Topic: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this - page 2. (Read 492 times)

Mate, name calling is not an argument.

Your court of ‘public opinion’ does not overrule a court of law in a commonwealth jurisdiction. That image does not constitute proof, that’s not proof whatsoever, but there is proof published on the internet that he made that claim. There is proof that that image exists. Now why would he incriminate himself so close to his date in court unless he was certain the proof existed? What would his motive be?

It’s craig who is sseeking remedies against McCormack, Vitalik, Hodlonaut etc. You must believe he’s bluffing pretty hard.

Let Craig have his day in court, it’s not up to me to present the proof, it’s up to Craig. Calling Craig a fraud now is simply ‘premature’ and against all legal precedent. If this backfires for you, you are liable for defamation. But if you truly believe your claims, just wait for Craig to fail. You’re no better than he is claiming that he is a fraud before he even attempts to verify his claim in a truly civilized precedented matter.

Sit back, relax, enjoy the show.

Banks are required to keep statement records for 25. Bank statements will be provided directly from the bank, NOT from Craig, and therefore not subject to forgery.

The domain information will be provided directly from the service provider, as will the VPN payment. The email will be revealed as well. None of these documents will be provided directly from Craig.

Sure, you can deny the trust exists. I guess both parties and the court system really wasted their time if that’s the verdict.

Bingo. In the past his critics said he was just under immense pressure from his financiers to keep up the illusion that he was Satoshi but his actions of late go one step beyond that.


Congratulations. This is the most common sense thing you've ever said.


Ok you're taking a step backwards here in presuming the trust holding the bitcoins actually exists. As of now there is no evidence that it does.


This is part of the forged documents mindtrust was talking about. You've now completely slipped back into the baseless, zero credibility, zero respect for reality mode you got tagged for. Thats a shame. Just when I thought we were seeing some progress.

I agree that if Craig is a fraud he’s facing some SERIOUS penalty. Craig is only facing a cvil suit with the Klieman estate to recover the 1.1 million bitcoins (which cannot be recovered until 01/01/2020). Craig is now going after various trolls in court by which he plans to prove he is Satoshi for all the ‘alleged defamation’ he’s recieved.

Shouldn’t it be the other way around if your claims are true?

And why the hell was the bitcoin.org domain registered and paid for on Craig Wights credit card prior to the release of bitcoin?

He had countless of chances to save his face. He never stepped back. There is only one explanation to his situation: He is a sociopath.

After his first time which he declared himself being satoshi, If he had stepped back, We would have laughed and forgotten everything about him. But no, he wanted to go all the way down.

He is either going to end up in Jail or in a mental hospital if he keeps going. I am not a lawyer but I believe going to a trial with forged documents is a serious crime.

Craig has never been able to send BTC from the genesis block. Also I don't understand why he would have needed to hire a CEO of his new 'bitcoin compnay' like he stated in his letter. That logically doesn't make sense from a someone who if said to be satoshi clearly knows what decentralization means.

Those BTC are not under dispute here, they mined many blocks after that. You can see some of the original addresses to see the blocks they mined in the court docs.

I have not followed the case closely, but this particular part does not make sense to me.

The BTC that was (most probably) mined by satoshi in BTC's early days is "untouched" as in has not moved since receiving the block rewards. In other words, satoshi's coins have not moved since they were mined.

The term "misappropriated" would imply the coins were moved to addresses whose private keys are exclusively controlled by CSW. If CSW does have access to the private keys, he would logically move the coins in case Kleiman's wife finds backups of the keys and moves the coins herself. CSW could also create a signed message to "prove" or at least provide strong circumstantial evidence that he is satoshi. To my knowledge, CSW has done neither.

Without either of Klieman's wife or CSW having access to the private keys, any court ruling will be generally worthless because the coins will remain inaccessible, and unencumberable.

https://youtu.be/uVtOkE5vHbY

Youre a great writer. I don't agree with you 100% of the time but I appreciate that you bring an original flair to the forum.

Also one minor correction: it's Adam Back, not Beck. Who coincidentally, I believe is a much more likely candidate for being satoshi than Wright or Kleiman.

The Australian fraudster is suing the family of the late companion and replaced Ver as the main evil of the cryptocurrency world.
Read the original article on https://shitcoinoffering.com/faketoshi-how-did-craig-wright-end-up-like-this/



This is Dave Kleiman. In 1986, he enlisted in the US Army, where he was recognized as a soldier of the year. Let’s agree that this is an exceptional success for a helicopter mechanic. All thanks to the technical talent of Dave and his responsible attitude to the service. Four years later, he was demobilized and started to work for the Palm Beach County police.

“Why the fuck are you doing this with such impressive experience?” Asked a colleague Kleiman, to whom he presented the first computer with games for his daughter. “I always dreamed about it. Since childhood I loved movies about cops,” answered Kleiman and at the same time, he studied programming languages.

They came in handy when, in 1995, he was in a wheelchair due to a motorcycle accident. Joe Swanson will be created much later, so Dave left the police service and began working in IT. There he started to earn some good money and has founded the corporation Computer Forensics LLC with his partners. But that was not the end of his troubles. In 2010, he was diagnosed with serious body lesions from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. And three years later, he was found in his house rotting with alcohol, excrements, and fire guns.

Kleiman’s friends say that he discussed with them everything except for one topic: cryptography that he became interested in at the turn of the millennium. On this basis, he became acquainted with the Australian businessman Craig S Wright. There’s a theory that Kleiman was the real Satoshi Nakamoto. And Wright knew it but took all the glory to himself. Unsuccessfully. And now he is fighting off Ira Kleiman in court. He accuses Craig of misappropriating his brother’s 1.1 million BTC. Lawyers for the defendant are trying to convince the court that Kleiman only helped Wright to edit the Bitcoin protocol and had no rights to it. And the only Satoshi is the brilliant Australian himself, the person who invented the multi-billion dollar industry and stuff.

But the defense has one small yet important blind spot: Craig cannot prove that he is Satoshi. And trying to fuck everyone up. But it doesn’t work. For example, Reddit users have discovered that this allegedly written on behalf of Kleiman letter was sent 2 years after his death and with a spelling error in the name of the deceased.



Why is the Kleiman case indicative for characterizing Wright as a person? Because he failed his businesses like DeMorgan and Hotwire. And then he met Dave and suddenly got to the roots of Bitcoin. That, in fact, is currently his primary asset. At the same time, he didn’t help Kleiman when he was dying of parasites, and now his lawyers also claim that he was nothing but Sancho Panza for Don Quixote.

 
Of course, when you have protection in the person of Calvin Ayre, the grandmaster of parties with coke, twerk, and children, you may think that you’re blessed personally by God.
https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1105762349397565440

 
But it’s not a reason to fight the Twitter community putting the bounty on the real personal data of your critic Hodlonaut, suing Vitalik Buterin, Adam Beck and other less promoted cryptocats, saying in every interview that BTC will soon cost 30K bucks, and he knows this for sure because he is the real Satoshi. Although, maybe Vitaly called him a complete psycho and for a good reason. Otherwise, it is difficult to understand 155 patent applications for cryptocurrency innovations for the 2 fucking years. And this is way more even than Elon Musk invented in one episode of “The Simpsons” 🙂

I don’t like that people on the hype train, like CZ, pick on Wright and delist BSV to trigger the growth of their tokens. But this guy deserved it. Most recently, Ver, with his drug cartels and Mt Gox background, looked like the biggest villain of the crypto world. However, Craig saved his main antipode just right now. He is so disgusting to everyone that you can blame him for all mortal sins: from the winter nosedive of BTC (this, by the way, is very likely) to the Notre-Dame de Paris fire.

 
Wright’s ostracism from the crypto crowd will be an excellent precedent for its future development. We are all like-minded people here, fighting for the progress and decentralization, against banks, bureaucracy, and corporations. And we can win only if we’ll go along the general course. Without scam, bullshitting, and sneaky people: those who are ditching friends and starting useless wars only to enrich themselves and satisfy their ego.

 

The place of Wright and Ayre is on the outskirts of history. Maybe they have BTC and mining power. But they don’t have the most important things: trust and respect. Rest in peace, Dave Kleiman. I sincerely hope that justice will prevail, the court will put down the lying bitch kangaroo in the name of your memory and family. Amen. 

Take a step towards living a scam-free life, subscribe to our newsletter!

In Blockchain we trust!