True, what Paris Saint Germain has to do is change the whole team, not just make changes on the front lines. It's useless that their front line is very good but in the midfield and back they are weak. Focusing only on star players will not make them better, they need to make transfers according to what is needed, not just look at their status. There are several star players who failed when defending PSG, not just one or two players.
No matter how ideal PSG's front line is, it cannot prove capable of winning the Champions League trophy because PSG always misses its midfield. What they have done is good enough, but it cannot be said to be perfect if they only focus on the front lines with the superstars. So if you really want to have that mentality in the UCL, solid players also need to be implemented on every front. Reflecting on the clubs that have beaten PSG, of course we can see from the midfield that was built to play solidly. 
Topic: ⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 1869. (Read 493444 times)
If the transfer fee for Osimhen was really only £133m, it would be a very cheap transfer in terms of price/performance. I think it is almost impossible to sign Haaland from Manchester City. Likewise, it is almost impossible to transfer Mbappe from PSG. I don't think there are any other strikers at this level. £133m is a very cheap price for Osimhen. Also, PSG need to sign more qualified midfielders to win the champions league. They can't win trophies just by transferring world star strikers, they need to turn into a good team to win trophies.
It's likely such offer will be also rejected by napoli. I remember that if napoli has given price tag for osimhen.
Quote
Napoli are asking for bids of £150million for Victor Osimhen amid interest from Manchester United and Chelsea, it is reported.
https://talksport.com/football/1370980/victor-osimhen-fee-napoli-man-utd-chelsea-transfer-news/#:~:text=Napoli%20set%20%C2%A3150million%20asking,Manchester%20United%20and%20Chelsea%20interestedThat price tag may still relevant this time consider napoli was failed to get treble winner for this season. I think that napoli will be also think so hard for the offer that will be offered by paris saint german. The problem is if osimhen is seeing EPL as his dream league.
EPL team may have more chance to get him rather than paris saint germant. PSG is now facing crisis caused by some of its important players will be leaving the club in summer.
PSG is also still looking for a good coach to manage the team for next season.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
If the transfer fee for Osimhen was really only £133m, it would be a very cheap transfer in terms of price/performance. I think it is almost impossible to sign Haaland from Manchester City. Likewise, it is almost impossible to transfer Mbappe from PSG. I don't think there are any other strikers at this level. £133m is a very cheap price for Osimhen. Also, PSG need to sign more qualified midfielders to win the champions league. They can't win trophies just by transferring world star strikers, they need to turn into a good team to win trophies.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
If the transfer fee for Osimhen was really only £133m, it would be a very cheap transfer in terms of price/performance. I think it is almost impossible to sign Haaland from Manchester City. Likewise, it is almost impossible to transfer Mbappe from PSG. I don't think there are any other strikers at this level. £133m is a very cheap price for Osimhen. Also, PSG need to sign more qualified midfielders to win the champions league. They can't win trophies just by transferring world star strikers, they need to turn into a good team to win trophies.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
If the transfer fee for Osimhen was really only £133m, it would be a very cheap transfer in terms of price/performance. I think it is almost impossible to sign Haaland from Manchester City. Likewise, it is almost impossible to transfer Mbappe from PSG. I don't think there are any other strikers at this level. £133m is a very cheap price for Osimhen. Also, PSG need to sign more qualified midfielders to win the champions league. They can't win trophies just by transferring world star strikers, they need to turn into a good team to win trophies.
At this point ... psg much more better option but longer term one , chelsea much more promising , they just out of champions league next season , that's the disadvantage.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
If the transfer fee for Osimhen was really only £133m, it would be a very cheap transfer in terms of price/performance. I think it is almost impossible to sign Haaland from Manchester City. Likewise, it is almost impossible to transfer Mbappe from PSG. I don't think there are any other strikers at this level. £133m is a very cheap price for Osimhen. Also, PSG need to sign more qualified midfielders to win the champions league. They can't win trophies just by transferring world star strikers, they need to turn into a good team to win trophies.
Paris is and has never been a potential destination for Erling Haaland and he has said that publicly, or at least implied it. He said for him it is either the Premier League, La Liga or the Bundesliga. He never spoke about PSG being on his list. 133 million Pounds for Osimhen usually sounds more than right, we just have the problem that the market is spoiled with transfer fees like that for Neymar back in the days. 133 million Pounds is about 150 million Euro. I guess there would also be bonuses dependent on success so selling him will end in a great deal for Napoli. The problem is that you can't replace him.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
Paris St-Germain are preparing a £133m bid for Napoli and Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and will move into pole position, ahead of Chelsea, for the 24-year-old. PSG is again gathering big football stars and putting together a mega team, but so far this strategy has not paid off for them. They still haven't managed to win the Champions League.
...
If the transfer fee for Osimhen was really only £133m, it would be a very cheap transfer in terms of price/performance. I think it is almost impossible to sign Haaland from Manchester City. Likewise, it is almost impossible to transfer Mbappe from PSG. I don't think there are any other strikers at this level. £133m is a very cheap price for Osimhen. Also, PSG need to sign more qualified midfielders to win the champions league. They can't win trophies just by transferring world star strikers, they need to turn into a good team to win trophies.
Manchester United are still watching Osimhen closely for a possible offer in the summer. However they aren't going to be the only team to make this offer either. They will most probably face some other big and champion teams to sign him. In that case it would be really difficult to sign him for them. Osimhen wouldn't even like to leave Napoli easily while they are having a wonderful season.
Only some specific teams might be able to make him think about his future twice before making his final decision. I don't know if he has any intention of joining Manchester United honestly. They are a better team now compared to the previous season but they still have a long way to go.
Only some specific teams might be able to make him think about his future twice before making his final decision. I don't know if he has any intention of joining Manchester United honestly. They are a better team now compared to the previous season but they still have a long way to go.
All these coaches are famous and all of them got enough experience to work in a team like Chelsea I think Nagelsmann can be an interesting option for Chelsea because he got fired because of a bad performance in Bayern Munich while in Chelsea he got the chance to prove himself and have better performance with his team and Conte could be a good option too.
If you want to choose a coach for Chelsea, then you should be able to choose the best, and of course you have to have experience being a coach with a very high level of experience. Chelsea must also be able to work well in a team because usually the coach has given good directions and provided a pretty good strategy, but usually players can also be the cause of defeat. Hopefully Chelsea will succeed in getting the best coach and can make important changes for Chelsea. 
Will Mauricio Pochettino become Chelsea's manager next season?
Chelsea have dropped out Julian Nagelsmann Luis Enrique are candidate manager for next season and right now left with Mauricio Pochettino, I don't think good ideas when showing his for Chelsea manager next season because has bad reputation when becoming PSG tactician last two years. Can't predictable with Chelsea's owner Todd Boehly because he made many time mistake from sacking Thomas Tuchel and replacing by Graham Potter until Frank Lampard bad reputation to replace Potter position. Seems Julian Nagelsmann is the best choose because he has good reputation success 8 winning record Champion League games with Bayern Munich and easy for him adapting with Primer League games atmosphere.
I think Chelsea have run out of coaching options and now Pochettino is the only hope for them to become Chelsea coach next season. Chelsea owner Todd Boehly is certainly also trying hard to bring in a credible and experienced coach, but with the current team situation, most coaches will definitely also reject offers from Chelsea. Quite concerned about what Chelsea is experiencing this season, even though they are one of the big EPL teams and due to management's inability to manage the club, this has had a huge impact on the team's performance in any competition.Chelsea have dropped out Julian Nagelsmann Luis Enrique are candidate manager for next season and right now left with Mauricio Pochettino, I don't think good ideas when showing his for Chelsea manager next season because has bad reputation when becoming PSG tactician last two years. Can't predictable with Chelsea's owner Todd Boehly because he made many time mistake from sacking Thomas Tuchel and replacing by Graham Potter until Frank Lampard bad reputation to replace Potter position. Seems Julian Nagelsmann is the best choose because he has good reputation success 8 winning record Champion League games with Bayern Munich and easy for him adapting with Primer League games atmosphere.
Barcelona and Roberto Firmino have had a verbal agreement.
Firmino has agreed to join Barcelona for free at the end of his current contract at Liverpool. His contract ends this July.
Klopp would have likes Firmino to remain at Liverpool but Firmino is hell bent on moving on to another club.
Personally, I don't think this is good decision from Barcelona. There is no point having a 31 year old as the back up striker of a 34 year old. Firmino is in decline currently. Barcelona needs a young and promising striker to be the back up for Lewandoski not a declining striker.
Firmino has agreed to join Barcelona for free at the end of his current contract at Liverpool. His contract ends this July.
Klopp would have likes Firmino to remain at Liverpool but Firmino is hell bent on moving on to another club.
Personally, I don't think this is good decision from Barcelona. There is no point having a 31 year old as the back up striker of a 34 year old. Firmino is in decline currently. Barcelona needs a young and promising striker to be the back up for Lewandoski not a declining striker.
I know it's just one way, but if Zidane went to Juventus, maybe Juventus would become a great team again and we'd be able to go far in the Champions League, lately Juventus is just a team that fights for a place in the Champions League, very sad and regrettable that a team as big as juventus, today is reduced a lot. I imagine Zidane won't go to PSG because PSG management doesn't want a long-term project, they want to win the Champions League urgently, which is something very difficult for any coach
Zidane is still one of the very good coaches this time, especially with the conditions he was in Madrid before, so indeed when he decided to go to Juventus, his hopes were clear that this would be the same as he did with Madrid.He's not a trainer who talks a lot but his ability is clearly really very good and I'm looking forward to this if in the end this is confirmed to be the truth.
At this point, I think Chelsea is confused. They don't know what they want. They didn't go all out for Nagelsmann that is why they lost him. They're looking for a coach that has experienced the EPL and that is not a very good idea. Pep and Klopp never had experience in the EPL before they became the managers of their respective clubs but they both did and doing well.
Potter and Lampard both have a degree of experience with the league but they both failed at Chelsea so what's the point of still[cking to that same philosophy? They also had a chance to sign Luis Erique but they refused because of the same lack of experience in the EPL excuse. They might end up with an average coach if they're not careful.
To me, the Pochettino they want to hire is a wrong decision, but what do I know?
I think the board at Chelsea just took a quick look and immediately decided who would be the right fit to be Chelsea coach and that decision fell to Lampard. But in this context, Lampard is a temporary coach, in which Chelsea gives hope to fans that there will be another coach to handle Chelsea next season. I don't understand why the Chelsea management didn't approach Nagelsmann directly even though he was a pretty great coach when he was with Bayern Munich.Potter and Lampard both have a degree of experience with the league but they both failed at Chelsea so what's the point of still[cking to that same philosophy? They also had a chance to sign Luis Erique but they refused because of the same lack of experience in the EPL excuse. They might end up with an average coach if they're not careful.
To me, the Pochettino they want to hire is a wrong decision, but what do I know?
Zidane is also reportedly the coach most wanted by fans to train Chelsea. I think the management should also approach Zidane and have direct talks with him to accept this offer because Zidane is a well-known coach who was very successful while at Real Madrid.
Chelsea must look for a coach who has the characteristics of building a stronger team in the coming season. Because the players currently owned by Chelsea are the good quality players they have brought in in this transfer window.
I think Chelsea have run out of coaching options and now Pochettino is the only hope for them to become Chelsea coach next season. Chelsea owner Todd Boehly is certainly also trying hard to bring in a credible and experienced coach, but with the current team situation, most coaches will definitely also reject offers from Chelsea. Quite concerned about what Chelsea is experiencing this season, even though they are one of the big EPL teams and due to management's inability to manage the club, this has had a huge impact on the team's performance in any competition.
At this point, I think Chelsea is confused. They don't know what they want. They didn't go all out for Nagelsmann that is why they lost him. They're looking for a coach that has experienced the EPL and that is not a very good idea. Pep and Klopp never had experience in the EPL before they became the managers of their respective clubs but they both did and doing well.
Potter and Lampard both have a degree of experience with the league but they both failed at Chelsea so what's the point of still[cking to that same philosophy? They also had a chance to sign Luis Erique but they refused because of the same lack of experience in the EPL excuse. They might end up with an average coach if they're not careful.
To me, the Pochettino they want to hire is a wrong decision, but what do I know?
No manager would want to take up a managerial job in a top club like Chelsea and get sacked before six months of his reign at the club and that I think is Chelsea's main problem in getting a another good manager at the moment.
The now club owner was busy buying good quality players instead of buying players that were needed for the club. The mouth watering amount of money used in getting the services of Enzo Fernandez would've been used to solve the current attacking issues at the club. Chelsea I think needs a very sharp no. 9 striker to compliment the great midfield line they have already and without that, any manager that comes to to club will still flop
The now club owner was busy buying good quality players instead of buying players that were needed for the club. The mouth watering amount of money used in getting the services of Enzo Fernandez would've been used to solve the current attacking issues at the club. Chelsea I think needs a very sharp no. 9 striker to compliment the great midfield line they have already and without that, any manager that comes to to club will still flop
That's why as reported by some sports media. that Nagelmann and Luis Enrique, have several requirements that must be met by Chelsea if they want to use their services. from Nagelsmann's side, it looks like he has learned a lot with what happened to him after his dismissal by Bayern Munich's management.
Luis Enrique, he also has a number of requirements that were submitted to Chelsea if he wanted to use his services as a coach. but it seems now the rumors are blowing stronger towards Pochettino. I don't know why Chelsea made it a top priority, or whether it was difficult for them to bring in a coach with more experience and potential. so I see, this problem is in the management of Chelsea itself.
Well, as you also said, I agree, that Chelsea needs player number 9 who is sharp in terms of scoring goals. because, the players currently available are unable to prove their ability to score goals. it's just that, the first problem lies with the coach and roughly, which coach is capable of bringing Chelsea in a better direction.
I know it's just one way, but if Zidane went to Juventus, maybe Juventus would become a great team again and we'd be able to go far in the Champions League, lately Juventus is just a team that fights for a place in the Champions League, very sad and regrettable that a team as big as juventus, today is reduced a lot. I imagine Zidane won't go to PSG because PSG management doesn't want a long-term project, they want to win the Champions League urgently, which is something very difficult for any coach
I read this too but I assumed he wanted to have a bigger role. Like most managers only decide on the tactics and such, but I read in my local news that he wants to have total control. The players they get, the players they sell, the teams training, the new tactical system, basically he wants to have the "new style" that only he brings to the table. We all know Total football, we all know tiki taka, we all know gegenpress.I read that he wants to make something that is his, and if he can achieve that which would take time to master by the players, he wants players that would work for that system, not the best players, but the ones that would fit the system the best. So he may go to a lower level team to get that type of permission to do whatever he pleases.
Roberto Firmino is about to leave Liverpool by the end of his contract at the end of this June. I would still like to see him playing for Liverpool more actually but it looks like the board don't have any plans for him anymore. I guess it wasn't Klopp's decision for him because I didn't see anything like he wasn't contented with Firmino. He was performing very well before his injury you know. It was like he made one of his best starts to a Premier League season in his career. This was still not enough to keep him longer.
Nunez is here from now on maybe but he isn't that much consistent about scoring goals. When he has a bad day Firmino is there to make up for that. But when Firmino leaves I wonder what kind of plans Liverpool will have for the position.
Nunez is here from now on maybe but he isn't that much consistent about scoring goals. When he has a bad day Firmino is there to make up for that. But when Firmino leaves I wonder what kind of plans Liverpool will have for the position.
Chelsea is facing a unique problem with the coach situation right now. They do want to bring in good coaches. They are probably very interested in Zidane as well. But the problem is Zidane is not interested to manage Chelsea. That’s also exactly what happened with Julian Nagelsmann. Whoever the next coach of Chelsea, is probably not going to be able to bring in the results in the first season of his appointment. He will need to be given some time before he can actually bring in the results.
what you said is true, where Chelsea must be able to give time to whoever the coach they show next season because building a team in a better direction takes time and needs a process in the midst of a situation that has hit their club.For Lampard, he has not been fully successful since he was shown as Chelsea coach this month, he needs time to adjust the game he is implementing, even if Tood Boehly believes Lampard can give the best for Chelsea next season, he must provide support for now. dismissal and alternating coaches that are carried out in close proximity will only be a waste of time if no improvement occurs.
Sports media talk about names like Julian Nagelsmann, Mauricio Pochettino, Zinedine Zidane, Luis Enrique, Luciano Spaletti, Oliver Glasner for Chelsea coaching. However, I think coaching at Chelsea right now can be as difficult as wearing a shirt made of fire. Chelsea has long lacked a sense of organization and teamwork. Chelsea's coach will work first and foremost to establish the bond of friendship between the players in the team. I think coaching at Chelsea is a risky business. Some coaches may not accept Chelsea's managerial offer as a result of their career planning.
All these coaches are famous and all of them got enough experience to work in a team like Chelsea I think Nagelsmann can be an interesting option for Chelsea because he got fired because of a bad performance in Bayern Munich while in Chelsea he got the chance to prove himself and have better performance with his team and Conte could be a good option too.
Mason Mount is monitored by not only Liverpool but also Arsenal as it seems. Before anything else Mount hasn't been impressive at all this season. He played in so many matches for Chelsea but had so few contribution with goals and assists in total. He was much better last season honestly. Their bad look as a team is also a big factor in this to happen for sure. Because Chelsea have been a big mess so far.
Mount is still very young (24-year-old) and I think he is a really skilled player at the same time. He might not want to continue with Chelsea in case he gets an official offer from a more successful team this season. They aren't going to be a part of the Champions League in the end. Maybe not Liverpool but Arsenal can be a really good option to think about for him.
https://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/arsenal-talks-chelsea-mason-mount-transfer-plans/blt51a583f33f5f0a16
Mount is still very young (24-year-old) and I think he is a really skilled player at the same time. He might not want to continue with Chelsea in case he gets an official offer from a more successful team this season. They aren't going to be a part of the Champions League in the end. Maybe not Liverpool but Arsenal can be a really good option to think about for him.
https://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/arsenal-talks-chelsea-mason-mount-transfer-plans/blt51a583f33f5f0a16
Jump to: