Topic: EXPRESS THOUGHTS ABOUT B&H AND RANK AND MERIT SYSTEM (Read 475 times)

I get your point and even visited the link you provided. I can't say anything about it. But I have my own journey here and willing to continue in the purpose why I join in this forum. We have different perception regarding with the merit and DT system that you are ranting about but in the end both has the same goal and that is to put things right for the forum. In my case I am only doing awareness and it could not help to change the system for I am only addressing to the users for a change.

Anyway, continue on what you believe is right. Who knows that lesson had learn already and everything will be alright. Just remember that nobody is perfect and we can make mistakes but we can learn from it and it is called as experience.

The benefits or negatives of the merit system can not be assessed without considering the trust system. The both are tied together.

You see it is not a matter of opinion. If there are clearly disadvantages and holes that are there to be exploited,
Evidence they are being exploited and undeniable incentives to exploit them.
  Then there is no point in quoting anecdotal experience as a refutation to those independently verifiable pieces of evidence that demonstrate both systems could provide some benefits by killing free speech and turning the forum into a echo chamber that is openly exploited by proven scammers to scam with impunity. When those disadvantages were not there before.

Best to read this thread and see if you can refute the points made there, nobody else has been able to.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-most-important-thread-you-can-contribute-to-this-yearno-kidding-5088852

If not then just accept that your individual experience is only that.

Also even if we accept your claims that all of the spam and scammy promotion of certain alt projects that gave anyone a financial reason to attempt to promote them was crushed by the merit system I'm not sure it is possible to say this was conclusively positive for this forum or bitcoin or the strong alts.  Sure it made it more readable and less chaotic for real enthusiasts.

Even if we could prove that it was there is nothing to say there are not far superior ways to deal with the same issues without the insoluble problems and negatives the current systems have brought with them.

Read the link if you find holes there then mention them but remember the thread starter made this before the monster mistake of conflating earned merit with trust. That opened a far more serious bunch of issues which he warned about before it took place.

May be you're new and just want a few merits or maybe you're powering up another alt or you just want to come to meta to really help improve the forum. Who knows. Best to do a lot of research before posting an evaluation of the systems in place. They are dangerous and the benefits could easily be achieved by other methods.

That is your point of view or opinion and I can't change the way you think about it. If you have issues with the other users here then you can have a choice either starting a thread dedicated for them and say everything you wanted to say.

In my case, merit system works fine. Piles of shitposts in major boards is a disaster to read. It somehow lessen whe  merit and rank system was implemented. It add also the scam project they promote that relatively destroy the bitcoim system. Let just hope that shitposting or this kind of activity will minimized to desired percentage or will be eradicated in the future.

I can't say anything about trust system except that it is useful for those utilize the system correctly. For abuses, I do not know about it and if there are abuses of the system hope not to get involve in that particular.

Anyway, I am seeing a big use of local board in the future. As bitcointalk community grows it will be directed to their local boards and discussn all about cryptocurrency independently about cryptocurrency and high chances that major boards for bitcoin and altcoin discussion will be removed for it will be moved to every local boards.

It's worked so brilliantly that bct is a desolate relic controlled by many documented scammers and their alts who also now happen to control DT1 and all the best rev streams.

That's right it was a broken design that was immediately jumped upon by the very most greedy and corrupt who then were handed a total windfall by the genius who didnt notice that the most greedy and self interested are not automatically the most trustworthy.

The holes in it are undeniable. Nobody even tries to refute these holes exist.
They allow people who get inside the self sustaining and colluding protection racket to

Scam with impunity, you can red tag whistle blowers, refute flags of scamming based on independently verifiable evidence  , you can conduct mutual red tag removal trades,  give trust includes or other incentives for people to support your position on flags, give merit to those that support you and starve merit from those that oppose your actions or opinions or produce evidence of your scamming.

Only an imbecile would consider both designs as a success or of course scammers and the greedy scum controlling them or those seeking their favor.

The original idea of requiring some small amount of merit to gain certain privileges or initial rank were okay.
Noob jail worker way better and was way less useful to scammers.
These systems are merely a sloppy attempt to fix some spammers and remove accountability for making important decisions.

The original or even early supporters of bitcoin have mostly left the forum.

This argument good posters earn merit and poor poster earn none is bs.
The majority of high merit earners are full on tards with no achievements here at all.
Tman, lfc, tp, etc are demonstrably morons with terrible post histories and all have some scamming or shady shit in them with zero achievements here at all.

Merit is cancer
Trust system is dangerous.

Keep eating ass supporting a broken system is most noobs only hope. Hence...

In regards to threads being posted in the Beginners & help section that are of negative connotation; The assumption is that newbies will be more prone to falling for these types of scams, and phishing attempts. Although, this isn't always the case, I guess there is some logic behind it. Therefore, depending on the actual information within the thread I would say it is OK depending on the content to be posted to the Beginners & help section. However, that's entirely depending on the perception of the moderator dealing with the report, because it could go both ways. My viewpoint is if the thread is quite obviously talking about basic concepts, and is aimed towards a newcomer to cryptocurrencies then it would likely be appropriate within that section.

I would say that guides to avoid scams, and tips about researching would be more appropriate than outright scam accusations. Scam accusations do not belong in Beginners & help, unless they're case studies included with a guide of some sort. As for complaints, and various other things it likely belongs in a different section e.g post about the forum belong in meta, a post about a exchange belongs in the exchange section, and a post about a user belongs in reputation most of the time.

There's also a big chance that misinformation has been spread on this forum whether it was intentional or not. Its very rarely that someone has completely understood a concept, and not only that be able to convey it to someone else accurately. Things like best ways to avoid phishing can be informative, but can also be biased based on their perception, and may even be incomplete. Unfortunately, in every walk of life we can only offer guidance its up to the person to digest that, improve upon it, and find their way.

I believe quite a few countries have updated their laws to become more strict on ICOs, and how they can operate. This may or may not have had a significant contribution to the reduction of ICOs. As well as anything, overtime people will become more aware of bad businesses, and the telltale signs. For example, many years ago scam phone calls were very successful, and although they can still be successful today the general population are far more aware of this than 20 years ago.

Thanks for the compliment. I know that many users here are already expressing their thoughts toward the effeciency and success of rank and merit system as shown in some statistical reports the decreased number of spam posts. Yet, it is not yet too late to express it.

My intention here also is to include my opinion on the development of the forum if compared before and after the rank and merit system implemented. As time pass t more users realize the importance of utilzation of the forum or what actually a forum should be where we could exchange ideas to a certain issues in regards to cryptocurrency or even off topic.

I am glad that it also change me as a user of the overview of the forum. The forum now is worth it for cryptocurrency related discussions which admin really created and intnded for. It may be a little bit late for to express here but at least I made it. I have great gratitude of bitcointalk forum. It change me not only a user but a person itself having a positive outlook in life.

If it is the first time someone uses a wallet, like Electrum, he has to rely on the results of a search engine because he is not familiar with the site. What is important is to not visit google ads and run the site through whois to get more info about it. If it was created recently, there is a big chance you are on a fake/phishing site. Once you visit the genuine site, bookmark and save the link, and visit it only from your bookmarks in the future. 

You're overly exaggerating.

If they were actually really "good quality posters", they wouldn't have lost hope or have any problems with earning merits.

I guess you thought I was mentioning about OP. If it is so my bad when I expressed my idea into texts. It partially comes from the vague or general phrase in OP 'scam related threads', from which I took the part for scam reports (that I usually see recently) to discuss with. You are right because the phrase contains scam detective tactics as well.  

What I mentioned by 'good initiatives' are threads in Beginners & Help but to report scam or phishing apps / sites to newbies. I think such threads (you see, I used 'threads', not thread so it is not OP) should belong to Scam accusation sub-board.

For Beginners & Help, it needs more generalized threads, scam detective methods, guides (or in your words, scam tactic and scam detective tactic).

• Beginners & Help: tactics, guides, questions
• Scam accusation: specific scam reports

---

There are overlaps between scam report and scam detective tactic/ guides. In scam accusation/ report, there are some points that can be used for tactic so at the end it is up to moderators to leave such threads in B&H or move them to Scam accusation.

Guidelines, how to spot a scam ICO & report effectively is better

"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime"

I would have to disagree. This should be one of the first boards a complete newbie winds up on. One of the best things they can see are the myriad of ways that people are trying to take your sats. Regardless that these methods can be very similar or even exact copies of older scams; the majority of the world isn't on the look out for these situations anyways.

Scam accusations is better suited when you can actually point to an individual/business/brand not necessarily a scam tactic.

The thing I would like to see more in B&H over an apparent attempt to improve post quality; is factual information. I try to drop into B&H as I genuinely like assisting people and it's one of the best places to find people in need. The last couple times though I've been seeing posts that are fairly well constructed but are so factually flawed you would think it was a joke. It's no help to anybody if the main improvement is quality of layout and appearance built on BS information.

I can see a lot of irrelevant and reluctant topics are discussed in the Beginners and help section, even I reported some of them for off-topic to the section mt report was marked as bad so I did stop reporting such posts/threads.We can clearly find which threads are creating for the purpose of earning some merits so members and merit sources don't encourage such activities or else in the future we may see constructively created on topic spam posts everywhere due to merit races.

It is a trend of latest topics I see. Lengthy topics. When I see those topics, I try to skim and scan them. Writing something succinctly help readers feel more comfortable to read and don't miss key points in wall of texts.

OP, length does not equal quality when it comes to posting.  I just wanted to mention that since the gist of your post could have been written much more succinctly, and frankly what you wrote in the OP was bloated (IMO).

Not sure I agree with any of this, nor can I even begin to guess how you'd know what lower-ranked members are striving for since very little on bitcointalk is as it seems.  What might look on the surface like simple helpful posts might be attempts to earn merit, might be plagiarized, might be written by a member in the same thread that one of his alt accounts has posted in--you never know.

Lol, not surprising.  I've got B&H on ignore and have for years, because the times I've visited it, it seemed like most threads were wall-to-wall drivel.  Seems like it's a perfect section to target suckers for scams, too.

You're making quite a few very interesting remarks, OP.

The Merit-ICO-bounty discussion is rather complicated, more complicated than you'd think at first glance: did ICOs disappear because most of them were scams? Did they disappear because of the Merit system, which decreased the number of (newbie/jr) participants, leading to less "naive" supporters? If so, then how do we explain the new DeFi scams? Etc.

The way I see it, the Merit system has limited the duration period of new spammers: spammers arrive and try to get a few Merits to be eligible for bounty campaigns and then start spamming for a few weeks or months, i.e. the duration of the campaign. After that, they receive their coins which are most of the time either of very low value, or scams, and sometimes they even don't get anything at all.

Thereafter, they realize they've wasted a lot of time for nothing and get out. Their only other option is to stop spamming to gain Merits (which is of course a good thing, but probably rather exceptional).

Conclusion is, I don't believe spamming will be completely eradicated, but spammers will give up eventually thanks to the Merit system. I do believe that it has already become virtually impossible to find post-2017 (post-Merit) high-ranked members spamming these boards.

But it also comes with a disadvantage, in which the forum gained a huge decrease on traffic, on users per se. But somehow, the forum's active members can be counted by a single person in an hour and the good quality posters also decreased (as some of users also had lost hope in the forum after the implementation of Merits and the less signature campaigns that opened for their ranks) drastically which also indicates that the forum's quality (by far) are better compared to the era before merits. Hence, such disadvantages/outcome opened a lot of doors to a better improvement.


Well, the forum can earn by ads alone in the Auction, hence, it's impossible that the forum would be deceased, even after the implementation of upcoming Epochtalk

Personally, I think that the B&H board is one of the very important parts of the forum, and where every beginner should get some basic guidelines on how the forum works, but also on how to start journey in the crypto world. There has already been discussion that some topics may not belong there, but although various scam projects can be moved to the appropriate board, topics like internet security actually have no alternative but to be moved to off-topic which sometimes happens.

The right balance needs to be found here, and an additional sub-board on internet security has already been proposed - and it would be really good to have it, because someone who is bad about IT/online security is at high risk of falling victim to various crypto scams.

There are currently around 16 out of 36 threads on the first page of Beginners & Help, that are of a negative connotation, essentially phishing or malware. The positive side to it is that it creates awareness on a popular entry-level board, but I figure the impression for a newcomer is that the cryptosphere is tremendously risk prone (which it is somewhat, until you become aware of the dos and don’ts, even if most of them are obvious from the get-go).

Perhaps it’s a passing phase, merit oriented (I just merited some of the kind, since they are informative and some with potential dangerous outcomes), or due to it being easier to find information on this sort of events than others, we’ll see, but there is a certain lack of genuine beginner questions, let alone positive inputs.  Maybe there are not that many new genuinely interested beginners right now (mark the term interested) to come up with their novice questions.

Some of the threads about the scam-related because what are the most common board does the newbie is going to? Of course, the beginners and help because some of them does not have enough idea, also there are a lot of threads right there you can learn like hashing, logic gates, phishing attacks, and more. This board gives a lot of awareness to other members.

Also about the scam threads again usually (some) members are often visiting the scam accusations board regarding it's included as the child board, so few of our members too are posting it on B&H but still appropriate In Scam Accusations still you can move your topic too.

---

Merit systems make more filtered the quality of posts of the members, if they think you deserve to have it why not? There are no benefits of holding a lot of merits, they have the rights too who is is the one to receive their smerit.

Its a matter of choice actually. If a user tend to focus on joining campaign and make his profile like a report based encyclopedia with dozen of links. Whom can give him such merits if someone ought to review. Though the quality post he share should value more. But we cant deny that there are users here who checked profile before landing a merit on them.

So what do you think of the system? At first it was little annoying on my part but of course not until I grasp thr process and later on it become a routine for me and that resulted to a good one. Keep it up, just do what you think is right but always observed rules imposed here on forum.

The threads can help of course, but to an extent. I am still surprised how users fall for some of this scams, mostly giveaway related. Tbh i think scams are pretty easy to sidestep, I mean, users still use custodial/web wallets, they don't keep their seed phrase secret, users download and click random links, prefer to use Google search to get their wallets rather than go through the official website etc (and imo this instructions are pretty easy to adhere to). This is just a few of the follies users commit and lose their funds in the end, and somewhat makes the efforts of those who make awareness threads on different scammers modus operandi seem futile.
I think so too, and imo that's why the mods allow it in that section. I don't think the scam accusation board has much newbie traffic as beginners and help (do you have any statistics to back me up ) so many of them will likely miss or even never see the threads if it's only posted there.