So much popcorn time, it's crazy!
Who would have thought giving away ltc would cause so much drama.
Topic: FAKE - LitecoinFoundation.org donates 2000 LTC to wtogami and Aspect for 0.8.2 - page 2. (Read 1737 times)
June 17, 2013, 01:11:19 PM
Who would have thought giving away ltc would cause so much drama.
June 17, 2013, 01:09:28 PM
So much popcorn time, it's crazy!
June 17, 2013, 01:07:26 PM
I think people should do whatever they want to do. I dont see any problems at all. I was around during the ltc dark times and understand that people thinl twice. I dont see a problem with 2k being sent to devs that people trust. If dev then sends ltc to donation pool or if it is accounted for even though its on another address who cares? If the 5k pledger cares that would however be interesting to know about, but he/she/it is anonymous so I guess well.. Anyway people are free to do whatever they want to do with their ltc. Would be awesome if 5k could be triggered.
Free market for the win. Does it support secret deals?
June 17, 2013, 01:04:56 PM
We took the word of warren who we trust and he spoke well of aspect.
So we wanted to send ltc to aspect cuz he did the work but we really wanted to support the new warren who lacks stake.
So we wanted to send ltc to aspect cuz he did the work but we really wanted to support the new warren who lacks stake.
June 17, 2013, 01:02:40 PM
I think people should do whatever they want to do. I dont see any problems at all. I was around during the ltc dark times and understand that people thinl twice. I dont see a problem with 2k being sent to devs that people trust. If dev then sends ltc to donation pool or if it is accounted for even though its on another address who cares? If the 5k pledger cares that would however be interesting to know about, but he/she/it is anonymous so I guess well.. Anyway people are free to do whatever they want to do with their ltc. Would be awesome if 5k could be triggered.
June 17, 2013, 01:00:00 PM
We want to reward positive work. We gave to the last dev fund and it was umm... lost.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
I will tell you again, aspect freaked out, I think it was an overreaction but he has totally the right to do so , the way you stated things was really wrong, now every one is watching, if you have good attention of all this especially now , you just donate the 2K to the Address in the original fund raising thread and let Dev's decide between each-other. you just can add a note that you wish this LTC goes to X and Y, and let X and Y decide whether take it or leave it for the development .
I honestly thought be knew. I understand he did not and his reaction is reasonable.
Sadly our org took almost a week to agree to give the ltc the way it wanted to.
Also it did so cuz the last lead dev stole the ltc. We want to pay for work done.
I wouldn't worry about someone stealing the donation really, let them discuss this between each-other, your 2K could bring the Dev team to reach the goal to claim the 5K LTC reward, and let the Devs decide who deserve what and how much any one deserves, because they only know what every one is doing and how much is every one contributing, it is just not right to decide for whom the donation should go.
June 17, 2013, 12:54:19 PM
Yes but warren has stated he might not stay and coblee seems to be too busy. We wanted to give more than 2k.
June 17, 2013, 12:50:44 PM
We want to reward positive work. We gave to the last dev fund and it was umm... lost.
What happened to it?It seems like Litecoin development is heading in a good direction now, so it might be worth considering donating to the main fund?
June 17, 2013, 12:50:35 PM
We want to reward positive work. We gave to the last dev fund and it was umm... lost.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
I will tell you again, aspect freaked out, I think it was an overreaction but he has totally the right to do so , the way you stated things was really wrong, now every one is watching, if you have good attention of all this especially now , you just donate the 2K to the Address in the original fund raising thread and let Dev's decide between each-other. you just can add a note that you wish this LTC goes to X and Y, and let X and Y decide whether take it or leave it for the development .
I honestly thought be knew. I understand he did not and his reaction is reasonable.
Sadly our org took almost a week to agree to give the ltc the way it wanted to.
Also it did so cuz the last lead dev stole the ltc. We want to pay for work done.
June 17, 2013, 12:44:46 PM
We want to reward positive work. We gave to the last dev fund and it was umm... lost.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
I will tell you again, aspect freaked out, I think it was an overreaction but he has totally the right to do so , the way you stated things was really wrong, now every one is watching, if you have good attention of all this especially now , you just donate the 2K to the Address in the original fund raising thread and let Dev's decide between each-other. you just can add a note that you wish this LTC goes to X and Y, and let X and Y decide whether take it or leave it for the development .
June 17, 2013, 12:38:55 PM
We want to reward positive work. We gave to the last dev fund and it was umm... lost.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
We can give to who ever we want it is our money. Aspect caused the drama. He could have politly declined.
June 17, 2013, 12:35:29 PM
Wow, would be great so see 2k donated to the fund raising so that the 5k bounty can be triggered. That would be awesome! 
June 17, 2013, 12:34:23 PM
Did you not read the thread?
They clearfied that.
Also you started a thread in the scammers section...
You can answer to coblee but we dont. We were formed at a dark time in ltc history.
They clearfied that.
Also you started a thread in the scammers section...
You can answer to coblee but we dont. We were formed at a dark time in ltc history.
So you owning a huge stake of LTC gives you the right to decide to be someone or claim some rights that you shouldn't have ?
seriously who you think you are ? and what are you even arguing about ? why didn’t you just send the donation like the rest of us ? do you want us to make a song about you donating so you go more viral? what is the whole point of that anyway?
- if you have a good attention just send the LTC to the address in the original thread and that is it, why you even complicate things when there is no need to, except if you have other attention!!
June 17, 2013, 11:36:41 AM
Did you not read the thread?
They clearfied that.
Also you started a thread in the scammers section...
You can answer to coblee but we dont. We were formed at a dark time in ltc history.
They clearfied that.
Also you started a thread in the scammers section...
You can answer to coblee but we dont. We were formed at a dark time in ltc history.
June 17, 2013, 11:31:53 AM
I answer only to Coblee.
I refused the funds and I did not claim this to be a scam. I simply asked to justify your existence as an organization other then a domain name or identify who you are. I also stated that a new bitcointalk account with 0 posts offering donations and stating in the topic 'LitecoinFoundation.org donates 2000 LTC to wtogami and Aspect for 0.8.2' which is not true (as 'donates' denotes present and past) and that this looked suspicious.
When my response https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2499524 has been instantly deleted from the thread without anyone responding or explaining or discussing, I instantly created a fraud accusation thread.
If your statement states 'XYZ donates' this will be interpreted by community members as donation challenge being reached. If you then do not do that, it will be damaging to the donation fund.
Next time, do not delete developer responses but post actual responses to it in the thread.
I refused the funds and I did not claim this to be a scam. I simply asked to justify your existence as an organization other then a domain name or identify who you are. I also stated that a new bitcointalk account with 0 posts offering donations and stating in the topic 'LitecoinFoundation.org donates 2000 LTC to wtogami and Aspect for 0.8.2' which is not true (as 'donates' denotes present and past) and that this looked suspicious.
When my response https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2499524 has been instantly deleted from the thread without anyone responding or explaining or discussing, I instantly created a fraud accusation thread.
If your statement states 'XYZ donates' this will be interpreted by community members as donation challenge being reached. If you then do not do that, it will be damaging to the donation fund.
Next time, do not delete developer responses but post actual responses to it in the thread.
June 17, 2013, 11:21:58 AM
I will wait for coblee or warren to get in on this and other threads before having any further discussions in this regard.
In my personal opinion, if you wanted to donate and your intentions were honourable, you should have done just like all other donors and contributors.
In my personal opinion, if you wanted to donate and your intentions were honourable, you should have done just like all other donors and contributors.
Again we do not answer to you. All you should do is refuse the ltc not claim scam.
The last dev fund we supported was run by greedi and you know where that money went. We are more careful now.
June 17, 2013, 11:19:22 AM
Bythe way i am not the richest in ltc land but the group as a whole hasa good shot.
A good shot at what?
Like I said, I will wait for Warren to wake up to make any further statements in relation to this. All I know right now is that few of us in the development team who is online right now have never heard about any of this.
I just messaged you on IRC.
aspect
Im not at home at warren is the only dev guy we talked to. We can do what we want and do not answer to the current dev team.
June 17, 2013, 11:18:07 AM
I will wait for coblee or warren to get in on this and other threads before having any further discussions in this regard.
In my personal opinion, if you wanted to donate and your intentions were honourable, you should have done just like all other donors and contributors.
In my personal opinion, if you wanted to donate and your intentions were honourable, you should have done just like all other donors and contributors.
June 17, 2013, 11:06:39 AM
Bythe way i am not the richest in ltc land but the group as a whole hasa good shot.
A good shot at what?
Like I said, I will wait for Warren to wake up to make any further statements in relation to this. All I know right now is that few of us in the development team who is online right now have never heard about any of this.
I just messaged you on IRC.
aspect
June 17, 2013, 11:02:51 AM
We formed in 2012 when there were no active devz but greedi.
At the time the name fit. Now coblee is back and we have warren as an active and skilled dev we might change our name.
We are speculators who formed to help ltc. We are happy to see progress and wanted to hand out the ltc we collected ages ago.
At the time the name fit. Now coblee is back and we have warren as an active and skilled dev we might change our name.
We are speculators who formed to help ltc. We are happy to see progress and wanted to hand out the ltc we collected ages ago.
Jump to: