I wonder how much similarity is between the lists, I guess is it's over 50%, although Jaroslaw has been tapping into another "source" for sure.
Either way it seems having an obnoxious personality only gets you so far, "the market" seems saturated for now.
Topic: [Feature added] Color besides usernames for Ignored by % of established members. - page 3. (Read 27265 times)
September 29, 2013, 06:14:51 AM
September 28, 2013, 11:25:49 PM
Ah, a gladiator battle!
September 28, 2013, 09:44:08 PM
Can't believe Atlas is still on there. 
September 28, 2013, 09:32:42 PM
smoothie was finally unseated as ignore champion! Jaroslaw was permabanned, though, so who knows how long his reign will last.
Code:
member established_ignores raw_percentage posts adjusted_percentage
Jaroslaw 174 .04720 727 .04708
smoothie 138 .03743 9022 .03281
MPOE-PR 137 .03716 4328 .03509
wopwop 132 .03581 687 .03570
ElectricMucus 132 .03581 6289 .03267
ChartBuddy 129 .03499 3119 .03357
zyk 114 .03092 411 .03097
Come-from-Beyond 109 .02957 2024 .02874
iCEBREAKER 106 .02875 1719 .02809
crumbs 96 .02604 1821 .02532
Walsoraj 85 .02306 541 .02303
eve 83 .02251 346 .02260
sublime5447 82 .02224 1676 .02160
bulanula 79 .02143 2961 .02009
TECHICENINE 78 .02116 302 .02126
Matthew N. Wright 77 .02088 6516 .01762
bonker 77 .02088 616 .02082
Ira H. Fuchs 77 .02088 40 .02113
subSTRATA 75 .02034 42 .02059
MysteryMiner 73 .01980 1474 .01927
Atlas 72 .01953 934 .01929
Coinseeker 72 .01953 975 .01927
nkspace 70 .01899 188 .01916
WaverleyStreet 70 .01899 78 .01921
becoin 67 .01817 952 .01793
puffpuffpass 62 .01682 190 .01698
gweedo 62 .01682 5255 .01424
lucif 60 .01627 1970 .01548
Maria 59 .01600 427 .01604
Viceroy 57 .01546 1843 .01473
bitrebel 56 .01519 928 .01496
cunicula 56 .01519 1998 .01437
Jaroslaw 174 .04720 727 .04708
smoothie 138 .03743 9022 .03281
MPOE-PR 137 .03716 4328 .03509
wopwop 132 .03581 687 .03570
ElectricMucus 132 .03581 6289 .03267
ChartBuddy 129 .03499 3119 .03357
zyk 114 .03092 411 .03097
Come-from-Beyond 109 .02957 2024 .02874
iCEBREAKER 106 .02875 1719 .02809
crumbs 96 .02604 1821 .02532
Walsoraj 85 .02306 541 .02303
eve 83 .02251 346 .02260
sublime5447 82 .02224 1676 .02160
bulanula 79 .02143 2961 .02009
TECHICENINE 78 .02116 302 .02126
Matthew N. Wright 77 .02088 6516 .01762
bonker 77 .02088 616 .02082
Ira H. Fuchs 77 .02088 40 .02113
subSTRATA 75 .02034 42 .02059
MysteryMiner 73 .01980 1474 .01927
Atlas 72 .01953 934 .01929
Coinseeker 72 .01953 975 .01927
nkspace 70 .01899 188 .01916
WaverleyStreet 70 .01899 78 .01921
becoin 67 .01817 952 .01793
puffpuffpass 62 .01682 190 .01698
gweedo 62 .01682 5255 .01424
lucif 60 .01627 1970 .01548
Maria 59 .01600 427 .01604
Viceroy 57 .01546 1843 .01473
bitrebel 56 .01519 928 .01496
cunicula 56 .01519 1998 .01437
September 28, 2013, 08:07:37 PM
Who is the highest ranking Ignoree?
I'm thinking I've got to be near top brass by now.
I'm thinking I've got to be near top brass by now.
September 21, 2013, 02:54:31 PM
So...am I highlighted? I just see between 16-33, working my way up to Scottish Rite ignore rate!
I don't think I actually caused many if not most of the ignores...it was a hacker who usurped my account for a day. I was able to regain control, but the damage had been done with him pissing on every thread he could find that day.
Yes you are. I don't think I actually caused many if not most of the ignores...it was a hacker who usurped my account for a day. I was able to regain control, but the damage had been done with him pissing on every thread he could find that day.
August 12, 2013, 04:51:37 PM
So...am I highlighted? I just see between 16-33, working my way up to Scottish Rite ignore rate!
I don't think I actually caused many if not most of the ignores...it was a hacker who usurped my account for a day. I was able to regain control, but the damage had been done with him pissing on every thread he could find that day.
I don't think I actually caused many if not most of the ignores...it was a hacker who usurped my account for a day. I was able to regain control, but the damage had been done with him pissing on every thread he could find that day.
August 06, 2013, 06:10:23 AM
The sockpuppets must have bailed. haha
Mine jumped to 16-35? and now its back down to 11-17. Silly noobs can't make up their minds.
Mine jumped to 16-35? and now its back down to 11-17. Silly noobs can't make up their minds.
August 06, 2013, 02:20:55 AM
I no longer see my ignorance rating under my avatar on my posts or in my profile. Did something change?
August 05, 2013, 04:28:00 PM
When people call you a troll for making posts they disagree with and put you on their ignore list for replying to people who took the time to respond to your comments, the whole system becomes meaningless and just encourages circle-jerks.
I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.
I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.
You certainly understand the mechanism, but I must say at this point I see it at as an honor that some people find my posts so annoying that they absolutely do not want to see them ever again. Only certain kind of ideological minded people done that, and there are alot of them on this forum. So I recently decided to fully commit myself to their expectations and changed my forum appearance accordingly.
Also smoothie hasn't posted as much recently so I might have overtaken him by now.
July 12, 2013, 06:23:58 PM
When people call you a troll for making posts they disagree with and put you on their ignore list for replying to people who took the time to respond to your comments, the whole system becomes meaningless and just encourages circle-jerks.
I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.
I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.
+ 2-8
My list began to grow thanks to some, not so understanding, folks who didn't like me asking for proof that DGM repays all that it takes.
Those that choose to ignore should be required to explain why and have a tally or list of those they have blacklisted. Likewise, those being ignored should know these people are so they can stand up for themselves if necc.
OK you 10-16, mostly DGM luvin noobs ! Get back into your cages !
HT xD
update..
Make that 10-15.. Its about time I cleaned my monitor.
July 05, 2013, 01:12:17 PM
Some people only post hate, spam or trolls. I ignore only them, which represents 3 or 4 people.
July 05, 2013, 11:43:02 AM
When people call you a troll for making posts they disagree with and put you on their ignore list for replying to people who took the time to respond to your comments, the whole system becomes meaningless and just encourages circle-jerks.
I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.
I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.
June 28, 2013, 06:09:14 PM
No.
June 28, 2013, 05:47:18 AM
Did the requirements for being 'very-established' changed since activity appears here?
June 18, 2013, 06:21:04 PM
i'm not understanding the numbers here. my account says 9-14 ignores.
June 07, 2013, 11:27:46 AM
The number of established users increased, moving the range up.
June 07, 2013, 12:51:04 AM
Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
You're very established if:
- You have 100+ hours of online time
- You have 100+ posts
- You registered 30+ days ago
There are ~1414 very-established users right now.
The change only shows up in the default theme.
Is this still true or has the system been changed?- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
You're very established if:
- You have 100+ hours of online time
- You have 100+ posts
- You registered 30+ days ago
There are ~1414 very-established users right now.
The change only shows up in the default theme.
I believe it's still the same, except there are probably more very-established users now.
Something maybe changed?
My little ticker now shoes 13-27 ignores, and I believe it was 12-something yesterday. I guess it could be users ignoring me that are becoming established, but wouldn't that dilute the numbers and hence reduce them? Honestly, I have barely been on here for the past year and have hardly been trolling since my return...though there was some newb trying to solicit $300 for an occulus for his VR porn integration while preaching about the necessity of abusing of women, and I did him a faggot in a mocking manner while demanding he fight me in person if he's the man he claims to be. Even if that racked up some ignores, why would the lower limit of my range go up?
June 05, 2013, 03:06:06 PM
Current rules are:
Is this still true or has the system been changed?I adjusted the thresholds.
Old:
New:
Also, I made the light highlight lighter.
Old:
Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 0.75% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 0.75% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
New:
Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
Also, I made the light highlight lighter.
and
I changed the algorithm to take into account your number of posts.
ignore_ratio = (established_ignore_count + 1 - posts / 500) / total_established_users
The range that you might see under your avatar is no longer quite accurate, though it's pretty close.
ignore_ratio = (established_ignore_count + 1 - posts / 500) / total_established_users
The range that you might see under your avatar is no longer quite accurate, though it's pretty close.
June 05, 2013, 03:05:13 PM
Current rules are:
Is this still true or has the system been changed?I adjusted the thresholds.
Old:
New:
Also, I made the light highlight lighter.
Old:
Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 0.75% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 0.75% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
New:
Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight
Also, I made the light highlight lighter.
and
I changed the algorithm to take into account your number of posts.
ignore_ratio = (established_ignore_count + 1 - posts / 500) / total_established_users
The range that you might see under your avatar is no longer quite accurate, though it's pretty close.
ignore_ratio = (established_ignore_count + 1 - posts / 500) / total_established_users
The range that you might see under your avatar is no longer quite accurate, though it's pretty close.
Jump to: