Pages:
Author

Topic: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this (Read 492 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
How fucking stupid are you? Im on the Bitcoin SV side, as is Craig Wright.

Are you just going to resort to name calling as your last refuge or will you actually be bothered to defend your master Craig Wright here? I'm curious to know why exactly you still support him despite the evidence presented above, which makes him look like a total fool.

I have no problem refuting these claims one at a time. None of those claims are new to me. You need to give me more time as I respond to each of you.

*crickets*

Meanwhile you'll have to add combating this to the list of wormy excuses you have to make:

https://www.ccn.com/craig-wright-kleiman-lawsuit

Basically Wright got caught forging an email and has potentially committed a felony for knowingly submitting false documents to court.

Welcome to law.
Welcome to court.
It was nice knowing you.
Have a nice life.
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
How fucking stupid are you? Im on the Bitcoin SV side, as is Craig Wright.

Are you just going to resort to name calling as your last refuge or will you actually be bothered to defend your master Craig Wright here? I'm curious to know why exactly you still support him despite the evidence presented above, which makes him look like a total fool.

I have no problem refuting these claims one at a time. None of those claims are new to me. You need to give me more time as I respond to each of you.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1427
How fucking stupid are you? Im on the Bitcoin SV side, as is Craig Wright.

Are you just going to resort to name calling as your last refuge or will you actually be bothered to defend your master Craig Wright here? I'm curious to know why exactly you still support him despite the evidence presented above, which makes him look like a total fool.
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. 

Your comments on this forum are sexist, insulting, disgusting, childish, course & completely uncalled for. Your attitude towards women on this forum is from the middle ages & I have reported your disgusting rants to moderators.

You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility.

Then please leave.

Gender is completely irrelevant to dictatorship and suppressing people’s opinions. Grow a sack.
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. 

Your comments on this forum are sexist, insulting, disgusting, childish, course & completely uncalled for. Your attitude towards women on this forum is from the middle ages & I have reported your disgusting rants to moderators.

You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility.

Then please leave.
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
He's a mentally sick conman. There are many clinical cases that you can read about this behavior[1]. At this point even if he manages to get a hold of satoshi's keys (i.e. steal them assuming Kleiman was the real deal), it won't be sufficient proof as the personality/writing/etc. does not match (not even remotely).

[1] Therefore, this thread is a waste of time.
Coming from yourself, someone who has completely abused the trust system on this form, using your power to suppress opinions. There is nothing definition as to what legally constitutes bitcoin in any country on any planet. Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility.  
You can cry me a river of tears later when your scam cash version of Bitcoin goes to near $0. Kiss Someone's gotta open source that spam generator that was used by the very same people promoting BCASH and BAB. Roll Eyes

How fucking stupid are you? Im on the Bitcoin SV side, as is Craig Wright.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
He's a mentally sick conman. There are many clinical cases that you can read about this behavior[1]. At this point even if he manages to get a hold of satoshi's keys (i.e. steal them assuming Kleiman was the real deal), it won't be sufficient proof as the personality/writing/etc. does not match (not even remotely).

[1] Therefore, this thread is a waste of time.
Coming from yourself, someone who has completely abused the trust system on this form, using your power to suppress opinions. There is nothing definition as to what legally constitutes bitcoin in any country on any planet. Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility.  
You can cry me a river of tears later when your scam cash version of Bitcoin goes to near $0. Kiss Someone's gotta open source that spam generator that was used by the very same people promoting BCASH and BAB. Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
He's a mentally sick conman. There are many clinical cases that you can read about this behavior[1]. At this point even if he manages to get a hold of satoshi's keys (i.e. steal them assuming Kleiman was the real deal), it won't be sufficient proof as the personality/writing/etc. does not match (not even remotely).

[1] Therefore, this thread is a waste of time.

Coming from yourself, someone who has completely abused the trust system on this form, using your power to suppress opinions. There is nothing definition as to what legally constitutes bitcoin in any country on any planet. Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility. 

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
He's a mentally sick conman. There are many clinical cases that you can read about this behavior[1]. At this point even if he manages to get a hold of satoshi's keys (i.e. steal them assuming Kleiman was the real deal), it won't be sufficient proof as the personality/writing/etc. does not match (not even remotely).

[1] Therefore, this thread is a waste of time.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
What’s the advantage of outing yourself as satoshi?

He's not outing himself as anybody other than Craig Wright. He's pretending to be satoshi because the fate of his shitcoin depends on him maintaining this masquerade.

1. Paying a zillion dollars in tax.

We've been over this already. You can't pay taxes on bitcoin if you neither sold nor bought it. That is unless he is the recipient of a trust as you claim, then he would eventually have to pay taxes on it regardless, I imagine.

2. Having every central bank and government wanting to kill you and your family.

Self-aggrandizing paranoia is the most popular form.

3. Earning Nutildahs respect.

Like most people who are aware of his malodorous presence, he will never have my respect. The only way he could possibly earn my respect is if he apologized for lying to the crypto community and then disappeared from the public scene, as he originally said he was going to do in 2015, and then again in 2016.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1427
The evidence speaks for itself. Most notably was his editing of a blog entry to make it appear that he invented the term "cryptocurrency." If there was any sort of actual evidence that demonstrated Craig was responsible for inventing bitcoin he would have presented it by now. Instead he just fabricates evidence and gets caught every time he does it. There's no reason to believe hes suddenly going to produce actual proof after all this time of just producing lies.

Hes obviously motivated entirely by reasons of finance and ego, which renders him the exact opposite of what the actual Satoshi embodied.

What’s the advantage of outing yourself as satoshi?
1. Paying a zillion dollars in tax.
2. Having every central bank and government wanting to kill you and your family.
3. Earning Nutildahs respect.
4. Satisfying ones Histrionic personality disorder/attention desperate disorder

If you are going to argue Craig Wright is a fraud, use This format:

Craig Wright is a fraud because________________ (insert supporting fact here).
Because:


Can you somehow refute these?

Damn that latest video stroke something in  me.
I think this comment describes it best:

Michael McClelland

"I wanna just be left alone!"

So let me go on one of the worlds largest television networks and say this.

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
The evidence speaks for itself. Most notably was his editing of a blog entry to make it appear that he invented the term "cryptocurrency." If there was any sort of actual evidence that demonstrated Craig was responsible for inventing bitcoin he would have presented it by now. Instead he just fabricates evidence and gets caught every time he does it. There's no reason to believe hes suddenly going to produce actual proof after all this time of just producing lies.

Hes obviously motivated entirely by reasons of finance and ego, which renders him the exact opposite of what the actual Satoshi embodied.

What’s the advantage of outing yourself as satoshi?
1. Paying a zillion dollars in tax.
2. Having every central bank and government wanting to kill you and your family.
3. Earning Nutildahs respect.

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
The evidence speaks for itself. Most notably was his editing of a blog entry to make it appear that he invented the term "cryptocurrency." If there was any sort of actual evidence that demonstrated Craig was responsible for inventing bitcoin he would have presented it by now. Instead he just fabricates evidence and gets caught every time he does it. There's no reason to believe hes suddenly going to produce actual proof after all this time of just producing lies.

Hes obviously motivated entirely by reasons of finance and ego, which renders him the exact opposite of what the actual Satoshi embodied.
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
Mate, name calling is not an argument.

I'm not name calling so much as stating an observable fact. You are, without proof, claiming a known liar/hoaxer purchased the bitcoin.org domain before the release of bitcoin.

Let Craig have his day in court, it’s not up to me to present the proof, it’s up to Craig. Calling Craig a fraud now is simply ‘premature’ and against all legal precedent. If this backfires for you, you are liable for defamation. But if you truly believe your claims, just wait for Craig to fail. You’re no better than he is claiming that he is a fraud before he even attempts to verify his claim in a truly civilized precedented matter.

Craig Wright is a fraud. Hes proven himself to be a fraud on several occasions and this latest stunt is just another instance of fraud in a long string of con jobs. Craig is not Satoshi. After this long winded hoax is finally put to rest you will owe us all an apology for putting up with your insufferably misinformative dialog.

If you are going to argue Craig Wright is a fraud, use This format:

Craig Wright is a fraud because________________ (insert supporting fact here).
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Mate, name calling is not an argument.

I'm not name calling so much as stating an observable fact. You are, without proof, claiming a known liar/hoaxer purchased the bitcoin.org domain before the release of bitcoin.

Let Craig have his day in court, it’s not up to me to present the proof, it’s up to Craig. Calling Craig a fraud now is simply ‘premature’ and against all legal precedent. If this backfires for you, you are liable for defamation. But if you truly believe your claims, just wait for Craig to fail. You’re no better than he is claiming that he is a fraud before he even attempts to verify his claim in a truly civilized precedented matter.

Craig Wright is a fraud. Hes proven himself to be a fraud on several occasions and this latest stunt is just another instance of fraud in a long string of con jobs. Craig is not Satoshi. After this long winded hoax is finally put to rest you will owe us all an apology for putting up with your insufferably misinformative dialog.
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
You can't prove that craig wright isn't satoshi either so fuck u haters.
it is nearly impossible to prove a negative when it comes to proving that someone is *not* a specific anonymous person who took steps to hide his identity.

You cannot prove that I am not satoshi either. I am not claiming to be satoshi.

There is a decent amount of evidence to suggest CSW is not satoshi, such as providing dubious evidence to prove he is satoshi which leads me to believe he is not satoshi. He could sign a message or a transaction from an address reasonably belonging to satoshi.

I don’t believe the whole “the coins are locked in a trust” story for a second. A competent trustee would require the coins be held in an address only the trustee controls to prevent being accused of misappropriating the coins if someone else moves them. The coins satoshi mined haven’t moved.  

If CSW wants to present credible evidence that he is satoshi, I will be more than willing to admit he is satoshi (I am willing to keep an open mind and consider additional evidence). I don’t think he will present such evidence.
jr. member
Activity: 82
Merit: 2
gmaxwell is an idiot that thinks high fees are a good thing. fuck that guy.

You can't prove that craig wright isn't satoshi either so fuck u haters.
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
I was watching some of his presentations the other day on youtube and its easy to see why people are persuaded by this guy.  He does appear extremely intelligent and can be a charming person.

There is no doubt that Craig Wright was around during the early days of bitcoin, the truth is no one really knows if Dave was Satoshi or someone else was.  The early private keys may have been destroyed or lost so just because someone can't sign them doesn't mean a thing.

Craig is relatively scatter brained and very difficult to interpret. But the news surrounding him is really just unprecedented name calling and alternative facts in the court of public opinion from what seems like valid evidence.

Ex: when Satoshi said ‘I am NOT a lawyer’ on this form. Craig Wright wasn’t a lawyer until 2012 yet that information was not public. He is currently doing his doctorate in law at Leicester.

This place is toxic, full of bots with one liners to persuade the average human. Look at a YouTube video comment that says ‘Craig Wright is a fraud’ or ‘faketoshi.’ The account often belongs to some sort of bot, but then the ripple effect plays in when you flood all the content with those one liners and alternative facts, The average human just believes it without their own research.

That wave of actual retards who came in during the December 2017 bitcoin bull run literally just jumped ship on the ‘faketoshi bcash LoL’ train without any knowledge of the space.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1427
I was watching some of his presentations the other day on youtube and its easy to see why people are persuaded by this guy.  He does appear extremely intelligent and can be a charming person.

There is no doubt that Craig Wright was around during the early days of bitcoin, the truth is no one really knows if Dave was Satoshi or someone else was.  The early private keys may have been destroyed or lost so just because someone can't sign them doesn't mean a thing.

I'm not sure i agree with this, and the way you describe him as smart/intelligent. Sure he might be streetwise, but as far as i know he has commited 0 code to Bitcoin Core, and his Bitcoin SV is just a garbage copy paste.

Comparing him to some of the developers of core, it becomes painfully clear that he knows absolutely nothing compared to these guys. (Wuille, Todd, maxwell et al.), and is definitely not on the same level.

I'd love to be proven wrong, (not really), but has he ever commited any code?


This looks like an interesting read, https://github.com/vbuterin/cult-of-craig
hero member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 554
I was watching some of his presentations the other day on youtube and its easy to see why people are persuaded by this guy.  He does appear extremely intelligent and can be a charming person.

There is no doubt that Craig Wright was around during the early days of bitcoin, the truth is no one really knows if Dave was Satoshi or someone else was.  The early private keys may have been destroyed or lost so just because someone can't sign them doesn't mean a thing.
Pages:
Jump to: