Topic: [FOFF] BlackJack.Fun | Signature Campaign - page 13. (Read 16595 times)
Thank you all for your posts / Payments for week 4 will be processed soon. [Exchange rate: 64,600]
Bitcointalk Usermane: Troytech
Blackjack.fun Username: Troytech
Blackjack.fun Username: Troytech
Hey, join the prediction contest... if one of the campaign participants wins, a decent bonus will be added to your weekly payment.
-snip-
It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
Impossible or not, actually it depends on each participant.It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
I may be able to meet the maximum quota of 30 posts, but sometimes some of my post quality is not good enough because it is too chasing the number of posts.
But it would be very good if it was reduced, and I also agree.
If "merit" were the leading indicator, it would probably be good for post quality.
But will it be targeted by the number of merits that must be achieved for each participant?
And thanks for providing a complete list of boards that are ignored, this is very helpful so that the post quota every week is met according to the target,
but not to avoid the list that is ignored because I am also active in some of the ignored board lists.
If there will be a merit requirement, it will be even harder to fulfill that target. I'd say 30 posts a week is a bit much but not that bad. To obtain merits the post needs to be a very good quality, like newspaper/magazine level quality and it is impossible to make posts that good consistently (there is not enough topics to cover and there certainly isn't enough time, for me at least) and the post count will decrease even more.
I'd say the current rule-set is fine.
No change needed.
Best regards,
Willi
Welcome!
Code:
Gaza13: Full Member
Signature, Avatar and personal text updated.
Post count (including this one ) = 502
-snip-
It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
Impossible or not, actually it depends on each participant.It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
I may be able to meet the maximum quota of 30 posts, but sometimes some of my post quality is not good enough because it is too chasing the number of posts.
But it would be very good if it was reduced, and I also agree.
If "merit" were the leading indicator, it would probably be good for post quality.
But will it be targeted by the number of merits that must be achieved for each participant?
And thanks for providing a complete list of boards that are ignored, this is very helpful so that the post quota every week is met according to the target,
but not to avoid the list that is ignored because I am also active in some of the ignored board lists.
If there will be a merit requirement, it will be even harder to fulfill that target. I'd say 30 posts a week is a bit much but not that bad. To obtain merits the post needs to be a very good quality, like newspaper/magazine level quality and it is impossible to make posts that good consistently (there is not enough topics to cover and there certainly isn't enough time, for me at least) and the post count will decrease even more.
I'd say the current rule-set is fine.
-snip-
It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
Impossible or not, actually it depends on each participant.It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
I may be able to meet the maximum quota of 30 posts, but sometimes some of my post quality is not good enough because it is too chasing the number of posts.
But it would be very good if it was reduced, and I also agree.
If "merit" were the leading indicator, it would probably be good for post quality.
But will it be targeted by the number of merits that must be achieved for each participant?
And thanks for providing a complete list of boards that are ignored, this is very helpful so that the post quota every week is met according to the target,
but not to avoid the list that is ignored because I am also active in some of the ignored board lists.
Thank you all for your posts / Payments for week 3 will be processed soon. [Exchange rate: 71,820]
Welcome!
Also
It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
- Btw, please do not forget that any post written after page 250 will not be taken into account.
- Below you can also see a list of boards that are ignored.
Welcome!
Code:
babo: Rank updated
Smartprofit: Sr Member
Z-tight: Sr Member
Gaza13: Full Member
Smartprofit: Sr Member
Z-tight: Sr Member
Gaza13: Full Member
Also
It seems to me that 30 posts a week is an impossible task for many participants, so starting next week the quota will be reduced (but the amount of payments per post will be increased) .. I’m still undecided, but I think that we will return to “merits” as the main indicator. On April 15, I will publish new payout rates (but I can already say that the upper limit will be $4 per post).
- Btw, please do not forget that any post written after page 250 will not be taken into account.
- Below you can also see a list of boards that are ignored.
Code:
1. Computer hardware
2. Invites & Accounts
3. Digital goods
4. Collectibles
5. Goods
6. Services
7. Currency exchange
8. Games and rounds
9. Investor-based games
10. Long-term offers
11. Lending
12. Securities
13. Auctions
14. Micro Earnings
15. Кopзинa
16. CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
17. Chinese students
18. Obsolete (buying)
19. Obsolete (selling)
20. MultiBit
21. Archival
22. Serious discussion
23. Ivory Tower
24. Off-topic
25. Politics & Society
26. Press
27. Bounties (Altcoins)
28. Tokens (Altcoins)
29. النقاشات الأخرى
30. Ekonomi, Politik, dan Budaya
31. Topik Lainnya
32. Service Announcements (Altcoins)
33. Off-topic (Hrvatski)
34. Trgovina
35. Off-Topic (Deutsch)
36. Presse
37. Off-Topic (India)
38. Press & News from India
39. Off-Topic (Italiano)
40. Off-topic (Nederlands)
41. Buluşmalar
42. Konu Dışı
43. Pazar Alanı
44. Пoлитикa
45. Бayнти и aиpдpoпы
46. Xaйпы
47. Paзнoe
2. Invites & Accounts
3. Digital goods
4. Collectibles
5. Goods
6. Services
7. Currency exchange
8. Games and rounds
9. Investor-based games
10. Long-term offers
11. Lending
12. Securities
13. Auctions
14. Micro Earnings
15. Кopзинa
16. CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
17. Chinese students
18. Obsolete (buying)
19. Obsolete (selling)
20. MultiBit
21. Archival
22. Serious discussion
23. Ivory Tower
24. Off-topic
25. Politics & Society
26. Press
27. Bounties (Altcoins)
28. Tokens (Altcoins)
29. النقاشات الأخرى
30. Ekonomi, Politik, dan Budaya
31. Topik Lainnya
32. Service Announcements (Altcoins)
33. Off-topic (Hrvatski)
34. Trgovina
35. Off-Topic (Deutsch)
36. Presse
37. Off-Topic (India)
38. Press & News from India
39. Off-Topic (Italiano)
40. Off-topic (Nederlands)
41. Buluşmalar
42. Konu Dışı
43. Pazar Alanı
44. Пoлитикa
45. Бayнти и aиpдpoпы
46. Xaйпы
47. Paзнoe
Bitcointalk Usermane: entebah
Blackjack.fun Username:
will add bj username if got accepted
I already updated the table with your name and only then saw that you did not indicate the BlackJack username.Blackjack.fun Username:
will add bj username if got accepted
➥ I do not consider applications containing phrases like “Will be updated later”
sorry just saw the spreadsheet
Bitcointalk Usermane: entebah
Blackjack.fun Username: entebahh
Bitcointalk Usermane: entebah
Blackjack.fun Username:
will add bj username if got accepted
I already updated the table with your name and only then saw that you did not indicate the BlackJack username.Blackjack.fun Username:
will add bj username if got accepted
➥ I do not consider applications containing phrases like “Will be updated later”
Bitcointalk Username: Z-tight
Blackjack.fun Username: Z-tight
Blackjack.fun Username: Z-tight
Bitcointalk Usermane: _act_
Blackjack.fun Username: _act_
Reapplying
Blackjack.fun Username: _act_
Reapplying
Bitcointalk Username: Fiatless
Blackjack.fun Username: Fiatless
Blackjack.fun Username: Fiatless
Bitcointalk Usermane: Doan9269
Blackjack.fun Username: Doan9269
Will accept any available lower rank pay
Blackjack.fun Username: Doan9269
Will accept any available lower rank pay
Username: pawel7777
BTC SegWit Address: bc1q79vqvnghljgu926g7gtuhnncq560kc24cur43t
BTC SegWit Address: bc1q79vqvnghljgu926g7gtuhnncq560kc24cur43t
Bitcointalk username: dothebeats
Blackjack.fun username: dothebeats
Blackjack.fun username: dothebeats
Bitcointalk Usermane: entebah
Blackjack.fun Username:
will add bj username if got accepted
Blackjack.fun Username:
will add bj username if got accepted
Bitcointalk Usermane: Twentyonepaylots
Blackjack.fun Username: shinokir4
Blackjack.fun Username: shinokir4
Bitcointalk Usermane: Russlenat
Blackjack.fun Username: Russlenat
Blackjack.fun Username: Russlenat
Bitcointalk Usermane: arjunmujay
Blackjack.fun Username: arjunmujay
Blackjack.fun Username: arjunmujay
Jump to: