Temtum’s main net is today capable of 120,000 TPS before network updates are deployed
https://test.lab.temtum.com/admin/load-test
See for yourself the speed on Temtum’s network - this is on the live test net which is the same as the mainnet
Here’s the explorer to see the blocks
https://explorer.lab.temtum.com/
Third party validated by bsi - listed on liquid and coinall - more exchanges to come soon
This was a PhD developed over 7 years - no other blockchain can come close - educate yourself on projects like this which is more than just token price
10 nodes online, decentralised, 12 second block time but also able to do instant confirmations
Topic: Fastest coins/blockchains list - page 2. (Read 585 times)
Nice initiative. It would be helpful to people looking for quick transacting coins. I hope you'd be able to add coins and keep it updated for a long term. Turning it into a website might be able to make it self sustaining.
in my opinion the potential of crypto is that Altc is better than internet system services at central banks such as VISA. starting from the speed of service and ease and cheap access fees for each transaction. but the problem is the blockchain system can't cancel when we enter the address of our transaction incorrectly.
Waiting to give relictum pro a try, its said the relictum pro blockchain can process a million transactions in a second, surpassing EOS, ETH and Bitcoin all together, now that's what I called lightning speed
If I am not mistaken the coins like NANO who are all using some kind of similar mesh/dag or whatever they are called nowadays, the more transactions and the more users, the faster they actually become. I did not fully understand it,,, but this means the more users, the more TPS and more secure. That was fascinating to me, can anyone confirm?
There's one problem with such lists: most of those coins are far from the actual number of real/worthy transactions of established blockchains, like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
This means that they may not be properly tested. Of course, as long as you don't transfer big bucks on those chains, not much to worry.
And of course, some of them are not actually decentralized coins, so they'll beat easily the proper coins at transaction speed.
But I cannot argue, there are plenty of fast coins, I used myself Ripple and Waves and they are indeed fast. I am kinda surprised Dogecoin didn't make it to the list.
This means that they may not be properly tested. Of course, as long as you don't transfer big bucks on those chains, not much to worry.
And of course, some of them are not actually decentralized coins, so they'll beat easily the proper coins at transaction speed.
But I cannot argue, there are plenty of fast coins, I used myself Ripple and Waves and they are indeed fast. I am kinda surprised Dogecoin didn't make it to the list.
Bitcoin is taking at least 10 minutes gap for latency reasons whereas visa and swift are working based on central server based system hence for them it is much possible to process literally big number of tx per second.
I mean to say we should not focus on the things which are trying to shake the basics of what Mr.Satoshi has designed.
So, on top of blockchain based things like lightening-network kind of developments alone will persist and serve what you actually look for.
I mean to say we should not focus on the things which are trying to shake the basics of what Mr.Satoshi has designed.
So, on top of blockchain based things like lightening-network kind of developments alone will persist and serve what you actually look for.
It is a good list. The only thing that caught my attention is that Ethereum is not on the list. Yes, sometimes transactions can take minutes. But, this is normal for this kind of crowded blockchain.
It's because title is 'fastest coins/blockchain list'
Other blockchains such as steem/eos could be processing transactions as much as ethereum, 'crowded' isn't an excuse. Plus there aren't any transaction fees either.
Updates:
New column! Nodes online - average daily number of nodes online.
At the request of the people, I added a column with the number of nodes in the network. For networks where nodes are divided by role (like Fleta), the total number of nodes is indicated. For others (like BitShares or Universa) the number of masternodes (mn) or validators is indicated for the absence of other data. For some networks, the number of nodes could not be found, or the data is inconsistent. They are still marked with a question mark (?). These are Dragonchain (DRGN), EOS, ICON (ICX), Komodo (KMD) and OmiseGO (OMG). If you have data on the number of nodes in their mainnet, let me know.
DigiByte (DGB), Fantom (FTM), Futurepia (PIA), GoChain (GO), Seele (SEELE) - pending
Ardor (ARDR), Komodo (KMD), Waves (WAVES) - with all due respect, candidates for departure
AION will not be included in the list, as a) slow and b) having a central switch
Relictum Pro not listed as misunderstood
New column! Nodes online - average daily number of nodes online.
At the request of the people, I added a column with the number of nodes in the network. For networks where nodes are divided by role (like Fleta), the total number of nodes is indicated. For others (like BitShares or Universa) the number of masternodes (mn) or validators is indicated for the absence of other data. For some networks, the number of nodes could not be found, or the data is inconsistent. They are still marked with a question mark (?). These are Dragonchain (DRGN), EOS, ICON (ICX), Komodo (KMD) and OmiseGO (OMG). If you have data on the number of nodes in their mainnet, let me know.
DigiByte (DGB), Fantom (FTM), Futurepia (PIA), GoChain (GO), Seele (SEELE) - pending
Ardor (ARDR), Komodo (KMD), Waves (WAVES) - with all due respect, candidates for departure
AION will not be included in the list, as a) slow and b) having a central switch
Relictum Pro not listed as misunderstood
List updates:
Checked data on three recently added fast blockchains:
Six more in Waitlist: AION, DigiByte (DGB), Fantom (FTM), Futurepia (PIA), GoChain (GO), MetaHash (MHC). And it seems that soon I will have to leave only those that achieve performance over 1000 tps.
Exchanges Page: New!
Initially, my goal was to find out which blockchain can hold a load comparable to a visa, but I see that at this stage the main practical application is a quick transfer between exchanges. Therefore, I added the Exchanges page, where I compared all the coins with the most popular exchanges. There are six of them so far: Binance, Bittrex, Bitfinex, BTC-Alpha, Crex24, Kraken. What else to add? Yobit? Exmo? Huobi? Seems like the EOS, Ripple, Tron and OmiseGO are best listed for now. And yes, there is the withdrawal fee for each coin, if it is on the exchange!
Checked data on three recently added fast blockchains:
| Dragonchain (DRGN) | 15 000 tps |
| Fleta (FLETA) | 14 000 tps |
| SysCoin (SYS) | 14 000 - 30 000 tps |
Exchanges Page: New!
Initially, my goal was to find out which blockchain can hold a load comparable to a visa, but I see that at this stage the main practical application is a quick transfer between exchanges. Therefore, I added the Exchanges page, where I compared all the coins with the most popular exchanges. There are six of them so far: Binance, Bittrex, Bitfinex, BTC-Alpha, Crex24, Kraken. What else to add? Yobit? Exmo? Huobi? Seems like the EOS, Ripple, Tron and OmiseGO are best listed for now. And yes, there is the withdrawal fee for each coin, if it is on the exchange!
dragonchain quite fast too.
Thank you for +merit support and contribution. There is 3 projects in my waitlist to add. Fleta (FLETA) 0.5sec 14 000 tps
Dragonchain 15 000 tps
SysCoin (SYS) 60 000 tps
Fleta and SysCoin has published detailed Loadtest reports (links already in the table). Dragonchain tweeted their TPS as 60 000. Sometimes advertised and verified TPS are little different.
I requested additional information on Dragonchain performance from the developers. And I'm trying to find information about average confirmation time for all 3. As soon as I know the transaction confirmation times, I will immediately add them to the list. 
It is a good list. The only thing that caught my attention is that Ethereum is not on the list. Yes, sometimes transactions can take minutes. But, this is normal for this kind of crowded blockchain.
actually it is normal but we know that sometimes network on ethereum blockchain is difficult to predict, sometimes it can be interrupted, and sometimes suddenly many people transact here causing this network slow down, even to make transactions in a matter of minutes it requires quite expensive gas, in my opinion ethereum does not deserve to be included in "fastest coins" category
It is a good list. The only thing that caught my attention is that Ethereum is not on the list. Yes, sometimes transactions can take minutes. But, this is normal for this kind of crowded blockchain.
snip
I really appreciate your work, and I hope you can keep updating it from time to time(there will be an update happening, for example eth will go to pos and else) because it has value for the researcher and also for the users that look for the best coin for making a transaction. dragonchain quite fast too.
about to know how much TPS that can be gained by a blockchain platform needs more deeply research.
I just take EOS as an example and 50k is not a real TPS that can be achieved by EOS. The fact that block.one is even feeling doubt if that protocol can be used to launch voice or not.
You should read this to know more about that
https://hackernoon.com/who-scales-it-best-blockchains-tps-analysis-pv39g25mg
Thank you for article. Its very skeptical, but quite fair. Agree with you. Initially, I focused on publications, but I have an increasing understanding that studies done by a group of users by prior agreement deserve much more trust. The one useful I found is FLETA Mainnet Performance Test Report, mentioned in your article, and other is Loadtest of ARDOR. I think that all research regarding the speed of certain blockchain should look something like this two. I just take EOS as an example and 50k is not a real TPS that can be achieved by EOS. The fact that block.one is even feeling doubt if that protocol can be used to launch voice or not.
You should read this to know more about that
https://hackernoon.com/who-scales-it-best-blockchains-tps-analysis-pv39g25mg
how about adding the source on the table instead of in the thread? for example, you can attach the link to the source that claims eos can do 50,000 tps or something like that.
we can use the source you use to compare it with ours, I found out nem can do 4,000 tps.
Thank you for suggestion. Yes, regarding EOS I's mistake, I made at the start of research. The source that misled me is here. This was the first article I read on this topic and which, in principle, encouraged me to begin collecting additional information. So, your proposal about adding source in table is reasonable and of cource i'll do it. And yes, another source shows, that 3996 TPS is record for EOS mainnet (Jungle Testnet 2.0 record is 9179 TPS). we can use the source you use to compare it with ours, I found out nem can do 4,000 tps.
how about adding the source on the table instead of in the thread? for example, you can attach the link to the source that claims eos can do 50,000 tps or something like that.
we can use the source you use to compare it with ours, I found out nem can do 4,000 tps.
we can use the source you use to compare it with ours, I found out nem can do 4,000 tps.
Nice post OP! I always feel when alts start to claim fastest on the blockchain sector, then they really have no idea about what people really need. Worse,,, people fall for it and also think fast is good.
For example, Litecoin which I like, yes it is fast, and so is Ethereum, but which site on earth will give you 0 confirmation? None at all.
For example, Litecoin which I like, yes it is fast, and so is Ethereum, but which site on earth will give you 0 confirmation? None at all.
Interesting list.
However, it is important to note that up to a certain point, the speed of the coin simply does not matter anymore - whether or not a block will confirm within 10 secs after you sending it or 5 seconds honestly shouldn't bother anyone using this for normal commerce.
This shouldn't be the sole factor taken into judgment for picking your investments.
Thanks for the feedback. The main question that guided me in my research was how close are the blockchain or distributed ledger solutions to displacing or replacing traditional payment systems. Are they technically ready to beat VISA or SWIFT TPS? And im afraid the answer is not yet. But I do not argue that blockchain technologies are more universal, more functional and offer more features. However, it is important to note that up to a certain point, the speed of the coin simply does not matter anymore - whether or not a block will confirm within 10 secs after you sending it or 5 seconds honestly shouldn't bother anyone using this for normal commerce.
This shouldn't be the sole factor taken into judgment for picking your investments.
I just take EOS as an example and 50k is not a real TPS that can be achieved by EOS. The fact that block.one is even feeling doubt if that protocol can be used to launch voice or not.
You should read this to know more about that
https://hackernoon.com/who-scales-it-best-blockchains-tps-analysis-pv39g25mg
Interesting list.
However, it is important to note that up to a certain point, the speed of the coin simply does not matter anymore - whether or not a block will confirm within 10 secs after you sending it or 5 seconds honestly shouldn't bother anyone using this for normal commerce.
This shouldn't be the sole factor taken into judgment for picking your investments.
Thanks for the feedback. The main question that guided me in my research was how close are the blockchain or distributed ledger solutions to displacing or replacing traditional payment systems. Are they technically ready to beat VISA or SWIFT TPS? And im afraid the answer is not yet. But I do not argue that blockchain technologies are more universal, more functional and offer more features. However, it is important to note that up to a certain point, the speed of the coin simply does not matter anymore - whether or not a block will confirm within 10 secs after you sending it or 5 seconds honestly shouldn't bother anyone using this for normal commerce.
This shouldn't be the sole factor taken into judgment for picking your investments.
Jump to: