Topic: Flat Earth - page 193. (Read 1095196 times)

Jesus Christ man, have you even look at the Moon?  Evenly lit my ass.  How can you be so deluded?  Just fucking look at it, you can see dark craters with the naked eye. 

You do have eyes, don't you?

Au contraire mon ami! I've provided video from CRROW777 that shows the moon suffering from aliasing effects during the solstice; this effect is indicative of an electro-mechanical image projection system. I've also noted that the moon is evenly lit, hard evidence the image you're seeing is a projected one. I'm sure I've posted more proof than just that and, I'm also sure I could expand on it with a bit of work.

You keep referring to my descriptions as a model as if I'm working from a theoretical structure that I have. There's no flat earth model, what I do have are my observations, the documented observations of others and, an honest description of the world around me and how it works. I don't have access to the source of the projections and the jews aren't going to share their observations, so I'm really limited here on what I can state as fact.

However, I can theorize that there's a 3rd shadowy celestial object; the projector itself probably causes the appearance of a hidden celestial object that can eclipse the sun and moon. It's possibly a filter or a lens overlapping the projection but I'm really taking shots in the dark here. It's often referred to as the Black Sun in various esoteric text.

You claim the sun and the moon are projections (with absolutely no proof btw) how does your model explain the 2 different eclipses? Just more projections?

I have to rely on others to provide some of the proof since I cannot afford a Virgin Galactic flight yet.

I do however use satellites to view TV and have used a satellite finder to set up my satellite dish.

Also I met a scientist that worked on satellites.  I think he would be very disappointed if his skills were used as a mere horse and pony show.
It would mean that the conspiracy would extend to not just fooling the general public but the employees working on space related technology as well.

It would mean that a large amount of highly intelligent people are working on meaningless tasks without their knowledge.

The technology used to receive signals from Satellites appears sound to me. Unless technology exists like a skyhook I tend  to believe that satellites orbit around the earth in space.

For the transmitted signal not to be coming from space would defy any logic that I can think of.

^^^ Space race, the fix is in on that one. The US and Russia have collaborated secretly behind the scenes since the start of the cold war. If you don't agree with this statement then surely you can provide scientific proof that outer space is real? I'm not fooled by the puppet show they put on and neither should anybody else.

---

---

".. A selenelion or selenehelion occurs when both the Sun and an eclipsed Moon can be observed at the same time. ..." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_eclipse

That's right folks, during a selenelion eclipse you can observe both the sun and the moon in the sky above you while the earth below you passes between them. This is some hard evidence that we live on globe, how could the earth possibly be flat in light of this evidence? I guess I should just give up and admit I'm wrong.

I have not said that you are bad. You have the right to express your opinion even if I believe that you are wrong.

I very strongly believe in civil liberties and the right to freedom speech and will fight for the right for you to express your opinion.

Diversity of opinion is something that I value in the people that I associate with. If I want to hear my own opinion I could just talk to myself.

But I also have the right to say that I disagree with your opinion.

Whether it is a tangled mess or not - it proves nothing. We don't know the reasons as to why it is like it is. A lot of materials have to be specially selected because of the way they react to heat, lack of gravity and keeping weight down is essential.

If it is neat then people would argue that it is too neat and must be a film set. Neat or not - it proves nothing.

Even if it was a photo shoot in a studio it still doesn't prove anything. They were in the middle of a space race and photos could have given the Russians clues about US technology. It doesn't mean that space travel didn't happen.

Eclipses prove the earth is not flat as well.

^^^ Pickled Earth hahaha

---

---

NASA receives $57 million USD a day in tax money to hoax the globe. I'm forced to pay for this fraud and you want to say that I'm bad and wrong for being critical about the unprofessional tangled mess they show off? You'd think that with that kind of financial incentive they could hire a professional electrician as a consultant when designing their virtual set backdrops.

She was a though cookie but starting to crumble

Funny how I comment on the obvious discrepancies. Structured cabling = extension lead for data. Suddenly my motives for challenging the obvious stupidity of the comparison is being challenged ?

I don't care what orad is or NASA does. I live in a country that doesn't even have a space program.

The comparison is stupid. Do you think the comparison is not stupid ?

The item on the right looks like a gas sniffer. I'd like see someone replace that function with a cat6 patch lead.

^^^ it's funny how you're triggered by criticism of the ORAD virtual set backdrop NASA uses in their studio.





Orad Virtual Set Technology is far ahead of the stop motion animation NASA used back in 1965.

I doubt that cat5 or cat6 cabling is an adequate substitute for the custom scientific instruments hanging on that wall.

That is one of the dumbest memes I've seen.

It is like taking a photograph of a workshop full of tools and comparing it to a nicely curled up extension lead expecting it to perform the same tasks..

It exists on paper and is enforced by all the countries that signed it. The ships, aircraft and soldiers don't show up until you do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System

---

---

Meanwhile at NASA...

I fail to see the correlation with that straw-man. What financial or scientific incentive is there to mislead people about a round earth ? I'm not talking about a conspiracy theory - where is the actual proof that there is a financial or scientific incentive ?


EDIT:
I'm still wanting to verify the axis personally. I've presented the photographic proof and I'm waiting to find someone that has proven that it doesn't exist.

With this logic we should go ahead and shut this site down and kill crypto.

We should put our faith in the experts at the central banks around the world along with the financial experts at JPMorgan and Goldman Sacs. 

Not really.  Humanity evolved believing the earth was flat. 

Leave the math and physics and engineering and all the hard stuff to other people.    You can live in bliss. 

That's because you're blatantly lying about stuff you can verify yourself (ships at sea), you're ignoring stuff that people figured out hundreds of years ago (day/night/seasons/gravity/etc), and you're putting your tinfoil hat on when it comes to more modern stuff (pictures from spacecraft).

It's impossible to prove anything to a dishonest person who isn't looking for proof.

Ok - this is our disconnect.  If this thread has not given you an experiment you can do yourself, and if you are going to call millions of people liars, then nothing I can post will help any further.  :/

In this post below you said you have proven it many times right here on BCT.  I thought you could help us out.  I couldn't find the post where you laid out actual proof that was 100% facts where we could test them out for ourselves.  

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.46993895
"I'm showing you facts and proof.  You can't refute them - why won't you investigate them?"

I want to verify this myself because I'm taking the responsibility to teach my son.  I want to make sure I'm not teaching him my brainwashing.  When I look at this thread I see what you guys (sphere earth) are saying (I got the same story) but you're not proving anything.  I never saw proof.  Just stories.  I'm shocked after 500 years we don't have definitive proof.  Scientific proof.  Testable, measurable, repeatable.  I find it shocking.    

If millions of people have personally verified this where is this proof at?  It's absolute insanity you would spend 3 years on here fighting nobatman if you did not have 100% proof, gained through your own experimentation,  and were simply repeating with authority figures have told us.   How would this be different than spreading the word of Jesus Christ and fighting tooth and nail.  Millions perhaps billions believe that.  So does that prove it's correct?  

Here is the other part of the quote from the link above.
"My personality is to help others.  Stop them from being scammed, or give them directions."

If you don't have 100% proof we are on the sphere, gained through your own experimentation, how can you be sure you're actually helping?  Is this not the same as a religious person getting into your face trying to help you with no actual proof, just stories from their holy book?  Would you consider them helping you?  

How much of that Legal Canadian weed have you smoked over the last few days?  That's 2 post with no insults!

Millions of people have personally verified it.   Is that not enough proof?

Why do you feel the need to verify this yourself?  Humans have genetic memory, but we pick up most facts through society.