At this moment it is better to mine ETH, but i wish to support your work, so i will mine with 2-rigs 1070 for couple days.
https://i.imgur.com/ZOb8UaD.png
Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 287. (Read 2164329 times)
"SOME THEREAD IS DEAD RESTART" --
I received the above message in the console window after 2-3 hours. The mispelling of "thread" was quoted from the message; the miner hung and required a restart. Since there was no timestamp on the console window, I don't know how long the miner was idle.
I went back to mining with EQM. The miner outperforms NiceHash EQM, but I notice that when I mine CryptoNight on the CPU, and Equihash with this new miner, this new miner gets 220-230Sols/s rather than the 210-220Sols/s with the EQM miner (while also mining CryptoNight on the CPU). However, if I do not mine CryptoNight on the CPU, the new ZEC miner gets 260Sols/s mining ZEC. The GPU involved is a GTX 980ti.
Still a few bugs in v1.0.2b. Hope they get bashed! --scryptr
I received the above message in the console window after 2-3 hours. The mispelling of "thread" was quoted from the message; the miner hung and required a restart. Since there was no timestamp on the console window, I don't know how long the miner was idle.
I went back to mining with EQM. The miner outperforms NiceHash EQM, but I notice that when I mine CryptoNight on the CPU, and Equihash with this new miner, this new miner gets 220-230Sols/s rather than the 210-220Sols/s with the EQM miner (while also mining CryptoNight on the CPU). However, if I do not mine CryptoNight on the CPU, the new ZEC miner gets 260Sols/s mining ZEC. The GPU involved is a GTX 980ti.
Still a few bugs in v1.0.2b. Hope they get bashed! --scryptr
Very good miner 162sol/s only 74w gtx1060 3GB
Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b
I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...
I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...
You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s
P0 state enabled?
what the miners reporting im not worry about that ...
Have you enabled power state 0 (P0)? If your memory speed is 3005 you are in P2 state which is slower in some memory hard algos.
P0 State on GTX980 gave me 210~215 Sol/s 1404 gpu / 3814 mem 74C on W8 (W10 had me some hash trouble on miner). using 376.09 nvidia driver
Now checking stability on long run
https://s15.postimg.org/pnmjnz55n/nvidia_980_gtx.jpg
NOTE: up to 215~218 on v0.02... Nice work!!!!
On Nanopool the hashrate and profit is also in line with the miner for me - using 6 hour averages. This is great work! Thanks! EWBF! 
EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better
Your setting ? .
120 core 55 tdp 400 mem
on pool side the earning is not right, are e sure the dev fee is 2% only?
I see hashrate in miner 1:1 on suprnova
Running 2b on my msi 970 with latest driver 376.19 and power state on GPU set to 0, I'm getting 175 SOL. This is pretty impressive. Thanks for your work.
EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better
Your setting ? .
120 core 55 tdp 400 mem
on pool side the earning is not right, are we sure the dev fee is 2% only?
EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better
Your setting ? .
EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better
Author, what is better for your miner - memory clock or gpu?
What is your effective memory speed at +1000? I use a different skin, and maybe mine is showing the base clock, and not the 5x for gddr. In Linux I remember setting +1000 but in Windows it's usually closer to +200
how do you change power target?
Just adjust slider in msi afterburner : https://i.imgur.com/vjW0qPv.png
At 100% power target, i'm getting about 325 sol/s per gtx 1080, at 60% power target about 290 sol/s, great improvement over other miners. +200mhz core +1000 mhz memory in msi afterburner, I have founders edition cards.
how do you change power target?
Just adjust slider in msi afterburner : https://i.imgur.com/vjW0qPv.png
EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b
I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...
I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...
You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s
P0 state enabled?
It needs work. I can't change one of my 1060 clock. Both of my 1060's are locked at P2. But all in all it rocking away. Thanks for the update
Is here any speed difference beyween 0.0.1b and 0.0.2b? Or only bug fixes?
BUG FIXES--
The miner is the same speed, but the bug fixes have resulted in better performance. Fewer rejected shares means better payout. It works fine on NiceHash now, for example. --scryptr
awww. finally someone release nvidia miner with some increase speed..
just tested with my old gtx 960 2gb.. run good with 95sols/s stock rom.
really nice working dude. much appreciate.. love it and keep working.
just tested with my old gtx 960 2gb.. run good with 95sols/s stock rom.
really nice working dude. much appreciate..
love it and keep working. ocminer is there some problem, pool reporting 95% invalid shares with ewbf just now?
miner say all ok, 5min ago had 2% bad shares
miner say all ok, 5min ago had 2% bad shares
No problems here, running fine on 1060 and 970 here on zec.suprnova.cc
yeah one miner (I have 10+ miners) had win10 right click pause and that was the cause, even you pool credited me fine, just you dashboard was 98% red
Is here any speed difference beyween 0.0.1b and 0.0.2b? Or only bug fixes?
1070 g1 +100 core , + 700 mem gives 282 at 82% power limit .
any best config for power/hash ? ... with 100% i think hits 300
any best config for power/hash ? ... with 100% i think hits 300
45-50 Sol/s on GTX 680
Jump to: