so what are you trying to prove here ?? we all know that making money is impossible in -EV games
91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
I'm trying to prove that trading > gambling = HYIPs. HYIPs are less fair but with equal risk.
not necessary , trading can be way worse than gambling when you don't know what you doing
I remember that I did horrible trades in my first days , we can't just say that trading is better than gambling
in other words some traders may have an average of like -4% of the trades they do , while in most gambling games the expected value is -1%
but yeah trading is profitable as long as the person is gaining experience
No, it's still better to lose your life savings from trading than gambling.
Gambling always is a loss longterm. Furthermore, I see no need to go on for 90 days. With gambling, you can easily reproduce those 90 days in a short time by betting faster without changing your strategy.
HYIPs are quite bad too. If you do not lose your own money, you'll profit from the theft made to some other people.
Trading is best. Here you are supported by luck in as much as you do not know what you are doing.
I know the most skill-based gambling game played in casinos is poker. It's +EV when you know what you are doing. I think poker is more skill based than trading but if you learn risk management, then you can gamble on finance without predefined odds. And why you say that trading require lots of skill? It's really easy, gambling is harder to predict, I read How to make money trading Bitcoin Reddit series and Gunbot thread, opened demo account and sucking out lots of money from other traders. Then I deposited 0.003
BTC into Bitfinex and then got 0.0035
BTC in less than week. Basically saying I'm stealing money from the market. So I've found a talent for trading and I'm going to improve trading skills.