Topic: [FIBRE] | 625k | [SuperNET] | FibreDark | FibreLock | FibreGateway | ZeroTrust | - page 118. (Read 514922 times)

Good choice, show youre skills, volume will pick up and donations will be bigger!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>UPDATE<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

A debate took place today on the funding of Block Cypher and capital for marketing etc.

The outcome:

Nothing has changed..................................

We will press on as usual and will keep up our aggressive development schedule.

Revision 2 Will be released on the 18th and Private beta testing starts on the 11th

If I knew this debate would stir peoples emotions as it did, i would never have entered into it.

I repeat!! Nothing has changed we will still press on as normal.

There will be no secondary coin offering or FibreLite. Lets just press on

Wooohooo This should add some buy pressure. Guys get your rigs pointed at the Fibre Multipool.

I dont know how many times I have to say it!! We will carry on as normal nothing has changed!! if investors want to jump ship because of a debate that took place, what am i supposed to do!

I was not forcing anything on anyone, we merely asked for opinions on the matter. Those selling will be kicking themselfs in a few weeks when they are priced out.

Get them rigs mining everyone!!!

Krushang

yes you are killa! Thats completly right and thats why we have a strong community.

But now it is all about communication strategy and announcement strategy this stuff should be discussed internal.

Honestly a lot of investors loosing trust atm in my opinion due to this chaos here.

Can't we focus on Revision 2 now?

There is enough time till then to discuss this stuff in the irc or in private channels.

Thats what I meant with having a Fibreboard with people who have less than 10.000 Coins but who are trustworthy. You don't have to give them voting shares if you don't want but you can have constructive discussions about some stuff.

Honestly atm this is really chaos here

Lets focus again one step after the other step.

E.g.

Rev 2 :  XY DAte
Announcement how we go forward:  XY Date

..

I don't know but I would not invest atm in Fibre due to this chaos! No one knows how it goes on and if now a new coin etc pp...

Yes, please look at my history. I have nothing to hide. My only point here is you are putting together plans for another shit coin and once I heard that, mind was made up. I am not the only one and you are trying to fabricate me and others as having a shrill account to benefit your own desires. Go ahead, spin it like you want like you want, but trying to make me look like I was playing this topic is a sorry excuse for your own short comings. I'm trying to present ideas as I did in my earlier comments and you are just trying to cause a ton of panic and distrust and act like putting this new coin out is the way to solve all issues.

Enjoy the Silence.

wnw

So our debate today was floored because two of the main opposer's were your sock puppets.

I wish this was true and I had multiple coins like the other devs! I guess my downfall is putting the community before my own pocket.

We are the most active dev team in Crypto because we are only working on Fibre

Listen up, I also use multiple account all over the place and never try and hide it, as do many like me because I have a lot of coin and a lot of interest. I know you are an op on multiple coins as well (so don't gt preachy with me). I could give to shits about what you think of me. Based on your actions I have already made up my mind what I'm going to do because this is the same shit other coins pull over and over. Thought you guys had something here but you fucking blew it retards.


wnw

You accidentally signed your post from your other account with your name lol!! Not very clever.............

What?

OK putting on my financial engineer hat, because I think we can do better than donations.  My suggested structure follows, which meets the goal of raising money, without hurting current investors or creating some unworkable two coin structure (i.e. hurt current investors...):

1) Fibrelite is a new coin, that Fibre holders are able to convert to.  Fibre will cease to exist some period after the conversion.

2) "Baseline" # of coins in Fibrelite is the same as Fibre and Fibre holders can convert 1:1.  Thus there is no dilution
2a) But now you say then no money is raised, so what is the point

3) "Upside" # of coins in Fibrelite are the ICO.  Selling price is whatever the price of Fibre is at the start of the ICO (or some average over the last X days, whatever).  However many BTC come in from the ICO dictate how many "Upside" coins get actually released, the remaining unsold coins are burned.  Maybe some BTC target is set, but the key point is the unsold coins (if any) are burned.

4) Net result is that the value of Fibre holdings = value of fibrelite holdings in BTC for current fibre investors (because price is the same and # of coins held by individual investors are the same), but since new coins are sold in the fibrelite ICO, devs get the money they need to maximally execute on their awesome plans.

Comments / criticisms?  Let me know if any of that was unclear.  May need some tweaking but I think this is straightforwardly feasible from a tech perspective and best achieves everyone's objective.  



From a communication perspective, maybe you say something like the following:

1) Fibre is a great coin, and the worst case is that we continue to develop aggressively to grow and meet our goals

2) But we have even greater goals to create value for investors that we can execute on with new funding

3) Therefore we are considering a "v2" upgraded Fibre, ie. Fibrelite, which would have an ICO to provide that funding

4) We are 100% committed to not only protecting Fibre investors, but making sure they as early supporters get all the same upside in Fibrelite, which we think will be even greater for them than if we simply stay on the current course and develop fibre only (which is an option, but not one we think is the best)

5) To achieve (4), the ICO will have the same coin price as fibre, and new coins will only be created pro rata to new invested BTC coming in.  Fibrelite will also benefit, because potential investors will know our level of commitment in return for their support

Why was you trying to manipulate the debate today by using multiple accounts?

Any shred of respect I had for you is gone........................................

Will someone just me how much BTC is needed still to get this FIBRE in the cloud or moon for that matter...

Our community is most active in the whole altcoinworld

Retweet please

https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/519540140205547520

Says the person thats using 2 accounts to spread uncertainty lol

It has been brought to my attention that 2 of the main people opposing FibreLite are actually one person using the same account.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9116080
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9117554

im not sure what you are getting out of this but its really sad!!

On another note!! We have paid 1.5btc for the multipool. Its a lot but there was no one else and it was needed.

Whats left of the premine will not cover this amount! So we will make up the rest our selfs, as we have done many times.

So there is now zero premine left.