Topic: Flat Earth - page 389. (Read 1095196 times)
Am shocked we are still having this conversation here. What happened to the so called elite bitcoin community with a lot of scientific know how and all the technological development and coding techniques at the back of their palm. Totally amazed by this but remeber this and keep it in heart very well. The earth is geoid shape. Not flat or spherical. Spherical is perfectly rounded without any irregularities it is not infact the polar regions are flatter than the tropical regions. It is a GEOID
Happy to have found this thread. I'm especially looking forward to the solar eclipse discussion when I go back through the pages.
My disappoint to find there was no solid debate in favor of a flat earth during the eclipse.
Lol man, don't waste his time such things as proofs.
My reply in orange text.
Well I was personally curious if they were trolling or actually serious, it's clear at this point that at least notbatman is serious which is fascinating to me. He should be studied by psychologists. It's truly remarkable how he is able to deny reality just so the flat earth theory can fit his ideas. He said a photo taken with a nikon is real and can't be fabricated, I gave him what he asked for and he just didn't accept it. He is just going to keep doing the same thing.
You guys have some serious balls to call me dishonest. The fact I wasn't up-to-date on the latest hacks and cracks, fucking loser I didn't know they had broken the encryption when I made the post. Also psychology is a quack-science that's nothing more more than weapon used in the eternal struggle to keep the goyim slaves subdued. The Earth is flat and motionless, empirical proofs already on the books prove it. This makes globalism a conspiracy promoted by psychopathic liars.
Image of Hitler
You are totally dishonest and you know it. Let me ask you again, what proof would you consider valid to prove the earth is round? Since you reject all the millions of photos/videos of earth from space, what exactly do you need as proof?
1. You can provide proof of gravity (unproven theory).
2. You can prove the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel (still waiting on this).
3. You can show me the ocean curving.
4. You can prove the Earth is in motion.
Dishonest? Really go fuck yourself, I was ignorant of the fact Nikon and Canon had their encryption cracked. You're just a piece of shit who's arguing on the behalf of psychopaths and their collective lie.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
Note that the shadows from different clouds are parallel to each other. That’s because the Sun is very far away compared to the distance between the clouds. In fact, the Sun’s shadows are so close to parallel that we cannot measure the difference with sufficient accuracy to estimate the distance to the Sun using this method alone. A more nearby light source would produce shadows that diverge from each other at a more pronounced angle.
i. Image (A) is a cropped too close image of some clouds with what might be long shadows from a setting Sun, absolutely nothing for reference or scale. That's some fail "proof image" right there.
ii. The rays in Image (B) don't hit the ground nor are they parallel. This is not even a relevant image.
iii. Image (C) shows more long shadows at sunset but the area is wide enough to show divergence of several degrees between the two most removed shadows. Epic fail, you just proved the Sun's rays converge over a wide area.
iv. Image (D) is again cropped too close and with no reference points. This one isn't taken at sunset as per the shorter shadows but it's worthless without any scale reference points.
***
***
***
***
Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
The above two images prove the Sun's rays do not strike the earth in parallel.
3. I would but you don't accept any photos of that so what's the point?
4. http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2010/09/17/but-it-moves-how-we-know-the-e/
Also, again, people knew the earth was moving around the sun thousands of years ago just like they knew the earth wasn't flat. Around 230 b.c., the Greek philosopher Aristarchus suggested that this was the case. He was an outstanding observer and based this idea on careful observations.
With improved telescopes, astronomers started looking for another proof of Earth’s motion around the Sun, stellar parallax. Earth’s orbit is huge — some 186 million miles (300,000 kilometers) in diameter. If an astronomer measures the position of a nearby star, and then measures it again six months later, the star’s apparent position against the background of more distant stars should shift a tiny amount.
Observing this would prove that Earth in fact is not stationary. It wasn’t until 1838 that an astronomer finally detected this shift. That year, German astronomer Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel successfully measured the parallax of the star 61 Cygni.
And there’s yet another proof. Imagine standing still with rain coming straight down. To stay dry, you just hold your umbrella directly over your head. As you begin to walk, however, you need to tilt the umbrella “into” the rain, even though the rain is coming straight down. The faster you walk, the greater the tilt needs to be.
As Earth orbits the Sun, we can detect a “tilt” of incoming starlight. English astronomer James Bradley discovered this phenomenon in 1725 by accident — while he was searching for stellar parallax! This aberration of starlight, as it is called, is a result of light having a finite speed and Earth’s motion around the Sun.
I asked for proof, you're just typing garbage.
The Michelson & Morley experiment in conjunction with the Sagnac experiment is empirical proof the earth is motionless. Airy's experiment is also empirical proof it's motionless and it corroborates the results of the M&M experiment.
FUCKING BASTARD SHILL WASTING MY TIME!!!!!
ya know, perusing this thread for shitz and giggles (mostly giggles) i cant decide who is more retarded....
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
Well I was personally curious if they were trolling or actually serious, it's clear at this point that at least notbatman is serious which is fascinating to me. He should be studied by psychologists. It's truly remarkable how he is able to deny reality just so the flat earth theory can fit his ideas. He said a photo taken with a nikon is real and can't be fabricated, I gave him what he asked for and he just didn't accept it. He is just going to keep doing the same thing.
You guys have some serious balls to call me dishonest. The fact I wasn't up-to-date on the latest hacks and cracks, fucking loser I didn't know they had broken the encryption when I made the post. Also psychology is a quack-science that's nothing more more than weapon used in the eternal struggle to keep the goyim slaves subdued. The Earth is flat and motionless, empirical proofs already on the books prove it. This makes globalism a conspiracy promoted by psychopathic liars.
Image of Hitler
You are totally dishonest and you know it. Let me ask you again, what proof would you consider valid to prove the earth is round? Since you reject all the millions of photos/videos of earth from space, what exactly do you need as proof?
1. You can provide proof of gravity (unproven theory).
2. You can prove the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel (still waiting on this).
3. You can show me the ocean curving.
4. You can prove the Earth is in motion.
Dishonest? Really go fuck yourself, I was ignorant of the fact Nikon and Canon had their encryption cracked. You're just a piece of shit who's arguing on the behalf of psychopaths and their collective lie.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
Quote
There is no proof of gravity it's a bullshit theory.
2. We already explained you it's a matter of perspective but of course you are dishonest and dismissed it. I will provide photographic evidence for you because otherwise you wont admit being wrong.Quote
I'm sorry but you're the dishonest one here, perspective doesn't cause vertical lines to converge.
***
***
Notice that the vertical telephone poles remain vertical. Vertical telephone poles make you the liar not me!
***
***Notice that the vertical telephone poles remain vertical. Vertical telephone poles make you the liar not me!
Quote
Image (A)
Quote
Image (B)
Quote
Image (C)
Quote
Image (D)
Note that the shadows from different clouds are parallel to each other. That’s because the Sun is very far away compared to the distance between the clouds. In fact, the Sun’s shadows are so close to parallel that we cannot measure the difference with sufficient accuracy to estimate the distance to the Sun using this method alone. A more nearby light source would produce shadows that diverge from each other at a more pronounced angle.
Quote
i. Image (A) is a cropped too close image of some clouds with what might be long shadows from a setting Sun, absolutely nothing for reference or scale. That's some fail "proof image" right there.
ii. The rays in Image (B) don't hit the ground nor are they parallel. This is not even a relevant image.
iii. Image (C) shows more long shadows at sunset but the area is wide enough to show divergence of several degrees between the two most removed shadows. Epic fail, you just proved the Sun's rays converge over a wide area.
iv. Image (D) is again cropped too close and with no reference points. This one isn't taken at sunset as per the shorter shadows but it's worthless without any scale reference points.
***
******
***Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-image-sun-rays-shining-clouds-image11302331
The above two images prove the Sun's rays do not strike the earth in parallel.
3. I would but you don't accept any photos of that so what's the point?
Quote
You claim the ocean curves then show me the ocean curving motherfucker!
4. http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2010/09/17/but-it-moves-how-we-know-the-e/
Also, again, people knew the earth was moving around the sun thousands of years ago just like they knew the earth wasn't flat. Around 230 b.c., the Greek philosopher Aristarchus suggested that this was the case. He was an outstanding observer and based this idea on careful observations.
With improved telescopes, astronomers started looking for another proof of Earth’s motion around the Sun, stellar parallax. Earth’s orbit is huge — some 186 million miles (300,000 kilometers) in diameter. If an astronomer measures the position of a nearby star, and then measures it again six months later, the star’s apparent position against the background of more distant stars should shift a tiny amount.
Observing this would prove that Earth in fact is not stationary. It wasn’t until 1838 that an astronomer finally detected this shift. That year, German astronomer Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel successfully measured the parallax of the star 61 Cygni.
And there’s yet another proof. Imagine standing still with rain coming straight down. To stay dry, you just hold your umbrella directly over your head. As you begin to walk, however, you need to tilt the umbrella “into” the rain, even though the rain is coming straight down. The faster you walk, the greater the tilt needs to be.
As Earth orbits the Sun, we can detect a “tilt” of incoming starlight. English astronomer James Bradley discovered this phenomenon in 1725 by accident — while he was searching for stellar parallax! This aberration of starlight, as it is called, is a result of light having a finite speed and Earth’s motion around the Sun.
Quote
I asked for proof, you're just typing garbage.
The Michelson & Morley experiment in conjunction with the Sagnac experiment is empirical proof the earth is motionless. Airy's experiment is also empirical proof it's motionless and it corroborates the results of the M&M experiment.
FUCKING BASTARD SHILL WASTING MY TIME!!!!!
ya know, perusing this thread for shitz and giggles (mostly giggles) i cant decide who is more retarded....
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
Well I was personally curious if they were trolling or actually serious, it's clear at this point that at least notbatman is serious which is fascinating to me. He should be studied by psychologists. It's truly remarkable how he is able to deny reality just so the flat earth theory can fit his ideas. He said a photo taken with a nikon is real and can't be fabricated, I gave him what he asked for and he just didn't accept it. He is just going to keep doing the same thing.
You guys have some serious balls to call me dishonest. The fact I wasn't up-to-date on the latest hacks and cracks, fucking loser I didn't know they had broken the encryption when I made the post. Also psychology is a quack-science that's nothing more more than weapon used in the eternal struggle to keep the goyim slaves subdued. The Earth is flat and motionless, empirical proofs already on the books prove it. This makes globalism a conspiracy promoted by psychopathic liars.
You are totally dishonest and you know it. Let me ask you again, what proof would you consider valid to prove the earth is round? Since you reject all the millions of photos/videos of earth from space, what exactly do you need as proof?
1. You can provide proof of gravity (unproven theory).
2. You can prove the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel (still waiting on this).
3. You can show me the ocean curving.
4. You can prove the Earth is in motion.
Dishonest? Really go fuck yourself, I was ignorant of the fact Nikon and Canon had their encryption cracked. You're just a piece of shit who's arguing on the behalf of psychopaths and their collective lie.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
2. We already explained you it's a matter of perspective but of course you are dishonest and dismissed it. I will provide photographic evidence for you because otherwise you wont admit being wrong.
Note that the shadows from different clouds are parallel to each other. That’s because the Sun is very far away compared to the distance between the clouds. In fact, the Sun’s shadows are so close to parallel that we cannot measure the difference with sufficient accuracy to estimate the distance to the Sun using this method alone. A more nearby light source would produce shadows that diverge from each other at a more pronounced angle.
3. I would but you don't accept any photos of that so what's the point?
4. http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2010/09/17/but-it-moves-how-we-know-the-e/
Also, again, people knew the earth was moving around the sun thousands of years ago just like they knew the earth wasn't flat. Around 230 b.c., the Greek philosopher Aristarchus suggested that this was the case. He was an outstanding observer and based this idea on careful observations.
With improved telescopes, astronomers started looking for another proof of Earth’s motion around the Sun, stellar parallax. Earth’s orbit is huge — some 186 million miles (300,000 kilometers) in diameter. If an astronomer measures the position of a nearby star, and then measures it again six months later, the star’s apparent position against the background of more distant stars should shift a tiny amount.
Observing this would prove that Earth in fact is not stationary. It wasn’t until 1838 that an astronomer finally detected this shift. That year, German astronomer Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel successfully measured the parallax of the star 61 Cygni.
And there’s yet another proof. Imagine standing still with rain coming straight down. To stay dry, you just hold your umbrella directly over your head. As you begin to walk, however, you need to tilt the umbrella “into” the rain, even though the rain is coming straight down. The faster you walk, the greater the tilt needs to be.
As Earth orbits the Sun, we can detect a “tilt” of incoming starlight. English astronomer James Bradley discovered this phenomenon in 1725 by accident — while he was searching for stellar parallax! This aberration of starlight, as it is called, is a result of light having a finite speed and Earth’s motion around the Sun.
"The Johnson Space Center shooting was an incident of hostage taking that occurred on April 20, 2007 in Building 44, the Communication and Tracking Development Laboratory, at the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas, United States. The gunman, William Phillips, an employee for Jacobs Engineering who worked at Building 44,[1] shot and killed one person and took a hostage for over three hours before committing suicide." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_Space_Center_shooting
This is just one of many incidents over the years, these guys at NASA are psychopathic murderers in addition to being hoaxer, liars and scammers.
hoaxers, liars, scammers... Those fit more like to a flattard. Also pretty sure nomad is a psycho. So what now? This is just one of many incidents over the years, these guys at NASA are psychopathic murderers in addition to being hoaxer, liars and scammers.
"The Johnson Space Center shooting was an incident of hostage taking that occurred on April 20, 2007 in Building 44, the Communication and Tracking Development Laboratory, at the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas, United States. The gunman, William Phillips, an employee for Jacobs Engineering who worked at Building 44,[1] shot and killed one person and took a hostage for over three hours before committing suicide." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_Space_Center_shooting
This is just one of many incidents over the years, these guys at NASA are psychopathic murderers in addition to being hoaxer, liars and scammers.
This is just one of many incidents over the years, these guys at NASA are psychopathic murderers in addition to being hoaxer, liars and scammers.
Quote
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Source: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/93/release_1993_0901.htmlJET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Confirmed.
Because there's pictures of him.
Quote
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Source: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/93/release_1993_0901.htmlJET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Confirmed.
Because there's pictures of him.
Quote
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Source: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/93/release_1993_0901.htmlJET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Confirmed.
Quote
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Source: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/93/release_1993_0901.htmlJET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 1993
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin today announced the establishment of a study team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to explore possibilities for a return mission to Mars to recover some of the scientific objectives of the Mars Observer mission, if communications with that spacecraft cannot be reestablished.
The study team, led by JPL Assistant Laboratory Director Dr. Charles Elachi, will look at a variety of low-cost spacecraft, instrument and launch options, with the objective of returning to Mars in 1994 or 1996.
The team will review available spacecraft and instrument options from industry and government, including Mars Observer spares and possible international contributions. The team is expected to present potential mission options to NASA within the next two months.
Members of the study team currently include:
Arden Albee California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Carl Sagan Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. <--- rot in hell you bastard!
Bruce Murray California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Casani JPL
Tom Coughlin Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore
Steve Paddock Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Eugene Giberson JPL (retired)
Ray Heacock JPL (retired)
Jonathan Lunine University of Arizona, Tucson
Rich Matlock Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Washington, D.C.
Donna Pivirotto JPL
Rob Staehle JPL
John Beckman JPL
Larry Soderblom U.S. Geologic Survey, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Carolyn Porco University of Arizona, Tucson
Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft Co. (retired), Los Angeles
#####
#0901
Confirmed.
I just read that a NASA employee just murdered 58 people in Las Vegas, psychopaths confirmed!
"Paddock is the suspect in Sunday night's Las Vegas shootings that killed 58 and injured more than 500."
-- http://www.rgj.com/story/news/crime/2017/10/02/las-vegas-shooting-what-we-know-suspects-reno-connections/722362001/
Confirmed? "Paddock is the suspect in Sunday night's Las Vegas shootings that killed 58 and injured more than 500."
-- http://www.rgj.com/story/news/crime/2017/10/02/las-vegas-shooting-what-we-know-suspects-reno-connections/722362001/
Oh boi, never use /pol/ to confirm something, dumbass. 
I just read that a NASA employee just murdered 58 people in Las Vegas, psychopaths confirmed!
"Paddock is the suspect in Sunday night's Las Vegas shootings that killed 58 and injured more than 500."
-- http://www.rgj.com/story/news/crime/2017/10/02/las-vegas-shooting-what-we-know-suspects-reno-connections/722362001/
"Paddock is the suspect in Sunday night's Las Vegas shootings that killed 58 and injured more than 500."
-- http://www.rgj.com/story/news/crime/2017/10/02/las-vegas-shooting-what-we-know-suspects-reno-connections/722362001/
1. You can provide proof of gravity (unproven theory). - Mountain climbers are glad when they fall down on the mountain. Why? They wouldn't have anything to land on if they fell up.
2. You can prove the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel (still waiting on this). - Do you mean less than an angstrom out of parallel in the 93 million miles that they have to travel? Or will you give us more leeway?
3. You can show me the ocean curving. - Fill the glass to the brim with ocean water.
4. You can prove the Earth is in motion. - 7.1 earthquake in Mexico City area.
Happy to have found this thread. I'm especially looking forward to the solar eclipse discussion when I go back through the pages.
ya know, perusing this thread for shitz and giggles (mostly giggles) i cant decide who is more retarded....
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
Well I was personally curious if they were trolling or actually serious, it's clear at this point that at least notbatman is serious which is fascinating to me. He should be studied by psychologists. It's truly remarkable how he is able to deny reality just so the flat earth theory can fit his ideas. He said a photo taken with a nikon is real and can't be fabricated, I gave him what he asked for and he just didn't accept it. He is just going to keep doing the same thing.
You guys have some serious balls to call me dishonest. The fact I wasn't up-to-date on the latest hacks and cracks, fucking loser I didn't know they had broken the encryption when I made the post. Also psychology is a quack-science that's nothing more more than weapon used in the eternal struggle to keep the goyim slaves subdued. The Earth is flat and motionless, empirical proofs already on the books prove it. This makes globalism a conspiracy promoted by psychopathic liars.
You are totally dishonest and you know it. Let me ask you again, what proof would you consider valid to prove the earth is round? Since you reject all the millions of photos/videos of earth from space, what exactly do you need as proof?
1. You can provide proof of gravity (unproven theory).
2. You can prove the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel (still waiting on this).
3. You can show me the ocean curving.
4. You can prove the Earth is in motion.
Dishonest? Really go fuck yourself, I was ignorant of the fact Nikon and Canon had their encryption cracked. You're just a piece of shit who's arguing on the behalf of psychopaths and their collective lie.
Apparently one of the biggest supporters of flat earth came out and said he was testing the media. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2735261-kyrie-irving-says-flat-earth-theory-was-an-exploitation-tactic
Do you believe this or did he get caught with his hand in the cookie jar metaphorically speaking?
Do you believe this or did he get caught with his hand in the cookie jar metaphorically speaking?
He's chimping to peer pressure.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 104
Decentralized Ecosystem for User-Generated Content
Apparently one of the biggest supporters of flat earth came out and said he was testing the media. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2735261-kyrie-irving-says-flat-earth-theory-was-an-exploitation-tactic
Do you believe this or did he get caught with his hand in the cookie jar metaphorically speaking?
Do you believe this or did he get caught with his hand in the cookie jar metaphorically speaking?
ya know, perusing this thread for shitz and giggles (mostly giggles) i cant decide who is more retarded....
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
Well I was personally curious if they were trolling or actually serious, it's clear at this point that at least notbatman is serious which is fascinating to me. He should be studied by psychologists. It's truly remarkable how he is able to deny reality just so the flat earth theory can fit his ideas. He said a photo taken with a nikon is real and can't be fabricated, I gave him what he asked for and he just didn't accept it. He is just going to keep doing the same thing.
You guys have some serious balls to call me dishonest. The fact I wasn't up-to-date on the latest hacks and cracks, fucking loser I didn't know they had broken the encryption when I made the post. Also psychology is a quack-science that's nothing more more than weapon used in the eternal struggle to keep the goyim slaves subdued. The Earth is flat and motionless, empirical proofs already on the books prove it. This makes globalism a conspiracy promoted by psychopathic liars.
You are totally dishonest and you know it. Let me ask you again, what proof would you consider valid to prove the earth is round? Since you reject all the millions of photos/videos of earth from space, what exactly do you need as proof?
ya know, perusing this thread for shitz and giggles (mostly giggles) i cant decide who is more retarded....
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
the flat earthers or the idiots that engage them .....
hey did nomads mommy take his pc away or something?
was hoping to see the latest meme he spends all his sorry ass life making in this ridiculous thread
Well I was personally curious if they were trolling or actually serious, it's clear at this point that at least notbatman is serious which is fascinating to me. He should be studied by psychologists. It's truly remarkable how he is able to deny reality just so the flat earth theory can fit his ideas. He said a photo taken with a nikon is real and can't be fabricated, I gave him what he asked for and he just didn't accept it. He is just going to keep doing the same thing.
You guys have some serious balls to call me dishonest. The fact I wasn't up-to-date on the latest hacks and cracks, fucking loser I didn't know they had broken the encryption when I made the post. Also psychology is a quack-science that's nothing more more than weapon used in the eternal struggle to keep the goyim slaves subdued. The Earth is flat and motionless, empirical proofs already on the books prove it. This makes globalism a conspiracy promoted by psychopathic liars.
Jump to: