Topic: [FIBRE] | 625k | [SuperNET] | FibreDark | FibreLock | FibreGateway | ZeroTrust | - page 120. (Read 514922 times)

I am only trying to give my take on the reality of the situation. You've seen enough of me by now to know I've been here for a while. Thus far I have believed in the cause, but I am above all else a disciplined investor and I wont be waiting for my investment to be debased by the creation of a fundraising clone. The more talk of two coins the more the market will hurt in my view at least.

From reading above posts i understand this is Your biggest concern - people will sell some Fibre to buy some FibreLite

As stated before it will be community decision , poll is just suggesting quick funding options

Why is everyone speaking about jumping the ship lol

Fibre development continues very good and poll can doesn`t matter at all if community just doesn`t want it

Head up really

Still option A is best solution in my opinion

from 60k this coin was pumped, expect to buy a lot cheaper 

I agree!! But talking about jumping ship during this debate is only fueling the uncertainty. I would also have to question your commitment to the cause, due to the fact you are will so easily "jump ship" as you put it.

Its a hard one because our early adopters that have been with us since day one are for option A, but our more recent following we have gained are not.

This will ultimately be a community decision and will shape the future of Fibre. For the best I hope.

I think if option A wins out this poll and it is the option selected to go forward you can expect many large holders to jump ship. I would love to be part of fibre going forward, but I'll be forced to start looking to unload if option A is ultimately chosen. I get the feeling there are other larger holders who share my current position. Ultimately uncertainty is bad for everyone, and a decision will have to be made. Let's make the right one!

Hey Flogi , it is discussion on funding quickly future development(not only blockcypher but massive marketing strategies and new great developers who cost a lot) to speed up things and get massive exposure earlier

We suggested option a as we think it won`t impact Fibre and can bring only good things

Option b and c are suggested by community, we won`t definitely decide by ourselves

We are continuing our work and aren`t slowing down with anything ,rev2 is just around the corner

OK, thank you and respect what you are doing. I have just seen this new coin idea before and it's not as simple as it seems. It does and will cause panic and we all want to protect our investments "long term".

Are you willing to so easily jump ship? We are having a discussion! I have said many times nothing is set in stone. If the community do not want this then it will not happen.

Also, who said I don't care about your investment. I'm holding Fibre also, I care very much about OUR investment. My investment in Fibre is not just financial but also my time. I have spend hundreds of hours working on Fibre. I have missed out on time with my family to work on Fibre. Im the most invested person out of everyone.

This is a very important social experiment we're running here with FIBRE
as it has profound implications as to the mass adoption potential of crypto in general ..

Crypto currency startups are initially funded via IPO/ICO for POS coins or via a pre-mine
in the case of POW coins .. A very few projects are initially self-funded by the dev team or
are lucky enough to have an angel/whale investor willing to underwrite the launch and
initial development of a given project .. The existing funding options require a large dose
of 'trust' from the investors and we've all witnessed/suffered from the potential for fraud and
abuse inherent in the process to date  .. And .. at some point .. they ALL run out of MONEY ..

Perhaps we should focus on the 'end game' to help identify the best funding techniques
to facilitate getting there .. It's easier to see the path if we all have a clear vision of the goal ..
Presumably, we're all trying to create transaction networks that are secure, easy to use, feature
rich, adaptable, self funding, and mass adoptable .. At some point these networks must be self
sustaining or they will ultimately fail and they have to survive in the marketplace long enough
to achieve a "network effect" to attract necessary VC funding to go to the next level ..

Of the options presented in the poll option B makes the most sense to me ..

We have FIBRE ( v1.0 )  with a proven feature set and attributes but need additional funding ..
We 'rebrand' FIBRE ( v1.0 ) via an ICO as FIBRE ( v2.0 ) with all the existing features of FIBRE (v1.0 ) at launch ..
New investors will willing pay a higher market cap for FIBRE ( v2.0 ) because of the existing features at launch ..
Additionally, provide a small financial 'incentive' to existing FIBRE (v1.0 ) holders to 'convert' to FIBRE ( v2.0 ) ..
Rinse and repeat as necessary ( ie ) there may need to be subsequent funding rounds that would
require the creation of a FIBRE ( v3.0 ) and/or FIBRE (v4.0 ) to reach the ultimate  'goal' ..

Just throwing it out there ..

Triff ..

I'm not familiar with Yin/Yang but rather am referring to BST/BSTY. If it were my decision I'd focus on Fibre, continue to do good things, create an elite community and not look back. As mentioned before, build value in Fibre as it currently exists and the money that is required to fund things like BlockCypher will come...

The poll is confusing people, even myself and frankly getting a bad feeling about all of this now.

I am not sure I am voting for the things I stated in my previous post. In short, if there is a new coin presented that dilutes my current investment, I will exit to a new coin, not just a new one in this community. If the intent was to spur FUD, I think it's starting to work so I would seriously evaluate the majority concerns of the community and especially those with larger investments.

Say you don't care about my investment and you will shore up my feelings.

wnw

Lol whitepaper!!

We would have 5 road maps around the below subjects.

Adoption

Marketing

Wallet development

Block Chain development

Cloud development

With a trusted Dev team behind it FibreLite could be the biggest IPO since Etherium. Dont you want to be a part of history.

This is speculative! nothing is set in stone. If the community do not want outside investment. Then we will carry on as we are

Please see the above post by Triff. It sums up the issue faced by not only Fibre but by Crypto as a whole.

If you can think of any brilliant solutions please share.

Regards
Killa

Do you have a good whitepaper for the ICO prepared? Thats for me the most important part.

True, choosing option A

Correct!! Option B was the first idea we came up with. It was thrown out because FibreLites impact on Fibre is speculative, Option B's impact is certain.

Why would someone go to the trouble of creating an email address and a BTCTalk account just to vote on our poll??

Option B is impacting the Fibrecoin (Market price) a lot .. just beware of it guys!

You can spoof IP's for the vote, thus I don't trust the poll.

Most of our investors do not post in the BCT! I have however had several people contact me on IRC. If I think someone is trying to game the poll, we will host it on our website. Here I could have more protections in place e.g Captchas and IP detection.