Pages:
Author

Topic: Exchanges to be careful about IEO listing. - page 6. (Read 1599 times)

hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.

Exchanges should be able to identify a fraud project before it get listed on their IEO.
Their reputation will be ruined if they failed to avoid scams and frauds, even traders will leave them.
good exchange like binance must be have a certain way to verify the legality of the project.

I am sure they will taking care to select the right project to be list on the IEO. They will make sure the member will not get scam by the projects, and I think the project needs to pay some amount if they want to be list on the exchange, so the team doesn't scam the members. I think that it is necessary to prevent scamming because that will be related to their reputation too.
full member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 100
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.

Exchanges should be able to identify a fraud project before it get listed on their IEO.
Their reputation will be ruined if they failed to avoid scams and frauds, even traders will leave them.
good exchange like binance must be have a certain way to verify the legality of the project.
full member
Activity: 720
Merit: 103
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.
The main thing that this will not engage investors.Although I notice a lot of IEO held for example on the stock exchange ,,latoken,, and they are not profitable and pretty not honest with the participants of the bounty.So you do not need to completely turn off your head when investing.
copper member
Activity: 370
Merit: 1
now IEO is very clear for us to recognize, select IEO that has been registered on popular websites such as binance, okex, latoken, and exmarket to avoid fraud. investors are very interested in the IEO program. all turned to IEO, including me.
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 10
After the first Bittorent IEO by Binance exchange, the conditions are changed 180 degrees on the ICO planned projects. It is more cost friendly to get listed by the same exchange that can manage the token sale for the team. Small exchanges are not reliable like big ones.
you right sir, IEO is more friendly for us and the exchange who lauch that IEO is always list that coin.
IEO is the best choose for know, we know ICO is not safe and we must becareful when we look a good ICO.
i just hope no scam again in ICO, i miss ICO in 2017.
full member
Activity: 815
Merit: 101
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.
IEO steps are here to restore investor confidence after ICO played with them. now binance collaboration and the IEO are a hard slap for ICO project actors who have deceived many people. now they must be faced with the seriousness of the IEO in making a good and quality project.
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 322
I think other than top exchange like Binance and bittrex don't do any much deeper investigation before listing any IEO, if so, this can turn investor into huge loss.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 2
☀️ Iskra Coin ☀️
Presently the only exchange I would stay away from is idex and systemkoin because they have bad examples of worse listing ,dumpis and of cos failed fundraising through IEO ,best exchanges for IEO are binance ,okex huobi ,bitforex ,idax ,latoken
member
Activity: 341
Merit: 10
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.
IEO contributes to investors feel more secure about what they invest. But all have risks. Do you know projects like Merculet (MVP). There are many guarantees but in the end it is still a dead project. Team Dev has left the project when he has listed major exchanges.

So there is nothing to guarantee 100% you will be safe. The IEO, too, projects are carefully selected but do not mean it can live forever.
full member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 129
It is a matter of time before we start to differentiate between real exchanges that are capable of holding IEO from those hungry exchange platform that are merely fundraising platform with sole interest of making quick money by listing project for IEO. I will not mention names but If you are investor and you are very wise, by now you will know some of these exchanges I am refering to. Some of them have numbers of tokens running crowdsales higher than the number of crypto listed and trading on their platform. Not to talk of many dead projects that they have refuse to delist.
sr. member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 326
but BINANCE rarely opens projects for the IEO, maybe because the requirements are quite strict.
but I really like the concept of the IEO from the ICO, because I think it's safer and avoid fraud

They should really strict about accepting such IEO projects. Considering that Binance is one lf reputable exchange, they shouldn't put their reputation at risks. As you know, scammers are really trying hard to enter IEO now. There is still fund raising behind this project and we could still fall for the fraud. Exchanges should really be cautious selecting IEO. Now it is hard for a particular coin to start listing on an exchange.
full member
Activity: 714
Merit: 100
3... 2... 1... Launch!
This is good advice because not all IEOs will be hosted by reputable exchanges that have a track record of being reliable or a decent success rate so make sure you focus on the major launchpads such as Tokinex, Binance, Liquid, OKex, Houbi, and KuCoin and research each one
member
Activity: 616
Merit: 12
Send&Receive Money Instantly, w/ no hidden costs
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.

However, this kind of IEO will also affect the exchange, later it will become a problem if too many coins / tokens are listed on the exchange so that at certain points there may be several coins that have a volume below the average. This thing will create these markets become a junk someday.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
After the first Bittorent IEO by Binance exchange, the conditions are changed 180 degrees on the ICO planned projects. It is more cost friendly to get listed by the same exchange that can manage the token sale for the team. Small exchanges are not reliable like big ones.
member
Activity: 287
Merit: 10
if we see exchanges are more cautious with new Ieo listing. we cant say exchanges are users friendly like icos this time ieo are facing strict rules
jr. member
Activity: 318
Merit: 1
Almost all ieo that i saw in this time of cryptocurrency are listed in cheap Exchanges so same with icos will never be profitable so i invest in ico than ico because ico csn be list in multiple exchangers than ieo and i have a project that offers ico and this is the Dencoin tokens .
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 251
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.

The exchange will have to do some due diligence about the project they want to list.
and of course, they have to do it seriously if they want to maintain the reputation of the exchange.
I believe the top exchanges have professional peoples to do the research prior listing IEO.
member
Activity: 882
Merit: 13
Well there's always a scam projects that will conduct IEO on a scam exchange, best thing to do for investors is to avoid those exchanges which is not reliable or had done a previous scam IEO. Just participate on reputable exchange like binance because its a trusted platform and all the IEOS on binance are trading way above their IEO price.
member
Activity: 602
Merit: 10
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.

Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.

Binance still leading in IEOs because most IEOs they held always give profits more than x5 for their investor. Its like a hype but good exchangers must be list only good project with good prospect.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 289
Others didn't see that IEO has an disadvantage anyhow, and that is if the exchange are not good in the market the utility token will also be useless to be list ion that exchange. Just like Latoken, were recently most bounty hunters and investors hate it due to most of the token that has been listed to their platform died in the end(Zero volume).
Pages:
Jump to: