Topic: Find Trendon Shavers in person thread... [BTCST, BTS&T, pirateat40] - page 11. (Read 81238 times)

Guess where they got most of the info:

This Forum:
http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.4.pdf

His fiat accounts:
http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.5.1.pdf

Have no idea where this came from: (someone backed a GPUMax Database???):
http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.9.pdf
http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.8.pdf


Looks like Daphne P Downes did most of the work:
http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.5.pdf

Just ask your banker. He has tons of charts like this about your own expenses, automatically generated every week/month. And this is not a joke.

Regarding the Shaver's one, it took a fair amount of investigation, time and effort. I'm pretty sure it would take weeks, if not months to make the same with, let me pick a random nick... TradeFortress expenses.

Because SEC acheived a (n obviously incomplete) one, does not mean it's easy.
Actually, all the opposite.

You mean except for the enormous amounts of bitcoin leaked to "Unidentified Sources or Recipients".

Damn.. I wish they would create such a nice chart on my finances, would really help with organizing things! :-)

Now who expected something to happen after all that time? Popcorn never runs out in Bitcoin-land!

Ente

That would be: no, no and no.

so. can someone translate all this stuff for normal people?

any chance we will see or  money back?
is there any money left ?
is he in custody?

It was said here or in another thread that much of the preliminary evidence are verbatim quotes taken off the bitcointalk.org public forum.

Its scary how easily the SEC can follow the money of someone without much trouble. Good post BCB, definitely an interesting chart of his scheme.

This is interesting



http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.6.pdf

His partners in GPUMAX are not secret. The information here is freely available on bitcointalk and around the internet.

GPUMAX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
MICHAEL THALASINOS
5605 MUIRFIELD CT.
FLOWER MOUND, TX 75022

TRENDON SHAVERS
7951 COLLIN MCKINNEY PKWY.,#3015
MCKINNEY, TX 75070

ZACH NAKASKA
4645 PLANO PARKWAY,#12302
CARROLLTON, TX 75010

INCORP SERVICES, INC.
GPUMAX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
815 BRAZOS ST STE 500
AUSTIN, TX 78701

There are either definitely other people involved or it's just a possibility. Both can't be true at the same time.

If there were other people, maybe he'll turn them over for a reduced sentence (if any).

^Moustakis' forum account

You guys are funny...

It said something about repatriation in one of the docs, where they mentioned asset freezing..

What if he tries to leave the country? Shouldn't they flag his passport, or is that not legal in this type of litigation?

I guess that mostly depends on if Pirate's actually still in the same damned apartment.

I don't think the SEC can have anything seized for a civil case, which may otherwise lead to damning evidence. ETA2: Not to say the available evidence isn't already damning...

ETA: D&T is going through the evidence much faster than I am, heh. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2799597

From D&T's post (my bold):
Here, the Commission easily makes a prima facie showing that Defendants: (1) operated
a Ponzi scheme in violation of Securities Act Section 17(a), and Exchange Act Section 10(b) and
Rule 10b-5; and (2) sold unregistered securities in violation of Securities Act Sections 5(a) and
5(c). Moreover, Shavers diverted BTCST investors’ BTC to a BTC currency exchange
headquartered in Japan, misappropriating it for his personal use. Given the nature the conduct
and these violations, a preliminary order freezing Defendants’ assets, authorizing expedited
discovery as to the location and extent of their assets, directing them to repatriate ill-gotten gains,
directing them to provide verified accountings, and requiring them to preserve evidence is appropriate
and necessary to preserve assets for possible recovery for victims of this fraud. For
the same reason, an order temporarily freezing Defendants’ assets and requiring the preservation
of evidence is warranted to preserve the status quo pending a preliminary injunction hearing.
^could be denied, though...

What do you think will happen?

By the way, that report was thorough and I admire its professionalism and thoroughness. I believe that the investigations conducted in this legal formality owe much of its credibility to the community of bitcointalk that aided and created the investigation.

You know, though - I only just started really delving into the SEC evidence on the docket. It appears Moustakis did actually get a hold of Pirate/Shavers on the phone

25 on page 6

http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.1.pdf


Full address (this is the same address as was long-ago [mid-late 2012] alleged by forum sleuths) on http://ia600904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.9.0.pdf

ETA: Very possible that apartment is vacant -- he didn't own it. http://www.apartmentguide.com/apartments/Texas/McKinney/Regency-At-Stonebridge/27487/ ETA2: Summons doesn't list it, but it's APT 1507 they want... Sent them an email asking about availability for giggles.

The bank they found connected to him has almost nothing in it (as of the time of the most recent statement the bank released)
http://ia600904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.5.1.pdf

So.... the most interesting thing out of all that is that Moustakis apparently had a phone conversation with Pirate, but after going through everything the SEC & court submitted so far (h/t D&T for docket -- available @ http://ia800904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.docket.html ), either Pirate really did stick around at the same apartment (which'd be dumb as shit), or they don't appear to know where he is.


ETA3: I wonder if the transaction log @ http://ia600904.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.txed.146063/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.8.pdf indicates they DID already seize stuff -- I can't find where it's indicated to've come from.

(ETA4: spreadsheet apparently WAS Pirate's, not payb.tc's)

When I'm thinking of the SEC's response, I'm comparing it to the Michael Brown prosecution.

Here's an article I wrote and publicly posted about Brown...

"Two Secret Service Raids Later, Previous Holder of Over $4m in BTC in Good Spirits

One man's world has been inarguably changed, for the better, and the worse, by Bitcoin. Through a shrewd and, what some have claimed dubious, business deal, Nashville, TN resident Michael Brown (known online as “Knightmb”) acquired 371,000 Bitcoins (then worth roughly $20,000 in a market which couldn't bear downward pressure) for $5,000. As of this writing, the 371,000 Bitcoins he purchased in 2011 are currently worth approximately $4m. Now, however, he may not only be Satoshi-less, but may also (again) be at risk of a stay in federal prison.

Who Is Michael Brown?
Brown lives in TN with his wife and child, working in just about everything technical. He provides wireless Internet service, designs hardware for other his company and other Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs) to use, as well as software. Brown also works as network, email, and website administer for multiple SMBs. Brown is quite familiar with Bitcoin and within the earlier online community. Around 2010, Brown even wrote and published an abstract on “Timekoin,” a proposed Bitcoin alternative he still uses.

Brown's Bitcoins
Around the time of Bitcoin's birth, Brown collected money (the project had roughly $12,000 in total funding) and bought hashing power to accumulate Bitcoins. By the time the money had run out, the project owned approximately 371,000 Bitcoins. However, even while the price of Bitcoins were roughly $.06 each, there was only very weak market demand. According to Brown, “It is easy in hindsight to think of how foolish anyone would be to sell that large amount of bitcoins for such a small amount, but back then there were articles written all over the Internet about bitcoin being a pyramid scam or a fools investment. The people (investors) that originally got into it, thought they had made a huge investment mistake and just wanted to get out.” And get out they did, allowing Brown to buy the project and its 371,000 Bitcoins for “only” $5,000.

However, while this collection of Bitcoin would be worth roughly $4,000,000 USD as of this writing, Brown states he did give away most of his holdings, including a large chunk to Wikileaks when they began accepting BTC donations, with Brown adding the quip “At the time though, I might as well have been sending power points from pokemon cards as far as what actual value they would get from it.“ Brown also gave much of his holdings away to those finding his contact information, with the remainder being sold once the Bitcoin market skyrocketed, allowing him to “make back my initial investment plus a lot of interest.“

There have been claims of foul play by Brown's previous partners, who were primarily members of electric bicycle forum Endless-Sphere. Bitcoin Magazine reached out to Justin, the current owner of the forum (Brown previously owned the forum while the Bitcoin accumulation project was ongoing). However, as of this writing, no evidence was brought up indicating Brown had done anything morally questionable. While there was “a three day mutiny” against Brown while he owned the forum, it appears this was solely related to the sale of the forum to another person (not Justin) who wanted the forum to be monetized.


Tax Document Theft
In mid-2012, Mitt and Ann Romney's tax documents were stolen from their accounting firm, PWC. Later, PWC received a flash drive and ransom letter demanding $1m worth of Bitcoins to keep the documents private. These documents, as of today, were never released, though it would appear the Romneys never paid the ransom. BitInstant, for their part in grabbing the media's attention in this ordeal, offered the Romney campaign a free USD-to-BTC conversion should they be interested.

The flash drive in the envelope sent to PWC did not just contain copies of the documents the ransomer was threatening to release, but also included two pictures of cats around furniture. The cat pictures were heavily scrutinized by the US Secret Service and considered to be the smoking gun of the case, which Brown says “has kind of turned into a running joke now among friends and family.” The Secret Service then decided, likely with evidence not yet presented to the public, to conduct a raid against Michael Brown and his family's home (again).

Likely taken into consideration by the United States SS was Brown's previous acquaintance with SS agents during their last raid of his house, which occurred in 2009. At the time, Brown worked for an insurance company to help them neatly organize customers' personal information into a spreadsheet. Brown alleges that part of the information he was to organize were social security numbers, which he wasn't sure if was legal. Brown contacted the insurance company but wasn't given proper attention until he threatened to tell national media. Brown says, “They explained that no one should have access to any customer's social security number, but I was trying to show them it was wrong assumption. Soon afterward, instead of fixing the issue, they called the federal government and told them I had stolen their customer data which contained tens or hundreds of thousands of social security numbers.“ It was at this point Brown first experiences the joy of a federal raid, where only his workstation was seized (he would not be so lucky in the future).  According to Brown, “After many months and many visits to the Secret Service office in Nashville, the case was finally closed for being a waste of time and resources for the Secret Service and my workstation was returned (damaged). No charges were ever filed and the case dropped.“

The 2012 Raid
It was September 14th, 2012 when Brown and his wife would again awake to bright flashlights being shone in their faces by Secret Service agents. This time, agents demanded answers about the pictures of cats written to the USB drive included with the ransom letter sent to the Romneys' tax firm.

Unfortunately for the Secret Service, they soon found neither the cats nor the furniture pictured. This didn't prevent them from further interrogating Brown and his family, however. His daughter would later be able to identify the cats as being owned by one of Brown's former clients, Janine Bolin, whose computer he backed up for her while helping repair her system. The Secret Service left Brown's house after crawling around his attic and confiscating any electronics they could find. They then paid a visit to Bolin's house, where they'd again confiscate all electronic equipment in case it might have evidence.

Brown states legal fees may be as high as $6,000, with other damages including what was done to his house (including the stereotypical broken doors), and says the situation the US Secret Service has created is similar to if “your local plumber has his entire truck taken, along with all the tools he uses for the trade.” Brown appears in good spirits, however, saying “if I ever do get any/all of my equipment back, I'm going to have a lot of extra of the same thing at least.” Brown ends responding to my questions with “Overall, the Federal government is made up of regular people like myself. The Federal government makes mistakes and bad things happen because of it. The most our family can do is pick up our life and move on. That is why we were reaching out for help. There have been many times when I've donated money or resources to help those in need, I guess it is time I ask the same in return of my fellow man.”

Brown has created a site for donations at www.mbdonationfund.com."


Now - one day after I posted that article (June 26th), I was alerted to MB being formally indicted on the same day of me posting that article (pure coincidence -- I'm just pointing out how relatively fast the response was). There appears to have never been a search warrant on Pirate -- I seriously doubt the SEC knows where he is. There no reasonable motive on the MB case, and while "he" went after someone high on the totem pole, the rapid response in that case (he's already appeared in a court) versus the molasses-slow response here is very disappointing.

(Oh -- sorry for breaking my "I'll shut up, now" promise)