Topic: Flat Earth - page 393. (Read 1095196 times)
^^^ Perspective doesn't splay vertical lines you schmuck, you're a fucking idiot! I asked for proof and you've failed to provide any and you've made the false claim that perspective causes vertical lines to converge.
Don't get caught up in his Reductio ad absurdum.
It's my quest from now on to convince notbatman to stop believing in nonsense and accept that the earth is not flat.
OK you can start by proving the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel. You claim Eratosthenes theory is correct, now fucking prove it!
Wait, so you didn't like the photos of earth made with a nikon camera?
The link is to prove he takes his photos with a nikon, he has plenty of photos in his profile:
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/876437156352446464
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/855781447659081729
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/832684613294182400
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/827619432398745600
I thought you said those were impossible to forge.
The train's destination is not above the ground, but rather far away, and perspective means that the tracks appear not to be parallel but instead to converge to the vanishing point.
The same applies to the beams of light above them. The Sun is very far away and the beams are pretty much parallel, but they're pointing towards you, and perspective makes them appear to converge towards the vanishing point - which in this case is the Sun's location in the sky.
The technical term for these beams is "crepuscular rays." Occasionally, when the Sun is very low on the horizon, you can see "anticrepuscular rays," where the beams seem to converge to a different point on the opposite side of the sky to the Sun. Here's an example:
The Orville - Episode 4 - "If the Stars Should Appear"
Is a non-direct snub to flat earthers and the like...
"The crew of the Orville encounter a society blinded by self-imposed ignorance"
Don't get caught up in his Reductio ad absurdum.
It's my quest from now on to convince notbatman to stop believing in nonsense and accept that the earth is not flat.
OK you can start by proving the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel. You claim Eratosthenes theory is correct, now fucking prove it!
Don't get caught up in his Reductio ad absurdum.
It's my quest from now on to convince notbatman to stop believing in nonsense and accept that the earth is not flat.
Hey people can we talk about something that really happened...like the MOON LANDING !
Come on people!
Come on people!
Apparently, the moon landings are all faked, and were filmed in Hollywood Studios, directed by Stanley Kubrick !!!
Have you heard the latest? Hurricane Maria is a false flag event, with all the damage depicted of the entire island nothing more than CGI. And, there was no earthquake in Mexico City, again, all staged-cum-CGI.
Hell, I'll go one even better - BobLaw is a white straight male living in Cleveland, Ohio, with the only horses in his life consisting of cum-stained My Little Pony dolls.
What if the hurricane and earthquake were triggered by people with an agenda and the technological means to do so? What's your point here trying to mock this shit, the Moon landing is so fucking obviously fake you're a fool if you're trying to defend it. You're not backing a scam are you?
You'll go on my naughty list with Vod...
Everyone talks of people with agendas and in reality, that might be true, but my question is, why don't people who know about it - such as yourself - attack and destroy them instead of attacking innocent people here in the forum? They are united - we are divided. They win, we lose.
After the revelation tho...Purely for entertainment purposes we are going to get cricket bats and make a game show out of these lying scheming corrupt bastards.!!! Where wrong answers means seconds and we get celebrities on like Ian Botham to crack fuck out their asses..
So stay tuned for that.
Q: "determine whether an image is real or not"
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
So then: https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/736926801830744068?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpetapixel.com%2F2016%2F06%2F01%2Fastronaut-shares-photo-nikon-dslr-kits-iss%2F
All the photos this guy made have to be real, right?
That link doesn't have any pictures, just a bunch of smart remarks.
The link is to prove he takes his photos with a nikon, he has plenty of photos in his profile:
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/876437156352446464
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/855781447659081729
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/832684613294182400
https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/827619432398745600
Hey people can we talk about something that really happened...like the MOON LANDING !
Come on people!
Come on people!
Apparently, the moon landings are all faked, and were filmed in Hollywood Studios, directed by Stanley Kubrick !!!
Have you heard the latest? Hurricane Maria is a false flag event, with all the damage depicted of the entire island nothing more than CGI. And, there was no earthquake in Mexico City, again, all staged-cum-CGI.
Hell, I'll go one even better - BobLaw is a white straight male living in Cleveland, Ohio, with the only horses in his life consisting of cum-stained My Little Pony dolls.
What if the hurricane and earthquake were triggered by people with an agenda and the technological means to do so? What's your point here trying to mock this shit, the Moon landing is so fucking obviously fake you're a fool if you're trying to defend it. You're not backing a scam are you?
You'll go on my naughty list with Vod...
Everyone talks of people with agendas and in reality, that might be true, but my question is, why don't people who know about it - such as yourself - attack and destroy them instead of attacking innocent people here in the forum? They are united - we are divided. They win, we lose.
Are any of you flat earth nutters gonna explain why things fall to the ground, or are you just gonna keep changing the subject and shifting the burden of proof?
I've answered the question many times.
Edit:
I'll recap for you...
The reason objects fall is because they're denser than the air or whatever substance surrounds them. The object displaces the air and the air reacts by pushing the object down. It's more complex than just the air pushing on things but that's the basics of why things fall.
Are any of you flat earth nutters gonna explain why things fall to the ground, or are you just gonna keep changing the subject and shifting the burden of proof?
Q: "determine whether an image is real or not"
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
So then: https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/736926801830744068?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpetapixel.com%2F2016%2F06%2F01%2Fastronaut-shares-photo-nikon-dslr-kits-iss%2F
All the photos this guy made have to be real, right?
That link doesn't have any pictures, just a bunch of smart remarks.
edit:
Nikon has been cracked. -- https://blog.elcomsoft.com/2011/04/nikon-image-authentication-system-compromised/
Q: "determine whether an image is real or not"
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
So then: https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/736926801830744068?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpetapixel.com%2F2016%2F06%2F01%2Fastronaut-shares-photo-nikon-dslr-kits-iss%2F
All the photos this guy made have to be real, right?
Oh, so good. Outdid yourself this time.
Q: "determine whether an image is real or not"
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
So then: https://twitter.com/astro_timpeake/status/736926801830744068?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpetapixel.com%2F2016%2F06%2F01%2Fastronaut-shares-photo-nikon-dslr-kits-iss%2F
All the photos this guy made have to be real, right?
Q: "determine whether an image is real or not"
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
I suspect that you could find and post all kinds of technical info for all kinds of equipment if you really wanted to.
Q: "determine whether an image is real or not"
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
edit:
Shame, it's been cracked.
https://blog.elcomsoft.com/2011/04/nikon-image-authentication-system-compromised/
A: "A digital camera equipped with a processor for authentication of images produced from an image file taken by the digital camera is provided. The digital camera processor has embedded therein a private key unique to it, and the camera housing has a public key that is so uniquely related to the private key that digital data encrypted with the private key may be decrypted using the public key. The digital camera processor comprises means for calculating a hash of the image file using a predetermined algorithm, and second means for encrypting the image hash with the private key, thereby producing a digital signature. The image file and the digital signature are stored in suitable recording means so they will be available together. Apparatus for authenticating the image file as being free of any alteration uses the public key for decrypting the digital signature, thereby deriving a secure image hash identical to the image hash produced by the digital camera and used to produce the digital signature. The authenticating apparatus calculates from the image file an image hash using the same algorithm as before. By comparing this last image hash with the secure image hash, authenticity of the image file is determined if they match. Other techniques to address time-honored methods of deception, such as attaching false captions or inducing forced perspectives, are included." -- http://www.patents.com/us-5499294.html
Canon and Nikon use this encryption technology to digitally sign their photographs.
edit:
Shame, it's been cracked.
https://blog.elcomsoft.com/2011/04/nikon-image-authentication-system-compromised/
I believe this is a real photograph:
Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
This is a partial panoramic view. It may not be a full 360 degree view, or even a complete 180 degree view, but it shows exactly what a GE picture should show in a partial panoramic view.
I would also like to ask our friend what are his parameters to determine whether an image is real or not, something like:
If it shows the earth is not flat it has to be false otherwise it has to be true, right?
I believe this is a real photograph:
Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
This is a partial panoramic view. It may not be a full 360 degree view, or even a complete 180 degree view, but it shows exactly what a GE picture should show in a partial panoramic view.
I believe this is a real photograph:
This is math. https://www.astro.umd.edu/~richard/ASTRO340/eratosthenes.pdf
Pointless images are pointless, stay in school kids, learn math.
I believe this is a real photograph:
Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
This is Eratosthenes:
This is Eratosthenes theory:
Source: https://www.astro.umd.edu/~richard/ASTRO340/eratosthenes.pdf
This is a still-frame from a video recorded aboard an airplane:
This is a comparison of a flat and motionless Earth vs. Eratosthenes theory (the globe):
...
This is Eratosthenes theory:
Source: https://www.astro.umd.edu/~richard/ASTRO340/eratosthenes.pdf
This is a still-frame from a video recorded aboard an airplane:
This is a comparison of a flat and motionless Earth vs. Eratosthenes theory (the globe):
...
Jump to: