Topic: Force Moderators To Give A Reason For Deleted Posts (Read 934 times)

It shows multiple reports.
I have this example where a french user posted in the wrong board and, in the end, the reports arrived in my report list :



But it is better to have reports from several users than not at all.


I can't say (my situation is not representative), but in total on the whole forum there are several tens of thousands of reports handled per month.

Indeed, there are many types of reports and you guys handle every day to keep clean the forum... Thanks to all the Staff/Mods for the superb work.

There might be multiple reports for just one thread/post and this may double or triple the work, right?
I mean, if there is one spam post and 2-3 members reported the same post, so does it shows only 1 report to your end or it does show multiple reports for that 1 single post?

What is the highest number of reports do you handled in a day so far? Just curious to know the number...

While I don't think the OP is approaching this issue the best way, I think he has a point in at least one way. Without some sort of system of feedback how exactly do user know how to improve their behavior to be more in line with forum rules and general social norms for the community? Of course they could read old threads, but the fact that the target subject matter is spread all over hell as previous precedent setting incidents makes that very difficult.

I think some kind of pull down menu for the mod to select a small handful of reasons for a post deletion for example would be useful and be a minimal amount of disruption of the mods time. You could have options like "SPAM" "POOR QUALITY" "OFF TOPIC" "OTHER" and perhaps an optional note field, and just set "OTHER" to default and let the mods use it if they think feedback would be productive.

Specific features aside, I have been pointing out for a long time that the unofficial nature of all these arbitrarily enforced rules around here not just for the forum itself, but the overall community enforced rules, leads to a lot of unnecessary conflict and confusion that could be prevented with some simple standards, disclosure, and feedback mechanisms.

Hello and thank you for your feedback Welsh. I'm sorry I'm replying late, I was busy the whole weekend!

I understand your point, I almost never post "congratulation" posts but in that case I wanted to tell the developers "Please think where you want the project to go before you start spending these coins". Personally I believe GRIN has a bit divided community under the waters, mostly because of its block distribution model, that's the root of my message.
Reading my post again now though, I suppose my point was not written in a clear and constructive way; I tried to put it in a humble way as to not offend them or appear as a FUDer but I probably watered down my message too much! x)

Well... for this particular example the "magic word" that would help me improve this post was what you said about "It doesn't add anything to the discussion", that helped me and it WILL help me with my future posts!



Have you tried visit the "Patrol" feed? I have a few times tried to read an interesting post and find a new thread to watch in there but it's like a garbage generator!
Probably most of these threads are created so that the signature spammers can post short-nonsense-posts without going off-topic.

There are many threads with a bunch of signatures which are never being seen by other user users, still the campaign runners are paying for those!!!
It's their fault for choosing to go for quantity over quality; they also have the tools if they wanted, like choosing people based on Merit for their signature campaigns and not force them to do like 20+ posts per week.
But if the moderators would delete these threads, the spammers would invest other parts of the forums, so I believe it's best to leave them be.
Just focus on improving those of us who might occasionally break a small rule and have our posts deleted!

Yeah, the problem with threads on Bitcoin Discussion, Altcoin Discussion, and similar, is that there is rarely anything that could be considered a defined "end-point". Look at some examples from the first page of Bitcoin Discussion, threads such as "Do you think cryptocurrencies will be gone anytime soon?" or "Can bitcoin help countries in economic crisis?". You could go back and forth on these topics forever; everyone could have an opinion, even if it's been said before, and there is no 100% right answer. Even if this thread is dead for months, someone can come along a bump it with their opinion and not be off-topic. Furthermore, the OP very rarely sticks around to read what is being said or discuss it, and therefore very rarely locks the topic once they feel the thread has run its course. Once a thread in these boards hits 5+ pages, you are very unlikely to read anything worthwhile.

The bolded sentences are what I'm after. Genuine questions are fine, just seeing those dated open-ended or long-solved questions brought up after X years by those sig campaigners get on my nerves.


Gotcha, that's what I meant.

If we are considering the time it will take for mods to give out reasons one by one on each post that is being deleted I think a much better approach is to provide the “comment” of each report the moderator has receive without disclosing the member who has reported the post. With this you will get the chance to see why your post got deleted and why did the mod agree on their reasoning. Not disclosing the name of who reported it would also prevent future altercations happening from members involved with it.

My criteria for reporting necrobumps is pretty much the same as that for reporting general spam posts. Is it worthwhile? Does it add new and relevant information to the discussion?

Often necrobumps in boards like Technical Discussion and Technical Support are fine. Since topics in these boards are usually about a discrete issue or question, then adding and building on what has come before is often better than opening a new topic on the same issue and having to repeat many of the same points and discussion. Necrobumps in boards like Bitcoin Discussion are usually the exact opposite. The vast majority of the time necrobumps in boards like this are just a couple of lines of spam, often repeating almost exactly what has already been said before, and very rarely adding any new information. If I'm reporting necrobumps on spam megathreads in Bitcoin Discussion for example, I'll also go back and report the OP and ask to have the thread locked.

Do you mean users reporting their bounty activities? The posts which are lists of Facebook and Twitter links? I see absolutely zero point in reporting those. There are thousands of posts like that every day; it would be a massive waste of yours and moderators' time. As long as they post within the designated bounty section and aren't spilling out to the rest of the forum, then just ignore them.

If you are talking about general spammy posts from users wearing signatures, then yes, you should report them as you would any spam post.

Will action be taken against necroposts? On the one hand, it reduces the same topics posted over and over while on the other hand, the type of post could just be spammy.

Also, are those campaign-spammy posts acceptable in reports?

Varies. Some days can be quieter than others. It was specially crazy in the summer when the report badge proposal was posted. As for the types of reports we receive we don't always have good reports. Its quite common for arguments on the forum to leak into the report function, and users trying to get posts deleted etc. Reports can be made about trademarks, but they are left to theymos, and usually theymos receives a message directly rather than a report.

The main reports we get are spam, trolling, and wrong section. Then there's reports for necro bumping, plagiarism, double posts, bumping before 24 hours, multiple old bumps, quote pyramids, broken BB code, ref links, malicious software, fake announcements, ban evasion, and user who have made mistakes when posting a thread, and want it removed. That's probably not even all of it. Depending on the section that the moderator is handling greatly effects how many reports they're handling too.

I support the idea for an explanation for deleting a post by mods, but only if there is a semi-automated system something like one-click execution. The click will trigger both actions at a time "delete" and "msg the user with an explanation". The explanation is something prebuilt or another way could be that when we report a post or thread, we mention the reason in the comment field, so, that comment can be forwarded to the user as an explanation. And also I want to get notified when a thread gets deleted where I made a post.

Sometimes I wonder how many reports mods get each day in total and in how many types. Such as, low quality, ref spam, likely scam, wrong board, multiple threads, what else?

I'm not a big believer in forcing people to do stuff to appease people who make mountains out of molehills.  I'm far more likely to suggest people try to be less entitled and maybe consider that random people on the internet don't owe you an explanation for simply doing their job.  What have you done to earn an explanation?  Clearly your post being deleted hasn't had any adverse effect on the forum whatsoever.  But if such posts were not removed and were instead allowed to multiply, that would quickly begin to negatively impact the forum.  A hundred people lining up to say "congratulations" is not a discussion.  This is a discussion forum.  Send them a personal message next time.