Topic: Former Staff member Lauda has a pill addiction - *not disputed by lauda* - page 7. (Read 4588 times)

When does knowing something about me equal to being close to me? If you knew my favorite color, you would be close to me Some people know *some things*, and some think they know *some things*. Nobody is anywhere near *being close to me*.

For all the reasons mentioned by others in this.

You are saying that no one knows anything about you? I know that is not true.

Why don't you go as far as to explicitly deny that you have a pill addiction?

Such a thing does not exist. Therefore, it would be even more interesting to hear the made up lies. We are waiting, mr./mrs./whatever. source.

Sorry for the delay (life happens/busy).

I will start by saying that I will ask my source if I can give you his name, however I wont be able to recommend him doing so.

My source tells me that he was told by people close to Lauda that Lauda has a serious pill addiction. My source also tells me that Lauda has often talked about drugs in "chatrooms" (which could be a number of things). You knowing who my source is will not really change anything, you knowing who my source is would still make this an anon's word against Lauda's word -- actually Lauda has not actually denied this, so it would be against nothing.

Lauda having a pill addiction may or may not be a big deal, however if Lauda were to outright deny this, then my source might provide more information, might provide names of those who gave this information (with things like chat logs/PMs), or those who directly know of this might come forward themselves to prevent Lauda from lying about this.


Lauda also has a history of refusing to explicitly deny engaging in shady behavior after being accused of said shady behavior, including when evidence is presented. For example, when it was proven that Lauda owned an account that placed bids to buy accounts, he left himself an 'out' in case someone came along with proof that he actually purchased forum accounts with that account (Lauda giving negative trust for those who trade accounts when he very clearly did so in the past reeks of trying to stifle the competition). He also has not addressed the claim that he is the same as ThePharmacist, who is someone who, as of recently has backed Lauda in many threads, and to my knowledge has not substantially opposed Lauda in a dispute.

You are not new here. You are very clearly advertising the fact that you are a tor user, that you value privacy and that you are new here. I understand that you are not trading around here, however someone advertising they are new is usually a pretty good indication they are not, and that they are up to no good. As someone who is paying attention, it is very clear that you are not new here beyond the above. Perhaps you are unable to access your previous account(s) because you have forgotten your password.


It is good to see TC back. Maybe he can add Lauda to his exclusion list.

I know nothing about Tomatocage, have no time now to investigate, and tend toward caution in airing such suspicions.  But I do think it’s a reasonable suspicion worth investigating, and I can articulate why:  Quickseller has a prior history of obtaining illicit control of a DT account.  Any unexplained DT action beneficial to him should be examined, as a matter of course.


Oh, yes.  I think that drugs are certainly on-topic in this thread:

Sort of on-topic about Quickseller:  Do you guys think someone (like QS) has control of the Tomatocage account?  I've never had dealings or even words with Tomatocage, and I'm interested to know why he excluded me from his trust list.  If it was for being abrasive or racist, I sort of could see that, except I would think that my efforts to combat shitposters and scammers would outweigh this.  I've never said a bad word about him or OgNasty for that matter.  I am not upset about not being on DT anymore, just a bit puzzled.  I haven't scammed anyone--that's number one--and I have tried to help the forum as a whole, and I'll continue that. 

I have called Quickseller out for being a troll and selling accounts, and for the escrow scam that he pulled, and that's why I asked if he might control the Tomatocage account.  I'd be interested to know all of your opinions.

Pills!  Just say no to drugs, kids!

It is such threads as this which help us newer folks decide who was right or wrong in old controversies.

That being said, I shall now pass judgment on Internet flaming competence.  As the only member of this forum who has ever received +50 for an insult, as a shriek from the target of the insult, I declare that you are a clumsy amateur, Mr. “Nasty”.  Attempts at style without substance fizzle out as a wet firecracker:  The tantrum of a garden-variety sadist whose namesake aspiration is to be “nasty”, but who does not know how to hit where it hurts.

On the flipside opposite pain, do you also have trouble finding “the spot” with women?  Not that I’d expect you to even try.

---

Beware!  I heard from a friend of a friend that Quickseller is HIV-positive from his time turning tricks on the street near a bathhouse; and Quickseller has not denied this!

---

Shush.  Mr. Quickseller is busy “looking for the real killers”.  That, and/or scamming somebody.  He will make more cheap, transparent excuses present evidence for his accusations when he has a spare moment in his jam-packed VIP schedule of swindling, molesting children, and selling his butt for crack money (as he has not denied).

---

Meow.

I've had, and still have, some mixed feelings about all of this. IMO, I do not think it is DTs job to clean the forum from spam/shitposters, however, I think the recent inundation of crap which came over the forum may have created sufficient grounds (in my mind) to allow community members like DT to try and help fight it, but the efforts at times seemed overly abrasive and lacking composure. Weird thing for me is the way the exclusions occurred and the order of events?....  and, why did Og pick a Stewie meme here?    

The merit system should hopefully overcome the need for DT to get involved as much with content... abusing the merit system is another story which I haven't personally come to any conclusions about yet - in relation to DT members and what could be considered acceptable reasoning.

And to try and stay on topic, where you at QS??

Not to bother anybody but I think quickseller is always up to lauda he always end up arguing with lauda, I think this two have a valentine chemistry. And my conclusion is that quickseller has a crush on lauda. LOL.

-
Tom and jerry.

P.S. I'm not making fun I'm serious?.

Lauda I have had enough of your shit this weekend, you are staying outside.. no catnip for you and I don't care that it is snowing.

I agree we can't keep this thread off topic like this.

If you are really interested in helping me develop, you can join my development forum at http://forum.wytness.io/

Ooh that was quick, btw if you're looking for some more suggestions maybe something like:

• DT status of user which will show if the user is DT1/2 instead of going to trust settings to check if that's the case or no
• Possible sMerit listing? As in possible tracking on how much merit a user has given/received from a particular user. While it's available on the forum page as well a total amount sent can be helpful to check for possible merit abuse

Lastly the "update" button seems to redirect to cnhv.co or something. Not sure if that's intentional or yet to be developed. I think there's more stuff I wanted to recommend/ask about when I checked it out a while ago but then I guess we'll go way too off topic with that here 

That was easily fixed.    

I used the site a while ago, just a pet peeve I had about it was I couldnt find a way to go the Bitcointalk profile of the person. I mean I can google the name, use the last posts/topics button to find the profile ID but it's kinda cumbersome.

In my opinion, there is no sense scraping BTC addresses, since Google can do that faster than I can.  Unless it was for detecting if more than one user had the same address.  But I wouldn't want to give a false sense of security just because no duplicate address was reported...

I'm interested in any other ideas people have once I create an official announcement thread about BPIP. 

Neat website, will definitely keep it bookmarked. Any other stats you're planning on adding besides merit and posts? Might be useful to scrape BTC addies as well.

When completed in a couple weeks, it will update posts and merit within 60 seconds.   Trust and activity are update less often, as I have to scan their profile to get that information.  Right now there is up to a week delay as I am programming and I need to pause my parser and then it needs to catch up to ALL the new registrations... luckily that number has been dropping in the last two weeks (thanks to merit!).

At the bottom of each profile page it lists the time we last checked and next time we expect to check.  You can request an updated check at any time for a small proof of work fee.

You sure, og? You didn't make the Forbes list of The Richest People of cryptocurrencies No offense, tho.

---

How often does your web site gets updated?

QS is currently the 4th least trusted member.  The other three are long inactive...

Ok princess whatever you say.. I am so glad that you and QS get on so well...