Topic: Exclusion reason of Royse777 (Read 980 times)

Thanks for your honest reply. Appreciated.

---

I think its enough whatever discussed here.

I am going to lock threads to avoid further arguments.

Quoted for reference.

I have never threatened anyone in the real world and here.
Life is not complicated, life is easy if you know how.

I should actually ask you: "get rid of Yoshie" what is the threat to me.

My education has never brought something to court "if something is wrong or threatening we will solve it on the spot". That's our work system.

Personal: if you want it.

I don't like physical ... no need to explain.

I'm also the most lazy of dealing with women.

my age is enough to make you unconscious,ladies' room

Huh!
Am I reading you are working in government and you will come to me with your passport to meet in person and will show me something?
Is this a written threat to take me to the court when come to meet me in person? Or you will come to me to attack me physically?

---

All those about me in the quote were really unnecessary because  "I will keep Yoshie aside" does not mean getting rid of you. It meant that I am dealing with the Smarty pant and his pal TalkStar.

Hit the ignore button if you think I am boring, have arrogance and repetitive. So far I have nothing to learn from you I guess. How old are you anyway?

I see you are having hard time seeing Mr. Smarty panty is getting roasted here. His pal TalkStar left the ground though.

So you want to get rid of me.... that's a written threat to me.

You need to know, I have a permanent job (outside this forum), working in government.
I do not work in your house, as your slave, you want me to obey everything you say and suck your saliva, <<>>.

You know this forum......don't need to explain if you know....save your stupidity you don't need to be published in this forum.

You talk too arrogant and too stupid in your arrogance, repeating the same words every day, boring.

I judge you too close to your own destruction from your emptiness.
Do not be like a child who whines for ASI, a little adult, we deal with adults.

Do I need a passport to meet you in person, then (we) talk about "get rid of.

---

Sorry @Coolcryptovator is a bit off topic, he's fishing.

A simple PM would not create all these drama.

But when someone starts pointing to you and starts accusing you for something you never thought of then you just do not stay silent. I am still trying to understand the beef here against me. Are all these just because I excluded smarty pant and his pal?

Please anyone help me to understand.

Cheers,

Edit:
And have you guys noticed the timing of creating this topic? Not long after I created this topic: daddy issue or schooling?
Coincident or planed?
After all it was against his master.

I read this drama for several days. I don’t understand why it was so much noise. Every day, someone trusts and someone ceases to trust. On my list, there are weekly pros and cons, but few people come to the reputation with the proceedings.
Coolcryptovator, if you didn’t like something on the Royse777 trust list, you can do the same. Just put him a tilde and not wage war with even more people against him. I think you understand what I'm writing.
I respect the opinions of many people who are on my trust list. But if I see that people will cease to trust me, I will not involve the community in this matter.
Maybe I offended someone, but believe me, I will always prefer a bad peace than a big war.
Do not interact with each other anymore. The forum is great, and there are always people here who can understand and support everyone.

Thought so, very easy excuse. Yeah?

Let's play political. Am I obliged to give you an explanation?

But since I am not playing obliged game here unlike you:
Those I believe falls in your category are already in my trust list, don't you see your pal there?

In this particular case (quoted) I do not see any question I was asking but you are asking me. I see you need to seek help from Google again and this time to understand punctuation.  

---

You have a chance to prove your statements, ignoring is not going to bring much weight for you:


update
Excuse me, where am I talking about all? Are you in drug?

What am I missing here? Is there categories of users like cock suckers, tampon suckers and so on!
And you tell me who to include and who to exclude?

Is this a political meaning that you came up with?

Again you have this all fever here.
You, smarty pant, cool playing guy (don't get fool by thinking that I am complimenting you) =/= All
Yeah, could be: You == your pal TalkStar

So you are saying you became a master now? This sound all other users who are genuinely hunting for scams are your pupils. LOL

Which part is off topic?

more update
Your master here just done something.
If leaving a counter feedback and removing it later makes all these drama from you against me then what about this?
Oh yeah! You are not obliged. /reputation sucker

Due to that point I have been ignoring you replies, don't have enough time to reply same questions again and again. All the answers are on the main post.


Please don't insult all the scam hunters just because of me. Scam hunters just not hunting scams for merits or reputation. Because there is some scam hunters still hunting scams (including me), even they have earned more than 1000 merits. Its enough for Legendary ranks, also they have gained enough reputation. So why they are still hunting?

You are excluding multiple scam hunters means you indirectly support that scammers to whom we left negative feedback since you are on DT1.


I noticed you multiple time mention my pal, yes all scam busters are my pal. I won't mind it we have communication each others even out of forum. I like them and always try to support and I will support them.

And please stay on topics, seems you are going out of topic.

It was just a counter feedback which are still practiced by a lot of users in here despite in some of the users opinion is that counter feedback does not weight any value. Now opinions aren't meant to be the same.

---

Visual is always better if there is option.


I will keep Yoshie aside though but noticed Coolcryptovator and his pal TalkStar. Coincidentally both of them noticed it in the same evening/night.

This must be the fact you were talking about Mr. cool playing guy? /reputation sucker
And what about these topics:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/trust-system-abuse-by-tman-5225907
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/entrust-or-distrust-for-this-5226189
You do not see anything wrong that comes from your masters?
I don't see you to talk about it. (Oh Yeah, you did not notice these topics.)

Let me give you two friendly advise:
Learn to have your own voice.
Be fearless¹.

¹. Don't tell me that you were fearlessly hunting scammers in the past. You had nothing to lose in the past but to find a niche to gain reputation and earn merits to rank up.

The fact that Royse777 removed a controversial positive feedback is enough to say that the user is ready to correct their sent feedback and it doesn't mean that the user lacks knowledge of how the trust system works. Earlier we have seen many DTs doing mistakes while leaving negs and they worked on their ratings too and still are on DT1 so that's not a negative factor against them. Excluding someone from a trustlist too doesn't make them unworthy nor including someone (unless that person is a known scammer). Only thing that matters is their positive/negative ratings that are incorrect.

There is literally no need to announce your exclusions unless the person who you excluded cares about it. I don't think Royse777 even mentioned about your exclusions anywhere around, yet you are trying to suggest users to exclude him by creating a whole fucking thread in reputation based on, nothing but an bold move of him to let know others that straight away tagging is not always good if the crime is not proven otherwise. I think that was the reason for his counter on Best Change.

If you want to play political mobbing games better take them to PMs. Good for your repo here @Coolcryptovator.

Yes,  I clearly said this earlier. This thread is backfiring on the original postrr once you start to dig a little deeper.

Do people here really expect their words taken at face value. All claims, statements and assertions must be thoroughly scrutinized and analyzed to extract the possible fragments of truth they mutate into misleading traps.

Royce for admin position based on careful evalution of this drama.

If I see any retaliation here it is retaliatory exclusions by the mentioned trio and starting this thread...

So you are here to play political game with me? Seems like you have learnt a new vocabulary - "obliged" /reputation sucker.

Let's play the same game as you did in your last post:
Am I missing anything? Where is the guideline from theymos about this please? Point me sir if I am missing.

Did I say I worry about you being anywhere?

Has anyone said everyone will have the same judgements?

Did I say something has to be different for me?

Have I or anyone said that facts can be changed?

And what facts we are talking about here Mr. Smarty pant? I can play game all the day if you insist me. But please don't. I am happy to hangout with a small community I like, just around the corner of the forum.

You may not see me in reputation and meta board very often to throw mud to each others by taking some shelter of established members but this does not mean that I will be bad to play political game with you or anyone who are like you and your pal talkstar. Remember my birth in this community was way longer than you. You born not very long ago when all those merit suckers and trust suckers has started hanging around in the meta and reputation board with some useless merit begging threads and activities to get attention of the other forum members to have personal gains. Now see why I distrusted you and your pal? I am not playing "obliged" game here by the way.

Perhaps you need to learn another vocabulary: Retaliatory.
Seek help from Google.

Am I obliged? If no then you shouldn't expect.


Answer is above.

Am I missing something? Is there any guidelines or instructions from theymos about exclusion/inclusion ratio? Point me if I am missing.

All the problems have been described on main post. Doesn't necessary repeat again.

It has been described  as well. For again I believe we had not talk each other before BestChange issue. So I were against your action & reaction there. I suspect as a retaliatory you excluded me & YOSHIE. If my suspection is right then you may realise this is retaliatory or not.


I stated that perhaps other DT1 wouldn't agree with me, everyone have different judgments and opinions. Same as for you, it doesn't matter you are agree or not, fact will not change based on our beliefs.
Since I am not on DT1 you shouldn't worry about my exclusion list.

---

Off topic;
Perhaps sometimes we forget about what does mean ~exclude, +include and no action( means not include or exclude).

Let's not bring the things that are not related to these topic in my opinion. The Best Change response from you to me was here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53605122

The response was made to break the points I had here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53603746

And if I remember correctly then by then (before making the response) you changed your red to a neutral or entirely removed I guess after seeing my response for your red tag at that time. So your case is that: You are confuse (the way you change feedback based on the arguments) like hell on where to put red and where to put neutral or where to put positive.

Anyway, pointing to that post which was your response was enough instead of the wall of text you had in your last post bud.

---

Off topic:
If an ebay seller makes a mistake then you do not blame ebay as whole?
If an amazon seller makes a mistake then you do not blame the entire amazon company?

And you sir,
Can you find a feedback left by me which does look very inappropriate please?
Can you find a user who I have distrusted or trusted does look very inappropriate please?

/= You have problem for ~Coolcryptovator, ~TalkStar and ~YOSHIE?

Can I expect you to create separate topics for distrusting following users too?
1. ~iCEBREAKER (Trust: +6 / =0 / -2) (70 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Blazr (Trust: # +1 / =2 / -3) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW ~Royse777 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 631 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW ~Patatas (Trust: neutral) (111 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~wolwoo (Trust: +1 / =2 / -3) (445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~mosprognoz (Trust: +6 / =1 / -1) (161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

/= And from now on whoever you distrust, I expect separate topics for each exclusion?
/= And your distrust list (6) seems very little compared to your entrust list (25). Amazingly very few of us has this ratio of entrust and distrust list (25:6).

Nah! I don't like much too /s

This? Which one comes first to have a retaliatory mentality? If an action has done before or after?
Like if I distrust a user in my trust list after they distrust me or I entrust the user after they entrust me or I leave a favorable feedback after they left me a favorable feedback or I leave a red trust after they leave a red trust for me.

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-15_Sat_06.10h/366632.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632;dt

I am so confused with my retaliatory characteristics sir.

You think kinda?
This fella thinks he is an alpha from Baboon family and he is okay to smell his teen girl's tampon that just came out with rotten smelly blood and may be feels good to feel it on his d**khead.
He needs medical attention to live in a civilized society.

Basically I don't care about trust someone wants to trust or not, but now the story is different after I read the post @Royse777.

I will start the story of the campaign (BestChange) from the beginning.

Preliminary:

PROBLEM ONE:

Before the BestChange campaign, promoting on this forum, I first saw their involvement in a number of fraudulent customers on the BestChange site posted in 2017.

When the campaign started on this forum, I raised the topic about the BestChange site, Reputation: Topic: [Doubt the possibility of a scam] BestChange Bounty and Signature Campaign., To warn participants that you are promoting fraudulent sites, be careful because they do not use (escrow) most likely you are not paid, the main problem.

One by one the comments came, and I said if the campaign manager pays the first week and so on I will remove the trust for BestChange, I have already told @Royse777 about this.

the problem is that they pay on time to campaign participants. I revoked and closed the topic, finished.

---

PROBLEM TWO:

a second problem arises with something else still related to the BestChange site.

After a few days other accusations arose from @johhnyUA: Topic: About Bestchange [again]

So I reversed my direction 100% and I found other evidence about the trading site @BestChange, with the darkening of money.

Finally I don't trust him anymore about the BestChange site.

Proven to be deceptive.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53667163

With the struggle of the members here.

In the end the money was returned.

If, the topic of accusations against the BestChange site in reputation is not made by me, the possibility is that the money @ SergeyMalar is USDT 21,010, don't know, maybe it's gone.

Because @SergeyMalar has created a topic in local Russia, no one cares about it. thank you, for: @johhnyUA.

Thank you, to the members in this forum and DT who are fighting for the rights of others, so that @SergeyMalar can be happy with his family again.

---

However, this trust issue arises here, so, I don't know what @Royse777 has in mind about this trust.

---

PROBLEM THREE:

off topic:
I really don't care anymore about the BestChange campaign whether you want to be paid or not.

So right now, if I associate it with the red trust in (BestChange), I can't make a decision because there are 11 DT members currently in it.

I respect their decision in this matter.

For now I am just waiting for the results of the 11 DT, against (BestChange). In making a decision to delete or not. red trust

So now I have explained the point of the problem now.

I apologize to @Royse777 and all who are here about this problem.
If anyone is not happy.
Now everything is clear the point of the problem from where.

For the issue of trust @ Royse777 which does not trust me, as I mentioned in the initial post.

Yeah, TMAN went kinda crazy today with me poking him a little and mods deleting his posts n shit, and he had me thinking that he said you got banned, but it was just slippery tongue bullshit..

I am pretty familiar with the beginning of the Best Change situation but not the outcome thus far..
I didn't much like that they were tagged straight away either..



"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." IMO

All I can smell is used tampon smell vagina in every single one of your posts roysecunt

You don’t even understand that countering doesn’t work any more you wanknozzle you have no business being on DY or even on the fucking forum.

That campaign ended up paying out and I removed the neg but for every campaign that pays out there will be 4 that wouldn’t in that situation,

Prevention is better than cure you fucko. Like your father should of worn a rubber instead of having to think about aborting you

Not sure where is the confusion. The thread you mentioned was created around two hours before creating this thread by OP. How was I suppose to know that OP was going to create a thread after around two hours? I don't have a time machine :-D

I also have no idea why OP had this topic in mind that he had to open an entire thread to explain the reasons of excluding me right after two hours of the topic I created. And coincidencely him, talkstar noticed it in the same day. I excluded both few weeks ago though.

When Best Change launched their signature campaign they did not ask for an escrow. User Yoshi went and created a thread about it. TMAN and him tagged them. TMAN's reason was something like, without escrow they are scammer or something, I really can not remember much but to me the reason was really inappropriate and very very harsh for a campaign who just don't want to use escrow. Everyone have their right to practice how they conduct business. So I countered that neg with a positive which clearly stated that my positive was a counter of the negative TMAN left. And Yoshi's reason was too much inappropriate that he later removed his neg immediately after my response ¹.

That was it! TMAN started his mighty poetry on me, he even asked me to remove my trust list if I do not want to be in DT. It's like having a list means one only wants to be in the DT system Lol. (Shall I start saying loudly that exclude TMAN because he does not have fair knowledge of having a list? Of course Not! )

Having a list also means I trust or don't trust this and that users. Or I am wrong here?

@eddie13, I am not banned. I already responded your PM. Just woke up and writhing this from my phone. I will PM you later with some information.
¹ https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53603746

At least you have realized the purpose of this thread. Whoever want to exclude/include anyone they are free to do.

Well, then you may add him as well.
Point is valid.

...and then you went and created this thread: daddy issue or schooling? thus eliminating the need to take the moral high ground. 

I didn't follow that BestChange thread and don't really know what the drama there is about, though I did take a peek and saw that they're not using an escrow--but in any case my opinion is this:  DT members rotate through and there's been a lot of change as far as what the list looks like, and no member is going to exhibit perfect characteristics of what it should mean to be on DT. 

So even if Royse777 changed some of his feedback and excluded a member for personal reasons, so what?  We've seen DT members do that before, many times.  DT members have been known to engage in vendettas and all sorts of other crap--but as long as their judgement is usually very good, and bad judgement isn't a pattern I don't see what the problem is.  So I think Royse777 is totally fine on DT unless someone can point me to an egregious error that he made, but I don't think there is one.

If you feel like it, can you drop me a PM with some info on why he might not be a good fit for DT (or post it here)?  It's hard to glean the facts with all the vitriol flying about.

You guys are really mad and starting a rep thread about Royse777 because he excluded you?

I thought I had Royse777 on my inclusions list but I guess not.. Adding now..
Fixed..


Oh?


They are a bit ambitious aren't they?
Feel free to PM me if you think I should know anything..

I have just had a message off forum that explains Royse777 actions, it seems he has been a cunt all his life, from pre school to school and now quite obviously to pre-adulthood. Royse was actually molested by his uncle Vlad - since then royse has become a little flower (not like an actual pussy flower) I mean an actual wilted rose, he was rejected by everyone he knows and then made himself into a "neckbeard Gentleman"

we all know what these "Gentlemen" are like, fat - ugly, shitty beards and wear dodgy fedora's.

he has a quest to make sure everyone else on the internet becomes a virgin (not anal virgin obviously) like him

women Reject him and he got angry - he started hitting up r/mallninjashit for inspiration, his collection of swords he cleaned every fucking day - he finally found his friends -people he could actually "connect with" he felt part of a community - anyway he was on reddit and for all our fucking sins this prick saw r/bitcoin - why the fuck didnt this just direct to bitcoin.com? this prick would be roger Ver's problem right now.

so Pajeetroyce ended up here, saw that sig campaigns paid more than he could earn in 80 hours working in the local factory..

anyway im bored now, but if anyone else requires TMAN to continue this story - appreciate below and I will continue fuckers..

xxxx

Royse, enjoy the stinky pillow.. I also shat underneath your bed earlier you cuntnugget

Until yesterday i wasn't aware about this matter and discover that "Royse777" excluded me from his trust list. Till then he was in my trust list. I have also seen some other members name there including you and OP. After seeing this i didn't took that negatively because its not mandatory that everyone will accept my judgement positively where every single member have their freedom to trust someone or not. Its been a long time he was in my trust list but suddenly he feel it necessary to exclude some guys including me. I don't think its a big issue for me if anyone love to get wrong meaning from anything where actually that is nothing but a honest motivation.

People still exist who love to get motivated and i feel its my responsibility to notify him that he has been added on my trust list which doesn't mean that i am asking them to add me. Its a greetings for their well doings and for me they deserve that.   

As far as i know proverb made from real life experiences and when its a matter of knowledge than i blindly believe that every people is nothing but a learner. Entire time frame of our life give us opportunities to gather knowledge and we shouldn't miss that.

In fact I saw it a week ago after LoyceV updated the thread.
But I don't care and I also add @Royse777 to my list, not trust.

---

I assume that:
People who do and place trust incorrectly or are misused according to my knowledge are like a porcelain plate slammed to the ground, However...people in Japan have been using gold for sticking up a broken plate for a long time. In the form of things like this can be considered as appreciation, the more obvious lack of psychology, argument or pessimism, this also has in common.

---

If I can say to @Coolcryptovator in this case there is no need to worry and anxiety where one person does not recognize you, there are still dozens and hundreds of other DT members who acknowledge and trust you.

You have a good reputation in this forum.
Proverb says:
people who have (knowledge) fall asleep, a thousand times better, than people who worship do not have (knowledge).

that and the fact he is a busy pajeet cunt who deserves a shit envelope through his leterbox.

fucking wankstain royse cuntsmouth.

good move coolcryptolator.

xxx

Still I do not see a valid reason.

 Are you saying those who excluded and included me are clueless about how the forum trust list works and only you have the required knowledge?

If this was something really you wanted to know or learn then you could just simply PM me instead of creating false impression of you being the innocent forum guy.

Obviously NOT, but I think you missed the reason of this topic.


I think your all the questions on the OP. And I am not something special that's other should follow me and I don't expect as well.

I can't remember if I have asked someone to add me. You should report to moderators for such as PM.


Had I said? They would more experience from me and thats why I create this thread so they would see if my thoughts is right or wrong.



Already said the above. I am not saying I am innocent guy. A person can't be nice guy to all over forum user.

Was anyone asking you to give an explanation to exclude me? Imagine everyone is creating topics for each and every exclusion lol

Edit:
Just a curios question: What is your beaf against me? Because I excluded you and talkStar ?

One of you are the one who include users in their trust list and ask for indirect favour in return in PM.
There are some users who are in this community with certain goals to achieve for their personal gains. These type of users are not good to trust eventhough they spread an image of being trusted.

I hope this gives a little insight of some of the users exclusions in my list.

Although I am not obliged to describe about my trust list but I want to share why I excluded Royse777 from my custom trust list. Reasons are below.

1. Royse777 doesn't have enough knowledge about trust system: I think everyone know BestChange story, he/she had left counter feedback to BestChange with green trust which was not appropriate according to most of DT members. That was fine he withdrawn his/her green trust when realized it was wrong. So I can say he/she doesn't have enough knowledge how should use feedback. (However, perhaps he learned lately).

2. Retaliatory mentality, I am assuming Royse777 had excluded YOSHIE since he was thread opener against BestChange. I don't know exact reason why he/she have excluded me from his/her trust list, nor I will ask to him/her. But I believe I had not supported his counter feedback for BestChange and likely that's why he/she excluded me. If so really this is poor mentality but its depend on his/her who will be on his trust list. Also don't  know reason exclusion of TalkStar as well since TalkStar still trust Royse777 judgment. So personally I believe that kind of retaliatory mind won't fit on trust network.

So by considering both reason I have decided to exclude Royse777 from my trust list. I don't have complain about him/her, because he/she isn't obliged to explain about his own trust list. Both of reason is my personal opinion, it won't match with all over DT members and of course I appreciate everyone individual thoughts. I share it with community because other DT members would add him on their trust list or would exclude him from their trust list. But personally I think his/her judgment isn't perfect for DT network.

Here you can see his/her trust list.


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.

I did whatever should I, anyone could do what they think. I don't like any arguments and drama. Perhaps someone would think why I have excluded him/her? Because point number two noticed just yesterday and I was quite busy and was not able to make post. I don't think we should exclude any person just for single disagreement on a subject.  If so then we should exclude 80% user of forum. This forum is for discussion and should be agreement & disagreements.  Sometimes even we do not agree with admin, it doesn't means we have to exclude him. I am not telling I am trusted person, but can say trusted more than who joined forum Today (newbie).