There's a user
@mumu68 that recently have an issue against one of the casino. He submitted screenshots and evidence about his issue that is really valid. Later on, his case developed and the real issue arise when the casino gave their opinion. In the end, The casino pays the user using their own money despite the red flag suggested to them by 3rd party risk management since the user keeps pressuring them through negative attacks to their brand.
I haven't read this case in depth, but my point of view is that if a person is claiming a false scam accusation against any casino, it should be a no concern for the casino and they should not become under any pressure. A gambler who is saying wrongly about any casino won't be able to produce valid evidence against the casino while the casino must be able to produce some pieces of evidence which will prove that the scammer is speaking false.
Thinking about it, I see it is unreasonable to have such restrictions, like newbies are not allowed to post in gambling board or Scam accusation board. It does not make any sense as if I can bet, I have rights to post, complain and create a scam accusation thread.
Also, not all the newbies speak falsely about the casino, some have real concerns, and we just cannot treat everyone the same like disallowing the newbies in certain boards or sections.