Bitcointalk Usermane: DiMarxist
Blackjack.fun Username: DiMarxist
Topic: [FOFF] BlackJack.Fun | Signature Campaign - page 12. (Read 16268 times)
Bitcointalk Username: Aanuoluwatofunmi
Blackjack.fun Username: Anuoluwatofunmi
Blackjack.fun Username: Anuoluwatofunmi
Reapplying for full member slot
Bitcointalk Usermane: Nanga Parbat
Blackjack.fun Username: NangaParbat
Blackjack.fun Username: NangaParbat
Bitcointalk Usermane: Troytech
Blackjack.fun Username: Troytech
Blackjack.fun Username: Troytech
Bitcointalk Username: Makus
Blackjack.fun Username: Makus
Blackjack.fun Username: Makus
Bitcointalk Usermane: Ambatman
Blackjack.fun Username: Ambatman
Blackjack.fun Username: Ambatman
Bitcointalk Usermane: pi-network314159
Blackjack.fun Username: pinetwork314159
Blackjack.fun Username: pinetwork314159
Bitcointalk Usermane: pi-network314159
Blackjack.fun Username: pinetwork314159
Re-applying again
Bitcointalk Username: promise444c5
Blackjack.fun Username: promise444c5
Bitcointalk Username: Promocodeudo
Blackjack.fun Username: Promocodeudo19
Blackjack.fun Username: Promocodeudo19
Thank you all for your posts / Payments for week 5 will be processed soon. [Exchange rate: 66,150] 
We have several slots for Full Member
Bitcointalk Usermane: sg4j1n3ll0We have several slots for Full Member
Blackjack.fun Username: sg4j1n3ll0
Bitcointalk Usermane: |MINER|
Blackjack.fun Username: minergoal
I can handle with the fm payrate
Blackjack.fun Username: minergoal
I can handle with the fm payrate
Thank you all for your posts / Payments for week 5 will be processed soon. [Exchange rate: 66,150]
We have several slots for Full Member
We have several slots for Full Member
As you know, I have applied for another campaign that currently fits me more and I got accepted.
Thank you Icopress and Blackjack.Fun for the time beeing and bye-bye to my lovely Avatar.
Thank you Icopress and Blackjack.Fun for the time beeing and bye-bye to my lovely Avatar.
I have been accepted in other campaigns
Thank you Icopress and Blackjack.Fun for a wonderful week.
I look forward to working with you again in the future.
Thank you Icopress and Blackjack.Fun for a wonderful week.
I look forward to working with you again in the future.
Thank you all for your posts / Payments for week 4 will be processed soon. [Exchange rate: 64,600]
Bitcointalk Usermane: Troytech
Blackjack.fun Username: Troytech
Blackjack.fun Username: Troytech
Hey, join the prediction contest... if one of the campaign participants wins, a decent bonus will be added to your weekly payment.
-snip-
It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
Impossible or not, actually it depends on each participant.It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
I may be able to meet the maximum quota of 30 posts, but sometimes some of my post quality is not good enough because it is too chasing the number of posts.
But it would be very good if it was reduced, and I also agree.
If "merit" were the leading indicator, it would probably be good for post quality.
But will it be targeted by the number of merits that must be achieved for each participant?
And thanks for providing a complete list of boards that are ignored, this is very helpful so that the post quota every week is met according to the target,
but not to avoid the list that is ignored because I am also active in some of the ignored board lists.
If there will be a merit requirement, it will be even harder to fulfill that target. I'd say 30 posts a week is a bit much but not that bad. To obtain merits the post needs to be a very good quality, like newspaper/magazine level quality and it is impossible to make posts that good consistently (there is not enough topics to cover and there certainly isn't enough time, for me at least) and the post count will decrease even more.
I'd say the current rule-set is fine.
No change needed.
Best regards,
Willi
Welcome!
Code:
Gaza13: Full Member
Signature, Avatar and personal text updated.
Post count (including this one ) = 502
-snip-
It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
Impossible or not, actually it depends on each participant.It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
I may be able to meet the maximum quota of 30 posts, but sometimes some of my post quality is not good enough because it is too chasing the number of posts.
But it would be very good if it was reduced, and I also agree.
If "merit" were the leading indicator, it would probably be good for post quality.
But will it be targeted by the number of merits that must be achieved for each participant?
And thanks for providing a complete list of boards that are ignored, this is very helpful so that the post quota every week is met according to the target,
but not to avoid the list that is ignored because I am also active in some of the ignored board lists.
If there will be a merit requirement, it will be even harder to fulfill that target. I'd say 30 posts a week is a bit much but not that bad. To obtain merits the post needs to be a very good quality, like newspaper/magazine level quality and it is impossible to make posts that good consistently (there is not enough topics to cover and there certainly isn't enough time, for me at least) and the post count will decrease even more.
I'd say the current rule-set is fine.
Jump to: