Pages:
Author

Topic: For DT1 members: mhanbostanci & alts - page 3. (Read 2654 times)

legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1531
May 21, 2020, 11:06:27 AM
#58
You either didn't read the referenced thread and supported the flag just because you don't like Lauda, or you don't understand what "high risk of losing money" means, both of which are good reasons for you to not be in DT.

I guess we need to thank cryptohunter for creating a flytrap for you guys. Any other disgruntled DT wannabes looking to settle their personal grudges via the trust system? Lets see if TECSHARE, patron saint of DT1 shithead guild will join in or will chicken out as usual.


I know very well what it is to lose money.
Examine the flag.
Lauda and his gang can be as hostile to me as they want.
Unlike those in Lauda's gang, I am conscientious.
That's why, I can make a neutral decision on this flag.
The victimization of the users is obvious.

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
May 21, 2020, 10:25:04 AM
#57
The flag has nothing to do with your lies about it.
The flag is evaluated within itself.
By speculating, you are trying to make people believe in lies.
Please give up this unnecessary hostility.

You either didn't read the referenced thread and supported the flag just because you don't like Lauda, or you don't understand what "high risk of losing money" means, both of which are good reasons for you to not be in DT.

I guess we need to thank cryptohunter for creating a flytrap for you guys. Any other disgruntled DT wannabes looking to settle their personal grudges via the trust system? Lets see if TECSHARE, patron saint of DT1 shithead guild will join in or will chicken out as usual.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1531
May 21, 2020, 09:32:42 AM
#56
DT1 please consider excluding the users mentioned in the OP, and the users who are seeking to exact revenge via the creation and support of a frivolous flag.

The flag has nothing to do with your lies about it.
The flag is evaluated within itself.
By speculating, you are trying to make people believe in lies.
Please give up this unnecessary hostility.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
May 21, 2020, 09:29:36 AM
#55
also you mr.bastard won't talk about this trust abuser https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lafu-abusing-trust-system-5248906
for hide your fucking skin
Lafu is really cool, exposing malware and stuff...
DT1 please consider excluding the users mentioned in the OP, and the users who are seeking to exact revenge via the creation and support of a frivolous flag.
Quote
Support: mhanbostanci, muslol67, hacker1001101001, bonesjonesreturns
Flag is opposed so no worries about it but members who supported such flag shouldn't be in system. I see that account muslol67 is not DT any more (he was DT earlier today or it has something to do with my trust settings  Undecided), troll and Bump are not DT anyway so only mhanbostanci left.

I will probably create another topic because of retaliatory negative I have received, I am breaking my head for few days and I have no idea what author of that feedback tried to say, I might ask in Bitcoin Technical Support about this input thingy Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
May 21, 2020, 07:12:55 AM
#54
DT1 please consider excluding the users mentioned in the OP, and the users who are seeking to exact revenge via the creation and support of a frivolous flag.

@Lauda

Sorry for the off topic
I am sorry too, I will not let peloso post anymore.  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 3213
May 20, 2020, 08:44:30 AM
#53
also you mr.bastard won't talk about this trust abuser https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lafu-abusing-trust-system-5248906
for hide your fucking skin

Never had and i never will , if i would abuse it  your Account and all your other playing buddys are would be already tagged !
Looks like you dont understand .

And the only Trust abuser are you here , you tried it an year ago sneaky and you failed .
Few weeks ago you tried it again on the hard pushing way with some others and failed again.

First you distrust all and a few days you trust all and few days laters after you got catched you distrust all again !
Sry mate grow up .

Back on Ignore again

@Lauda

Sorry for the off topic
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1187
May 19, 2020, 10:44:49 AM
#52


I won't even talk about including trust manipulator to his trust network last week and some other accounts, but I am glad that you at least agree on this part:
Quote
merit/giveaway/trust/default trust abuser


also you mr.bastard won't talk about this trust abuser https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lafu-abusing-trust-system-5248906
for hide your fucking skin
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
May 17, 2020, 10:28:03 AM
#51
A senior computer scientist and academic
Given his frivolous and unethical behaviour, he seems to be a very dumb academic if he is one (see tag on JollyGood and the endless pool of alts). Roll Eyes

Just to make it clear, are you claiming that mhanbostanci managed an "investment pool" for his niece and his student?
I think we need to add this to alt account bingo.
A senior computer scientist and academic likes to employ his students and nephew every once in a while on some errands / coding jobs for pay.
Can you try harder at making up stuff? Definitely worth a bingo update.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
May 17, 2020, 10:18:11 AM
#50
However he doesn't want his nephew to have access to the funds because he is a minor and he doesn't want him cashing out, buying drugs etc,

Right, and also posts from his nephew's account and pretends to have a deal with him. Such a great uncle.

mhanbostanci wouldn't agree!

mhanbostanci probably lied because we can't handle the truth.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
May 17, 2020, 10:15:16 AM
#49
However he doesn't want his nephew to have access to the funds because he is a minor and he doesn't want him cashing out, buying drugs etc,
That is definitely new excuse card.
THEREFORE he shares only a BTC address from his own wallet which his nephew can then use to receive payments on some of the jobs he is taking online.

mhanbostanci wouldn't agree!

when I realized that this account is my nephew,
I forbade him to use the forum. (He was 13 years old at the time.)

mhanbostanci wouldn't agree!

mhanbostanci probably lied because we can't handle the truth.
Maybe he lied to DragonDance as well?
full member
Activity: 127
Merit: 116
May 17, 2020, 10:09:56 AM
#48
to be part of a forum where proven criminals are playing the role of prosecutor, is probably the zenith of dystopia and totalitarian regimes,

however, even criminals deserve mercy, so I'll help terrorist ~lauda and her complicit DT apologists broaden their extremely limited intellect and worldviews:


ACQUITTING MHANBOSTANCI:

A senior computer scientist and academic likes to employ his students and nephew every once in a while on some errands / coding jobs for pay.

However he doesn't want his nephew to have access to the funds because he is a minor and he doesn't want him cashing out, buying drugs etc,

THEREFORE he shares only a BTC address from his own wallet which his nephew can then use to receive payments on some of the jobs he is taking online.

Riddle solved, I guarantee you ladies and gentlemen some of these DT cultists wouldn't be even offered a position at the counter on your local Burger joint...
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
May 17, 2020, 10:08:04 AM
#47
Just to make it clear, are you claiming that mhanbostanci managed an "investment pool" for his niece and his student?

There are several possibilities that more than one person can use the same wallet.
Investment fons, laziness/indolence, lack of knowledge etc.

Ok, more lies and fantasies then. Let me know when you're ready to tell the truth and stand by it. This obfuscation shit is getting old.

legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
May 17, 2020, 10:04:42 AM
#46
There are several possibilities that more than one person can use the same wallet.
Investment fons, laziness/indolence, lack of knowledge etc.
And? What is the case here?

Now do the right thing and exclude this abuser and his alts.

I've never added Zz on my trust list, but I trust mhanbostanci. Therefore, he will continue to be on my trust list.
So you trust liar(your words) and abuser(my words)  Cool
Since this message has been deleted by Lauda, I will not reply on this matter. Also, i'm busy atm. I'm out of this topic now.
You replied to my post but you ignored important parts of it because Lauda removed your post Huh
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1291
May 17, 2020, 09:56:14 AM
#45
Just to make it clear, are you claiming that mhanbostanci managed an "investment pool" for his niece and his student?

There are several possibilities that more than one person can use the same wallet.
Investment fons, laziness/indolence, lack of knowledge etc.

Now do the right thing and exclude this abuser and his alts.

I've never added Zz on my trust list, but I trust mhanbostanci. Therefore, he will continue to be on my trust list.
Since this message has been deleted by Lauda, I will not reply on this matter. Also, i'm busy atm. I'm out of this topic now.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
May 17, 2020, 09:48:50 AM
#44
merit/giveaway/trust/default trust abuser

I also have 2 eyes bro, how did he abuse the default trust system?
Seems you don't, you have loycev's trust viewer so you can check inclusions from both accounts. Here you go:

For account mhanbostanci http://loyce.club/trust/2020-05-16_Sat_05.03h/434984.html and for account ZZ http://loyce.club/trust/2020-05-16_Sat_05.03h/318348.html

merit/giveaway/trust/default trust abuser
Actually, it seems that you agree that accounts are alt accounts:
"So how right is it to find a connection between the Bitcoin addresses of users we dislike and forget about all their trustworthy backgrounds?"
Now do the right thing and exclude this abuser and his alts.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
May 17, 2020, 09:40:53 AM
#43
Stop going around in circles asking trivially deniable questions as the above. If the next post is another useless roundabout charade way of trying to defend the accused without any evidence, then it will be deleted.
Stop posting useless posts Blacknavy.

Just to make it clear, are you claiming that mhanbostanci managed an "investment pool" for his niece and his student?
I think we need to add this to alt account bingo.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
May 17, 2020, 09:39:38 AM
#42
Maybe he had to lie because he knew you wouldn't believe him? There is always a possibility here.

Interesting, not sure if we had this excuse before. So to cover up what is already an unbelievable story he made up an even less believable lie? Yeah that sounds exactly like the type of person we want in DT  Grin

Just to make it clear, are you claiming that mhanbostanci managed an "investment pool" for his niece and his student?
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
May 17, 2020, 09:20:59 AM
#41
Maybe he had to lie because he knew you wouldn't believe him? There is always a possibility here.
Ok, so mhanbostanci sent PM and lied to iasenko because he knew I wouldn't believe him? And he has telepathic abilities and he knew iasenko would post it here and I will read it? Yeah, makes sense.

"So how right is it to find a connection between the Bitcoin addresses of users we dislike and forget about all their trustworthy backgrounds?"
Excuse me, but what the hell are you talking about?

What is mhanbostanci still doing in DT, user is merit/giveaway/trust/default trust abuser and he is trying to convince people that blockchain proof is not solid one, which is malicious claim itself.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1291
May 17, 2020, 09:12:42 AM
#40
You should be tagged as somebody as a risk to deal with then.

Off-topic (lmao). Managing relative's investments isn't wrong. It is an investment pool.

Wrong. You think you know, but you actually have next to no idea which is a terrible character flaw.

I don't think so, I need to have technical English to be able to speak about such technical issues. I have insufficient English to express myself here, but I am aware of what it means.

And yet you find this as rock solid connection

There is not only address connection, but also personality similarity, spelling characteristics and registration dates are similar. In this case, there are 2 different characters. Also, off-topic.

We have here 2 signed messages from 2/4 addresses connected in one wallet while mhanbostanci claim it is not the same wallet and I have no reason to think that iasenko made this story.

Maybe he had to lie because he knew you wouldn't believe him? There is always a possibility here.

"So how right is it to find a connection between the Bitcoin addresses of users we dislike and forget about all their trustworthy backgrounds?"
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
May 17, 2020, 09:04:18 AM
#39
And yet you find this as rock solid connection https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53689508

Many investments of my relatives are in my hardware wallet
ekhem...
those signatures belong to different wallets.
We have here 2 signed messages from 2/4 addresses connected in one wallet while mhanbostanci claim it is not the same wallet and I have no reason to think that iasenko made this story.
Pages:
Jump to: