Topic: Fastest coins/blockchains list (Read 556 times)

This from your words sounds exciting, I will have a closer look, thank you

What I would outline, with the platform you can issue brand loyalty tokens on the public Ethereum Blockchain. Unlike loyalty points, tokens are valued in real-time and can be exchanged and transferred between users. Brands can reward their clients, like with points. Users can redeem tokens for discounts, products, and services. Google guys and have a look at their website to have a better understanding

Evening there. Value matters a lot and this is a key point for me, while evaluating and choosing the particular solution. And what exactly is Brandtokens coming with?

Good morning there everyone. I would say that there are not so many solutions with real and practical value, thus I wonder - are you guys following any advanced these days? Cause I have lately discovered Brandtokens and pretty impressed with the concept guys are bringing

Nice list you got there OP, my favorite lightening speed altcoin is Apollo currency and Meta coin, I don't now how they create or built this coins, I noticed Apollo currency using 1.2 seconds to deliver with transaction fee of only 1 APL coin, incredible but Meta coin is another story, it's like Meta coin isn't working on blockchain we all know, you send in a second and it's already in the other wallet address.

Added:
DigiByte (DGB)
Fantom (FTM)
Futurepia (PIA)
Updated:
Elrond (ERD)
Fleta (FLETA)
MetaHash (MHC)
Steem (STEEM)
Stellar (XLM)
Updated SmartContract Language column.
Question:
Should I move NEO to Below1000TPS page?

I added link to something, that looks like always running loadtest. I do not know what is under the hood, I have not seen. And yes, if you talk about founder, its "Russian". Generally, there is five projects in this list you can call Russian. It's Credits, MetaHash, Universa, Tera and Waves. And there is one common problems with this projects, except Tera - getting information and numbers is very difficult, marketing usually is "borderline scammy" due to the low qualification of marketers. But if we talk about software, in most cases it's good coded. In my opinion Universa is original and fast. Waves is slower, but more secure. Waves Enterprise, according to the developers, is a fundamentally different platform and much faster, but, unfortunately, is the only, that uses Russian FSB licensed cryptography. "Russian" blockchain projects are quite competitive. And the noted problems are inherent in many Asian projects, and some Western ones as well. In addition, most Russian projects try to attract as many foreign partners and advisers as possible, just to meet the requirements of the industry. In this regard, I consider it incorrect to divide blockchain projects into Russian, Chinese, American and so on. I personally consider them all international.

Updates

new Blockchains with performance below 1000 TPS are placed on a separate tab Below 1000 TPS. Ardor (ARDR), Komodo (KMD) and Waves (WAVES) were moved there.

Refined indicators for some coins. Bug Fix - Nem(XEM) confirmation time. The block time is 1 minute. So the average confirmation time is 30 seconds.

DigiByte (DGB), Fantom (FTM), Futurepia (PIA), GoChain (GO) and Seele (SEELE) - remain under consideration. I'm still studying.

But do they also not open themselves to new attack vectors and become less secure?
What about Ada and rchain offer?

Okay which single design offers improvements over bitcoin in all areas without giving up or creating new issues either attack vectors etc?
I have been reading what I can but i am not trained in deep analysis of these designs

Is there a clear design that has more advantages than disadvantages over bitcoin?

So many people and PhDs claiming their design is  superior until competitors claim there is blatant weaknesses

If there really is a completed working tested proven design that is faster , more secure, equally decentralized that bitcoin ?which is it and is there wide consensus from peer reviews and reliable sources?

Seems impossible for ordinary members without years of training to correctly assess new designs.

The highest level math and coder I know at my college personally who originally was excited for dag or delegated pos, nano
Now returned and changed his mind to saying simple pos3 design could be the best balance all things considered with some small tweaks to ensure most robust and capable and reliable nodes.

He is now looking at what he called accounts based design but I lost the rest of his message to understand what project this is. It might be blacknet. Since he was looking at that I know. Or it could be something else entirely. That dev was first to upgrade original pos.

As you say perhaps I should have put my post as a question not statement.

From your list a coin that it have 1M tps is Universa and I don't see the tag unproved, which makes me think is proved.
This is weird because it beats a lot of top coins and the project is on 500+ rank acording to CMC. Never heard of it until now.

EDIT: Now I see is a Russian project and everything makes sense now

Blockchain 5.0 will be the fastest it things go accordingly to plan, better transfer speed and a milli transaction in a second is what crypto space have been dying to see, hopefully it works out

That was why I said if the data they provided is accurate, I am trying to give him some direction about the issue he raised here. There are a lot of projects out there, he will waste a lot of time searching it one by one without any direction to start.
Another thing is, he was asking about Fastest coins/blockchain. Fantom, Coti, Vite and other DAG-based projects are coins, right?
Is there a problem suggesting it to him?

Naturally, when a newbie makes a slightly naive statement, because it may be that he wants to learn more about the blockchain, well if you know more about blockchain, then it is better to give a little explanation for those who do not really understand, not to ridicule.

This is a very naive statement - some blockchains actually get faster the more it’s decentralised as they can use the latency of other nodes and delegation and sharding to Increase TPS

The fastest most tps = most centralized. This is a problem that they can only prentend to solve. The only real possible improvement over btc is variable blocksize. This does not account for dag or nano type designs

Agreed - full third party validation and a live test that anyone can try is needed and not for just 2/3 seconds  - as far as I know only temtum has proven this

Not surprising considering the 13 research papers richard wrote about temtum as part of his PhD

These claims should be analysed like science research not just fraud claims like fantom

There is no proof for that. Their claim is still a speculation like what already done by EOS and the result is being so far from what already speculated by the EOS team. We can't take it as a real TPS.
It's clearly mentioned in the WP if that's up to 300k TPS.
I don't even believe with big claim of TPS that can be done by those DAG platforms. that needs more audit.

Where can we validate the claims of fantom ? - anyone can claim high TPS but where it the demo / proof

Also dag =/ blockchain

A project that might worth mentioning Fantom, they claim they can process 300,000 TPS on its Opera chain.
I think it can be considered as the top fastest coin/blockchain, but of course, as long as the data they provided is accurate.
https://hackernoon.com/dag-a-buzz-or-breakthrough-9b433d0b5424
Do not forget other DAG-based projects such as Coti and Vite, they have a faster transaction speed compared to ETH and BTC.

Where do you have Bitcoin and its Lightning Network? Isn´t it speed enough with preserved decentralization.
For example Tron claims to be faster than Ethereum, but Tron use DPoS as its consensus, so only 27 representatives vote what will happen in the network. That is not much, look how community reacted to Libra´s consensus.