I think there will be nothing wrong (in a sporting sense) if Chelsea changes ownership, in the end it should not directly affect the club. The only change in my opinion that is likely to happen is financial policy - maybe the new owner will care more about the club's profitability than titles and then Chelsea will turn into something similar to Arsenal.
Chelsea has officially released a statement that Roman Abramovich will sell the club before Chelsea facing Luton in the FA Cup.
Abramovich was forced to sell Chelsea due to the impact of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, where Abramovich is known to have close ties
to the Russian president. So Abramovich's assets are in danger of being frozen as economic sanctions are imposed by various countries
on individuals who are with the Russian government. In fact, since Abramovich officially became the owner of Chelsea in 2003, Abramovich
succeeded in turning Chelsea into a very formidable team in Europe. I think Abramovich is the best owner of the club, really providing financial
support to make the Chelsea squad strong. I'm not sure the new Chelsea owner will be as good as Abramovich, because as you said there is
a possibility that the new Chelsea owners will be more concerned about profits than winning trophies. Hopefully my guess is wrong, and Chelsea
get a new owner who is as good as Abramovich.
It seems to me that thinking about profit is just as important as about trophies - we can easily see this in the example of Barcelona, which has won many trophies but the club is on the verge of bankruptcy due to the financial policy of the management. Abramovich easily spent a lot of money on the club (and got a lot of trophies as a result) for the simple reason that it was not his money, but money stolen from the people of Russia. I think that the next owner of the club will be more rational and I don't see anything wrong with that.
