Hello,
I once again want to complain about the 13% bonus. That is ridiculous. You should at least set a "minimum odds" value to give it. I placed a 5%-bet at 1.01 odds and got an almost-2% increase in my ROI, of course I will probably take advantage of that to try to overtake Want0sell, but that is unfair and unrealistic (inflating our ROI's that much).
Greetings,
98789.
Hello 98789,
First I would just like to make a "small correction". You made a 5% current bankroll bet, so that results in a 8% starting bankroll bet. This is important because you risked 8% for a 1.12% ROI increase, and not just 5%.
I don't think the bonus is exploitable to win the competition, but it helps on small adjustments like you reaching Want0sell, but only because he has no bets left. His last 4 bets actually resulted in a loss for him, so if he had them for these last days, like you still have 6, you would probably not consider doing 1.01 bets.
So the "exploit" you are using right now, is not the 13% bonus, but the fact that he has no bets left (I would call this "strategy" and not "exploit").
Even right now, if we did not had the bonus, you wold probably consider doing a "normal bet" to reach him, and then doing 1.01 bets to try to keep the lead, and only because he has not bets left, and it's easy for you to control the situation.
I'm saying this because this is a competition, so everyone will always try to use the rules in their favor to try to get to the prizes.
Yes your job would be a little harder if there was no 13% bonus, but it would incredibly harder if he had 6 bets left like you.
Not saying everything is perfect, because it never is, and we will take your suggestion into consideration.
I already explained my problem with minimum odds, but we will consider it again.