Gambling always is a loss longterm. Furthermore, I see no need to go on for 90 days. With gambling, you can easily reproduce those 90 days in a short time by betting faster without changing your strategy.
HYIPs are quite bad too. If you do not lose your own money, you'll profit from the theft made to some other people.
Trading is best. Here you are supported by luck in as much as you do not know what you are doing.
Topic: Experiment: 1% profit daily gambling over 90 days (91 days exactly) - page 4. (Read 3099 times)
August 21, 2017, 02:41:56 PM
August 21, 2017, 12:30:24 PM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
This will hardly prove anything, you can make a bad/good investment, it doesn't have anything to do with random chance while gambling does.
Also, you should be able to profit from HYIPs with enough experience and getting in early, while gambling hmm
I don't think there is anything to do to beat the house longterm, you can do it short term though.
I guess his point is not about investment, but to prove that gambling is not a good idea to make profit. I would tend to agree that it is only slightly better than HYIPS - where there is no house edge and you're gambling purely on whether or not you can exit before the guaranteed scam happens. The only way you can really make money with HYIPs is if you're banking on referral profits. It is a slightly inaccurate comparison though. Trading shouldn't be considered gambling.
Gambling is much better then HYIP. In hyip you risk losing everything you out in to get a small amount each day. 40 days to double your money usually on HYIPs in a casino you roll one side and have 50/50 odds you know are fair. HYIP you will. Other people's money they lost so its like stealing and tou know you doing it.
Much better than HYIP I don't think so... They are very similar, most people at this moment see HYIP as gambling as they put some money there and count with their luck to have profit before the scheme crashes. I say luck because it's impossible to predict if more people will invest, how much they will invest. But in the end both enthusiasts (gamblers and HYIP investors) know they can lose hard, but they know there is some chance of profit too.
I'm ignoring possible 'innocents' investors as we have already seen these schemes coming and going in bunches. So I don't believe there are innocents anymore investing in HYIPs and Ponzi schemes, they are gamblers.
August 21, 2017, 12:17:20 PM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
This will hardly prove anything, you can make a bad/good investment, it doesn't have anything to do with random chance while gambling does.
Also, you should be able to profit from HYIPs with enough experience and getting in early, while gambling hmm
I don't think there is anything to do to beat the house longterm, you can do it short term though.
I guess his point is not about investment, but to prove that gambling is not a good idea to make profit. I would tend to agree that it is only slightly better than HYIPS - where there is no house edge and you're gambling purely on whether or not you can exit before the guaranteed scam happens. The only way you can really make money with HYIPs is if you're banking on referral profits. It is a slightly inaccurate comparison though. Trading shouldn't be considered gambling.
Gambling is much better then HYIP. In hyip you risk losing everything you out in to get a small amount each day. 40 days to double your money usually on HYIPs in a casino you roll one side and have 50/50 odds you know are fair. HYIP you will. Other people's money they lost so its like stealing and tou know you doing it.
August 20, 2017, 09:47:11 AM
so what are you trying to prove here ?? we all know that making money is impossible in -EV games
91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
I'm trying to prove that trading > gambling = HYIPs. HYIPs are less fair but with equal risk.91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
Gambling is not the same as HYIP, you can't judge it like that. HYIP is hard to predict if you are going to win your money back or not mean while in gambling you can control it by yourselves, so winning and losing is depends on yourselves while you gambling around. Both of these things has different meaning. And you might even get profit by doing sportbetting, if you have enough resources
August 20, 2017, 03:44:10 AM
so what are you trying to prove here ?? we all know that making money is impossible in -EV games
91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
I'm trying to prove that trading > gambling = HYIPs. HYIPs are less fair but with equal risk.91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
not necessary , trading can be way worse than gambling when you don't know what you doing
I remember that I did horrible trades in my first days , we can't just say that trading is better than gambling
in other words some traders may have an average of like -4% of the trades they do , while in most gambling games the expected value is -1%
but yeah trading is profitable as long as the person is gaining experience
August 20, 2017, 03:29:36 AM
so what are you trying to prove here ?? we all know that making money is impossible in -EV games
91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
I'm trying to prove that trading > gambling = HYIPs. HYIPs are less fair but with equal risk.91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
- gamble for 5 days 1 hour per day with a strict limit of the max bet and overall budget;
- spend time on buying/selling and exploring cryptos for 5 days 1 hour/day using the same max investment sum and the same overall budget.
August 20, 2017, 02:28:20 AM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
At the moment Day trading at cryptocurrencies is better then gambling just for the reason that the crypto market is being in a significantly increase.
I mean, new investors are coming up every day who makes the price of the crypto coins to go even higher then now, so it is very good and profitable for investors.
Try to make this experiment on a stocks market where the market is not being in a permanent increase
August 19, 2017, 11:48:55 PM
I wish you luck in your experiment See if you can do it 
August 19, 2017, 02:02:56 PM
so what are you trying to prove here ?? we all know that making money is impossible in -EV games
91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
I'm trying to prove that trading > gambling = HYIPs. HYIPs are less fair but with equal risk. 91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
August 19, 2017, 12:40:56 PM
so what are you trying to prove here ?? we all know that making money is impossible in -EV games
91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
91 days with only 1% a day won't prove a thing , it easy to make 300% or bust a day and that wont prove a thing too
it may turn as a success and it may fail , but really man 91% isn't big and it won't prove anything
August 19, 2017, 12:37:58 PM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
This will hardly prove anything, you can make a bad/good investment, it doesn't have anything to do with random chance while gambling does.
Also, you should be able to profit from HYIPs with enough experience and getting in early, while gambling hmm
I don't think there is anything to do to beat the house longterm, you can do it short term though.
I guess his point is not about investment, but to prove that gambling is not a good idea to make profit. I would tend to agree that it is only slightly better than HYIPS - where there is no house edge and you're gambling purely on whether or not you can exit before the guaranteed scam happens. The only way you can really make money with HYIPs is if you're banking on referral profits. It is a slightly inaccurate comparison though. Trading shouldn't be considered gambling.
Trading is gamble too but much safer and with little risk. It's poker, chess and roulette in one. Poker because even losing trade can win, you play against other people and it can +EV if you have enough skill. Chess because it can improve your trading skills. Roulette because you can win trade by luck without any skill.
Gambling and trading are two different things. Gambling is totally based on probability and luck while trading is totally skill based. I don't know what was the point of doing all this.
August 19, 2017, 11:26:41 AM
Well , in the crypto world I guess trading is more of a gambling too because there are lot of shit coins and you gotto be lucky to make some profits with that and yes ofc skill is required but crypto trading is not even close to normal trading .
Well, if you have the skill, you're probably going to understand they are shitcoins and you won't invest in them.
In gambling it's probability, not skill
But for someone with no knowledge or experience it's far better to gamble than to invest in something he doesn't understand.
August 19, 2017, 10:34:52 AM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
This will hardly prove anything, you can make a bad/good investment, it doesn't have anything to do with random chance while gambling does.
Also, you should be able to profit from HYIPs with enough experience and getting in early, while gambling hmm
I don't think there is anything to do to beat the house longterm, you can do it short term though.
I guess his point is not about investment, but to prove that gambling is not a good idea to make profit. I would tend to agree that it is only slightly better than HYIPS - where there is no house edge and you're gambling purely on whether or not you can exit before the guaranteed scam happens. The only way you can really make money with HYIPs is if you're banking on referral profits. It is a slightly inaccurate comparison though. Trading shouldn't be considered gambling.
Trading is gamble too but much safer and with little risk. It's poker, chess and roulette in one. Poker because even losing trade can win, you play against other people and it can +EV if you have enough skill. Chess because it can improve your trading skills. Roulette because you can win trade by luck without any skill.
Gambling and trading are two different things. Gambling is totally based on probability and luck while trading is totally skill based. I don't know what was the point of doing all this.
August 19, 2017, 09:25:52 AM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
This will hardly prove anything, you can make a bad/good investment, it doesn't have anything to do with random chance while gambling does.
Also, you should be able to profit from HYIPs with enough experience and getting in early, while gambling hmm
I don't think there is anything to do to beat the house longterm, you can do it short term though.
I guess his point is not about investment, but to prove that gambling is not a good idea to make profit. I would tend to agree that it is only slightly better than HYIPS - where there is no house edge and you're gambling purely on whether or not you can exit before the guaranteed scam happens. The only way you can really make money with HYIPs is if you're banking on referral profits. It is a slightly inaccurate comparison though. Trading shouldn't be considered gambling.
Trading is gamble too but much safer and with little risk. It's poker, chess and roulette in one. Poker because even losing trade can win, you play against other people and it can +EV if you have enough skill. Chess because it can improve your trading skills. Roulette because you can win trade by luck without any skill.
Gambling and trading are two different things. Gambling is totally based on probability and luck while trading is totally skill based. I don't know what was the point of doing all this.
August 19, 2017, 09:08:42 AM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
Of course trading is better than gambling and gambling is better than HYIP. So why you need to prove it? People might think that gambling is profitable because it can gain some profit and you do not need much money to hit some good payout. Mean while by trading, you really need some bankroll to earn good profit but there is no way you can get profit with small bankroll. And others like HYIP, this will never be profitable, you will lose your money when you start it
Btw your 1% profit, how are going to do it? Because as I know there is no guarantee like 1% everyday like 90 day? This must be really crazy if you can earn that. Going to see what will happen
August 19, 2017, 06:05:56 AM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
This will hardly prove anything, you can make a bad/good investment, it doesn't have anything to do with random chance while gambling does.
Also, you should be able to profit from HYIPs with enough experience and getting in early, while gambling hmm
I don't think there is anything to do to beat the house longterm, you can do it short term though.
I guess his point is not about investment, but to prove that gambling is not a good idea to make profit. I would tend to agree that it is only slightly better than HYIPS - where there is no house edge and you're gambling purely on whether or not you can exit before the guaranteed scam happens. The only way you can really make money with HYIPs is if you're banking on referral profits. It is a slightly inaccurate comparison though. Trading shouldn't be considered gambling.
Trading is gamble too but much safer and with little risk. It's poker, chess and roulette in one. Poker because even losing trade can win, you play against other people and it can +EV if you have enough skill. Chess because it can improve your trading skills. Roulette because you can win trade by luck without any skill.
August 19, 2017, 06:01:25 AM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
This will hardly prove anything, you can make a bad/good investment, it doesn't have anything to do with random chance while gambling does.
Also, you should be able to profit from HYIPs with enough experience and getting in early, while gambling hmm
I don't think there is anything to do to beat the house longterm, you can do it short term though.
I guess his point is not about investment, but to prove that gambling is not a good idea to make profit. I would tend to agree that it is only slightly better than HYIPS - where there is no house edge and you're gambling purely on whether or not you can exit before the guaranteed scam happens. The only way you can really make money with HYIPs is if you're banking on referral profits. It is a slightly inaccurate comparison though. Trading shouldn't be considered gambling.
August 19, 2017, 05:51:11 AM
Just lost these 0.15 mBTC.
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
1% daily, you just bet all your money with 1.01 odd once a day. This won't prove gambling is better than anything, just based on your luckyI will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
August 19, 2017, 05:48:57 AM
Ok, so I have 0.002 BTC to lose to show you why trading is better than gambling it did correctly. I'm not gambling addict, I just want show you why gambling is safer than HYIPs but worser than trading.
I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
1% daily, you just bet all your money with 1.01 odd once a day. This won't prove gambling is better than anything, just based on your lucky I will start 1 September 2017 (or 15 Sept if I won't had that capital by 1 Sept).
If by 1 December 2017 be successful, I will announce this and reinvest 0.003 BTC. I will save rest of winnings.
August 19, 2017, 05:48:28 AM
I really don't think that this experiment is going to show much at all due to the fact that there can be short term variances that will affect the outcome of your bets. We all know that gambling is -EV, and hyips are even worse.
Although 1% profit seems to be achievable, it is definitely not sustainable.
If my calculations are correct then the odds of you winning all of the 90 bets is only going to be around 16~%(i'm not a mathematician so if someone thinks its wrong lmk). You're probably better off placing a single bet, you'd be exposed to less house edge.
It's wrong, it won't be exactly 90 bets. But odds are much lower than 16%. I have a strategy but I will keep it secret for now. Although 1% profit seems to be achievable, it is definitely not sustainable.
If my calculations are correct then the odds of you winning all of the 90 bets is only going to be around 16~%(i'm not a mathematician so if someone thinks its wrong lmk). You're probably better off placing a single bet, you'd be exposed to less house edge.
Jump to: