Or maybe this is a normal option? Why should we be hired for a permanent job, and be in a sense a hostage of the employer? Today he pays you, tomorrow he can say that "the situation has changed, now there will be 50% of the agreements." Or - I laid off some of the staff, now you will still do the work for the laid-off? With outsourcing, you are almost on equal terms with the employer, you have a common interest in the result ...
Earlier i was so desperate to go to office. But since the time I have started working from home. i think I focus more on work
Otherwise in office we use to work less and gossip more and sometime during stress hour we have to tell other to please keep quiet for sometime
Back in 2005, while working in one company, the CIO suggested that most of the IT specialists not be kept in the office, but work remotely. The HR director was hysterical, talking about corporate values, principles and other nonsense. I pointed out that keeping 10 developers and 4 system administrators in the office is expensive and makes no sense, plus people will be additionally motivated and will not waste 2-3 hours a day stupidly on the road. A set of KPIs was written that allow me to evaluate the quality of work of my subordinates, they approved it and started working. It turned out that the corporate culture did not collapse, values did not disappear
In fact, the need for work such as "being in the office" of the existing staff of an average company, for example, a manufacturing company, is no more than 50% and maybe less. In reality, only those specialists whose physical presence is necessary should be "in the office". Why overpay for renting space, providing jobs? Calculate how much the total cost of 1 workplace in the office will cost you? From rent, to electricity and tea, coffee, cookies in the recreation area... What are these REGULAR costs?
But this is a slightly different side of the coin - they are still employees.
Now in my company, among the IT staff - 6 people are freely hired, free specialists, outsourcers. In general, I don’t see any problems - plus there is no need for personnel accounting, an extra burden on the personnel department, bu