Why not buy a new card instead of hassle with outdated hardware and make a problem of not supporting a device that even nvidia dropped long long time ago.

Because Nvidia keeps putting them out Fermi based cards in the OEM market, so people are bound to have them.
full member
Activity: 219
Merit: 100
December 17, 2016, 07:25:27 PM
280 sols with gtx 980 ti. nicehash is making 325............ but not so bad  .......... less power used
newbie
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
December 17, 2016, 07:19:45 PM
There is a little improvement ,  my  gtx 1080  was  320-330 sol/s   now  is   360-368 sol/s

Thanks for this  software
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
December 17, 2016, 07:03:10 PM
Why not buy a new card instead of hassle with outdated hardware and make a problem of not supporting a device that even nvidia dropped long long time ago.
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
December 17, 2016, 06:07:15 PM
@EBWF,  the compute 2.0 miner you compiled you might try using cuda6.5 to compile.  I'm not a developer but with claymore's eth miner he uses cuda6.5 for the older card support.  It may help with performance.
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
December 17, 2016, 05:48:54 PM
can some one help !



Config needs to be like this..

Code:
miner --server zec.suprnova.cc --user suggsy89.test --pass x --port 2142

You're missing a worker name and you need to remove -eu
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 504
December 17, 2016, 05:00:31 PM
can some one help !



I think you need to input zcash t-address instead of your username for suprnova..
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
December 17, 2016, 04:34:48 PM

Thank you my fake GT 730 now gives stable 7sol/s, v0.4 made 5-7sol/s and very high rejection rate.
0.5b with Quadro K620 33sol/s, with eqm 1.0.3b 38sol/s

Real GT 730 DDR5 gives 13sol/s on v0.5 up by 1sol/s from v0.4
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
December 17, 2016, 04:05:58 PM

Thank you my fake GT 730 now gives stable 7sol/s, v0.4 made 5-7sol/s and very high rejection rate.
0.5b with Quadro K620 33sol/s, with eqm 1.0.3b 38sol/s
legendary
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020
December 17, 2016, 03:45:05 PM
1080 performance now the same as a 1070 for me... Do you think there are model specific enhancements needed?
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 160
December 17, 2016, 02:55:57 PM
Would it be possible to compile a compute 2.0 version of 0.5b?  Thank you

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9EPp8NdigFiNzlWT3NIbFJhZ00
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
December 17, 2016, 02:27:52 PM
Would it be possible to compile a compute 2.0 version of 0.5b?  Thank you
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
December 17, 2016, 12:27:10 PM
Compared to EQM .03 getting a 15% reduction in hashrate. This miner also has a 5% reduction in power. So overall net loss in hash and a tiny bit less efficiency. There is something to be said of mining the coin direct though too.

EWBF, as with other miners, add the ability to execute multiple instances (or threads) of your miner with the same program. For instance running the miner twice right now increases hashrate by about 8%.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
December 17, 2016, 12:23:52 PM
version 0.0.4b
 2 x 1070 =  599 / 606  h/s


version 0.0.5b
 2 x 1070 =  716 / 722  h/s



legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
December 17, 2016, 12:17:48 PM
The miner 0.0.5b use only 94% of GPU that means there is room for more speed.

it was the same on 4b version, so it's not clear how much a 5% increase would get you, if it's possible to maximize the usage

it's not clear also what will be the limit with nvidia, instead amd is there at their limit confirmed by clymore with his last version
Jump to: