⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 3685.

joebrook

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 259

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: tomahawk9 on January 29, 2018, 02:26:57 PM

Quote from: tokeweed on January 29, 2018, 06:04:47 AM

Guess who's bidding for Eden Hazard for an English transfer record of 150M GBP...? Man City! Holy sh******t!!! If they sign him, we'd be seeing a Barca-esque power house in the EPL, and probably in the CL too.

And the Gunners have also agreed to Auba's fee of 50M GBP. It will be nice seeing him play in England.

I doubt Hazard would go to Man City, he knows Real Madrid wants him, and I think he wants to go to Spain, also, rejecting Real to go to The Citizens would a bad choice career wise, and 150m is way too much, wouldn't the FFP start snooping around Man City finances?

Aymeric Laporte to Manchester City done deal. The player has paid his release clause (€65m), he will travel to Manchester today, the presentation will be tomorrow.

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang might be an Arsenal player in the next 24h, final bid is arround £55.4m.

Deal between Chelsea and Roma for the striker Dkezo is off. According to reports, the player and Chelsea didn't find an agreement on the wages.

Conte is going to be mad about the turn of events with regards to how shambolic their transfers has been, I am sure Abrahimovich is on the verge of sacking the Italian that's why he doesn't want to give him any funds to buy any players. Conte has misused a lot of money for players who are not really playing that well.

Nahl

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1000

Aubameyang seems pretty near to Arsenal and if this rumour realized then there was another player would be the victim from Aubameyang arrival and possible Lacazette is the victim because during play for Arsenal Lacazette was not able to show satisfactory performance and during this season Lacazette only can makes 9 goals with only play full time 6 times from his 24 appearances in english league so i'm pretty sure Wenger does not satisfied with his performance and looking for another player

tomahawk9

hero member

Activity: 2086

Merit: 994

Cats on Mars

Quote from: tokeweed on January 29, 2018, 06:04:47 AM

Guess who's bidding for Eden Hazard for an English transfer record of 150M GBP...? Man City! Holy sh******t!!! If they sign him, we'd be seeing a Barca-esque power house in the EPL, and probably in the CL too.

And the Gunners have also agreed to Auba's fee of 50M GBP. It will be nice seeing him play in England.

I doubt Hazard would go to Man City, he knows Real Madrid wants him, and I think he wants to go to Spain, also, rejecting Real to go to The Citizens would be a bad choice career wise, and 150m is way too much, wouldn't the FFP start snooping around Man City finances?

Aymeric Laporte to Manchester City done deal. The player has paid his release clause (€65m), he will travel to Manchester today, the presentation will be tomorrow.

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang might be an Arsenal player in the next 24h, final bid is arround £55.4m.

Deal between Chelsea and Roma for the striker Dkezo is off. According to reports, the player and Chelsea didn't find an agreement on the wages.

yoseph

sr. member

Activity: 868

Merit: 266

Quote from: szpalata on January 29, 2018, 07:09:38 AM

Quote from: tokeweed on January 29, 2018, 06:04:47 AM

Guess who's bidding for Eden Hazard for an English transfer record of 150M GBP...? Man City! Holy sh******t!!! If they sign him, we'd be seeing a Barca-esque power house in the EPL, and probably in the CL too.

And the Gunners have also agreed to Auba's fee of 50M GBP. It will be nice seeing him play in England.

It's great Arsenal are now spending pretty big and the old man should keep up this trend from henceforth because the team has really lost some glory under his watch recently due to his stingy stands on paying huge fees. Manchester City are a great side already and i don't think Hazard will bring anything new to the side because they already have world class players installed in their setup unless they plan to remain extremely dominant in the EPL by hoardingall the good players from the other teams.

I really don't want Eden Hazard to be at Manchester City the same way that i didn't want Alexis Sanchez to be at the team, Hazard going there will be very massive but i think he already has his heart set on moving to Real Madrid who are also ready to bring on Harry Kane and possibly Lewandowski.

tokeweed

legendary

Activity: 3976

Merit: 1421

Life, Love and Laughter...

^ Lol. You know better than Guardiola?

And it's not just about the EPL for the Mansours. It's about building another football dynasty in Europe. Possibly something even bigger than Barca and Real.

szpalata

sr. member

Activity: 686

Merit: 253

Quote from: tokeweed on January 29, 2018, 06:04:47 AM

Guess who's bidding for Eden Hazard for an English transfer record of 150M GBP...? Man City! Holy sh******t!!! If they sign him, we'd be seeing a Barca-esque power house in the EPL, and probably in the CL too.

And the Gunners have also agreed to Auba's fee of 50M GBP. It will be nice seeing him play in England.

It's great Arsenal are now spending pretty big and the old man should keep up this trend from henceforth because the team has really lost some glory under his watch recently due to his stingy stands on paying huge fees. Manchester City are a great side already and i don't think Hazard will bring anything new to the side because they already have world class players installed in their setup unless they plan to remain extremely dominant in the EPL by hoardingall the good players from the other teams.

Claudyah

newbie

Activity: 252

Merit: 0

Since last week, City management is believed to have been involved in negotiations with Arsenal to sign Alexis Sanchez, with the Premier League leaders this season already bidding for £ 20m.

tokeweed

legendary

Activity: 3976

Merit: 1421

Life, Love and Laughter...

Guess who's bidding for Eden Hazard for an English transfer record of 150M GBP...? Man City! Holy sh******t!!! If they sign him, we'd be seeing a Barca-esque power house in the EPL, and probably in the CL too.

And the Gunners have also agreed to Auba's fee of 50M GBP. It will be nice seeing him play in England.

DIA7

hero member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 602

Both Liverpool and Tottenham will be missing PSG Midfielder Javier Pastore who eager to move out from the French side back to italy is his priority.
Dortmund have given Arsenal final word either pay the £60 Million price tag for Aubameyang or search somewhere else.
Hammers striker Diafra Sakho is holding talks with Rennes For a potential move to the French Ligue1 the fee will be close to 10€ for the 28 years old.
Finally done sense from Conte as he is not willing to offload Batshuayi. I think the reason for change of heart is that his deal with Dzeko is failing down and the other targets are not good caliber to join the defending champions.

joebrook

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 259

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: cicciobtc on January 25, 2018, 06:00:45 PM

-Mourinho has renewed his contract with Manchester United until 2020

-Younes from Ajax to Napoli for 5M

-Liverpool and Everton are strongly interested in Rondon of WBA for at least 15M

-Subotic is a new player of S.Etienne

-Lucas Moura is very close to Tottenham from Psg for 30M

Pep Guardiola claims that they are unable to compete with the other English Clubs in the transfer market even though they have spent more than 100M Pounds than any of their closet rivals and now they are on the verge of agreeing terms for Athletic Bilbao Aymeric Laporte for 57M Pounds.

cicciobtc

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1001

-Mourinho has renewed his contract with Manchester United until 2020

-Younes from Ajax to Napoli for 5M

-Liverpool and Everton are strongly interested in Rondon of WBA for at least 15M

-Subotic is a new player of S.Etienne

-Lucas Moura is very close to Tottenham from Psg for 30M

AnotherBTCNoob

full member

Activity: 318

Merit: 108

Quote from: Janinjo11 on January 25, 2018, 03:56:03 PM

Quote from: yoseph on January 25, 2018, 03:31:56 PM

I really think that it is very hypocritical of Antonio Conte to claim that there is no way that Chelsea would be able to match the spending power of the two Manchester clubs especially since he has spent 350M Euros since his arrival at Chelsea, Manchester United have spent 50M Euros more whiles Man City has spent 110M Euros more. Most have Chelsea spending have been wasted in the likes of Bakayoko and Drinkwater.

Manchester City made best investments among these three clubs. Premier League clubs have almost unlimited amount of money because of the income of TV rights. All clubs can easily spend 300-400m a year without being in danger to break the financial fair play.

Best investments yes but it must be said that the manager is a class act and knows exactly what he is doing. The management record is phenomenal.

DIA7

hero member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 602

Monaco have reached agreement with Southampton to sell their Argentine striker Guido Carrillo the transfer fee for the 26 years old is rumored to be around £19.2m.
Leverkusen 21 years old winger Julian Brandt have decided to ignore or the offers he is getting from Bayern Munich, Liverpool and Barcelona and he prefers to stay with Leverkusen for the time being.
Roma have accepted the bid over their Striker Edin Dzeko and Brazilian full back Emerson for £44M and add ons.
Arsenal are confident on landing on Aubameyang despite their second bid £51 Million was rejected by Dortmund.

Janinjo11

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Janinjo tips

Quote from: yoseph on January 25, 2018, 03:31:56 PM

I really think that it is very hypocritical of Antonio Conte to claim that there is no way that Chelsea would be able to match the spending power of the two Manchester clubs especially since he has spent 350M Euros since his arrival at Chelsea, Manchester United have spent 50M Euros more whiles Man City has spent 110M Euros more. Most have Chelsea spending have been wasted in the likes of Bakayoko and Drinkwater.

Manchester City made best investments among these three clubs. Premier League clubs have almost unlimited amount of money because of the income of TV rights. All clubs can easily spend 300-400m a year without being in danger to break the financial fair play.

yoseph

sr. member

Activity: 868

Merit: 266

I really think that it is very hypocritical of Antonio Conte to claim that there is no way that Chelsea would be able to match the spending power of the two Manchester clubs especially since he has spent 350M Euros since his arrival at Chelsea, Manchester United have spent 50M Euros more whiles Man City has spent 110M Euros more. Most have Chelsea spending have been wasted in the likes of Bakayoko and Drinkwater.

AnotherBTCNoob

full member

Activity: 318

Merit: 108

Quote from: joebrook on January 25, 2018, 12:42:10 PM

Quote from: tokeweed on January 25, 2018, 09:25:01 AM

Quote from: yoseph on January 24, 2018, 06:38:37 PM

Quote from: oHnK on January 24, 2018, 01:34:56 PM

Quote from: AnotherBTCNoob on January 24, 2018, 01:05:23 PM

Arsenal put 4 past Palace last Saturday with no Sanchez in the line-up. The signing of Mkhitaryan will be a good one for the North London club and I can see the opposite happening - Arsenal putting together a good run from now onwards.

How can you say that this is a good deal for arsenal? Mkhitaryan wasnt really playing for manchester united either and might be sloppy right now. He was a good player but he is no better than sanchez. Im not sure what wenger has in mind except for getting rid of sanchez because his wage is quite high and it is draining the club?

Since no money was paid to neither parties, i think Manchester United really benefited the most out of this deal especially since Mkhitaryan was not in the best form and was being benched because of Jesse Lingard,

Nope, with the kind of wages United is paying Sanchez, some players in the team (hello Pogba) would start to question the club's decision making on acquiring players and how much they get paid.

I think that dressing United room is gonna blow up by the end of the season with a couple of star players wanting to leave the club in the summer.

Nothing of that sorts is going to happen, most of this unrest is just media speculations and nothing more, if they want higher wages they should just negotiate for a better salary

I think you're right mate - the media go into a frenzy stating that big name players are pissed off but realistically, how can the Pogba's of this world start screaming that he's only on a reported £280k a week? Grin

joebrook

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 259

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: tokeweed on January 25, 2018, 09:25:01 AM

Quote from: yoseph on January 24, 2018, 06:38:37 PM

Quote from: oHnK on January 24, 2018, 01:34:56 PM

Quote from: AnotherBTCNoob on January 24, 2018, 01:05:23 PM

Arsenal put 4 past Palace last Saturday with no Sanchez in the line-up. The signing of Mkhitaryan will be a good one for the North London club and I can see the opposite happening - Arsenal putting together a good run from now onwards.

How can you say that this is a good deal for arsenal? Mkhitaryan wasnt really playing for manchester united either and might be sloppy right now. He was a good player but he is no better than sanchez. Im not sure what wenger has in mind except for getting rid of sanchez because his wage is quite high and it is draining the club?

Since no money was paid to neither parties, i think Manchester United really benefited the most out of this deal especially since Mkhitaryan was not in the best form and was being benched because of Jesse Lingard,

Nope, with the kind of wages United is paying Sanchez, some players in the team (hello Pogba) would start to question the club's decision making on acquiring players and how much they get paid.

I think that dressing United room is gonna blow up by the end of the season with a couple of star players wanting to leave the club in the summer.

Nothing of that sorts is going to happen, most of this unrest is just media speculations and nothing more, if they want higher wages they should just negotiate for a better salary

tokeweed

legendary

Activity: 3976

Merit: 1421

Life, Love and Laughter...

Quote from: yoseph on January 24, 2018, 06:38:37 PM

Quote from: oHnK on January 24, 2018, 01:34:56 PM

Quote from: AnotherBTCNoob on January 24, 2018, 01:05:23 PM

Arsenal put 4 past Palace last Saturday with no Sanchez in the line-up. The signing of Mkhitaryan will be a good one for the North London club and I can see the opposite happening - Arsenal putting together a good run from now onwards.

How can you say that this is a good deal for arsenal? Mkhitaryan wasnt really playing for manchester united either and might be sloppy right now. He was a good player but he is no better than sanchez. Im not sure what wenger has in mind except for getting rid of sanchez because his wage is quite high and it is draining the club?

Since no money was paid to neither parties, i think Manchester United really benefited the most out of this deal especially since Mkhitaryan was not in the best form and was being benched because of Jesse Lingard,

Nope, with the kind of wages United is paying Sanchez, some players in the team (hello Pogba) would start to question the club's decision making on acquiring players and how much they get paid.

I think that dressing United room is gonna blow up by the end of the season with a couple of star players wanting to leave the club in the summer.

yoseph

sr. member

Activity: 868

Merit: 266

Quote from: oHnK on January 24, 2018, 01:34:56 PM

Quote from: AnotherBTCNoob on January 24, 2018, 01:05:23 PM

Arsenal put 4 past Palace last Saturday with no Sanchez in the line-up. The signing of Mkhitaryan will be a good one for the North London club and I can see the opposite happening - Arsenal putting together a good run from now onwards.

How can you say that this is a good deal for arsenal? Mkhitaryan wasnt really playing for manchester united either and might be sloppy right now. He was a good player but he is no better than sanchez. Im not sure what wenger has in mind except for getting rid of sanchez because his wage is quite high and it is draining the club?

Since no money was paid to neither parties, i think Manchester United really benefited the most out of this deal especially since Mkhitaryan was not in the best form and was being benched because of Jesse Lingard,

miha8

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 111

Quote from: AnotherBTCNoob on January 24, 2018, 01:59:08 PM

Quote from: oHnK on January 24, 2018, 01:34:56 PM

Quote from: AnotherBTCNoob on January 24, 2018, 01:05:23 PM

Arsenal put 4 past Palace last Saturday with no Sanchez in the line-up. The signing of Mkhitaryan will be a good one for the North London club and I can see the opposite happening - Arsenal putting together a good run from now onwards.

How can you say that this is a good deal for arsenal? Mkhitaryan wasnt really playing for manchester united either and might be sloppy right now. He was a good player but he is no better than sanchez. Im not sure what wenger has in mind except for getting rid of sanchez because his wage is quite high and it is draining the club?

Not saying it's a good deal. Sanchez is class and a huge loss but Arsenal have acquired a quality player and I feel that he will be a good asset for them.

There is no Manchester while there is a Mourinho on the bench. He prefers defensive football which doesn't correspond to the Manchester. They have a very good team and they must play offensive, on goal more.

Topic: ⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 3685. (Read 474168 times)