Pages:
Author

Topic: First church to accept bitcoins - page 3. (Read 4346 times)

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
October 18, 2014, 02:12:18 PM
#50
My husband and I asked our church if they would take Bitcoin.  They said they would look into it.  

We have been holding our coins for the past year though so haven't sold them yet.  If and when we have another bubble, we will sell a few though and we will want to give a portion to our church.  At this point the conversation will hopefully go like this. "We would love to donate a few thousand to the church but we want to do it in Bitcoin.  Can you set up an account at Coinbase or Circle and we will send those funds immediately?"  

I think they will decide to take Bitcoin. Wink  We will see though.  

Also, while I am in India in a few weeks I am going to see if the organization I am working with will set up a Unocoin account so I can send them some too.  It is such a great way to donate internationally because it can save so much on fees. 

that's an inspiring story, wonder if you would write a little article for us so that we could publish it in our new online publication expected to launch in a few days.

I'm trying to aim it towards the good news of the CC industry: stories that make you feel good you got into CC, motivate you to stay in CC, and inspired you to do something great to improve the CC industry.

let me know if interested
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
October 18, 2014, 12:20:21 PM
#49
My husband and I asked our church if they would take Bitcoin.  They said they would look into it.  

We have been holding our coins for the past year though so haven't sold them yet.  If and when we have another bubble, we will sell a few though and we will want to give a portion to our church.  At this point the conversation will hopefully go like this. "We would love to donate a few thousand to the church but we want to do it in Bitcoin.  Can you set up an account at Coinbase or Circle and we will send those funds immediately?"  

I think they will decide to take Bitcoin. Wink  We will see though.  

Also, while I am in India in a few weeks I am going to see if the organization I am working with will set up a Unocoin account so I can send them some too.  It is such a great way to donate internationally because it can save so much on fees. 
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
October 18, 2014, 12:19:24 PM
#48
Interesting. But in the other thread there is a guy which said that his uncle said that bitcoin is satanism and Satoshi the devil  Grin Grin Grin.

Anyway, this is a good thing, and hope that bitcoin of church will be used for a good thing.

I just read that one too he should show that to his uncle now lol. But it's a really good news it'll sure get more attention in the community
or atleast among normal people who never heard of bitcoin.

Yes of course. Apart the case that bitcoin can help church and poor people, this is a good way to make advertising to bitcoin to the people who never heard of bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 18, 2014, 12:17:03 PM
#47
Interesting. But in the other thread there is a guy which said that his uncle said that bitcoin is satanism and Satoshi the devil  Grin Grin Grin.

Anyway, this is a good thing, and hope that bitcoin of church will be used for a good thing.

I just read that one too he should show that to his uncle now lol. But it's a really good news it'll sure get more attention in the community
or atleast among normal people who never heard of bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
October 18, 2014, 12:06:50 PM
#46
Interesting. But in the other thread there is a guy which said that his uncle said that bitcoin is satanism and Satoshi the devil  Grin Grin Grin.

Anyway, this is a good thing, and hope that bitcoin of church will be used for a good thing.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
October 18, 2014, 11:31:02 AM
#45

They'll make these guys look poor.


Wish all of God people lived like them, since that is not the case I'm glad some of the faithful are enjoying the fruits of His glory. 


 
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
October 18, 2014, 11:17:24 AM
#44

They'll make these guys look poor.
hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 500
October 18, 2014, 11:08:56 AM
#43
So much hatred of religion here. Such screwed up idiots. If Apple were to accept bitcoin, people would celebrate. If a church accepts bitcoin, people start hating on God.

So irrational. So much hatred. So wrong. So messed up.

Higher bitcoin adoption, even if it is by churches, is good.  Smiley
full member
Activity: 179
Merit: 100
October 18, 2014, 03:25:11 AM
#42
if so, then there should be many followers will accept bitcoins! good news!
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
October 17, 2014, 11:56:31 PM
#41
So much hatred of religion here. Such screwed up idiots. If Apple were to accept bitcoin, people would celebrate. If a church accepts bitcoin, people start hating on God.

So irrational. So much hatred. So wrong. So messed up.
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 100
October 17, 2014, 05:02:52 PM
#40

How does anyone that believes "the big bang theory" not understand that a plan had to be conceived prior to anything of that magnetude, furthermore that someone had to create the ingredients to make the thing in the first place. 


We don't in the sense you think "believe in the big bang theory"
We have examined the evidence that was left over from it and concluded that is most likely how the universe began

No one knows (including you) at this point what happened before it and very simply if you say that you require "someone" had to create the universe, then it doesn't answer anymore questions that it poses itself
I.e. Who created the creator and you fall into an infinite regression
If you say that a creator has always been or is some uncaused cause.. you're only digging yourself a deeper hole

I think Socrates once said "True knowledge is knowing that you know nothing"

Also if you think that "nothing" can't come from "nothing" I suggest you have a good think about what nothing actually is and watch a few of Lawrence Krauss' lectures on the subject
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 509
October 17, 2014, 04:38:27 PM
#39
I don't agree with many of the church's teachings but I don't think we should be trollish about it. Let's praise them for taking this step.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 17, 2014, 03:20:13 PM
#38
If they want to grow by leaps and bounds, their leaders should develop Ponzicoin - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-ponzi-ponzicoin-825091 - and implement it among their members.

Smiley
tss
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
October 17, 2014, 01:45:00 PM
#37

First they let they gays in church now they are accepting satan money.... what next eating babies?

j/k good endorsement.

ooh satan money and baby eating contests.  so what comes after that?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I'm really quite sane!
October 17, 2014, 11:37:26 AM
#36
This thread is getting way off course. I can't say I'm surprised of course. Any time there's a topic that's integral to one's identity, there's going to be a different opinion from every participant. The thing is, whether you're an Anglican Christian, a militant atheist, or anything else, your beliefs aren't relevant in Bitcoin Discussion. The thread is about a church in London accepting bitcoins in its collection. It's not "What do you think of churches in general?" Nobody would make that thread because we know that everyone has his/her finger on the trigger when it comes to sharing opinions.

In a futile attempt to steer towards relevant discussion: I support their decision to accept bitcoins. Not only does this help them by making donations more private, it shows people that Bitcoin isn't just for obscure online probably-illegal applications.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
October 17, 2014, 11:19:34 AM
#35
Perhaps I should have explained the reasons for my militant anti-theism. It is based on 3 premises:

1. Our civilization is a zero-sum game between reason and violence. Where one flourishes, the other suffocates.  When one waxes, the other wanes.

2.  There is also a similar zero-sum game between reason and superstition. Where reason thrives, superstition suffocates - and vice versa.

3. As superstition is the enemy of reason, it is therefore the ally of violence. A more superstitious world is a more violent world. History strongly supports this. Our world has become steadily less violent since the dawn of the age of reason a few hundred years ago, although it is counter-intuitive given the World wars.

Check out surprising decline in violence on youtube. And check out The real God, an Epiphany.


That, my friend, is moronic verse.   

It is clear by the usage of the term: "zero-sum game", your knowledge is extremely narrow, the term you meant is "zero-sum gain".   Nevertheless, your postulations are disjointed, illogical, and irrelevant to the matter of God. 

How in the world can you compare or contrast "reason" and "violence"?  Starting with such a weak base it's impossible to build any type of logical argument.  Might as well compare peanuts to hub caps, then conclude "that because there are more ways to eat peanuts these days, God must exist because he didn't create cars man did." -- disjointed premise and illogical conclusion.

Superstition is about that which is 'super', or greater than what one would be expected to believe.  'Super' anything by definition falls outside of the norm.  Given that 90+% of the world population are theist, Atheist are the ones who are 'superstitious'. 

How does anyone that believes "the big bang theory" not understand that a plan had to be conceived prior to anything of that magnetude, furthermore that someone had to create the ingredients to make the thing in the first place. 

You can't make a sandwich without ingredients and a plan of action, but somehow I'm to believe that a full universe came into existence without ingredients or a plan of action -- that's irrational, illogical, and ill-conceived foolishness.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
October 17, 2014, 10:25:17 AM
#34
Perhaps I should have explained the reasoning for my militant anti-theism. It is based on 3 premises:

1. Our civilization is a zero-sum game between reason and violence. Where one flourishes, the other suffocates.  When one waxes, the other wanes.

2.  There is also a similar zero-sum game between reason and superstition. Where reason thrives, superstition suffocates - and vice versa.

3. As superstition is the enemy of reason, it is therefore the ally of violence. A more superstitious world is a more violent world. History strongly supports this. Our world has become steadily less violent since the dawn of the age of reason a few hundred years ago. Although this seems a bit counter-intuitive given the World wars, it's true.

Check out "the surprising decline in violence" on youtube. And check out The real God, an Epiphany.

Also check out Christopher Ryan's interview with reason TV. Human beings are sexually omnivorous,  he argues strongly. Monogamy is one of the myths we need to let go of, because the more we embrace our hyper-sexual nature, the less violent our species will become.

.Religion's rabid demonization of natural human sexuality is one of the primary ways it makes our world more violent.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
October 17, 2014, 09:24:47 AM
#33
churches and religion have nothing to do with crypto

just like thy have nothing to do with fiat, gold, or any other currency ...  the simple fact is they would be wise to accept all currencies -- well not all, you know there are very many that simply have no place in the house of God, or to be handled by those of 'the faith'. 

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
October 17, 2014, 09:09:31 AM
#32
churches and religion have nothing to do with crypto
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
October 17, 2014, 09:05:45 AM
#31
Can we ask the church to use the BTC to pay for the service it gets, not change it into fiat?

rest assured if they are bright enough to accept btc as a part of their collections, they will likely limit their fees as best they can.  The problem is however, that because of fluxuation in rates they may not want to take the gamble of storing btc, fiat is still the most stable of currencies
Pages:
Jump to: