First of all this will be my last reply to this post, I don't have time to waste in something that has been proven millions of time before, you call people who belive that the earth is a sphere brainwashed, yeah! very funny cave man.
Convergence, perspective and refraction limits your field of view, you can't see the entire sky from any one point on the Earth's surface. Also atmosphereic refraction causes celestial objects to have an apprent position. You're debunking a strawman model.[/b][/glow]
Im sure you don't know what you talking about, and dont know how the experiment I propuse suffer from a strawman fallacy.
The object you're viewing in the sky could be anything from a high altitude aircraft to some kind of balloon riding the jetstream. I've seen telescopic video of an object with a blinking light that looks like a high altitude aircraft, the object was exactly where the iPhone ISS tracking app said the ISS would be.[/b][/glow]
You have seen a video? buT I have seen the ISS many times, with my own eyes passing over my city, and its not a airplane or something, i live in a 3rd world country and we don't have almost food for eat, and suppose my government spend money to fool people into belive that something is the ISS. For your info in my country we don't care of NASA or you are just a classic murica who think that America has the only space program in the world?? if the ISS were a US airplane of something we will shooting down for sure (or at least try it, lol).
Video and photographs of stars and plants taken by Nikon Coolpix P900/1000 owners all show twinkling lights that are not round at all. Again images of an object in the sky are not definitive proof NASA isn't just flying a kite up there to trick you.[/b][/glow]
I said textually "Buy a decent telescope" since when a Nikon Coolpix P900/1000 its a telescope?? I think its a camera and I said planets, no stars.
The stars say nothing of surface below them, you're making assumptions about the lights in sky then trying to validate your globe model with those assumptions. If the stars are projections off of a curved mirror (firmament) then you'll get distortions like a change in rotation direction and 24 hour light in Antarctica (summertime) from the light wrapping around.[/b][/glow]
Said that the stars are projections off a curved mirror is valid is the same as saying that stars are Tinkerbell family sticky in black gome. The rotation is different in both hemispheres can be well explain with the spherical earth
No you don't have a different opinion, you've just been brainwashed and are regurgitating the shit you've been fed by TPTB like an absolute cuck.[/b][/glow]
You just ask for some experiment to prove yourself and don't know why you insult people when you and your flat folks are one of the most funny and creppy group that exist.