Topic: Failed to submit review and also did not refund the payment. - page 2. (Read 1855 times)
September 25, 2024, 01:46:31 PM
I have removed my support and hope others may remove their support as well. And, I believe the ones who left tags should remove those tags as there's nothing wrong in giving someone a second chance to fix their behavior.
September 25, 2024, 01:36:11 PM
I withdrew my flag support.
However, I think that the jamyr deserves at least a neutral mark because there was obviously a problem that was not handled more correctly. Also, he has a similar problem with loan defaulting from before, and later fixing things.
Considering the inactivity for a certain period, did someone demand from jamyr to confirm the ownership of the account and to sign one of the previously used addresses?
Based on his staked Bitcoin wallet address dating back to 2021 in this [post] and his recent signature in post #90 in this thread, which matches his old address, I confirm that he is indeed the original owner of the account. His signature has been verified, as shown in the attached screenshot.However, I think that the jamyr deserves at least a neutral mark because there was obviously a problem that was not handled more correctly. Also, he has a similar problem with loan defaulting from before, and later fixing things.
Considering the inactivity for a certain period, did someone demand from jamyr to confirm the ownership of the account and to sign one of the previously used addresses?
Royse you just proved to be a very good stock, that I regret to have not invested more during your presale period. Though I would like to warn you now, to not put too much good expectation from me. I'm still a degenerate, but I will do my best to keep my nose clean.
What Rose and all those respectable members with big hearts who forgave you did was because they didn't want to lose an active member like you in this community and to avoid a repeat of what happened by you again, and they also followed the trust sytem work. The fact that you returned the money, regretted what you did, and proved that you deserve this forgiveness is enough. Did you see light_warrior's post in this thread? He left us, but he left a good mark that we remember him by, even after his death. It would be best if you always strived to leave such a mark that will live longer than you.I hope you have learned one of the lessons that you should never forget, but was AB de Royse777 the only one with whom you acted recklessly in the past?
September 25, 2024, 01:08:22 PM
I would not expect everybody be so eager to do the same.
I removed it because that's how the Flag system is supposed to be used, not because I trust jamyr. That's why I didn't Oppose the Flag. 
September 25, 2024, 01:02:24 PM
I somehow find it odd you didn't notice that (also unusual to see here culprits being forgiven, so yeah), but hey, the wrongdoing was against you and if you are forgiving him, I will also remove my support for the flag.
However, call me pessimist, but I would not expect everybody be so eager to do the same.
September 25, 2024, 01:01:21 PM
Royse you just proved to be a very good stock, that I regret to have not invested more during your presale period. Though I would like to warn you now, to not put too much good expectation from me. I'm still a degenerate, but I will do my best to keep my nose clean.
PokerPlayer PX-Z max wapfika loyceV coin-investor examplens ,
Thank you guys.
PokerPlayer PX-Z max wapfika loyceV coin-investor examplens ,
Thank you guys.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
September 25, 2024, 12:08:25 PM
To everyone who wanted to know more details (I will also use this post as the reference of a neutral feedback I am going to leave for jamyr).
jamyr failed to submit the job and retuning the money but that was long ago. Recently I found out that he helped me a lot in different things from long time but he never mentioned about his past and I was not aware too. He also never asked to give him any return of favor.
When I asked for his profile URL earlier today for some reasons, he gave me the URL and I discovered everything that happened in the past. He proved me a good person.
Good people deserve chances in their life. I would like to give him one that he deserves. Hope he will not do the same mistake in future.
jamyr failed to submit the job and retuning the money but that was long ago. Recently I found out that he helped me a lot in different things from long time but he never mentioned about his past and I was not aware too. He also never asked to give him any return of favor.
When I asked for his profile URL earlier today for some reasons, he gave me the URL and I discovered everything that happened in the past. He proved me a good person.
Good people deserve chances in their life. I would like to give him one that he deserves. Hope he will not do the same mistake in future.
September 25, 2024, 11:31:32 AM
I withdrew my flag support.
However, I think that the jamyr deserves at least a neutral mark because there was obviously a problem that was not handled more correctly. Also, he has a similar problem with loan defaulting from before, and later fixing things.
Considering the inactivity for a certain period, did someone demand from jamyr to confirm the ownership of the account and to sign one of the previously used addresses?
However, I think that the jamyr deserves at least a neutral mark because there was obviously a problem that was not handled more correctly. Also, he has a similar problem with loan defaulting from before, and later fixing things.
Considering the inactivity for a certain period, did someone demand from jamyr to confirm the ownership of the account and to sign one of the previously used addresses?
September 25, 2024, 11:22:42 AM
I removed my support to the flag since you already settled privately on the amount involved. I frequently saw jamyr on our local board before as helpful user when he is still active.
I hope for the betterment that he will not be involved on anything that related to financial dealings. I agree on the opinion above that neutral tag is necessary to make other user aware about this issue. Good for you that everything settled after a year.
I hope for the betterment that he will not be involved on anything that related to financial dealings. I agree on the opinion above that neutral tag is necessary to make other user aware about this issue. Good for you that everything settled after a year.
I also removed the tag Anyone can change their ways if they really mean to, I have to read the feedbacks to refresh my memory on the issue because I supported a lot of flags.
And I too agree that there should be a neutral tag to remind him of what he has done, maybe in the future this too will go away if he proves himself trustworthy and establishes his reputation.
September 25, 2024, 10:37:43 AM
I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag.
I've removed my Support because at least one of those statements is invalid now:Quote
jamyr did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act
Do you mind sharing which one of the two happened? 
September 25, 2024, 09:23:01 AM
I removed my support to the flag since you already settled privately on the amount involved. I frequently saw jamyr on our local board before as helpful user when he is still active.
I hope for the betterment that he will not be involved on anything that related to financial dealings. I agree on the opinion above that neutral tag is necessary to make other user aware about this issue. Good for you that everything settled after a year.
I hope for the betterment that he will not be involved on anything that related to financial dealings. I agree on the opinion above that neutral tag is necessary to make other user aware about this issue. Good for you that everything settled after a year.
September 25, 2024, 09:16:35 AM
I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.
@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim
I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195
I have no issue removing my support, but I do think that you might consider a neutral for reference on this topic and if he repeats his offense change it to red and be done with it. @JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim
I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195
Quote
suchmoon, NeuroticFish, yahoo62278, LoyceV, examplens, ABCbits, TryNinja, dbshck, Husna QA, Fivestar4everMVP, cryptofrka, shasan, JeromeTash, lovesmayfamilis, notblox1, Little Mouse, jokers10, Mahdirakib, Woodie, ScamViruS, GazetaBitcoin, FatFork, NotATether, Ultegra134, Charles-Tim, ajiz138, Smartvirus, Poker Player, Igebotz, decodx, paid2, Learn Bitcoin, robelneo, coin-investor, acroman08, BoXXoB, shoreno, PX-Z, Wapfika, SamReomo, komisariatku, Gladitorcomeback, Unknown Op
Totally your decision on whether to leave the neutral or not to, but I would want some sort of reference and Jamyr to feel like he is being held accountable for the offense and know that he cannot screw up his chance.
September 25, 2024, 08:43:53 AM
I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.
Idk if the fund was refunded or settled by whatever private talk but since it's requested from the creator of the flag, then i'll remove my support/opinion into this. I hope this will be the last strike from the user, last time it was a loan default. While it's easy to delete opinion on flags, negative tag will always depends on the giver and their principles.
September 25, 2024, 08:39:46 AM
I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.
I understand that there has been PM conversation between you, otherwise this bump after a year is not very well understood. I might remove my support for the flag but once you've convinced 40 people to support the flag I don't think they're all going to remove it just because of this bump. Maybe you'll have better luck with the tags, though.
September 25, 2024, 08:30:48 AM
I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.
@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim
I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195
@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim
I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195
Quote
suchmoon, NeuroticFish, yahoo62278, LoyceV, examplens, ABCbits, TryNinja, dbshck, Husna QA, Fivestar4everMVP, cryptofrka, shasan, JeromeTash, lovesmayfamilis, notblox1, Little Mouse, jokers10, Mahdirakib, Woodie, ScamViruS, GazetaBitcoin, FatFork, NotATether, Ultegra134, Charles-Tim, ajiz138, Smartvirus, Poker Player, Igebotz, decodx, paid2, Learn Bitcoin, robelneo, coin-investor, acroman08, BoXXoB, shoreno, PX-Z, Wapfika, SamReomo, komisariatku, Gladitorcomeback, Unknown Op
First id like to apologize to everyone in this forum, and thank Royse for even taking the time to appeal for my sake.
For what its worth, i promise that i will try my very best to lessen my delinquent behavior, id like it to be gone but I know i cant promise to be 100% of the time. Thanks for considering, i missed you all.
Code:
Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
Message:
to tardiness and delinquency!
----begin signature----
HK0qj+ztEZLH3ryfmoOD8IZQVc8JAHZO+z32jHGLKYoSUCdwcdNSshr1smdGokUMIxgvUY+SiyAdrjABZNDWQU8=
----end signature----
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
Message:
to tardiness and delinquency!
----begin signature----
HK0qj+ztEZLH3ryfmoOD8IZQVc8JAHZO+z32jHGLKYoSUCdwcdNSshr1smdGokUMIxgvUY+SiyAdrjABZNDWQU8=
----end signature----
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
September 25, 2024, 07:10:46 AM
I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.
@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim
I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195
@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim
I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195
Quote
suchmoon, NeuroticFish, yahoo62278, LoyceV, examplens, ABCbits, TryNinja, dbshck, Husna QA, Fivestar4everMVP, cryptofrka, shasan, JeromeTash, lovesmayfamilis, notblox1, Little Mouse, jokers10, Mahdirakib, Woodie, ScamViruS, GazetaBitcoin, FatFork, NotATether, Ultegra134, Charles-Tim, ajiz138, Smartvirus, Poker Player, Igebotz, decodx, paid2, Learn Bitcoin, robelneo, coin-investor, acroman08, BoXXoB, shoreno, PX-Z, Wapfika, SamReomo, komisariatku, Gladitorcomeback, Unknown Op
Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.
At least one alt this jamyr has. I think that's pretty strong evidence that these two accounts are connected.
jamyr
piso456
Proof
So now I found out that staking an address here, is one of the important things member should do.
3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK
The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
This other address is a blockchain.info address.
[ Archive ]3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK
The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
This other address is a blockchain.info address.
Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---
---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----
[ Archive ]1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---
---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----
Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.
At least one alt this jamyr has. I think that's pretty strong evidence that these two accounts are connected.
jamyr
piso456
Proof
So now I found out that staking an address here, is one of the important things member should do.
3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK
The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
This other address is a blockchain.info address.
[ Archive ]3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK
The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
This other address is a blockchain.info address.
Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---
---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----
[ Archive ] 1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM
---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---
---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----
What makes it a lot more difficult than it already is, is that $78 is almost 1/4(sometimes even more than 1/4) of the total average monthly salary here in the Philippines.
If I'd be given the opportunity to earn a week's worth of salary in a short amount of time, I'd take it!I don't get it: if 0.003 Bitcoin is worth so much you can't even pay it back, wasting the opportunity to earn it is just stupid.
And I don't understand—is the accused being ironic now? What is this reply, "Bye for now"? I don't get it; is he implying that he's not going to return the money after apologizing in the first place? I'm not against charging interest, since that's how a loan would act, but in the meantime, it's of outmost importance for even the starting 0.003 BTC to be returned.
the trust reference feedback was inaccurate. 
It says 0.003+
Royse has explained you and i hope you have no words after that but still if you are unhappy with plus sign then don't worry, you just pay 0.003 Btc to which you scammed and i will pay + from your side. are you agree now? It says 0.003+
If you are real owner of this account then still you have 37$ in your wallet and you should pay back because you are excusing that you have no fund..
current Fund in your wallets:
0x84c5ad0de7c8327109f79a98a3ddced8879bf15e : 37$ worth of Eth
used this address in 2020 for [BOUNTY] Emporium.Finance bounty.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5291652
I think lovesmayfamilis and some others are the proper person who may look into that account to find out if there is alt because receiving payment without completing task is something very bad especially when the said user couldn't meet up with the review why not he refund his or her money as clearly stated. Lastly for a user to be comfortably relaxed without making moved to refunds show that there are lots of Alt maybe he has sacrifice to lose the account without thinking twice.
Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.
I was just wondering why would a Sr. Member will scam a 90-100$ amount
I have tagged jamyr red and I support the flag. At least if he has no time for the review, he can send the money back. To send bitcoin from a wallet takes just little time.
I'm not going to delete it and will change it into natural trust it if it gets resolved but I do remember coming across this account username somewhere.Flag supported
[1]
Quote
7/2/2020 6:47:24 PM password reset via email
7/25/2020 9:08:58 AM password reset via email
12/30/2020 10:58:34 AM password reset via secret question
12/30/2020 10:58:48 AM password reset via secret question
7/25/2020 9:08:58 AM password reset via email
12/30/2020 10:58:34 AM password reset via secret question
12/30/2020 10:58:48 AM password reset via secret question
I think lovesmayfamilis and some others are the proper person who may look into that account to find out if there is alt because receiving payment without completing task is something very bad especially when the said user couldn't meet up with the review why not he refund his or her money as clearly stated. Lastly for a user to be comfortably relaxed without making moved to refunds show that there are lots of Alt maybe he has sacrifice to lose the account without thinking twice.
Jump to: